Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Enabling Customer Demand Management Kevin Evans President & CEO June 24, 2010.
PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
0 Michael Robinson Midwest ISO 3 June 2008 Midwest ISO Markets: Demand Response & Resource Adequacy.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Future of OASIS II Conference Presented by Karl Tammar – NYISO For the ISO/RTO Council March 29, 2005 ISO/RTO Activities and Initiatives.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Market Interface Committee Report to the WECC Board of Directors December 6-7, 2007 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
SPP.org 1. DRCC June 2008 National Town Meeting SPP Regional Transmission Organization Update.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Electricity Markets
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Review of CAISO Wholesale Electricity Market Trends APEX Sydney Conference California Electricity Wholesale Market Trends October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin,
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
 Sharon Jacobs Harvard Law School. 1) Order 719 2) RICE Rules 3) Bigger-picture regulatory questions.
The Economics of Commercial Demand Response for Spinning Reserve Michael Fisher, Jay Apt, Fallaw Sowell USAEE North American Conference October 26, 2015.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
National Energy Technology Laboratory Driving Innovation ♦ Delivering Results Steve Bossart, Moderator October, 2015 USAEE Pittsburgh North American Conference.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Conference on Standard Market Design Issues Alice Fernandez, FERC Staff January 22-23, 2002.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Municipal Utility Presentation. Municipal Utilities will experience significant cost increases that pressure rate payer price hikes 2 CAGR growth in capacity.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Demand Response in the USA Vienna Global Energy Workshop April 1, 2009
Natural Gas –generation intersection
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
North American Markets Status
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Electricity Restructuring and Deregulation
Resilience and Reliability in PJM’s Competitive Markets
Transforming the Electric Grid with Storage
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008

6/3/2008 Integration – RTO/ISO Level ISO-NE NYISO PJM MISO CAISO

6/3/2008 Integration – ISO-NE Energy Market: –Four distinct programs –Day-Ahead and Real Time opportunities Forward Capacity Market (FCM) –Demand Resources treated as supply resources in FCM Ancillary Services: –Larger Demand Resources can participate fully (5+ MW) –Pilot program underway to enable smaller Demand Resources to participate in reserves market

6/3/2008 Integration – NYISO Energy Market: –Participation through Day-Ahead Demand Response Program and the Emergency Demand Response Program Capacity Market –Participation through Special Case Resource Program Ancillary Services: –Operating Reserves and Regulation Service

6/3/2008 Integration – PJM Energy Market: –Economic Load Response enables Demand Resources to respond LMP Capacity Market (RPM) –Demand Resources may participate as a forward capacity resource Ancillary Services: –PJM provides opportunity to offer into the synchronized reserves and regulation markets

6/3/2008 Integration – Midwest ISO Energy Market: –Participation through Emergency Demand Response Program Ancillary Services: –Operating Reserves and Regulation Service

6/3/2008 Integration – CAISO Participating Load Agreements MRTU Implementation MRTU Release 1A

6/3/2008 Competition NOPR Would require RTOs/ISOs to accept bids from demand response resources in their markets for certain ancillary services. Would eliminate, during a system emergency, a charge to buyers in the energy market for taking less electric energy in the real-time market than purchased in the day-ahead. Would permit an aggregator of retail customers to bid demand response on behalf of retail customers directly into energy markets. Required staff to conduct a technical conference on demand response.

6/3/2008 DR Technical Conference Issues Value of and appropriate compensation for demand response in organized electric markets. Barriers to comparable treatment of demand response that have not previously been identified. Potential solutions to eliminate barriers to demand response.

6/3/2008 Smart Grid Energy and Independence and Security Act of 2007 Interoperability Standards FERC-NARUC Collaborative

6/3/2008 Demand Response Assessment of Demand Response National Action Plan for Demand Response

6/3/2008 Conclusions Adding significant new amounts of DR represents a challenge as well as an opportunity Measurement and Verification protocols and processes will be increasingly important Ultimately, we will see significant technological infrastructure additions and improvements