© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Study Group 2 – Algebra 2 Welcome Back!
December 11, 2013 Algebra and 8 th Grade Kimberly Tarnowieckyi Last time together October 23. Think back over your lessons form October 24 to December.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Geometry.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Academically Productive Talk in Mathematics: A Means of Making Sense.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Geometry.
Study Group 2 – Geometry Welcome Back!
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Facilitator: David Brown
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Transforming Geometric Instruction Part 1 Understanding the Instructional Shifts in the Iowa Core Mathematics Standards Grades 6-8.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
Welcome to TNCore Training!
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Mathematics Teachers High School October 11, 2013.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Sunnyside School District
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies for Scaffolding Student Understanding: Academically Productive.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Mathematical Structures: Addition and Subtraction Word Problem Types Tennessee.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies for Scaffolding Student Understanding: Academically Productive.
Warm-Up What are the 8 Standards of Mathematical Practices? Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Reason abstractly and quantitatively Construct.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Module 6 Conceptual Lessons.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Beyond Slope and Points David Harris, Escondido USD/K12 Alliance Susan Gomez Zwiep, CSU Long Beach/K12 Alliance CMC Palm Springs Oct, 2013 Lesson Available:
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra 2 Illuminating Student Thinking:
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
College and Career Readiness Conference Middle School Geometry Summer 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Geometry, Quarter 2, Unit 2.3 Proving Theorems About Parallelograms Days: 11.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Warm-Up List all of the characteristics of a rectangle. List all of the characteristics of a parallelogram.
Unit 4.4 Deriving the Equation of a Circle and Proving that all Circles are Similar Instructional Days: 9.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Measuring Polygon Side Lengths
Welcome to Day Three.
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Geometry

Rationale Orchestrating discussions that build on students’ thinking places significant pedagogical demands on teachers and requires an extensive and interwoven network of knowledge. Teachers often feel that they should avoid telling students anything, but are not sure what they can do to encourage rigorous mathematical thinking and reasoning. (Stein, M.K., Engle, R., Smith, M., Hughes, E Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell) In this session, we will focus on monitoring, selecting, and sequencing student work so you can assess and advance student learning during the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the lesson.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Session Goals Participants will: learn what to monitor in student work when circulating during the Explore Phase of the lesson; learn about guidelines or “rules of thumb” for selecting and sequencing student work that target essential understandings of the lesson; and learn about focus questions that target the essential understandings.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Overview of Activities Participants will: discuss the content standards and identify the related essential understandings of a lesson; analyze samples of student work; select and sequence student work for the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the lesson; identify “rules of thumb” for selecting and sequencing student work; and write focus questions that target essential understandings.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Midsegments Task A midsegment is a segment that connects the midpoints of two sides of a triangle. 1.Draw a triangle on the coordinate plane and label the coordinates of the vertices. Draw and label the coordinates of the midpoints of the sides and then draw the three midsegments.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Midsegments Task (continued) 2.Analyze the relationship between the midsegments and the sides of the triangles. What conjectures can you make? Support your conjectures with mathematical evidence and compare your findings with the findings of partners. 3.Marco’s group made the five conjectures listed below. The three midsegments of a triangle always have the same length. A midsegment is parallel to the side of the triangle that it does not intersect. The three midsegments of a triangle form an acute triangle. The length of the midsegment is half the length of the side of the triangle that it does not intersect. The three midsegments create four congruent triangles. a.Determine which conjectures are incorrect. For these conjectures, describe a triangle that Marco may have drawn for which this statement holds true. Then describe a counterexample for which the statement is false. b.Determine which conjectures are true. Describe using words, diagrams, or symbols why the conjecture is a true statement.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH The Task: Discussing Solution Paths Solve the task in as many ways as you can. Discuss the solution paths with colleagues at your table. If only one solution path has been used, work together to create others. Consider possible misconceptions or errors that we might see from students.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Linking the Standards to Student Solution Paths The task has been selected with specific Standards for Mathematical Content and Practice in mind. Where do you see the potential to work on these standards in the written task or the solution paths?

The CCSS for Mathematical Content CCSS Conceptual Category – Geometry Common Core State Standards, 2010 Expressing Geometric Properties with Equations (G-GPE) Use coordinates to prove simple geometric theorems algebraically G-GPE.B.4 Use coordinates to prove simple geometric theorems algebraically. For example, prove or disprove that a figure defined by four given points in the coordinate plane is a rectangle; prove or disprove that the point (1, √3) lies on the circle centered at the origin and containing the point (0, 2). G-GPE.B.6 Find the point on a directed line segment between two given points that partitions the segment in a given ratio. G-GPE.B.7 Use coordinates to compute perimeters of polygons and areas of triangles and rectangles, e.g., using the distance formula. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice What must happen in order for students to have opportunities to make use of the Standards for Mathematical Practice? 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Common Core State Standards, 2010

Five Representations of Mathematical Ideas Pictures Written Symbols Manipulative Models Real-world Situations Oral & Written Language Adapted from Van De Walle, 2004, p. 30

Five Different Representations of a Function Language TableContext GraphEquation Van De Walle, 2004, p. 440

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH The Structures and Routines of a Lesson The Explore Phase/Private Work Time Generate Solutions The Explore Phase/Small Group Problem Solving 1.Generate and Compare Solutions 2.Assess and Advance Student Learning MONITOR: Teacher selects examples for the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase based on: Different solution paths to the same task Different representations Errors Misconceptions SHARE: Students explain their methods, repeat others’ ideas, put ideas into their own words, add on to ideas and ask for clarification. REPEAT THE CYCLE FOR EACH SOLUTION PATH COMPARE: Students discuss similarities and difference between solution paths. FOCUS: Discuss the meaning of mathematical ideas in each representation REFLECT by engaging students in a quick write or a discussion of the process. Set Up of the Task Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the Lesson 1. Share and Model 2. Compare Solutions 3. Focus the Discussion on Key Mathematical Ideas 4. Engage in a Quick Write

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Analyzing Student Work

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Analyzing Student Work Use the student work to further your understanding of the task. Consider: What do the students know? How did the students solve the task? How do their solution paths differ from each other?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Group A

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Group B

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Group C

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Group D

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Group E

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Student Work

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Monitoring Sheet StrategyWho and WhatOrder

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Student Work (Small Group Discussion) Examine the students’ solution paths. Determine which solution paths you want to share during the class discussion; keep track of your rationale for selecting the pieces of student work. Determine the order in which work will be shared; keep track of your rationale for choosing a particular order for the sharing the work. Record the group’s decision on the chart in your participant handouts.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Standards and Essential Understandings Using coordinates of a midsegment of a triangle justifies that the midsegment is parallel to the side that it does not intersect because the slope of the segment containing the midpoints is the same as the slope of the segment connecting the endpoints of the third side of the triangle. Using coordinates of a midsegment of a triangle and the distance formula or Pythagorean Theorem justifies that the midsegment is half the length of the segment that it does not intersect. Parallel lines have the same slope because they increase or decrease at the same rate per horizontal unit increment (they have the same rise per 1 run). Coordinate geometry can be used to support this understanding. Coordinate Geometry can be used to prove geometric theorems because it is possible to replace specific coordinates with variables to show that a relationship remains true regardless of the coordinates.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Student Work (Small Group Discussion) Each team should record their group’s sequence of solution paths on the chart. Identify the student’s solution path that would be shared and discussed first, second, third, and so on. Be prepared to justify your response.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Student Work (Group Discussion) Listen to each group’s rationale for selecting and sequencing student work. As you listen to the rationale, come up with a general “rule of thumb” that can be used to guide you when selecting and sequencing work for the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the lesson.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Reflecting On Essential Understandings Which of the sequences of student work were driven by the standards and essential understandings?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Reflecting on the Standards and the Essential Understandings Using coordinates of a midsegment of a triangle justifies that the midsegment is parallel to the side that it does not intersect because the slope of the segment containing the midpoints is the same as the slope of the segment connecting the endpoints of the third side of the triangle. Using coordinates of a midsegment of a triangle and the distance formula or Pythagorean Theorem justifies that the midsegment is half the length of the segment that it does not intersect. Parallel lines have the same slope because they increase or decrease at the same rate per horizontal unit increment (they have the same rise per 1 run). Coordinate geometry can be used to support this understanding. Coordinate Geometry can be used to prove geometric theorems because it is possible to replace specific coordinates with variables to show that a relationship remains true regardless of the coordinates.

Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Common Core State Standards, 2010

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH “Rules of Thumb” for Selecting and Sequencing Student Work What are the benefits of using the “rules of thumb” as a guide when selecting and sequencing student work for the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the lesson?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Pressing for Mathematical Understanding

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Pressing for Mathematical Understanding Let’s focus on one piece of student work for the Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the lesson. Assume that a student has explained the work and others in the class have repeated the ideas and asked questions. Now it is time to “FOCUS” the discussion on an important mathematical idea. What questions might you ask the class as a whole to focus the discussion? Write your questions on chart paper to be posted for a gallery walk.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Pressing for Mathematical Understanding EU: Coordinate Geometry can be used to prove geometric theorems because it is possible to replace specific coordinates with variables to show that a relationship remains true regardless of the coordinates.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Pressing for Mathematical Understanding Do a gallery walk. Review other groups’ questions. What are some similarities among the questions? What are some differences between the questions?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Reflecting on Our Learning What have you learned today that you will think about and make use of next school year? Take a few minutes and jot your thoughts down.