Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Clinical QA Data Audits A GCP Point of View Linda Del Paggio GCP Compliance BioBridges, LLC.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
ICH GCP, the MHRA and PATHOLOGY PATHOLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE Rob Wosley MRQA SEPTEMBER 2009.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
Ethical Issues in Translational Research
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Research Ethics & Governance
DO THE CODES APPLY TO MY RESEARCH?
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Jennifer McCormick MA, CRC Karla Lichter RN CCRC.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
Good Clinical Practice GCP overview
A S Nanivadekar Introduction to GCP. A S Nanivadekar Outline Definition and scope Definition and scope Purpose of clinical research Purpose of clinical.
Clinical Trial Ethical Considerations
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
HUMAN RESEARCH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Objectives Identify the history events that lead to the development of principles, regulations, and guidance.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
+ UW-Stout IRB News from the IRB New protocol form New online training New certification New staff.
Thierry Le Chevalier, MD Good Clinical Practice Compliance.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Quality Assurance & Quality Control in Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Industries By- Dr. Sushrut Varun Satpathy MBBS, MD Assistant Professor Department of.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Ethical Guidelines For Clinical Research. Introduction  All research involving human subjects should be conducted in accordance with three basic ethical.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Good Clinical Practice
Investigator Responsibilities in Human Subjects Research
Roles and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Team
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
راهنماي اختصاصي اخلاق در كارآزمايي هاي باليني
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program

Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Current trials governed by: l Good Clinical Practices l Good Laboratory Practices l Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Clinical Practices “A standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials that provides assurance that the data and reported results are credible and accurate, and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial subjects are protected.” ICH-GCP [1.24]

Good Laboratory Practices l An array of standards and regulations to guide the planning, performance, monitoring, recording, reporting, and archiving of laboratory studies l Designed to assure that data are reliable and can be used

Good Manufacturing Practices l A collection of standards regulating the manufacturing, processing, packaging, and storage of drugs or devices l Designed to assure that these processes are consistent and reproducible

US Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act l Developed in response to elixir of sulfanilamide tragedy n First statutory regulation of cosmetics and therapeutic devices n Required drug manufacturers to provide scientific proof that new products were safe n Provided specific authority for factory inspections

Nuremburg Code l Developed in response to unethical medical experimentation on human subjects by German scientists during WW II l First set of standards for the review and conduct of human research requiring: n Voluntary consent of subjects n Justifiable reason for experimentation n Protection of participants

US Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendment l Developed in response to thalidomide tragedy requiring: n Manufacturers prove efficacy as well as safety before marketing a new product n Informed consent be obtained from all participants l Outlined a process for clinical testing that still applies today

Declaration of Helsinki l Defined ethical standards for the conduct of human research n Research in humans should be based on results of laboratory and animal experimentation n Research protocols should be reviewed by an independent committee prior to initiation n Risks should not exceed benefits

Declaration of Helsinki l Defined ethical standards for the conduct of human research n Informed consent should be obtained in all research subjects n Only medically and/or scientifically qualified individuals should conduct human research

US National Research Act National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research n Defined basic ethical principles for the conduct of human research n Formulated guidelines to ensure that human research is conducted in accordance with these ethical principles Required establishment of an IRB at all institutions conducting human research

The Belmont Report l Outlines basic ethical principles developed by the National Commission n Respect for persons n Beneficence n Justice l Addresses distinction between medical practice and research

The Belmont Report l Respect for Persons n Individuals should be treated as “autonomous agents” whose freedom to act on opinions, choices, and considered judgments should be given priority n Individuals with diminished autonomy are entitled to additional protections

The Belmont Report l Beneficence n Obligation to conduct research in a manner that maximizes potential benefits and minimizes possible risks l Justice n Selection of subjects should be equitable and the burdens of research should be borne by those most likely to benefit from the research results

International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) l Convened to devise a unified standard governing clinical research in the US, European Union, and Japan l Designed to facilitate the mutual acceptance of data generated from clinical trials by regulatory authorities in each jurisdiction

ICH Principles l Studies should be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki l Risks and benefits should be carefully scrutinized l Rights, safety, and well-being of study subjects of paramount importance

ICH Principles l Information from preliminary studies of the investigational product should support the study l Studies should be scientifically rigorous and outlined in a formal protocol l All studies should be reviewed and approved by a convened IRB

ICH Principles l A qualified physician should be responsible for all medical care and decisions l All study staff should have appropriate education, training, and experience l All study subjects should freely give informed consent prior to participation

ICH Principles l Study data should be recorded and stored in a manner that allows its accurate reporting, interpretation, and verification l Confidentiality of records should be protected l Investigational products should be manufactured, handled, and stored in accordance with GMP l QA procedures should be in place

Investigator Responsibilities l Hire study staff with appropriate qualifications l Delegate study tasks appropriately l Use investigational product per protocol l Comply with GCP and other regulatory requirements l Participate in data monitoring, auditing, and site inspection l Provide sufficient resources l Provide medical care l Conduct study procedures per protocol l Obtain IRB approval l Obtain informed consent l Maintain records and submit reports l Safety reporting

Investigator Responsibilities FDA Form 1572—Section 9 “Commitments” l I agree to conduct the study in accordance with the protocol and will only make changes to the protocol after notifying the sponsor, except when necessary to protect the safety, rights, or welfare of subjects l I agree to personally conduct or supervise the described investigation l I agree to inform any study subjects that the drugs are being used for investigational purposes and I will ensure that the requirements related to obtaining informed consent and IRB review and approval are met

FDA Form Commitments l I agree to report to the sponsor adverse experiences that occur in the course of the study l I have read and understand the information in the Investigator’s Brochure, including the potential risks and side effects of the drug l I agree to ensure that all study staff are informed in meeting the above commitments l I agree to maintain adequate and accurate records and to make those records available for inspection

FDA Form Commitments l I agree that an IRB will be responsible for the initial and continuing review and approval of the clinical investigation l I agree to promptly report to the IRB all changes in the research activity and all unanticipated problems involving risks to human subjects or others l I will not make any changes in the research without IRB approval, except where necessary to eliminate hazards to human subjects WARNING: A willfully false statement is a criminal offense USC Title 18, Sec 1001

Sponsor Responsibilities l QA and QC l Medical expertise l Trial management l Selection of investigators l Financial support l Compliance with regulatory issues l Protocol generation and amendment l Confirmation of IRB review and approval l Supply investigational product with appropriate information l Case report forms l Safety monitoring l Data monitoring l Site audit/inspection l Report submission