 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Advertisements

ODOT's Environmental Site Assessment Process
PHILOTECHNICS Decommissioning Radiological Laboratories in California CCRSO Conference October 5, 2007 Presented by: Jon Dillon, M.S.
1 MARLAP, MARSSIM and RETS- REMP: How is All of this Related…or NOT? Robert Litman, Ph.D. Eric L. Darois, MS, CHP Radiation Safety & Control Services,
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT IN AN ICS STRUCTURE. EU Mission Statement The Environmental Unit is established to provide technical and scientific expertise and capabilities.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Streamlined.
1 Aggregate Areas David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3,
Use of digital imagery in FPRA Effectiveness Evaluation Program: A Case Study Stéphane Dubé, NIFR Soil Scientist Fred Berekoff, PG District Stewardship.
Low-Level Waste Advisory Committee Meeting October 2, 2014 TENORM Study Update 3 rd Quarter Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
Potential Project Evaluation and Prioritization Indian and Howard’s Creeks Local Watershed Plan April 23, 2009.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Urban Planning Applications of GIS GIS can be applied to many types of problem. Among these are representatives of both raster and vector data base structures,
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
1 of 55 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 9.
Brandon Real Estate Board - June 19/20031 Your Logo Here ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
The Targeting Outcomes of Programs (TOP) framework.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Urban Planning and Development Applications of GIS Dr. Ahmad BinTouq GEO440: GIS for Urban & Regional.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Co-Located Chemical Sampling Planned Sampling Approach Laura Rainey Department of Toxic Substances Control October 12, 2010.
Review of Work Plan for Leaded Gasoline Tank Bottom Disposal Pit Assessment and Interim Stabilization Measures Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain.
RADIOACTIVITY IN VIRGIN SOILS AND SOILS FROM SOME AREAS WITH CLOSED URANIUM MINING FACILITIES IN BULGARIA Ivanka Yordanova, Lidia Misheva, Martin Banov,
Presented by Gary Lippner & Glenn Moeller 3 - Year Storm Water Monitoring Action Plan.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
ME551/GEO551 Introduction to Geology of Industrial Minerals Spring 2005 SAMPLING.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 3 - Identify Inputs (45 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Today’s Lecture Announcements Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
R Science storytelling: Soil lead, community, place, and the power of transdisciplinary collaboration Emily C. Keener, Beth Knox, Kevin Schultz, Sydney.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
© AEHS, Inc. 1 Environmental Support.
Writing an Outbreak Report Dr Noorhaida Ujang Epid Officer Muar Alor Setar,
1 Overview of Co-located Soil Chemical Sampling Approach Stephie Jennings, DOE October 12, 2010.
GE 3128: Geographical Research Methods Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Assistant Lecturer In Geography Department of Social Sciences State University of Zanzibar Friday22.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
Use of digital imagery in FPRA Effectiveness Evaluation Program: A Case Study Stéphane Dubé, NIFR Soil Scientist Fred Berekoff, PG District Stewardship.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
High Resolution Site Characterization Approach: Rapid Sample Collection with High Quality Analyses Targeting VOCs/SVOCs Presented by: Harry O’Neill, President.
Soil Sampling for Fertilizer and Lime Recommendations.
Laboratory Decommissioning : Essential Tools and Lessons Learned Jim Carscadden Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities.
Health Consultation Cincinnati Country Day School Lead Site Cincinnati, OH Ashley Roberts February 9,2009.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Apalachee Regional Planning Council BROWNFIELDS 101 9/28/2017.
Redevelopment Authority of the County of Washington O
TENORM Study Update Presented by Rich Janati on behalf of Dave Allard
Water Quality Monitoring -Sampling Design-
Environmental Issues Mapping Field Lab
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Review for Final.
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
Presentation transcript:

 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule

 Primary Objective: - Characterize the general nature and extent of radiological soil contamination in SSFL Area IV and Northern Buffer Zone;  New Task: - Collect and containerize soil samples for the DOE/DTSC chemical characterization effort

 Locations : SSFL Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone. May “chase” rad contamination from Area IV as appropriate.  Primary Data Screening Levels : Background radionuclide concentrations as defined by USEPA’s radiological background study  Rad Potential Contaminants of Concern : - Default Suite: 53 rad analytes - Site Specific Add-ons: Up to an additional 12 rad analytes based on site history

10 STUDY AREAS

Past Environmental Data Past characterization studies Confirmation sampling results EPA’s Technical Approach for Indentifying Potential Source Areas Identify PSAs Geophysical Survey Utilities Former excavation areas Areas identified by aerial photos and/or former worker interviews Historical Site Assessment Process knowledge and facility operation history Former worker interviews Aerial Photo Interpretation Past remediation and D&D Hypothetical Field Observations Deposition or erosion areas Topography Drainages Gamma radiation anomalies Gamma Survey Hypothetical Gamma Survey Results Hypothetical

 Round 1:  Targeted Sampling: Based on all the technical inputs, soil samples are “targeted” to test each potential source area.  Round 2:  Step-out Sampling: Based on Round 1 test results, “step-out” samples are needed to confirm extent of rad contamination only where screening levels where exceeded.  Random Sampling: Systematic grid approach described in MARSSIM to randomly test areas that were not targeted during Round 1. Needed for complete coverage and test for drift from adjacent rad sources.

Step 1: Evaluate a wide range of information to identify potential source areas Step 2: Use GIS Mapping to spatially locate each potential source area Step 3: Prioritize and select potential source areas Step 4: Layout targeted sample locations for selected source areas Step 5: 1 st Round: Collect and analyze targeted samples Step 6: Evaluate and Publish 1 st round data results Step 7: 2 nd Round: Collect and analyze step-out samples and random samples Step 8: Evaluate and publish all data results

 Master Soil Field Sampling Plan: Issued October 4 th  Issue Sampling Addenda by Subarea: Subarea 5C Addendum for Round 1 Testing issued October 6 th  Begin soil sampling in Area 5C: October 18, 2010  EPA will meet with Stakeholders concerning each Round 1 and Round 2 Addenda  Soil sampling work take approximately 14 to 18 months