The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPG 2004 Köln C. Schwarz Particle Identification with the PANDA detector at GSI C.Schwarz, GSI.
Advertisements

Cherenkov Detectors. Index of Refraction When light passes through matter its velocity decreases. –Index of refraction n. The index depends on the medium.
1 A DIRC for GlueX Paul Mueller Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee, Knoxville BaBar DIRC Collaboration for the GlueX.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute The HERA-B RICH counter.
CLAS12 – RICH PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Momentum range3-8 GeV/c  /K rejection factor Not less than 500  /p rejection factor Not less than 100 Angular coverage5.
SANE S pin A symmetries of the N ucleon E xperiment SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF JOHN GERMAN MASTERS STUDENT FROM NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY. JUNE.
Performance of AMS-02 on the International Space Station DESY Theory Workshop, Hamburg Melanie Heil Supported by the Carl-Zeiss Foundation.
Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato 1 Status of the LHCb RICH detector and the HPD Beauty 2005 Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato – Università degli.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
CLEO Particle Detectors Thomas Coan SMU What to detect? How to probe? What is a “detector?” Putting it all together Some examples.
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Åsmund Skjæveland Magnetic Distortion of HPD Images.
EIC Detector – JLab – 04/June/2010 Cisbani / HERMES RICH 1 HERMES: Forward RICH Detector Evaristo Cisbani / INFN-Rome Sanità Group Most of the slides from.
CLAS12 – RICH PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Momentum range3-8 GeV/c  /K rejection factor Not less than 500  /p rejection factor Not less than 100 Angular coverage5.
A RICH with Aerogel for a hadron machine On behalf of the LHCb RICH group Some results and considerations on: Cerenkov angle resolution from aerogel Index.
Aerogel counter with a Fresnel lens
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
18/11/04DELPHI visits, PhC1 Visits to DELPHI/LHCb Ph.Charpentier.
Electron and identified hadron v 2 to look for hadronic or partonic origin of elliptic flow Shingo Sakai for the PHENIX Collaboration Univ. of Tsukuba.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
CLAS12 Rich Imaging Cherenkov Counter
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
HERMES による パートン helicity 分布関数の QCD 解析 Tokyo Inst. of Tech. 1. Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD) 2. Parton Helicity Distribution and Nucleon Spin Problem 3.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Simulations of Light Collection Efficiency (JLab Hall C 12 GeV Kaon Aerogel Detector) Laura Rothgeb Nuclear Physics Group Catholic University of America.
KOPIO Catcher System RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 6, 2005 Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.)
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
SAS TRD Possible TRD configurations for PID up to the TeVs energies fig.s for this talk taken by: B.Dolgoshein Transition radiation detectors -NIM A326(1993)
May 26-27, 2005Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy1 KOPIO Beam Catcher Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.) Contents –What is Beam Catcher? –Concept.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
RICH studies for CLAS12 L. Pappalardo1 Contalbrigo Marco Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara CLAS12 RICH Meeting – JLab 21/6/2011.
Aerogel detector revisited Sokolov Oleksiy, UNAM, progress report, 20 Sept 2006 E int = M – wall reflectivity є – PMT relative area Belle geometry (traditional):
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
PhD thesis: Simulation & Reconstruction for the PANDA Barrel DIRC Official name: Open charm analysis tools Supervisor: Prof. Klaus Peters Maria Patsyuk.
Development of Forward Aerogel Cherenkov Detector for the H-dibaryon search experiment (E42) at J-PARC Japan-Korea PHENIX Collaboration Meeting Minho Kim.
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
CLAS12 – RICH RICH - TECHNICAL PARAMETERS PARAMETER DESIGN VALUE
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
Particle Identification in LHCb
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
The Hall C Heavy Gas Cerenkov
The HERMES RICH as SBS hadron identification detector
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Particle Detection Silicon Photo-Multipliers
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Wednesday ,April 4, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Presentation transcript:

The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP student from Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Contents 1.Introduction 2.Particle Identification 3.Detector Overview 4.Dual RICH Radiator Components 5.Performance 6.Conclusion 7.Summary 2

1. Introduction HERMES experiment at DESY, Hamburg, Germany – Electron-proton deep inelastic scattering – Beam energy-27.5 GeV – Study spin structure of the proton 3 RICH Detector Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector Electron Beam Hadrons are produced ( π, K, p,…) Identification of these particles is important for the determine spin structure Side View

2. Particle Identification Momentum (p) is determined from the magnet and drift chambers Velocity determined by cherenkov radiation angle Using Einstein’s relation mass can be calculated Once the mass is determined, the particle type is known ( π,K,p,…) 4,

Cherenkov Radiation Particle emits radiation when traveling faster than the speed of light in the medium Two radiators in the detector 5 Particle Path Cherenkov Radiation Cone θ n is index of refraction

Two radiators, one common mirror, and one common photon detector Separation possible due to new aerogel – n is larger than the Gas value but smaller than other radiator materials First application of aerogels as a RICH radiator 3. Detector Overview 6 Top Half

4. Dual RICH Radiator Components 7 Radiators – Aerogel (SiO 2 ) n= mm, 114mm, 11.3mm 391 titles, 5 rows, 17 col., 5 layers – C 4 F 10 (g) n= Mirror – 8 segments – Radius 2.2m, focal length 1.1 m Photo–Multiplier Tube (PMT) Array – 1934 Tubes – 15mm active diameter – Total 0.75 inch diameter PMT Funnel

5. Performance Efficiency was measured using these decay processes Detection efficiency – π 90% – K 75% – p 72% Angles match theoretical values 8 Gas π data Aerogel π data

6. Conclusion Allows identification of pions, kaons, and protons in the 2-10 GeV/c range This is almost the whole momentum range for the hadrons produces in the HERMES experiment Design can be improved by using larger tiles. Having smaller PMT tubes will reduce error 9

7. Summary HERMES is electron-proton deep inelastic scattering experiment Particle identification uses a combination of momentum and velocity Velocity is determined by cherenkov radiation angle Uses two separate radiators First application of the aerogel as a RICH radiator material 10

Performance Detail Yield – Aerogel average hits 10->8 Background – Ring-less tracks, multiple tracks per event, ring- less PMT hits, electronic Noise - 1 PMT hit per 5 events Average Angle and Resolution – Aerogel 7.6 mrad, Gas 7.5mrad 11

Angle Determination Inverse Ray Tracing – Determines the angle of Cherenkov Radiation Known emission and detection point Assume the emission point – Likelihood Analysis – Determines particle type Use average angle of the PMT hits per particle Creates a distribution 12

Detector Design Range determines parameters Index of Refraction Number of Detected Photons 13

Radiators Areogel Tiles – Structure Gas – 4000L 14

Mirror Array Three phase alignment – Set center of array – Orient the individual pieces – Further adjust from 9 segments Radius 2.2m Focal length 1.1m 15

Photon Detector Array of Photon-to-electron photocathodes – Minimum diameter of 15mm – Funnels – Pixel 23.3mm 16

Inverse Ray tracing Determines the angle of Cherenkov Radiation – Known emission and detection point – Assume the emission point 17

Likely-Hood Analysis Determines particle type Method – Use average angle of the PMT hits per particle – Creates a distribution 18

Error The error is low for protons and kaons because of the edges of the momentum have lower efficiency then the mids-range momentum Algorithm slightly different for the protons 19

Structure Information from Hadron Separation Electron beam and proton are polarized Picks quirk flavor Then the contribution of the identified quark to the spin can be calculated 20