Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on LC Preparations for RDA CEAL Committee on Technical Processing Meeting : Session 4 March 14, 2012 Tom Yee LC Policy & Standards Division.
Advertisements

A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Moving from AACR2 to RDA Ann Chapman Chair.
RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Expanding the Serials Family Continuing resources in the library catalogue Chris Oliver autumn 2002 LTS/McGill.
Cataloguing codes Need of Cataloguing Codes
Session 6 Issues in Cataloging Loose-leaf Integrating Resources Original content by Rhonda K. Lawrence Head of Cataloging, UCLA Law Library.
IME ICC5 Report Working Group 5: Multipart Items Working Group Leader: Irmela Buchholz Working Group Recorder: Susan Battison IME ICC5 August 15, 2007.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
AACR2's Strategic Plan and IFLA Work towards an International Cataloguing Code Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Library of Congress Representative to the Joint Steering.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
1 1 Introduction to Multimedia Chapter 9. 2 Objectives Get to know the phases of MM production. Get to know the team members in MM development.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Joy Anhalt Richard Stewart Reaching Forward May 6, 2011.
Revising AACR: RDA Stuart Hunt CILIP/BL Committee on AACR/RDA Oslo, January 2006.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Update for the Continuing Resources Cataloging Committee Midwinter 2005 Jennifer Bowen, ALA Representative to the.
Resource Description and Access (RDA) A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen NYLA Annual Meeting, Buffalo, NY October 26, 2005
Examine Quality Assurance/Quality Control Documentation
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
Software Engineer Report What should contains the report?!
William Yajima, PhD Senior Editor How to effectively organize and write for scientific books Association of Japanese Geographers 30 March 2013.
Module 5 Key differences from AACR2 Recording Data Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Multimedia and the Web Chapter Overview  This chapter covers:  What Web-based multimedia is  how it is used today  advantages and disadvantages.
Music Library AssociationFeb. 18, 2005BCC Open Meeting Development of AACR3 Kathy Glennan University of Southern California.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
Definition of a Vehicle Type for IWVTA + Extension of Approvals SGR Transmitted by OICA.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Introduction to Description and AACR II University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
ACRL 12 th National ConferenceMinneapolis, MN, April 8, AACR3: Redefining a Standard for the 21 st Century Matthew Beacom, Yale University John Attig,
FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records What is FRBR and why is it important? Christine Oliver McGill University Libraries
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: RDA: the state of play Ann Chapman Chair.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop Instructors Place/Date 1-1.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
Module 7: RDA Toolkit Features Library of Congress RDA Preconference for MLA/DLA May 4, 2011.
Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
AACR3/RDA. Why bother? Simplify –Encourage use as a content standard for metadata schema –Encourage applications of the FRBR model –Encourage international.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Session 2 Tools and Decisions. 2-2 Session 2 1. What tools are available to help you catalog IR’s? 2. What decisions need to be made?
1 Overview of the U.S. RDA Test by Tina Shrader Cataloging Section Head and CONSER Coordinator National Agricultural Library June 28, 2010.
1 Multimedia Development Team. 2 To discuss phases of MM production team members Multimedia I.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
2016 CTP Cataloging Workshop Session one
RDA: Cataloguing in the 21st century
RDA Terminology Changes -and- Record Display Comparisons
Describing Documents Ch3 in textbook Organizing Knowledge: An
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Presentation transcript:

Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University of Southern California

Caveat This summary covers a draft document, which is under consideration by the JSC constituencies right now CC:DA has substantial comments on the organization and contents of this draft JSC will meet in April to review all the comments and will direct the creation of a new draft – so specifics may change!

Organization of the Rules: Section A General Rules –General Rules for Description (A1) Apply to all types of resources –Resources Issued in Successive Parts (A2) Includes multipart items and serials –Integrating Resources (A3)

Introduction to Part I Scope Structure of the description Organization of the rules Applying general and supplementary rules Focus for the description Resources in an unpublished form Options and omissions

Outline of Chapter A1: General rules Preliminary rules Rules for each of the 8 ISBD areas –Title and statement of responsibility –Edition –Material (or type of publication) specific details –Publication, distribution, etc. –Technical description –Series –Notes –Standard number and terms of availability Multimedia resources “In” analytics and multilevel descriptions

Organization of the Rules: Section B Supplementary Rules Applicable to Specific Types of Content –Text –Music –Cartographic Resources –Graphics –Three-Dimensional Resources –Sound –Moving Images

Organization of the Rules: Section C Supplementary Rules Applicable to Specific Types of Media –Print and Graphic Media –Micrographic Media –Tactile Media –Three-Dimensional Media –Audio Media –Projected Graphic, Film, and Video Media –Digital Media

Focus for the Description Single-part resource Resource comprising two or more parts issued simultaneously Resource issued in successive parts Integrating resource Separately titled component part Multilevel description Assembled collection of resources

Chief Source of Information Part of general rules Standard list for all resources Some material-specific sources have been omitted –More bracketing of publication information?

Prescribed Sources of Information Part of general rules Standard list for all resources Some areas more restrictive than their AACR2 counterparts

General Material Designation Content –cartographic resource –choreography [notation] –data –graphic –mixed content –moving image –music [notation] –sound –software –text –three-dimensional Medium –audio –digital –film –graphic –micrographic –multimedia –print –projected –three-dimensional –tactile –video

Possible GMDs (Hypothetical) [text : microform] [music : digital] [multimedia : digital] [text : digital]

Unpublished Resources General rules apply equally to published and unpublished resources –Separate subrules when necessary AACR2 Ch. 4 rules either: –Recast as general rules, or –Removed if inconsistent with the general rules

Assembled Collections AACR2 rules pertaining to assembled collections (primarily from Ch. 4) –Chiefly incorporated into the General rules –Some moved to Section B, if content- specific

Published Resources Early printed resources –Where appropriate, AACR2 Ch. 2 “extra” rules now in General rules, or Supplementary rules for print and graphic media –Introduction to AACR3 will direct specialists to manuals with more detailed instructions No use of [S.l. : s.n.] or their equivalents for unknown place or publisher

Resources Issued in Successive Parts AACR2 Ch. 12 rules moved to: –General rules, if they apply to all resources Numbering area –Chapter A2, covering resources issued in successive parts Includes continuing and finite resources –Chapter A3, covering integrating resources

Technical Description Area Renamed from “physical description area” Split between General rules (Section A) and Rules for specific types of media (Section C) General rules expanded to provide instructions for all types of resources

Specific Material Designation Describe in terms of –Number of physical units –Number of components –Both Designed for clearer delineation of –Physical units (3 v.) –Presentation units (327 p.) –Logical aggregations of content (score, part)

AACR3: Part II (Proposal) Choice of primary and secondary access points –Choosing headings for the description –Choosing access points for works and expressions Layout should separate out decision making process –“Rule of 3” – optional? Editorial tasks –Rework Chapter 21 Address issues associated with the concept of authorship –Update terminology –Review concept of “collection”

AACR3: Part III (Proposal) Form of access points (AACR2 Ch ) –Incorporate authority control principles –Rules on related references (integrating AACR2 Ch. 26) Uniform titles –For collocation Construct a heading for a Work and its Expression Expandable Function like guidecards –For uniquely identifying works Clearly identify serials and other successively updated resources Link with variant forms of name, numeric identifiers, etc.

End of AACR2 JSC no longer considering rule revision proposals for AACR2 –Instead, proposals forwarded to General Editor for possible inclusion in AACR Amendments will be final update –Consists of 6 pages of actual rule revisions, plus the updated preliminary matter, etc.

Successor to LCRIs? Library of Congress will end LCRIs when AACR2 ceases Will move to a different type of documentation of cataloging decisions –Still will clarify national choices when the rules allow for options –May provide additional examples and procedural information

Additional Information JSC website: –Barbara Tillett’s PowerPoint presentation: aacr3pptjan2005.pdf CC:DA website: SDC website: Descriptive/Descriptive.html Upcoming LRTS article by Jennifer Bowen

Questions?