DR. BETHANY FLECK: SOTL FACULTY ASSOCIATE MICHAELA CLEMENS: HSPP COORDINATOR USING STUDENTS AS PARTICIPANTS NAVIGATING THE IRB FOR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Nursing Research. Perspectives for Assessing Ethical Acceptability Utilitarian Perspective - the good of a project is defined.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
FERPA and IRB: Implications for Testing Centers Judith W. Grant, Ph.D.,CIP NCTA Conference San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2009.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada2-1 Chapter 2: Child Development 2.1 Doing Child-Development Research 2.2 Child-Development Research and Family.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
DR. BETHANY FLECK & DR. AARON RICHMOND HOT OFF THE PRESS PUBLISHING YOUR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT THURSDAY DECEMBER 5 TH, 10:30-11:30AM:
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Ethical Issues in Research
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Pierre Boulos PhD CAREB 2015 Pre-Conference Workshop 1 Conducting research using our own children, ahem, I mean our own students, as participants.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
The Role of IRBs and Ethics Susan Kornetsky, MPH Children’s Hospital, Boston.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Ethical Issues and IRB Policies for SoTL and Action Research Panel Members:  Kathleen McKinney, Soc and Cross Endowed Chair in SoTL  Patricia Jarvis,
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Ethics and Politics of Research
Ethics in Social Psychology
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC
Conducting Human Subjects Research
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC
The Institutional Review Board: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
shades of gray: When is IRB approval required?
Conducting Human Subjects Research
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
Research Ethics in Sociology
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Everything You Wanted to Know about UOPX IRB
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Interviewer Research Ethics
Presentation transcript:

DR. BETHANY FLECK: SOTL FACULTY ASSOCIATE MICHAELA CLEMENS: HSPP COORDINATOR USING STUDENTS AS PARTICIPANTS NAVIGATING THE IRB FOR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT THURSDAY NOVEMBER 14 TH, 10:30-11:30AM: CN 103

WHAT IS S O TL? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning “Methodologically rigorous scholarly work conducted to enhance teaching and advance learning, ideally resulting in peer-reviewed products made public" (Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2013). All research using human participants needs to pass the Institutional Review Board. 1.Generate an idea (anecdotal evidence) 2.Transform the idea into a research study 3.Obtain IRB approval 4.Conduct study & disseminate results Timing is important

TODAY’S WORKSHOP Protect the student The Common Rule Major issues 1.Changing roles 2.Consent 3.Anonymity Example of a SoTL project: What are the IRB implications to consider? General Q & A

PROTECT THE STUDENT Students used as research participants When does the IRB come into play? Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or Identifiable, private information

THE COMMON RULE Title 45 CFR Part 46 is based on 3 ethical principles: 1.Respect for Persons Autonomy: People have the right to decide for themselves to participate, or not, in research (Informed Consent) People who may be considered vulnerable should be provided special protections 2.Beneficence Risks must be minimized, and benefits must always outweigh the risks (Risk- Benefit Analysis) 3.Justice Those who bear the burdens of research must receive its benefits (Fair Subject Selection)

MAJOR ISSUES 1.Changing role from teacher to researcher, student to participant Avoid coercion or undue influence Distinguishing classwork from research Use of 3 rd party to collect data Questions to consider: Can you run a focus group during class? When should you collect data?

MAJOR ISSUES 2.Obtaining Informed Consent When and how consent is obtained (consent process) Signed consent forms (FERPA) Clear statement in the consent to minimize potential coercion “You are free to decline to participate in this research study, or to withdraw your participation at any point, without penalty. Your decision whether or not to participate in this research study will have no influence on (state appropriate possible consequence)” Question to consider: What are the perceived or real risks to students for participating, or not, in research conducted by their instructor?

MAJOR ISSUES 3.Protecting Anonymity Anonymous versus confidential De-identification of data Tracking participants over time Audio, photo, and video Questions to consider: When should you look at and analyze data? Can you use photographs or videos in data collection or dissemination?

EXAMPLE OF A S O TL PROJECT: WHAT ARE THE IRB IMPLICATIONS TO CONSIDER? Developmental Research Methods Designed & implemented a Service Learning paradigm (SL) Compare SL section to a traditionally taught section. Research Questions 1.Does SL increase students understanding of research methods content? 2.How do students feel about the SL paradigm? 3.Does SL affect civic engagement? IRB: Major issues 1.Changing roles 2.Consent 3.Anonymity What other questions or concerns arise with this study?

USEFUL RESOURCES Center for Faculty Development: SoTL page MSUDENVER Institutional Review Board homepage Dr. Bethany Fleck Michaela Clemens

WHAT QUESTIONS REMAIN? Thank you for your time & participation The next workshop is Thursday December 5 th Hot Off the Press: Publishing your SoTL Work Dr. Bethany Fleck & Dr. Aaron Richmond Time: 10:30 to 11:30 AM Location: CN 103