D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEAT GOAT SIRE EVALUATION TEST USING THE GROWSAFE 4000 SYSTEM David Seymour WVU Extension Agent – Pendleton County
Advertisements

Effectiveness Evaluation for Production Drugs Crystal Groesbeck, Ph.D Division of Production Drugs.
Beef Production.  In this unit you learn about: Breeds and their Characteristics. Gestation Periods & Oestrous Cycle Dental Formula Grazing Systems Target.
BEEF PRODUCTION Beef. Introduction  The beef industry in Ireland is the largest sector of the Irish Agricultural Economy  There are 4.5 million beef.
Lambs from Birth to Harvest Feeding and Managing
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 29 Multiple Regression.
WHOLE BODY ANIMAL GROWTH ANSC 590 ANIMAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Nutrition for Show Steers Jim Sprinkle Area Extension Agent, Animal Science University of Arizona American Hereford Association.
Multiple Breed Evaluation Can MBE enhance crossbreeding? John Pollak Cornell University Director, NBCEC.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada The Genetics of Feed Efficiency in Cattle Dr. D.H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Research Scientist,
Applying feed intake monitoring systems into producer testing programs Dr. Daryl R. Strohbehn Extension Beef Specialist Iowa Beef ISU.
Effects of delayed implant protocols on performance, carcass characteristics and meat tenderness in Holstein steers J. L. Beckett, and J. Algeo Cal Poly.
Basics to Small Farm Beef Cow Nutrition Adam Hady Agriculture Agent Richland County UWEX Basics to Beef Cow Nutrition.
Unit 9: Dairy Cattle Feeding
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
 Draw growth curves  Explain different changes in body measurements  Explain different changes is body components  Explain different changes in carcass.
Improvement of Beef Cow Biological Efficiency
BEEF CATTLE FEED EFFICIENCY: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Dan Faulkner Department of Animal Sciences.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Live Beef Evaluation & Pricing. History 1916 Standards for U.S. grades developed 1924 Market classes and grades of dressed beef developed 1927 Voluntary.
Pork Production Phases and Scheduling AnS 225 Lab &
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Ultrasound Guidelines Council Overview Loren C. Jackson.
Computer Applications in Beef Nutrition
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Beef Evaluation and Pricing continued. Estimating Yield Grade Visually evaluate animal for differences in fat and muscle Shape.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Multi-breed Evaluation J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.
What does the new PATBQ hold for you? Roger Bergeron, agr. M.Sc. Pierre L. Demers, agr. Michel Dumas, d.t.a.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Introduction to Pork Production. Definitions Female after giving birth: Sow Young female: Gilt Having piglets: Farrowing Male: Boar Castrated Male: Barrow.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Fitting Together the Pieces of the Feed Efficiency Puzzle: IGF-I as a biomarker or indicator trait for RFI Gordon Carstens Texas A&M University NBCEC Working.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
REARING DAIRY HEIFERS PROFITABLY Dr. Rachel J. E. Stewart.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
BIF Feed Intake Guidelines Revision R. Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Maximizing Return Marketing At The Right Weight Phil Rincker.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Adding weight to lambs is the value added portion of most sheep operations. Goal is to do it as cheap as possible. Feeding Lambs DGM:ISU.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
Effects of Two Measures of Disposition on Post-weaning Gain of Beef Calves R. L. Weaber, Ph.D. F. E. Creason.
Sustainable Agriculture
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Feeding Lambs Goal is to do it as cheap as possible.
Correlation, Bivariate Regression, and Multiple Regression
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
CGs to EPDs 2006 BIF Symposium Sponsored by Ultrasound Guidelines Council Dr. Lisa A. Kriese-Anderson Auburn University.
Presentation transcript:

D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair

 Guidelines draft and editing ◦ Dr. G. E. Carstens, Texas A&M University ◦ Dr. R. A. Hill, University of Idaho ◦ Dr. J. A. Basarab, Alberta Agriculture and Food  Academic reviewers and discussions ◦ Dr. D. Strohbehn, Iowa State University ◦ Dr. R. M. Enns, Colorado State University ◦ Dr. M. Nielsen, University of Nebraska  Industry representatives ◦ Dr. S. Northcutt, American Angus Association ◦ Dr. L. Hyde, North American Limousin Foundation ◦ Dr. R. Williams, American International Charolais Association

 General minimum guidelines ◦ Individual feed intake data recording ◦ Reporting of intake and efficiency data  Animal classes ◦ Growing bulls ◦ Steer and heifer progeny  Guidelines document ◦ Posting to the web ◦ Incorporation into BIF guidelines, 9 th edition  Guidelines updates

 Breed  3-generation pedigree  Age of dam  Birth date  Birth weight  Weaning date  Weaning weight  Information required for defining feeding contemporary group ◦ Reference to breed association rules

 Start of test date ◦ Back-calculate age on test using birth date ◦ This is pre-warmup start date  Age limits should be defined ◦ Weaning is approximately 205 d, with range 175 to 235 d ◦ Minimum age on test should be older than weaning  Animals within a feeding contemporary group ◦ Maximum age range d  Pen of feeding will also define CG for intake traits ◦ Dependent on weaning CG size ◦ Target > 5 animals per feeding CG

 Adjustment period is typically 21 days ◦ Acclimation to facility and equipment ◦ Diet warmup – transition to final test diet  End of transitional period / start of test will be recorded ◦ Used to define start of intake recording  Longer warmup periods are okay, but probably unnecessary ◦ This will likely be a decision by test managers  Transitional diets for market progeny ◦ Step-up from growing to finishing ration is common ◦ The transition period data can’t generally be used ◦ The goal is to get intake on a constant diet ◦ Research is unclear regarding grow/finish choice with progeny tests but finishing diet is most common

 Minimum 70 d after warmup is required ◦ This makes a 91-d minimum total test period ◦ Intake requires less time, but growth requires about 70 d ◦ Animals don’t specifically have to have intake records for all (growth) test days if intake recording equipment usage is an issue  Ad libitum intake is required  Sickness ◦ Days/dates absent from the pen are usually recorded for all animals ◦ Full consumption (ad libitum) should return before recording resumes  Removal of animal(s) from pens ◦ Absence leads to a “non-test-day” and data is set to missing ◦ Working days (weights, RTU) are removed ◦ Equipment failures are also “non-test-day” criteria

 No assumptions or restrictions about diet ingredients ◦ These are specific to test location and conditions ◦ Ingredient composition should be recorded  Proximate analysis is also recommended  All animals within a test receive the same diet  Energy density should be sufficient for expression of animal differences  Dry matter content of the diet must be tested ◦ Intake is expressed on a dry-matter basis ◦ Increases comparability with other tests/studies ◦ Minimize measurement variation

 Dry matter intake per day is the key measure  Electronic equipment ◦ Follow hardware specifications for animal density  GrowSafe: ~7 (8 ?) young bulls or ~9 steer/heifer progeny per node  Calan: 1 animal per gate  Beginning/end of data recording period ◦ Avoid animals with large missing blocks  Minimum days with intake data ◦ Most studies show days or more is sufficient ◦ Some missing data is to be expected, especially with some hardware ◦ Data auditing will remove some data from test days

 Recommend > 6 live weights during the test period ◦ Enables the regression of live weight on test day to get ADG ◦ Minimization of measurement error ◦ R 2 should be at least 0.90 for these animal regressions, else ADG missing  2 on / 2 off is less desirable ◦ Easier to collect, but data quality is lower  Serial weights ◦ 14-d intervals are common, but not required ◦ Some test utilize 21- or 28-d weight intervals ◦ Equal spacing seems to be important

 Measuring body composition is important ◦ Intake is related to fat / muscle deposition = energy sink ◦ Ultrasound measures of FAT and REA are desirable ◦ Start/end is desirable ◦ If only one ultrasound measure is taken, measure at end of test  Utilize BIF guidelines for ultrasound data collection  Consult and follow breed association specific rules ◦ Data could also support carcass evaluation  Serial ultrasound ◦ Can estimate deposition “curves” for body composition similar to ADG ◦ Multiple measurements on a commercial test will be more expensive

 End of test date ◦ Computation of ages and length of test ◦ Test should be completed by 450 d of age  Ensure intake data recording equipment is known  Intake data “audit” ◦ Increases test data integrity ◦ Allows for across-test comparisons ◦ Audits for outliers and potentially biased data  Intake and growth correlations  Within animal variability  Residual feed intake calculations  Equipment failures  Extent is somewhat equipment specific