LBE/Scavenger TF-NGN 8 Berlin, July 1 st 2002. Overview LBE deliverable D9.9 for GEANT due Aug 31 Need to decide how to press ahead with workplan; had.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Advertisements

MB - NG MB-NG Technical Meeting 03 May 02 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester 1 Task2 Traffic Generation and Measurement Definitions Pass-1.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
IPv6 Deployment CANTO Nate Davis, Chief Operating Officer 13 August 2014.
IPv6 TF-NGN 8 Berlin, 2 nd July Agenda Review GTPv6 status D9.6 GEANT deliverable Presentations from participants –JOIN, RENATER, POZNAN 6NET –Outputs,
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
CCNA2 Module 4. Discovering and Connecting to Neighbors Enable and disable CDP Use the show cdp neighbors command Determine which neighboring devices.
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - TF-NGN Berlin: Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GEANT Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GÉANT TF-NGN meeting – BERLIN.
1 Some QoS Deployment Issues Shumon Huque University of Pennsylvania MAGPI GigaPoP April 15th NSF/ITR Scalable QoS Workshop.
ACN: IntServ and DiffServ1 Integrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv) Information taken from Kurose and Ross textbook “ Computer.
Lecture 3 Introduction 1-1 Chapter 1: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  circuit.
1-1 Internet Overview: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  circuit switching, packet.
School of Information Technologies IP Quality of Service NETS3303/3603 Weeks
02 nd April 03Networkshop Managed Bandwidth Next Generation F. Saka UCL NETSYS (NETwork SYStems centre of excellence)
TF-NGN TERENA General Assembly Roberto Sabatino Copenhagen, 23 October 2003.
Internet Traffic Management Prafull Suryawanshi Roll No - 04IT6008.
Tiziana FerrariQuality of Service for Remote Control in the High Energy Physics Experiments CHEP, 07 Feb Quality of Service for Remote Control in.
For discussion purposes. No implementation assurances 1 Consult 21 Interconnect Working Group NGN Interconnect - PSTN Emulation Technical Consultation.
Tiziana Ferrari Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks1 Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks Tiziana Ferrari Italian.
LBE TF-NGN Budapest October Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing1 Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing Tiziana.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Identifying Application Impacts on Network Design Designing and Supporting Computer.
Networks – Network Architecture Network architecture is specification of design principles (including data formats and procedures) for creating a network.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate VPNs in GÉANT2 Otto Kreiter, DANTE UKERNA Networkshop 34 4th - 6th April 2006.
Performance Monitoring - Internet2 Member Meeting -- Nicolas Simar Performance Monitoring Internet2 Member Meeting, Indianapolis.
Brett Neely IP Next Generation. To boldly go where no network has gone before...
An Efficient Approach for Content Delivery in Overlay Networks Mohammad Malli Chadi Barakat, Walid Dabbous Planete Project To appear in proceedings of.
Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari.
Fundamentals of Computer Networks ECE 478/578 Lecture #19: Transport Layer Instructor: Loukas Lazos Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Identifying Application Impacts on Network Design Designing and Supporting.
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Differentiated Services for the Internet Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
Introduction1-1 Chapter 1 Computer Networks and the Internet Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach Featuring the Internet, 2 nd edition. Jim Kurose,
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
8 June 2005TNC2005 JANET QoS Development Project: IP Premium and LBE Trials across JANET Victor Olifer UKERNA Network Development Project Manager.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
Performance monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Performance monitoring TF-NGN meeting, Rome (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network.
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
Real-time Flow Management 2 BOF: Remote Packet Capture Extensions Jürgen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd, Heidelberg, Germany Georg Carle GMD.
Scavenger performance Cern External Network Division - Caltech Datagrid WP January, 2002.
Interdomain IPv6 multicast Stig Venaas UNINETT. PIM-SM and Rendezvous Points Interdomain multicast routing is usually done with a protocol called PIM-SM.
Congestion exposure BoF candidate protocol: re-ECN Bob Briscoe Chief Researcher, BT Nov 2009 This work is partly funded by Trilogy, a research project.
2005 © SWITCH PERT – Beyond Fat Pipes Simon Leinen.
1 Computer Networks & The Internet Lecture 4 Imran Ahmed University of Management & Technology.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - Sequin: Monitoring Infrastructure Monitoring Premium IP.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Bjorn Landfeldt, The University of Sydney 1 NETS3303 Networked Systems.
Draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-04.txt 1 TCP Throughput Testing Methodology IETF 78 Maastricht Reinhard Schrage Barry Constantine.
Introduction & Vision. Introduction MANTICORE provides a software implementation and tools for providing and managing routers and IP networks as services.
CS 3830 Day 4 Introduction 1-1. Announcements  No office hour 12pm-1pm today only  Quiz on Friday  Program 1 due on Friday (put in DropBox on S drive)
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ 2005 Multicast Admission Control in DiffServ Networks Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskylä.
VLBI_UDP An application for transferring VLBI data via UDP protocol Simon Casey e-VLBI meeting, Haystack 20 Sep 2006.
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
1 12-Jan-16 OSI network layer CCNA Exploration Semester 1 Chapter 5.
Update on the IETF Diffserv Working Group NANOG 13 Detroit, MI June 8, 1998 Kathleen M. Nichols
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Filtering Traffic Using Access Control Lists Introducing Routing and Switching.
Connect communicate collaborate perfSONAR MDM for LHCOPN/LHCONE: partnership, collaboration, interoperability, openness Domenico Vicinanza perfSONAR MDM.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Institution of SLAs TNLC Meeting ― Athens, Afrodite Sevasti (SA2, GRNET)
1 Review – The Internet’s Protocol Architecture. Protocols, Internetworking & the Internet 2 Introduction Internet standards Internet standards Layered.
Philip Eardley, Bob Briscoe, Dave Songhurst - BT Francois Le Faucheur, Anna Charny, Vassilis Liatsos – Cisco Kwok-Ho Chan, Joe Babiarz, Stephen Dudley.
Cisco I Introduction to Networks Semester 1 Chapter 6 JEOPADY.
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE v2.0)
Introduction to Networks
Slides taken from: Computer Networking by Kurose and Ross
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Chapter 1: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge
CS580 Special Project: IOS Firewall Setup using CISCO 1600 router
Outline Overview of IP History of the Internet - 3-May-19
Presentation transcript:

LBE/Scavenger TF-NGN 8 Berlin, July 1 st 2002

Overview LBE deliverable D9.9 for GEANT due Aug 31 Need to decide how to press ahead with workplan; had some discussion already –Technical issues presented at TF-NGN 7 in April –Also held BoF at Limerick (TNC2002) in May Who is interested? –What are the application areas? What needs to be done on GEANT core? –To enable experiments between NRENs and end sites

Interest from…? To date we have interest from: –Arnes (Slovenia) –CESNET (Czech) –INFN-CNAF (Italy) –RedIris (Spain) –UKERNA/UoS (QoS pilots being formulated) –UNINETT (Norway) Are there others?

Original ideas From Tiziana’s TF-NGN 7 presentations: –Work plan definition Ongoing – some agreement at Limerick meeting –Review the Scavenger configuration Done – though GEANT routers different –Co-existence with IP Premium Not seen as a problem – GEANT spec underway –Identify test cases: e.g. GRID data? Ongoing – candidate set discussed

Original work plan Phases: –0: gather NREN requirements and define the service specification –1: baseline tests and service feasibility –2: performance analysis in user-based scenario (e.g. DataGRID) – can be transparent LBE on core –3: implement user and NREN-based scenario, then trial on production networks –4: joint US/Internet2/Abilene experiments (Scavenger) –Some revision after Limerick meeting…

Original (TCP) application areas Including but probably not limited to: –Mirroring (Uninett) –Usenet news and mail distribution (HEAnet/Surfnet) –Limiting point to point traffic not entitled to use NRN resources (RedIris) –Isolate production traffic from test bulk traffic, e.g. DataTAG (INFN-CNAF) –Non TCP-compliant programs (INFN-CNAF) –Student dormitory traffic (UoS) –Certain types of GRID applications (UoS) –Others?

Internet 2 Scavenger running for over a year –Approx 2% of traffic is LBE-marked Abilene core is not congested –Core transports DSCP 8 (Scavenger code point) transparently (does not alter value) –Scavenger applied at edges where congestion occurs. –At least four universities using Scavenger for dormitory traffic Abilene migrating to Juniper Q –Using T-640 routers (more output queues than current GEANT routers)

GEANT status Packets currently retagged to DSCP 0 on core –Can be checked by NANOG traceroute DANTE seeking method for DSCP transparency GEANT-US link not heavily loaded –20% as of May 2002, probably more now e.g. due to UKERNA’s loss of transatlantic carrier. Some implementation examples for M-series – ne.html (Thanks to

Checking DSCP propagation… Useful to be able to test where DSCP is being cleared if LBE DSCP not transported end to end Can use NANOG traceroute (latest version): –ftp://ftp.login.com/pub/software/traceroute/beta –(thanks Simon! ) –Run with –t option for TOS value. –Run from UoS shows TOS cleared at entry to GEANT core. Implies DSCP passes from UoS through MAN and JANET OK. Likewise for SWITCH.

Limerick BoF conclusions Four were noted: –Adopt a common DSCP (8). –Ensure DSCP is allowed to pass unaltered for end to end transparency –Let the NRENs and end users decide on implementation of LBE –Approach the IETF with suggestion to recommend global use of some DSCP values (may be tricky!) Minutes will be available from our LBE site

Some points to note… GEANT is not congested in the core –Usefulness currently in applying at the edges Packets can travel 90% to destination and then still be dropped. –But will still cause TCP backoff at source, easing congestion Server has to set DSCP, not client –Stig’s FTP server patch shows this can be easy (one socket option argument).

Stig’s FTP server patch Patch for troll-ftpd Command “site dscp value” –Works for sverresborg.uninett.no –Sets DSCP for data transfer (not control) –E.g. site dscp 32 –NB. The server must be accessed in passive mode Very simple patch.

GEANT implementation issues Needs own hardware queue, GEANT Juniper routers have four hardware queues (BE, Premium IP, routing protocols, 1 free!) –DANTE seems happy to use all four queues on GEANT core to enable LBE. –Candidate specification drafted by DANTE May be some problems in passing DSCP unaltered over whole GEANT core. –Requirement to alter/reset core routers?

Application enabling… Example of FTP server –Option for client to set DSCP –Equivalent of Unix “renice” on network Need to identify other applications –Any need to standardise DSCP options in applications? –If so, how? Note many FTP clients set DSCP too –Need to check and understand this – Stig suggested study of DSCP behaviour from applications…?

Do we need a testbed? Traffic generation/loading –Smartbits – appropriate? SmartTCP? –Other TCP tests? Measure the aggregate LBE throughput that applications can get out of a LBE queue with and without congestion. –Detail level of tests? If GEANT passes DSCP unaltered, we can run tests between NRENs/end sites…

Where next? LBE can be deployed incrementally: –Transparent transport of DSCP –Implementation of queues See Tiziana’s TF-NGN 7 slides Initially only at customer edge (requires transparent transport) –Implies no need for testbed? –Begin implementation in edge routers, where congestion is observed. –Low cost to deploy

Where next: applications? Are we happy with original scenarios and usages? Enabling LBE (Scavenger) on link between GEANT and Abilene. –Enable European-US end-to-end experiments, even if we don’t know exactly what they are now. Is there a clear user requirement? –If not, can we encourage one? –With Scavenger, applications can be nice without looking at MRTG graphs or other sources to predict network load.

Other related areas to consider? Some areas to perhaps consider: –LBE through firewalls –Remote host signalling request for LBE –Any uses for LBE with UDP? (no backoff) UDP usually used for media streaming? –Enforced LBE, e.g. for student dorms? –Application behaviour with LBE Should be “predictable” with TCP –Min spec router to implement LBE drops

Other DiffServ services?ABE Alternative Best Effort (ABE) –Aimed at real-time applications like voice –We’re not considering this yet –Some interest in Internet 2 community –Lack of implementations? –See:

Info Tiziana’s LBE site: – Scavenger: – –Includes configuration examples Need input for August 31 st deliverable! –Over to Tiziana for GEANT implementation…