Gary Kantor Discovery Health 1 Day 2. Process Measure Compliance with bundles Bar graphs measure the difference between different categories (elements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Bazner-Chandler RN, MSN, CNS, CPNP
Advertisements

Project leaders will keep track of team progress using an A3 Report.
Measurement in Greater Detail
Preventing Central Line Infections Saving 100,000 Lives with IHI Presented by Brenda Hackett, MT, CIC, MPH.
What is it? Alarm Fatigue Alarm fatigue occurs when clinical personnel fail to respond appropriately to alarms due to excessive or inability to understand.
Model for Improvement What can we change that will result in an improvement? PLAN DO STUDY ACT How will we know that a change is an improvement ? What.
Obtaining Results Desire Vessel Execute Culture is a vessel to cross the quality chasm.
1 Leadership for Safety Web Workshop: Reality Rounding Essential Hospitals Engagement Network July 17, 2013.
Advances in Non-Invasive Monitoring
MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality Chris George, RN MS Project Manager, MHA Keystone Center
Baseline Assessments Hospital: Pressure ulcer Incidence 8-13% Pilot Ward (Anglesey): Baseline incidence rate - 4.5% Nutritional assessment - 50% Pressure.
CLINICIAN ENGAGEMENT MAY 13 TH, 2013 Julian Marsden Clinical Director BC Patient Safety & Quality Council.
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection Prevention is Primary! Tennessee Collaborative Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections Erlanger Health.
Sean Berenholtz, MD MHS FCCM September 20, 2011 at 2ET/1 CT/12 MT/11 PT Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention CLABSI Supplemental Call Series.
Eliminating Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infections in NICU Patients The CCS/CCHA NICU Improvement Collaborative Paul Kurtin, MD Chief Quality and Safety.
Vanderbilt Infection Control & Prevention Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections Tennessee Center for Patient Safety Vicki Brinsko RN, CIC.
Research and analysis by Avalere Health Hospitals Demonstrate Commitment to Quality Improvement October 2012.
Certification of Central Venous Lines Georgia Health Sciences Medical Center Augusta, Georgia November 13, 2012.
Small Changes in Your Environment Can Have Big Effects on Your Behavior.
The Nature of Quality Improvement Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP Institute for Healthcare Improvement Testimony to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human.
Hospital Harm Index Presentation to MAPS Exploratory Work Group for Tracking Safety Progress April 10, 2013.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Audit Your Care A Closer Look at CLABSI and SSI Audit Forms Armstrong.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
Is healthcare getting safer ? The challenge of measurement Charles Vincent Department of Psychology & Oxford Academic Health Science Network.
Linking Quality Improvement and Infection Prevention Manoj Jain, MD, MPH Medical Director, QSource 19 February, 2009.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Overview of STOP-BSI Program.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance.
Preventing Surgical Complications Prevent Harm from High Alert Medication- Anticoagulants in Primary Care Insert Date here Presenter:
Toward Eliminating Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections.
Call 2: Background of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.
Improving ICU Care Through Teamwork
Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI Project) CLABSI’s (Insert your hospital name In Partnership with IPRO Date.
 1850 Semmelweiss found increased rate of mortality with puerperal sepsis patients and advocated hand washing to stop spread of disease  Died.
St. Mary’s and St. Joseph’s Stop BSI Project The Science of Improving Patient Safety A Johns Hopkins collaborative Document 7 Coaching Call 2, 10/19/2010.
Who We Are ~Where We are Going. Slide 2 Workshop Objectives Describe the purpose and vision of the ICU Safe Care Initiative/Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety.
The Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Unit-based Patient Safety Program (CUSP) Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins Univeristy.
11/10/20111 On The Cusp Journey: Sentara CarePlex Hospital Gail J. Rudder RN, CRNI Infection Preventionist November 10 th, 2011.
V. D. Pretlow 1, V.G. Dicks, PhD, MPH 2 1 Georgia Regents University Master of Public Health Program, 2 Georgia Regents University Institute of Public.
Adv Dip (Med Sci), MBBS, MBA (Healthcare Management)
Unit 9a: The BSI Story HIT Infecting a Patient Safety Culture This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health.
CSTS Data Entry The Cardiovascular Surgery Translation Study (CSTS) JHU Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety & Quality.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
Improving Care Through Technical & Adaptive Work Chris Goeschel RN MPA Director, Patient Safety &Quality Initiatives JHU Quality & Safety Research Group.
Patient Hand-Offs Sheri S. Crow, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Critical Care Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN.
Comprehensive Unit based Patient Safety Program Deepa Jose,RN,CCRN.
10 years after “To Err is Human” An RCA of Patient Safety Research? Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD.
Results: The Staff Safety Assessment Survey Lisa Lubomski, PhD April 11, 2013.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
ICU TO PREVENT CENTRAL LINE ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance On the CUSP: STOP BSI.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
Gary Kantor Discovery Health 1 Day 2. Process Measure Compliance with bundles Bar graphs measure the difference between different categories (elements.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Providing Feedback: Structural Assessment 2 Results & Exposure Receipt.
Patients get “recommended care” ~ 50% of the time. Adverse events occur in 10% of hospital patients. –50% are preventable. –7.5% of these patients die....the.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Model for Improvement Wednesday 16 June 2010 Presenter: Dr Jonathon Gray.
Driving to Results: Key Changes and Leadership Behaviors: Management Systems to Deploy & Sustain the Improvements David Munch M.D. IHI Faculty Chief Clinical.
Yousef I. Aljeesh, PhD, RN Said Abusalem, PhD, RN Naeem Alkariri, MSN, RN John A. Myers, PhD, MSPH Fawwaz Alaloul, PhD, RN Staff Developed IP Program Increases.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Alan Willson 17 November 2010
Toward Eliminating Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections
Staff Safety Assessment
Staff Safety Assessment
ICU Safe Care Initiative/CUSP November 16, :30 am – 3:30 pm
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) 2010.
Patient Safety WalkRounds
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) October 25, 2010.
Unit-Based Safety Program (CUSP)
Presentation transcript:

Gary Kantor Discovery Health 1 Day 2

Process Measure Compliance with bundles Bar graphs measure the difference between different categories (elements of the bundle)

BEST CARE ALWAYS : COMPLIANCE : CLABSI Target

Process Measure Compliance with bundles Overall compliance to the bundle can only be as good as the worst element.

BEST CARE ALWAYS : COMPLIANCE : SSI Bundle

Process measures for Central Line Bundle

A line graph is used to measure bundle compliance over time

Process Measure Compliance with bundles What to measure How to collect the data How to analyse the data

Checklist for Central Line Insertion Measuring Compliance with bundles Step 1 Checklists help measure act as a guide

Gary Kantor Discovery Health 10 Checklists

Design for Reliability 11 Level 1 Intent, vigilance, hard work Level 2 Reliability science, process redesign, human factors Level 3 High Reliability Organisations Reliability: 1:10 1:100,000 Anesthesia-related deaths Unassisted humans can’t achieve better than 1:100 reliability 1:10,000

Human Error If each step in a ten-step process can be performed with 99% reliability, that system functions error-free 90% of the time. A similar process with 50 steps functions error-free only 61% of the time 12

2 experienced pilots…..who had never flown together before 13 Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger (57) Former fighter pilot, safety expert First Officer Jeffrey B. Skiles (49) On last leg of first assignment in the Airbus A320 since passing the training course

14 Hero? …….

The windscreen quickly turned dark brown and several loud thuds were heard. Both engines ingested birds and immediately lost almost all thrust. Captain Sullenberger took the controls… …“my aircraft!” …while Skiles began going through the three- page emergency procedures checklist in an attempt to restart the engines. 15

16 Hero Checklist Design Teamwork

17 How do you build a skyscraper so it doesn’t fall down? A typical building site: Hundreds of workers Many subcontractors 16 or more different trades

18 USA serious building failures: 20 per year among >100 million buildings = % per year

19 How do you run a busy restaurant?

20 Mortality 1.5%  0.8% p=0.003 Inpatient complications 11%  7% p<0.001 Jan 29, 2009 Non-cardiac surgery 3,955 patient in 8 hospitals in 8 cities

At Johns Hopkins University – America’s #1 hospital – one or more simple steps required for central line insertion were missed 30% of the time 21 Peter Pronovost Michigan

Pronovost P. An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU. NEJM Dec After checklist implementation (and more)…

Within 3 months infection rate in Michigan’s ICUs decreased by 66%. The typical ICU cut its quarterly infection rate to zero. Michigan’s average ICU outperformed 90% of American ICUs. In the first 18 months,1500 lives saved. 23

Copyright ©2010 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Pronovost, P. J et al. BMJ 2010;340:c309 Sustained improvement !!

Checklists (Bundles): 2 Types 1.Applicable to tasks in which best practice is well understood 2.In situations of complexity/uncertainty, use checklists that foster teamwork and communication 25

26

What you find, when the checklist is well made, is ….the checklist gets the dumb stuff out of the way so you can focus on the hard stuff” 27

Hand hygiene Maximal barrier precautions Chlorhexidine skin antisepsis Optimal catheter site selection, with subclavian vein as the preferred site for catheters in adults Daily review of line necessity with prompt removal of unnecessary lines 28 PREVENT CENTRAL LINE INFECTIONS

29

30

31

To your planning page add: 1.Your aim 2.The outcome measures i)Rate = numerator/denominator (describe) ii)Days between iii) Welsh Safety calendar iv) Other 3.A process measure 4.How you will feedback the data every month to i)The frontline staff ii)Management iii) Presentation of your process measure

To your planning page add: 1.Your aim 2. Process Measures (Bundle compliance) 3.The outcome measures i)Rate = numerator/denominator (describe) ii)Days between iii) Welsh Safety calendar iv) Other 4.How you will feedback the data every month to i)The frontline staff ii)Management Mark with a * areas that you want to strengthen

Using the priority * areas plan a PDSA to improve or measure compliance with bundles Design or implement a checklist How to collect the data (checklist / spot checks) How to sample the checklists How to analyse the data How to display and present the data Who to present it too

Select a priority area for improvement resolving it will have a big impact it is under your control to test a change you can start on Monday

Plan a PDSA using the Model for Improvement What can we change that will result in an improvement? PLAN DO STUDY ACT How will we know that a change is an improvement ? What are we trying to accomplish? aim measurementchange

AIM of this change: PROBLEM : Design a PDSA to improve one of the areas with a *

AI M: use the Welsh Safety Cross PROBLEM : staff aren’t engaged in the project What When Where Who How AIM increase awareness through measurement AIM: the Welsh Safety Cross is completed Staff know what it means Welsh Safety Cross will improve the profile of the project. Will need to engage staff with colouring it in or they won’t take any notice

Mapping the Process “ All work is a process” W. E. Deming

Process Mapping What is a process map? Simply put, it is a way of visualizing all the steps taken to get to the desired outcome. Steps are shown in sequence as they are taken over time Helps identify delays and losses, opportunities for change

Process Mapping Exercise As a whole group lets spend the next few minutes creating a process map for getting to work in the morning

Process Mapping Exercise How can we get there quicker?

Process Maps High or low level Follow –patient journey –staff (eg gathering equipment) –steps in the protocol –Equipment procurement –etc

Leadership support Insert Maintain Remove MeasureFeedback

Process Mapping Exercise Within your groups: –Choose 1 person and together map a process they work with (draw the process out) –Spend time as a group analyzing the process, asking each of the questions listed above –Make notations on the map indicating key learning, important constraints –Time permitting begin to think about how you would redesign this process (possibly draw an idealized map)

Process Map Analysis Time – How long? Space – Where did the step take place? Human Resources – Who did it? Geography – How far is the journey? Financial Resources – What is the cost and to whom?

Process Map Analysis How many steps are in the process? Examine the order of the steps in the process – are they ideally placed? How many transfers occur in the process? Where do delays occur in the process? Can you identify known bottlenecks in the process?

Model for Improvement What can we change that will result in an improvement? PLAN DO STUDY ACT How will we know that a change is an improvement ? What are we trying to accomplish? Aim MeasurementChange

How confident are you in your ability to improve on: –Teamwork –Measurement –Overall progress Feedback

How did you find the workshop? Feedback

Thank you for your participation