2010 Great Lakes Water Rate Survey MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Janice Beecher and Jason Kalmbach I NSTITUTE OF P UBLIC U TILITIES MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ipu.msu.edu Please do not distribute by electronic or other means or cite without permission.
Beecher Great Lakes Water Rate Survey Top ten water systems by service population from eight Midwestern states, by service population size as reported in EPA Consumer Confidence Reports Illinois, Indiana, Michigan*, Minnesota*, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (*no economic regulatory authority) Data gathered from websites & personal communications. Nine water providers no rate information available directly on the website
Beecher Watershed map and systems in the sample – not final
Beecher Service population
Beecher System service populations
Beecher Sample characteristics
Beecher Effective date of tariff
Beecher Billing cycles
Beecher Billing combinations
Beecher Tariff charges
Beecher Rate structures
Beecher Peaking-factor rate (Ann Arbor, MI)
Beecher Rate structures by ownership
Beecher Public fire-protection in fixed charges: average by meter size
Beecher Public fire-protection in fixed charges: range by meter size
Beecher Fixed charges and variable unit rates for 100 ccf by usage level
Beecher Conservation and assistance policies
Beecher Average charges by state
Beecher Average charges by system characteristics
Beecher Average charges for 0 cf (0 gal.)
Beecher Average charges for 1,000 cf (7,480 gal.)
Beecher Average charges for 50,000 cf (374,000 gal.)
Beecher Average charges for 1 mil. cf (7.4 mil. gal).
Beecher Monthly bills by system size and ownership
Beecher Comparison to AWWA rate survey (2008)
Beecher Water utility cost-trend analysis Data from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission Period: Benchmarking analysis Annual financial reports Class AB water utilities N ranges from 72 to 94 Informative but not generalizable to other water systems
Beecher Utility plant to revenue ratios (capital intensity)
Beecher Utility plant investment by function
Beecher Ratio of value of plant additions to retirements
Beecher Operating revenues and expenses per water sold
Beecher Operating expenses per water sold
Beecher Operating expenses by water source
Beecher Pumping statistics
Beecher Revenue trends by customer class
Beecher Trends in residential water sales and revenues
Beecher Note: rate disparity between private and public systems (Beecher) Income, property, and other taxes and fees (e.g., franchise) Profits (equity returns to “owners” are less for public) Financing (including SRF for cities) Scale and density economies (favor cities) Locational cost differentials (varies) Contributions and system development fees (cities) Costing practices (depreciation v. replacement expense) Hidden subsidies (but also transfers) Rate practices (outside-city rates) Cost avoidance and deferrals (sometimes) Investment incentives (private) Economic regulation (cost-based rates) Note: significant variations from system to system Some municipal utilities actually provide transfers