The Nuts & Bolts in developing an Eligibility IEP Charter School Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Ventura County SELPA Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses (PSW) Model: An Overview This PowerPoint is provided as an overview to the Ventura County SELPA.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
Adapted Physical Education Position Paper Revised Dec 2011.
Educationally Related Therapy Services Understanding the role of physical and occupational therapists in the school environment Jackie Davis Templin, MS,
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Assessment for ASD Programming November 2012IDEA Partnership1.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.
+ PPBOCES Leadership Team: Corridor Training October 2015 Digging Deeper into evaluation, eligibility and IEP Development IEP: Present Levels IEP: Service.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Strategies For Making Assessment Meaningful and Manageable
Understanding the IEP Process
American Institutes for Research
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Week 3 The IEP Process.
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Special Education Process
Assistive Technology Implementation
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

The Nuts & Bolts in developing an Eligibility IEP Charter School Institute

Evaluation Report Directly and explicitly address performance in relation to the identified concerns, questions and priorities Identify characteristics the student demonstrates that are or are not consistent with special education eligibility criteria Documents the sources of information and assessment methods used Includes dates the assessments were completed and by whom

Full and Individual Evaluation vs A Comprehensive Evaluation Colorado ECEA Rules and the federal regulations require a “full and individual evaluation” that must be conducted before the initial provision of special education and related services. This evaluation includes assessments in “all areas related to the suspected disability.” In the past, the “comprehensive evaluation” was interpreted by most to mean a common battery of assessments for all students referred. Now a more focused, student-centered approach is indicated.

WARNING Caution should be taken not to delay a referral for special education evaluation beyond the point when the team suspects a disability. RtI problem-solving and the provision of interventions do not replace the right of a child with a suspected disability to be identified as such and to receive special education and related services.

Guiding Questions when Considering Eligibility What’s the reason for the referral? What do we already know and what do we need to know (environmentally, developmentally, and educationally)? What are parents’ primary concerns? Is the root cause of the (student’s) identified needs known? How do identified needs educationally impact the student? Which disability categories should be considered?

PWN Consent To Evaluate Notice of Meeting Sign in Sheet Excusal Forms Identifies the Evaluators by Discipline for the Evaluation Report

Key Components in the Evaluation Report: Assessments/Evaluators Background Information “Nuts and Bolts” of Report Educational Implications

Background Information & Pertinent Health History BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Reason for referral Individualized RTI History Pertinent School History: retention, attendance, home schooling, previous services, ELL history/services, frequent change of schools Screenings: school-wide and/or individual screenings completed within the RTI process (OT/PT, Speech, Vision, Hearing) Teacher/Parent Concerns Areas that are not a concern should be noted here Transitional Statement that leads to the evaluation This list is not all inclusive and should be individualized to accurately and relevantly describe the child. Everyone has a different background. PERTINENT HEALTH HISTORY: Every student in the process of an initial or triennial evaluation needs a vision/hearing screening within 12 months and a health review. Any educationally relevant health information that helps to answer the disability question would be added in the background.

Nuts and Bolts of the Report This section includes the information needed to answer the disability question that the team has gathered through the evaluation process. Each area assessed should include a combination of both data and a narrative description of strengths and concerns.

Educational Implications This should be an individualized summary of the student’s strengths/challenges AND how are his/her challenges impact his/her ability to access general education. Go back to the disability pages you are considering to help identify areas of potential educational impact. Wording that would imply eligibility should not be used. You are describing current skill sets and not pre-determining eligibility. Examples: Cathy’s current skill in the areas of reading comprehension and decoding will make it difficult for her to keep pace when reading grade level curriculum. Ashley’s current academic skills allow her to access the general education curriculum. John’s skill levels in listening comprehension and vocabulary will make it challenging for him to participate in whole group discussions in core subjects.

Evaluation Report Checklist  Completed within 60 calendar days of obtaining consent?  Vision/Hearing?  Student observation in relevant settings?  Does it provide meaningful and understandable information to parents and others who do not have your background and training?  Does it directly and explicitly address the initial questions and concerns?  Does it discuss a pattern of strengths, interests, and weaknesses so that a meaningful plan can be developed?

Educational Implications in Evaluation Report Goals Accommodations Modifications Service Delivery Statement Student Needs and Impact Of Disability Present Levels of Educational Performance

Guiding Questions When Developing IEP What’s the plan for improving outcomes for students? What’s the meaningful interpretation of the data? How is the student impacted in the classroom? How does all the information go together? What specially designed instruction does the student need? Can the student receive “reasonable educational benefit from general education alone”?

Purpose: Highlight strengths and areas of concern in academic and non-academic areas requiring specialized instruction. If an Eligibility Review: Summary should be brief & scores are not necessary; you are summarizing the student’s overall strengths and academic needs from the Evaluation Report. If an Annual Review: Describe the student’s current level of performance to include current testing/progress monitoring and progress towards previous IEP goals. Present Levels of Educational Performance

Purpose: This section should identify and link needs from the Evaluation Report. The needs detailed in this section should then link with goals, accommodations, and/or modifications. Specifically, explain how identified needs are impacting access to the general education curriculum. How does all the information go together? How is the student impacted in the classroom? What specially designed instruction does the student need? Student Needs and Impact of Disability

Accommodations vs Modifications Accommodations Accommodations involve adapting instructional strategies and/or the classroom environment to allow a student to access the curriculum Modifications Modifications change the curriculum when reasonable accommodations will not be effective in allowing the student to participate in the general education classroom

Accomodations -Accommodations do NOT change the standards, instructional level, content, or performance criteria -Accommodations may include the provision of related services, the assignment of para-educators for specific purposes, and/or the provision of adaptive materials or instructional strategies targeted for the student -Accommodations examples include, but are not limited to: materials, manner of presentation, calculators, word processors, heterogeneous grouping, peer partnerships, format, seating arrangements, lighting, sound, rephrasing, additional time, highlighted reading materials, organizational aids, prewritten notes, study guides, etc.

Modifications -Modifications change what a student is expected to learn when participating in the general curriculum; may change the instructional level, the content and/or the performance criteria -Require a standards-based IEP for instruction -Routinely providing modifications to content during classroom instruction and/or classroom assessments for students who do not have a significant cognitive disability may have the unintended consequence of reducing a student’s opportunity to learn critical content that may be evaluated on district and state assessments -Modified instruction based on alternate academic achievement standards/Extended Evidence Outcomes (EEOs) should be provided if the student’s IEP Team determines that the student meets eligibility requirements as a student with a significant cognitive disability. The student’s IEP would outline ways the student is to work on meaningful tasks linked to the grade-level standard

Purpose: This is what makes Special Education “Special”. This is what we do! This is a thorough and individualized description of what the student’s day/week looks like. Include push in and/or pull out supports Include any adult monitoring that is needed If any supports are provided by a para-professional under the supervision of the special education teacher, include it here Include any areas checked in “Special Factors” such as Extended School Year, Assistive Techonology, Behavior Plan….. Service Delivery Statement