Updated Abstract T2:ERG Correlation with PCa Aggressiveness Conclusions T2:ERG Assay Clinical Performance The T2:ERG assay described has not been approved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular tests for the detection of prostate tumor derived nucleic acids in peripheral blood Matthias Jost, PhD 1, John Day, PhD 1, Ryan Slaughter 1,
Advertisements

John Harrison, Michelle Garassi, Sara Wierzbicki, William LeBar Hospital Consolidated Laboratories-Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, Evaluation of the.
John Harrison, Michelle Garassi, Sara Wierzbicki, William LeBar Hospital Consolidated Laboratories-Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, Abstract There.
Clinical Performance of the APTIMA HPV Assay for Detection of E6/E7 mRNA from High-Risk HPV Types in Liquid Based Cytology Specimens C. Hill1, J. Dockter1,
Nick Curry, MD, MPH Infectious Diseases Prevention Section
Magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer and could be used to reduce unnecessary biopsies: Initial results from a prospective trial.
Prostate cancer diagnosis today Mungai Ngugi. Introduction Prostate cancer remains a major problem in the world and particularly in black people who have.
Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay Clinical Data Review
Between-Method Differences in Prostate Specific Antigen Assays Affect Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction by Nomograms C. Stephan, K. Siemβen, H. Cammann,
Clinical Trial Designs for the Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Classifiers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
 2013 Genentech USA, Inc. All rights reserved. Disclosure/Disclaimer The Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer (MBiC) slide presentation is not an independent.
Prostate Cancer Genetics and Diagnosis
Prostate cancer: early detection, monitoring and prognosis: Essex Biomedical Sciences Institute (EBSI) Elena Klenova, University of Essex the search for.
High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Needle Biopsy Risk of Cancer on Repeat Biopsy Related to Number of Involved Cores and Morphologic Pattern.
EVIDENCE AND DEBATE SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER.
Objectives: Our first segment focused in the anatomy and functions of the prostate gland, to get a clear understanding of the male Genito-Urinary System.
Comparative quantitative evaluation of the XIAP, survivin & Ki67 transcript levels in urine & tissue samples of bladder cancer patients.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
The Need for Organ Site Specific Cancer Research John T Isaacs Chemical Therapeutic Program Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins.
RISK OF NON SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS DIAGNOSED BY AN EXTENDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY PROCEDURE AND TREATED BY RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
Dan Spratt, MD Department of Radiation Oncology Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: FDG-PET and Targeted Molecular Imaging.
EDRN Approaches to Biomarker Validation DMCC Statisticians Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Margaret Pepe Ziding Feng, Mark Thornquist, Yingye Zheng,
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School.
Some Current Issues in the Management of Prostate Cancer Suman Chatterjee MD.
The PCA3 Assay improves the prediction of initial biopsy outcome and may be indicative of prostate cancer aggressiveness de la Taille A, Irani J, Graefen.
S. Fuessel 1, S. Unversucht 1, R. Koch 2, G. Baretton 3, A. Lohse 1, S. Tomasetti 1, M. Haase 3, M. Toma 3, M. Froehner 1, A. Meye 1, M.P. Wirth 1 1 Department.
MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: Results of Initial Experience in a Radiation Oncology Department Department of Radiation Oncology.
Comparative quantitative evaluation of the XIAP, survivin & Ki67 transcript levels in urine & tissue samples of bladder cancer patients Woei-Yun Siow &
Pei Lin, MD Department of Hematopathology UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease Principles and Applications.
Overdetection of prostate cancer ESMO Brussel 2007 Chris H.Bangma Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer Symposium The Prostate Net September 17, 2011 Steven Lucas Wayne State University School of Medicine Karmanos.
Improved Detection of Bladder Cancer in Diagnosis and Surveillance Patients Using a Point-of-Care Proteomic Assay Barry Stein, M.D. G. Katz, M.D. NMP22.
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Fifth Annual African-American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 24, 2009 Christine.
Prevention with Finasteride Ian M. Thompson, MD October, 2009.
4. DPKK Workshop in Bonn/Königswinter Quantitative multi-gene expression analyses on paired prostate tissue samples from radical prostatectomies.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
INCREASED EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN KINASE CK2  SUBUNIT IN HUMAN GASTRIC CARCINOMA Kai-Yuan Lin 1 and Yih-Huei Uen 1,2,3 1 Department of Medical Research,
Use of Candidate Predictive Biomarkers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
The Use of Predictive Biomarkers in Clinical Trial Design Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
Poster Title ABSTRACT #59 Cell cycle progression genes differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Steven Stone 1 Jack Cuzick 2, Julia Reid.
Prostate Cancer Management: A Guide for Patients and Caregivers
FREEDOM FROM PROGRESSION FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING I 125 VERSUS Pd 103 FOR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY Jane Cho, Carol Morgenstern, Barbara Napolitano, Lee Richstone,
Blood and Tissue Based Molecular Signatures in Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression Tarek A. Bismar, MD Professor, University of Calgary Departments.
Understanding Prostate Myths
Yuna Jo. Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) continues to burden the Western world with its high rates of incidence and mortality despite the.
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
This program will include a discussion of investigational agents not approved by the FDA for use in the United States, and data that were presented in.
PSA, PCA-3 and peace of mind in suspected prostate cancer
prostate cancer protein and mRNA biomarkers
#4826 Cancer/testis antigen expression pattern is a potential biomarker for prostate cancer aggressiveness Luciane T. Kagohara1, Prakash Kulkarni1, Takumi.
Prostate Cancer Screening in the fit Chilean Elderly: a head to head comparison of total serum PSA versus age adjusted PSA versus primary circulating prostate.
Volume 180, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Genomics and Genetic Testing
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Figure 3 Semantic model of the active surveillance (AS) timeline
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Comprehensive Determination of Prostate Tumor ETS Gene Status in Clinical Samples Using the CLIA Decipher Assay  Alba Torres, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Scott.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
European Urology Oncology
Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Genomic Testing: When and Why
Prostate Cancer Update
Figure 1. Identification of three tumour molecular subtypes in CIT and TCGA cohorts. We used CIT multi-omics data ( Figure 1. Identification of.
Study overview. Study overview. A, Schematic illustrating clinical trial design and the nature and number of tissue specimens available for downstream.
Prostate cancer screening beyond PSA – STHLM3 and/or MRI
Presentation transcript:

Updated Abstract T2:ERG Correlation with PCa Aggressiveness Conclusions T2:ERG Assay Clinical Performance The T2:ERG assay described has not been approved or cleared by FDA. Purpose: There are several unmet needs in diagnosing and stratifying the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa). Although serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) has high sensitivity for predicting prostate biopsy outcome, it has poor specificity leading to >60% negative biopsies. Once diagnosed, better prognostic tools to stratify the PCa aggressiveness are needed to guide treatment options. In this multi-site study, we evaluated the performance of a quantitative TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) gene fusion urine test for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. We also correlated T2:ERG mRNA levels in urine with indicators of PCa aggressiveness. Experimental Design: Post-DRE first void urine specimens were prospectively collected from 556 consenting patients scheduled for prostate biopsy from the University of Michigan, San Diego VA Medical Center and Université Laval. T2:ERG mRNA copies in samples were quantified using transcription-mediated amplification assays and results normalized to PSA mRNA copies to generate a T2:ERG Score. T2:ERG mRNA levels were correlated with biopsy outcome, biopsy Gleason Score, % positive cores, % involvement and PSA density. Results: PCa was detected in 226/556 men (41%). The T2:ERG urine test performed equivalently at three different sites (sens/spec=~42%/~85%). T2:ERG copy levels were significantly correlated with biopsy Gleason Score, % positive cores, % involvement and indolent vs. significant PCa as defined by the Epstein criteria, but not with PSA density. Conclusions: In a prospective multi-center study, the T2:ERG urine test demonstrated high specificity for predicting biopsy outcome; sensitivity was similar to the prevalence of T2:ERG gene fusions in prostate tumors. Importantly, T2:ERG copy levels significantly correlated with prognostic indicators of PCa aggressiveness. The T2:ERG urine test may therefore have utility for discriminating between patients requiring aggressive treatment and those who could be managed conservatively through active surveillance. Figure 1) T2:ERG assay clinical performance to predict prostate biopsy. The quantitative T2:ERG assay performs similarly in three different geographic cohorts. At a T2:ERG Score cutoff of 65, the sensitivity for the combined cohort was 42% and specificity 84%. TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion Molecular Urine Test Correlates with Indicators of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Sheila M. J. Aubin 1, Sarah Williamsen 1, Petrea Hodge 1, Jessica Meinke 1, Javed Siddiqui 2, Laurie Sefton-Miller 2, Jonathan Silberstein 3, Kimberly Christensen 3, Amy Blase 1, Carol Kashefi 3, Yves Fradet 4, Harry Rittenhouse 1, Kyoko Sakamoto 3, Arul Chinnaiyan 2, Jack Groskopf 1 1 Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA, 2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3 San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA, 4 Université Laval, Quebec, Canada Figure 2) Correlation of T2:ERG copy levels with aggressive cancer, n = 92: T2:ERG copy levels were significantly correlated to the Epstein criteria for classifying aggressiveness of prostate cancer. The Epstein criteria defines insignificant cancer as biopsy Gleason score <6, % PCa involvement <50, % positive biopsy cores <33% and PSA density <0.15. San Diego A prototype quantitative T2:ERG urine test has been developed. Clinical performance vs. biopsy outcome: – High specificity (82-85%) for detection of cancer – Sensitivity (40-45%) similar to T2:ERG prevalence in prostate tumors – Equivalent performance from three clinical sites T2:ERG levels in urine correlate with criteria for indolent vs. significant cancer. Methods Assay Steps Pipet samples manually Add target capture reagent Incubate at 62°C, RT Wash magnetic particles with wash buffer using target capture system (TCS) Add oil, amplification and enzyme reagents Incubate at 42°C for TMA Add probe, selection and detection reagents for HPA Read using a luminometer Target Capture System Luminometer Assay Overview Messenger RNA targets are purified by magnetic separation using oligonucleotides and magnetic microparticles to isolate target nucleic acid for amplification and to eliminate potentially interfering substances. Gen-Probe's Transcription-Mediated Amplification (TMA) reliably targets RNA sequences and generates a billion fold copies of target nucleic acid in minutes. The Hybridization Protection Assay (HPA) uses a specific DNA probe that hybridizes with the nucleic acid target to emit a chemiluminescent signal for detection and differentiation. Subject Demographics Demographics n No. biopsy positive (%)4943%9243%8537% Previously negative biopsy (%)28%39%13% Median/ave age (range)65/67( )64/64( )64/64( ) No. Ethnicity (%): White7869%213100%19387% Black1110%146% Hispanic1110% Asian98%115% Native American/Alaskan22% Unknown22%4 Median/ave ng/ml PSA (range)4.2/5.3( )5.7/8.2( )5.1/8.3( ) Median/ave cc TRUS prostate vol (range)45.0/55.6( )38.0/42.0( )47.1/58.7( ) Université Laval San Diego VA Medical Center Universitiy of Michigan ** Cancer significance based on Epstein criteria (JAMA 271:368-74, Cancer 101:2001-5) *Wilcoxonranksum test- Gleason Score %PCainvolvement % pos cores PSA density Cancer Significance** nMedian T2:ERG Scorep value* > % >50% % >33% > "Indolent" "Significant" DRE First-catch urine sample ( mL) Transfer urine to transport tube Specimen Collection and Processing Male urine samples were collected after a digital rectal exam (DRE). The DRE was performed by applying firm pressure from the base to apex and from the lateral to the median line for each lobe (exactly 3 strokes per lobe). Urine was kept on ice and processed within 4 hours. Whole urine samples were processed by adding an equal volume of urine transport medium (UTM, buffered detergent). Combined % 30% 84% 90% nAUCCutoffSensitivitySpecificity Laval/SDVA %85% U of Michigan %82%