Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post- Essential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.
Advertisements

Ongoing clinical trials with JAK2 inhibitors in MF
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Prolonged Low Dose Therapy with a Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor, Panobinostat (LBH589), in Patients with Myelofibrosis1 Phase II Study of Low-Dose Pomalidomide.
Perspectives on defining ruxolitinib resistance/suboptimal response and therapeutic decision-making in this setting Claire Harrison, MD.
Wilson WH et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 686.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Benefits of JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy: Why Do They Work in Patients With and Without JAK2 Mutation Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University.
Phase 2 Trial of PRM-151, an Anti-Fibrotic Agent, in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Stage 1 Results1 Imetelstat, a Telomerase Inhibitor, Therapy for Myelofibrosis:
Interim Results of an International, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Relapsed or Refractory.
The Efficacy and Safety of Continued Hydroxyurea Therapy versus Switching to Ruxolitinib in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Initial Results of a Multicenter, Open Label.
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Complete Hematological Molecular and Histological Remissions without Cytoreductive Treatment Lasting After Pegylated-Interferon -2a (peg-IFN-2a) Therapy.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
Treon SP et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 251.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
1 Oliva EN et al Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 91.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Combination Ruxolitinib + Sonidegib in Myelofibrosis
PERSIST-1: Pacritinib Improved Spleen Volume Reductions in Myelofibrosis vs Best Available Therapy CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
How Many Inhibitors for JAK2?
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Pacritinib, a Dual JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor: An Integrated Efficacy and Safety Analysis Of Phase II Trial Data In Patients With Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis.
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects
Presentation transcript:

Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post- Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis 1 SAR302503: Interim Safety, Efficacy and Long-Term Impact on JAK2 V617F Allele Burden in a Phase I/II Study in Patients with Myelofibrosis 2 1 Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3838.

Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282.

Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282. Background The JAK2V617F mutation is associated with myelofibrosis (MF). Pacritinib is a potent inhibitor of both wild-type JAK2 and the JAK2V617F mutant form. Previous Phase I studies showed that pacritinib was well tolerated with meaningful clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with MF (ASH 2009;Abstract 3905; ASH 2010;Abstract 3082). Objective: –Assess the spleen response rate (SRR), duration of spleen response, safety, tolerability and effect on MF-related symptoms of pacritinib in patients with MF.

Trial Design Pacritinib 400 mg/d, orally (n = 34) >Primary MF (PMF); postpolycythemia vera MF (PPV-MF); postessential thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF) >Spleen volume (SV) was measured by MRI every 12 wks (volume targets 25%/35% reduction) >Physical examination (PE) of SV was assessed every 4 wks >SRR defined as ≥35% reduction in MRI-measured SV between baseline and week 24 Eligibility (n = 34) PMF or PPV-MF or PET-MF Palpable spleen ≥5 cm Prior therapy failure/New patient No minimum requirement for platelet, leukocyte or neutrophil counts ECOG performance status: 0-2 Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282.

Efficacy of Pacritinib in Reduction of Splenomegaly as a Function of Baseline Platelet Count Spleen response Patients with baseline platelet count ≤150,000 (n = 19) All patients (n = 34) Patients with at least 50% reduction in SV by PE 42%41% Patients with at least 35% reduction in SV by MRI 26%24% Patients with at least 25% reduction in SV by MRI 37%35% Reduction of splenomegaly was observed with similar frequency in patients with normal or low platelet counts. Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282.

Effect of Pacritinib on Reduction of Splenomegaly by MRI Analysis With permission from Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282. > Thirty-five percent of patients had ≥25% reduction, 24% had ≥35% reduction of splenomegaly. > Eight patients did not have postbaseline response by MRI (hence, not included). > Median response duration is ongoing and has not been reached; median ≥257 days. > Median time to response was 84.5 days. Best Response per Subject % Change in Spleen Volume by MRI Baseline spleen volume (mm 3 ) ≥4001; ; ≤2000

Adverse Events Possible drug-related events leading to discontinuation (n): Increased bilirubin (1), thrombocytopenia (1), allergic reaction (1), nausea (1), pruritus (1). Adverse event (n = 34)Grade 1/2Grade 3/4 Diarrhea64%9% Nausea41%0% Vomiting24%0% Fatigue15%6% Increased ALT/AST12%9% Abdominal pain12%0% Anorexia12%0% Flatulence18%0% Ageusia/dysgeusia12%0% Alopecia12%0% Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282.

Safety Summary Pacritinib was generally well tolerated, and toxicities were readily manageable: –The majority of AEs were Grade 1 or 2. –Gastrointestinal toxicities (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) were the most prominent but were easily managed. No problematic myelosuppression was observed. Pacritinib was equally tolerated by patients with normal platelet counts and those with thrombocytopenia and anemia.

Komrokji RS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 282. Author Conclusions Pacritinib is an active drug for the treatment of PMF, PPV- MF and PET-MF splenomegaly and MF-related symptoms regardless of baseline thrombocytopenia. Once-daily dosing is well tolerated, with manageable gastrointestinal toxicity as the main side effect. Minimal effect of pacritinib on existing cytopenias in patients with MF provides an important therapeutic niche.

Investigator Commentary: Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis Pacritinib inhibits JAK2 but not JAK1. Although it has no anti- inflammatory effect, it decreases spleen size and improves quality of life in a good number of patients. It may not be as effective as JAK1 and 2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, but its effect is seen primarily in patients with low blood cell counts. Because ruxolitinib potentially decreases platelets and red blood cell counts, the effect of pacritinib in these patients was fostered. Pacritinib does not induce myelosuppression and as such was equally effective in patients with low platelet counts and in those with normal counts. Although it causes adverse events including nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, pacritinib may offer a solution in the treatment of MF in patients with low platelet counts. Interview with Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD, January 25, 2012

SAR302503: Interim Safety, Efficacy and Long-Term Impact on JAK2 V617F Allele Burden in a Phase I/II Study in Patients with Myelofibrosis Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3838.

Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract Background Dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway is associated with myelofibrosis (MF). SAR is an oral selective small-molecule inhibitor of JAK2 kinase. A previous Phase I trial showed that SAR was well tolerated and produced significant reductions in JAK2V617F allele burden and durable clinical benefits in patients with MF (JCO 2011;29:789). Objective: –Report updated safety and efficacy results of SAR in patients with MF with long-term follow-up. –Analyze JAK2V617F allele burden (JAB) in this patient cohort

Trial Design Dose-escalation cohort (n = 28) mg/d, orally q4wks x 6 cycles Eligibility (n = 59) PMF or PPV-MF or PET-MF Intermediate- to high- risk MF Platelet count ≥50 x 10 9 /L Dose-confirmation cohort (n = 31) 680 mg/d, orally q4wks x 6 cycles * After 24 weeks, patients could enter extension study if treatment was beneficial and well tolerated. Dosage used was the same as that which the patient last received. SAR Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract Extension study* (n = 43)

Spleen Volume (SV) Reduction (Abstract Only) Treatment time (n) Median (cm) Range (cm) Patients with ≥50% SV reduction Baseline (n = 58) Not applicable 6 months (n = 57) % 12 months (n = 42) % 18 months (n = 36) % 24 months (n = 31) % 30 months (n = 18) % 36 months (n = 9) % Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3838.

JAK2V617F Allele Burden (JAB) (Abstract Only) Treatment cycleJAB Rangep-value Baseline (n = 51)20% 3-100% 0.03 versus 24 cycles (n = 21)9%0-100% Treatment cycleJAB >20% at baseline Rangep-value Baseline (n = 23)60%23-100% 0.03 versus 24 cycles (n = 12)21%6-100% Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3838.

Author Conclusions With SAR treatment, a clinically significant and durable decrease in spleen size was observed in patients with MF. The reduction in circulating JAK2V617F allele burden was durable. No unique safety issues have been identified with continued dosing of SAR (data not shown). A SAR dose of 400 to 500 mg/day represents the optimal balance between safety and efficacy in patients with MF. These 2 doses constitute the experimental arms of an upcoming Phase III study (NCT ). Pardanani A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3838.

Investigator Commentary: SAR — Efficacy and Long-Term Effects in Patients with Myelofibrosis Currently, about 10 different JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical studies. They all act by preventing ATP from binding to the JAK2 enzyme and so are not specific for the JAK2 mutation. Because all patients with MF have overactive JAK2, these agents are effective in any patient with MF. The difference among these inhibitors is the ability to affect other members of the JAK family. For instance, ruxolitinib and the CYT-387 compound inhibit both JAK1 and 2. This capability may be particularly advantageous over others because inflammatory cytokines, which play important roles in the pathophysiology of MF, are inhibited by the dual targeting of JAK1 and JAK2. Interview with Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD, January 25, 2012