Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Advertisements

EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Development and Implementation Presentation to the Alberta Environmental Monitoring Panel,
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Best practice partnership models
USDA Forest Service Research and Development Tribal Engagement Roadmap Consultation - January 10 to May 11, 2014 [DATE of PRSTN]
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Measuring for Success NCHER Legislative Conference Sophie Walker September 26, 2013.
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT a quick overview Elizabeth Trybula, Watershed Information Specialist Indiana Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts.
SEM Planning Model.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
USGS Realignment, Science Planning, and FY 2012 Budget Matthew C. Larsen Associate Director Climate and Land Use Change U.S. Department of the Interior.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Wayne National Forest and Scorecard Compliance Peter B Williams, PhD  Ecosystem Mgmt Coord. USDA-FS, Washington Office  Interim Forest Supervisor, June-Sept.
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Natural Heritage & Urban Forest Strategy (NH&UFS) DRAFT STRATEGY Open House Presentation June 20 th, 2013.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Whistler 2020 Monitoring Program CSIN February16, 2006.
Sierra Water Workgroup Summit 2013 Kings Beach, CA Don Yasuda Regional Analyst USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Meeting Stockholm, 8-10 September 2015 SAI capacity from a Post-2015 development agenda perspective The PASAI cooperative.
Alberta’s Cumulative Effects Management System Air & Waste Management Association Beverly Yee 05 November 2010.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Maricopa Priorities Update Spring Agenda Overview Strategic Directions Implementation process Categorized Recommendations Preliminary Timeline.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change Neil Leary, AIACC Science Director AIACC Regional Workshop for Latin America.
Theme 2 Developing MPA networks Particular thanks to: Theme 2 Concurrent Session Rapporteurs, Dan Laffoley, Gilly Llewellyn G E E L O N G A U S T R A L.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Linking SEA and City Development Strategy (CDS) in Vietnam Maria Rosário Partidário, Michael Paddon, Markus Eggenberger, Minh Chau, and Nguyen Van Duyen.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Managing the National Communications Process UNFCCC Workshop on Exchange of Experiences and Good Practices among NAI Countries in Preparing NCs September.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Business Transformation Project December 18, 2015 Rachel Mercer, Project Director.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Agriculture in Australia Agriculture in Australia utilises a large proportion of the country’s natural resources. Agricultural activity is undertaken on.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
February 21-22, 2018.
World Bank project example
Environment and Development Policy Section
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
National one Health Strategy( )
Presentation transcript:

Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011

Discussion Outline Background Current Situation Developing a Strategy for IM&A Improvements Next Steps and Collaborative Opportunities 2

IM&A Project Purpose Identify and recommend improvements to achieve an agency-wide IM&A system that is integrated, aligned, effective and efficient in supporting priority business requirements of the Forest Service and partners. 3

IM&A System Improvement: Why Now?   Environmental threats and evolving “business requirements”   Increasing need for collaboration and transparency.   Available resources are not likely to increase.   There is a need to be more proactive in assessing and managing risks and impacts. 4

IM&A Problem Statement The Forest Service does not have a comprehensive system for managing IM&A activities. –We lack consistent, accurate, timely, transparent and accessible resource information to answer core management questions. –We do not have effective policy, direction, processes and governance for IM&A activities and investments. –Collaboration with partners is not as consistent and inclusive as it needs to be. –Significant data gaps and redundancies exist within the system. 5

IM&A Vision Land managers have the resource information they need to manage all lands in a collaborative way. To support this, an IM&A system needs to: –Work with partners and stakeholders toward shared objectives. –Integrate Forest Service programs in this common effort. –Continually implement program and process improvements. 6

Desired Condition of the IM&A System IM&A information, technology and processes: –Use the best available science (scientific credibility). –Are accessible and accurate. –Support an all-lands approach. –Are collaborative, transparent, timely, and useful. –Are based on national standards and processes developed with partners. –Are adaptive and responsive to changing conditions and business requirements. 7

Broad Scope of the IM&A System Address priority business requirements such as: –Ecosystem / watershed health and sustainability –National & broad scale FS and partner assessments –Adapting to a changing climate – Climate Change Scorecard –New Planning Rule (broad-scale monitoring) –Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program –Montreal Process reporting 8

Approach Define priority Forest Service and partner business requirements. Identify the associated core management questions. Improve the IM&A system to focus on delivering the information that answers those core management questions. 9

“Core” Information Concept 10

Questions, clarifications, comments related to IM&A background? 11

IM&A System Improvement Strategy: The Journey Where we’ve been and where we are:  Sensing questionnaire  Leadership interviews  IM&A Roundtable: Internal and external partners/stakeholders  Steering Committee and Core Team  Leadership and partner engagement  Case Studies  IM&A Strategy 12

Draft IM&A Strategy Goal 1 INCLUDE all lands and all partners. 1)Address IM&A issues with an all-lands approach. 2)Address partner business needs and stakeholder interests. 13

Draft IM&A Strategy Goal 2 Provide CREDIBLE information. 1)Focus on the right information – identify and apply the best available knowledge and tools. 2)Ensure quality and relevance of the science behind information. 3)Ensure quality and consistency of information. 4)Ensure accessibility and transparency of information through timely delivery of information, technology, protocols and tools for use by managers, policymakers, partners and the public. 14

Draft IM&A Strategy Goal 3 Effectively RESPOND and adapt. 1)Ensure the IM&A system is dynamic and supports management that is responsive to social, economic and ecological change. 2)Ensure the IM&A system is responsive to changing institutional capacity. 15

IM&A Case Studies Purpose: To help identify system-wide IM&A improvements, implementation actions and “early successes.” Initial Focus Areas:  Critical loads of air pollution  Aquatics inventory and monitoring  Vegetation status and trends  Carbon assessment and management  Land management plan (LMP) broad-scale monitoring 16

IM&A Strategy and Case Study Relationships Strategic Improvements LMP Monitoring Carbon Vegetation Aquatic Air Implementation Actions 17

Carbon Case Study The following tools and data sources are being enhanced and expanded: –NFS Bioenergy Carbon Calculator –Product Carbon Tracker tool –Forest Carbon Management Framework –Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity –National Land Cover Database (NLCD) tree canopy cover 18

Aquatics Case Study Proposing a national stream survey network to assess status and trends of streams, with temperature and macro-invertebrates as initial indicators. Example of successful monitoring program in Pacific and Interior Northwest Currently, no national standards for collection and analysis Leveraging partner programs (USGS and USEPA) 19

Questions, comments on strategy and case studies? 20 Photograph courtesy of NRCS

Working with Partners and Stakeholders Photos courtesy of NRCS and the Alliance of Aquatic Resource Monitoring, Dickinson College 21

Next Steps Strategy development, review and refinement Case Study reports Implementation Actions –Immediate –Longer-term Measuring progress 22

Issues and Challenges What?!! There’s no new funding for this? Collaboration – not easy, not fast Cultural transformation –Think beyond traditional boundaries Team approach (broader than “corporate”) Team approach (broader than “corporate”) Integrate …in all directions (up, down, sideways) Integrate …in all directions (up, down, sideways) Transparent, accessible information Transparent, accessible information –Be adaptive, nimble, and better at change management Be prepared for changes in work (duties, methods, etc.) Be prepared for changes in work (duties, methods, etc.) Governance – rules for IM&A decision making 23

Governance of IM&A Inherent in all elements of IM&A System Collaboration with partners Rules and procedures for decision making –Who, how and when –Clear and understood by those affected Strategic, tactical & operational decisions at all levels of the organization(s) (“Wedding Cake”) –Appropriately transparent, aligned & integrated Transparency of decisions made and related performance accountability 24

Discussion 25

Steps to Success We are building on prior efforts, current successful programs, and lessons learned. We are being strategic and concentrating on what is most important. The system will be adaptive, through phased implementation, innovation, and continuous learning. All FS deputy areas are involved and committed. We are engaging our partners. 26

Thank you for participating! Please complete the post-meeting survey NFF will provide a web link to the questionnaire For additional information, please contact: Tracy Hancock, USDA Forest Service