Chapter 4 An Agile View of Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agile Development : an introduction
Advertisements

1 COSC 4406 Software Engineering COSC 4406 Software Engineering Haibin Zhu, Ph.D. Dept. of Computer Science and mathematics, Nipissing University, 100.
Agile Development.
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
Agile
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Coming up: The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development Software Engineering:
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering Dr. M. Zhu
Agile Process: Overview n Agile software engineering represents a reasonable compromise to conventional software engineering for certain classes of software.
Software Engineering Lecture No:12. Lecture # 7
An Agile View of Process
Software engineering Process models Pavel Agejkin.
SEC 308 Yazılım Mühendisliği Software Process Models
Chapter 3 – Agile Software Development 1Chapter 3 Agile software development.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2, 3, &4 Process copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Chapter-3 Agile Development
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
Developed by Reneta Barneva, SUNY Fredonia Agile Development.
Chapter 4 Agile Development
Chapter 5 Agile Development Chapter 5 Agile Development Moonzoo Kim KAIST 1.
Chapter 4 Agile Development 1. The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 2 “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Software Processes.
Chapter 5 애자일 개발 Agile Development
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Coming up: The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development Software Engineering:
Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 5 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 1 Method/Process = step-by-step description of the steps involved.
1 The Manifesto for Agile Software Development “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this.
CS 3610: Software Engineering – Fall 2009 Dr. Hisham Haddad – CSIS Dept. Chapter 4 Agile Development Discussion of Agile Development and Agile Process.
Agile Methodology Paul Mohrbacher. Agile Manifesto We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through.
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Traditional Process Models A quick overview. 2 Waterfall Model (Diagram) Communication Project initiation Requirements gathering Planning Estimating Scheduling.
1 Chapter 3: Lecture 3 Agile Development Slide Set to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e by Roger S. Pressman Slides copyright.
Software Engineering (CSI 321) An Agile View of Process 1.
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
Requirements Engineering Requirements Engineering in Agile Methods Lecture-28.
1 Agile Development. The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 2 “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others.
Agile. Processes Waterfall Traditional With prototyping Sprial Agile Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) Scrum Crystal eXtreme Programming (XP)
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
CS 4500: Software Development Software Process. Materials Sommmerville Chapters 1, 2 and 3 Software Cycle and Models:
TIK 302 Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Agile Proses. Agile View of Process Represents a reasonable compromise between conventional software engineering for.
1 The economies of ALL developed nations are dependent on software The economies of ALL developed nations are dependent on software More and more systems.
Software Engineering Principles I (Spring 2017)
Chapter 5 Agile Development Moonzoo Kim KAIST
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Chapter 4 & Chapter 5 Important Concepts
Manifesto for Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 An Agile view of process.
Software & Software Engineering Pertemuan-4 Dosen :Kundang K Juman
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Agile Development.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Chapter 5 Agile Development
Software Engineering (CSI 321)
Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Agile Software Processes
Agile Process: Overview
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
The Manifesto for Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering Dr. M. Zhu
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 4 An Agile View of Process

The Manifesto for Agile Software Development “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.” Kent Beck et al, 2001

What is “Agility”? Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change Effective communication among all stakeholders (managers, customers, end-users) Drawing the customer onto the team Organizing a team so that it is in control of the work performed Yielding … Rapid, incremental delivery of software

What is “Agility”? (cont.) Agility is more than change management Agility means that customers and developers need to work together as collaborators on the development team try to build products that can be adapted to a rapidly changing market place

An Agile Process Is driven by customer descriptions of what is required (scenarios) Recognizes that plans are short-lived Develops software iteratively with a heavy emphasis on construction activities Delivers multiple ‘software increments’ Adapts as changes occur

Characteristics of An Agile Process Adaptable All agile processes are adaptable to manage unpredictable changes that take place during software development projects. Responsive Agile processes rely heavily on customer feedback generated by their evaluation of operational prototypes. Incremental The focus of agile processes is on the delivery of software increments in relatively short timeframes.

The Debate -- Stick-in-the-muds vs. Glorified hackers

Key Traits Among Agile Team Competence Skill and knowledge of process Common focus Deliver a working software increment in time Collaboration Decision-making ability Fuzzy problem-solving ability Mutual trust and respect Self-organization In control of the work it performs

Agile Process Models Extreme Programming (XP) Adaptive Software Development (ASD) Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) Scrum Crystal Feature Driven Development (FDD) Agile Modeling (AM)

Extreme Programming (XP) The most widely used agile process, originally proposed by Kent Beck Use an object-oriented approach XP Planning Begins with the creation of “user stories”, i.e., use-cases Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost Stories are grouped to for a deliverable increment A commitment is made on delivery date After the first increment “project velocity” is used to help define subsequent delivery dates for other increments number of stories implemented during first release

Extreme Programming (cont.) XP Design Follows the KIS (keep it simple) principle Encourage the use of CRC (Class-Responsibility Collaborator) cards (see Chapter 8) For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of “spike solutions”—a design prototype Encourages “refactoring”—an iterative refinement of the internal program design

Extreme Programming (cont.) XP Coding Recommends the construction of a unit test for a store before coding commences Encourages “pair programming” XP Testing All unit tests are executed daily “Acceptance tests” are defined by the customer and executed to assess customer visible functionality Two programmers work together for coding a story

Extreme Programming (XP)

Adaptive Software Development Originally proposed by Jim Highsmith ASD — distinguishing features Mission-driven planning Component-based focus Uses “time-boxing” (See Chapter 24) Explicit consideration of risks Emphasizes collaboration for requirements gathering Emphasizes “learning” throughout the process

Adaptive Software Development

Dynamic Systems Development Method Promoted by the DSDM Consortium (www.dsdm.org) DSDM—distinguishing features Similar in most respects to XP and/or ASD Nine guiding principles Active user involvement is imperative. DSDM teams must be empowered to make decisions. The focus is on frequent delivery of products. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution. All changes during development are reversible. Requirements are baselined at a high level Testing is integrated throughout the life-cycle.

DSDM Life Cycle Feasibility study Business study Establish basic business requirements and constraints Business study Establish functional and information requirements, and define basic application architecture Functional model iteration Produce a set of incremental prototypes Gather additional requirements from users Design and build iteration Revisit prototypes built during the functional model iteration Implementation Place the latest software increment into operational environment

DSDM Life Cycle (with permission of the DSDM consortium) DSDM Life Cycle (cont.) DSDM Life Cycle (with permission of the DSDM consortium)

Scrum Originally proposed by Jeff Sutherland et al Scrum—distinguishing features Development work is partitioned into “packets” Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is constructed Work occurs in “sprints” and is derived from a “backlog” of existing requirements Meetings are very short and sometimes conducted without chairs “demos” are delivered to the customer with the time-box allocated

Scrum process flow (used with permission)

Crystal Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith Crystal—distinguishing features Actually a family of process models that allow “maneuverability” based on problem characteristics Face-to-face communication is emphasized Suggests the use of “reflection workshops” to review the work habits of the team

Feature Driven Development Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al FDD—distinguishing features Emphasis is on defining “features” A feature “is a client-valued function that can be implemented in two weeks or less.” Uses a feature template <action> the <result> <by | for | of | to> a(n) <object> e.g., Add the product to a shopping cart A features list is created and “plan by feature” is conducted Design and construction merge in FDD

Feature Driven Development Reprinted with permission of Peter Coad

Agile Modeling Originally proposed by Scott Ambler Suggests a set of agile modeling principles Model with a purpose Use multiple models Travel light Content is more important than representation Know the models and the tools you use to create them Adapt locally