Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4 Companion site for Light and Video Microscopy Author: Wayne.
Advertisements

Chapter 23.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35 Diffraction and Polarization.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Final image at infinity Eye-ring Eye-ring 12.6 Refracting telescope.
The waves spread out from the opening!
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
The Wave Nature of Light
Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
Diffraction of Light Waves
Optics 1. 2 The electromagnetic spectrum Visible light make up only a small part of the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves. Unlike sound waves and.
Chapter 31 Images.
Chapter 26 Geometrical Optics. Units of Chapter 26 The Reflection of Light Forming Images with a Plane Mirror Spherical Mirrors Ray Tracing and the Mirror.
Reflection and Refraction of Light
Chapter 34 The Wave Nature of Light; Interference
Chris A. Mack, Fundamental Principles of Optical Lithography, (c) Figure 3.1 Examples of typical aberrations of construction.
Geometrical Optics and Basic Imaging Light Paths of the Bright Field Microscope E. D. Salmon University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Interference & Diffraction
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
Fiber Optics Defining Characteristics: Numerical Aperture Spectral Transmission Diameter.
Reflection of Light Reflection and Refraction of Light Refraction of Light.
1 Chapter 10 Diffraction March 9, 11 Fraunhofer diffraction: The single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction
Diffraction vs. Interference
Happyphysics.com Physics Lecture Resources Prof. Mineesh Gulati Head-Physics Wing Happy Model Hr. Sec. School, Udhampur, J&K Website: happyphysics.com.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
Chapter 25 Optical Instruments.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Interference and the Wave Nature of Light
Diffraction: single slit How can we explain the pattern from light going through a single slit? w screen L x.
Lenses and Mirrors. How does light interact with pinholes? How does light interact with lenses? –___________ How does light interact with mirrors? –___________.
Optical Instruments, Camera A single lens camera consists basically of an opaque box, converging lens and film. Focusing depends on the object distance.
Circular aperture Rectangular aperture Fraunhofer Diffraction.
 When light strikes the surface of an object  Some light is reflected  The rest is absorbed (and transferred into thermal energy)  Shiny objects,
Chapter 36 Diffraction In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
Background Research. material selection for launching of telescope; must be soft, able to absorb vibration, fit within the appropriate temperature range.
Light, Reflection, and Refraction Chapters 14 and 15.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
S-110 A.What does the term Interference mean when applied to waves? B.Describe what you think would happened when light interferes constructively. C.Describe.
The waves spread out from the opening!
Chapter 38: Diffraction and Polarization  For a single opening in a barrier, we might expect that a plane wave (light beam) would produce a bright spot.
Fundamental Physics II PETROVIETNAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES Vungtau, 2013 Pham Hong Quang
March Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECE-1466 Modern Optics Course Notes Part 2 Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
Lenses and Imaging (Part I) Why is imaging necessary: Huygen’s principle – Spherical & parallel ray bundles, points at infinity Refraction at spherical.
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Image at:
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 5.  Diffraction is any behavior of light which deviates from predictions of geometrical optics.  We are concerned.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
Optics (Lecture 2) Book Chapter 34,35.
1 The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Snell’s Law Image formation.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
(Image: T. Wittman, Scripps) Introduction to Light Microscopy.
Geometrical Optics.
Phys102 Lecture 26, 27, 28 Diffraction of Light Key Points Diffraction by a Single Slit Diffraction in the Double-Slit Experiment Limits of Resolution.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Converging Lenses Converging lenses change the direction of light through refraction so that the light rays all meet (converge) on a single focal point.
Light Through a Single Slit
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Example: 633 nm laser light is passed through a narrow slit and a diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 6.0 m away. The distance on the screen.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Fraunhofer Diffraction
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
Fraunhofer diffraction from Circular apertures:
The waves spread out from the opening!
Presentation transcript:

Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned Image Source for the Crusader Helmet Janet Crossman-Bosworth Research Engineer – Optical Design Human Interface Technology Laboratory University of Washington January 16, 2003

Introduction Three optical designs will be presented. First Design - Low frequency fiber resonance input Second Design - High frequency fiber resonance input Third Design -

First Design

Goals for First Design Point Source Re-imaging Circular Scan 19mm Screen ≤ 20µm RMS Spot Sizes 532nm Wavelength Low frequency fiber resonance input (2.5kHz) from endoscope prototype Axial Length of System < 100mm

Fiber Input for First Design Plotted fiber tip positions from model data for endoscope prototype (linear mode shape) Optical Node Length * = 4.5mm average Maximum fiber tip displacement = ± 2mm N.A. = 0.11 (single mode fiber) * Optical Node Length = The distance between the fiber tip and the position along the axis from which the light appears to emanate.

Optical Layout for First Design File Name: HMD – I All Custom Lenses Display Diameter = 18mm Lens System Length = 23mm (fiber tip to screen) Estimated Weight = 0.5g

At the Screen (Image Plane) File Name: HMD – I Central Region: RMS Spot Diameter = 31.19µm 32 spots/mm 64 resolvable spots/mm approx.* Peripheral Region: RMS Spot Diameter = 303.05µm 3 spots/mm 6 resolvable spots/mm approx. * We have been able to resolve approximately twice as many spots/mm as that calculated from the RMS spot diameter.

Resolution: Diffraction Limited Example Rayleigh Criterion: The maximum illumination of one diffraction pattern coincides with the first dark ring of the other diffraction pattern. Separation = 1.22 λ (F/#) (This is also called the Airy Disk Radius.) Sparrow Criterion: There is no minimum between the maxima from the two diffraction patterns. Separation = λ (F/#) Our measurements use a criterion between that of Rayleigh and Sparrow.

Summary for First Design Fiber tip displacements of ± 2mm do not occur for video rate frequencies. The first design will not work for video rates. There is not sufficient resolution in the periphery of the first design.

Second Design

Goals for Second Design ≤ 15µm RMS Spot Size 2mm to 4mm Optical Node Length Maximum Fiber Tip Displacement = ± 1mm (Representative of higher frequency systems) Axial Length of System < 80mm

Fiber Input for Second Design Simplified model (Not actual measurements) 4mm Optical Node Length Maximum fiber tip displacement = ± 1mm across a spherical curve N.A. = 0.11 (single mode fiber)

Optical Layout for Second Design File Name: HMD – ZK3e All Custom Lenses Display Diameter = 20mm Lens System Length = 52mm (fiber tip to screen) Estimated Weight = 1.0g

At the Screen (Image Plane) File Name: HMD – ZK3e Central Region: RMS Spot Diameter = 61.99µm 16 spots/mm 32 resolvable spots/mm approx. Peripheral Region: RMS Spot Diameter = 107.30µm 9 spots/mm 18 resolvable spots/mm approx.

Summary for Second Design The required field of view has been achieved. The illumination across the field of view is more uniform. A spot size of ≤ 15µm is not achievable across a 19mm field of view, using a 0.11 N.A. fiber with a maximum displacement of ± 1mm, according to the Optical Invariant*. * For more information about the Optical Invariant, see Appendix A.

Third Design

Goals for Third Design 50µm RMS Spot Size Increase the fiber N.A. to 0.4 or 0.5 50µm RMS Spot Size 0.95mm Optical Node Length Maximum Fiber Tip Displacement = ± 0.5mm (Representative of higher frequency systems) Axial Length of Lens System < 80mm 5 Lenses or Less All Commercial Lenses to Reduce Cost

Fiber Input for Third Design Simplified model (not actual measurements) 0.95mm Optical Node Length Flat object plane using a Noliac ring bender Maximum fiber tip displacement = ± 0.5mm across a flat plane N.A. = 0.4 (custom fiber)

Third Design – Prototype Design File Name: HMD – ZZH1c4 1 Custom Lens, 4 Commercial Lenses, and 1 Fiber Optic Taper Display Diameter = 20mm (at large end of 2x magnification fiber optic taper) Intermediate Image Plane Diameter = 10mm (at small end of taper) System Length = 69mm (fiber tip to taper) + 19mm (taper) = 88mm Estimated Weight = 6g (lenses) + 16g (taper) = 22g

Fiber Optic Taper Schott Fiber Optic Taper 2x Magnification Large end diameter = 20mm Small end diameter = 10mm Taper Length = 19mm Fiber diameter at large end = 6µm Estimated Weight = 16g

Image at Small End of Taper File Name: HMD – ZZH1c4 Central Region: Airy Disk Diameter = 15.65µm (Diffraction Limited) 64 spots/mm 128 resolvable spots/mm approx. Mid-Peripheral Region: RMS Spot Diameter = 25.87µm 39 spots/mm 78 resolvable spots/mm approx. Peripheral Region: Airy Disk Diameter = 22.43µm 45 spots/mm 90 resolvable spots/mm approx.

Image at Large End of Taper File Name: HMD – ZZH1c4 Central Region: Spot Diameter = 31.30µm 32 spots/mm 64 resolvable spots/mm approx. Mid-Peripheral Region: Spot Diameter = 51.74µm 19 spots/mm 39 resolvable spots/mm approx. Peripheral Region: Spot Diameter = 44.86µm 22 spots/mm 45 resolvable spots/mm approx. A design goal of 50µm diameter spots yields 20 spots/mm and approximately 40 resolvable spots/mm.

Tolerance Analysis of the Third Design (Tolerance Analysis for the Intermediate Image Plane) 40 tolerances were used which, each by themselves, would allow no more than a 100m RMS spot diameter at the intermediate image plane for any field point, but with a 1% minimum tolerance on all tolerances except the decenters and tilts. 10 Radius of Curvature Tolerances 5 Spacing Tolerances 5 Center Thickness Tolerances 10 Decenter Tolerances, ranging from 0.05mm to 0.20mm 10 Tilt Tolerances, which were either 0.6 or 1.0 The optical design program uses the final spacing to the intermediate image plane to adjust the back focus during tolerancing.

Tolerance Analysis (continued) Results: A Monte Carlo tolerance analysis was run, which simulates the effect of all the tolerance errors simultaneously. The mean RMS spot diameter was 134µm. This translates to approximately 15 resolvable spots/mm. After being magnified by the 2x taper, there would be approximately 7 resolvable spots/mm. This design is highly sensitive to tolerance errors. Very tight tolerances are required to maintain intended design performance.

Third Design with Curved Source Vignetting High field curvature Peripheral RMS spot size diameters = 1.022mm

Third Design with IR Source Wavelength = 1.31µm RMS spot size diameters = 2.7mm to 3.2mm Nearly parallel light impinges upon the screen. Distance between last lens and taper = 35mm (A beamsplitter could be placed here.) Light from 2 object points Light from 11 object points

Summary for Third Design The image meets the 50µm spot diameter goal, except in the mid-periphery where the spot diameter is approximately 52 microns. The system exceeds the 80mm length goal by 8mm. Only 5 lenses were used. 1 custom lens was needed. Tight tolerances are required for this design. A flat image source is required for this design. A beamsplitter could be used with this design for IR light. Will the crosshatching of the taper be visible?

Conclusions The original goal was a 19mm screen with 809 resolvable spots, or approximately 43 resolvable spots/mm. The third design very nearly meets this original goal across the field of view. The first and second designs do not. An analysis of the optical invariant is needed to determine what characteristics are needed in the optical fiber. Methods to increase the fiber N.A. and increase the fiber tip displacement for a standard fiber are known here at the HIT Lab.

Conclusions (continued) Fiber scanners are being designed and fabricated to meet these optical specifications. Large fiber tip displacements at high resonant frequencies are difficult to achieve. Just as there is an optical invariant, there may also be an invariant for resonant fiber scanning. Designs are limited to geometrical size limitations of the Crusader Helmet. (i.e. 20mm flat screen & 100mm length)

Possibilities for Future Design Work Use Other Fiber Input Characteristics Further Aberration Control Circular or Rectilinear Scan Gradient Index Optics Diffractive Optics Doublets and/or Triplets Most or All Custom Lenses No Fiber Optic Taper No Field Flattening Eight or More Lenses

Appendix A Optical Invariant

Optical Invariant Optical Invariant = ypnu – ynup y & yp = Axial & Principal Ray Heights u & up = Axial & Principal Ray Angles n = Index of Refraction

Optical Invariant at Object & Image Surfaces ypnu – ynup = yp’n’u’ – y’n’up’ y = y’ = 0 and n = n’ = 1 So ypu = yp’u’ yp’ represents half of screen diameter = -9.5mm u’ represents the angle needed to produce an Airy Disk diameter of 15 µm. u’ = -2.48 º ypu = (-9.5)(-2.48) = Optical Invariant

ypu = (-9.5)(-2.48) = Optical Invariant yp represents maximum fiber displacement u represents axial ray angle from fiber tip An unmodified fiber may have a Numerical Aperture (N.A.) of 0.11, where N.A. = sin u If N.A. = 0.11, then u = 6.32°, and yp = 3.73mm If yp = 1, then u = 23.56°, and N.A. = 0.40

The End