Special Assistance Alternatives Provision 1 and Provision 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Verification of Eligibility for School Meals.
Advertisements

Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
Afterschool Snack Program Afterschool Snack Program Department of Agriculture Division of Food and Nutrition
Food and Nutrition Services
Meal Counting and Site Operations Virginia Department of Health Special Nutrition Programs 2014.
Meal Benefit Eligibility and Verification for Certifying Students’ Eligibility for Meal Benefits Benefit Issuance Verification.
Kentucky Administrative Review Training. Reinvention Goals The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 calls for a more effective and efficient review process:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Fall 2014 NA Training©MDE – Rodney Miller 2 Session Topics.
Counting, Claiming and CEP – The 3 C’s
CNP DIRECTORS’ WORKSHOP Administrative Review Be Prepared! March 14, 2014.
Meal Counts, Overt ID, Claims Review Process Meal Count Collection Procedures.
Meal Counting and Claiming
Joyce Soroka Supervisor of Field Services. P.L , Section 126 Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of.
Eileen Hileman Administrative Assistant for School Nutrition Programs MS, RD.... Pam Heimbach.
Step by Step Instruction: How to Submit a Claim using CNP Web Released February 2014 “How to Submit a Claim using CNP Web” is intended for the School Food.
Community Eligibility March 5, 2015 Presenters Patricia Winders, Child Nutrition Donna Ratliff, Child Nutrition Adapted from USDA, FRAC.
COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction School Nutrition Team.
Preliminary Procedures for Community Eligibility Provision and National School Lunch State Categorical Funding.
Community Eligibility Provision February 20, 25, 26, and March 10, 2014.
A Changing Metric: Low Income vs. Economically Disadvantaged Revised July 6, 2015.
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
Direct Certification Nonpublic Schools School Year Office of School Support Services School Nutrition Programs June
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I Los Angeles I Orlando The E-Rate Program Calculating Discounts Fall 2011 Applicant.
VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR SCHOOL MEALS. IT’S ALMOST VERIFICATION TIME IN TENNESSEE!!
Introduction to the Community Eligibility Option (CEO) CEP Training School Year.
Monitoring Requirements for Sponsors of Multiple Sites Pages
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) NYS Child Nutrition Program Administration Update.
Community Eligibility Provision. Overview CEP is a 4-year reimbursement option for eligible high-poverty districts and/or schools Minimum of 40% Identified.
Implementing Community Eligibility Incorporating CEP at Your School Alie Wolf, Data Analyst, OPI-School Nutrition Programs BJ Granbery, Division Administrator,
Child & Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Time allotted for this training is 30 minutes.
Eligibility Traditional and Mixed Districts- Stay in Training Room with Katie Full CEP- Conference Room with Cindy McIntosh RCCI’s- Valerie’s Office with.
Meal Application Information Provided by the LAUSD Food Services Division Updated 09/01/2015.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
September 3,  The intent of CEP is ◦ To improve access to free school meals in eligible high poverty SFAs and schools ◦ To eliminate administrative.
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). History Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 Provides an alternative to household applications for free and reduced.
Community Eligibility Provision Information WebEx for
Community Eligibility Option (CEO) and Title I Suzette Cook Title I Coordinator Office of Title I West Virginia Department of Education June 2012.
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Eligibility Manual Highlight of Changes Revised January 2008.
Community Eligibility Provision, Title I and Accountability Bridgette Hires and Elena Sanders, 10/2/2014.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Presented by the MDE Office of Child Nutrition (OCN) & Office of Federal Programs (OFP)
Community Eligibility Provision Catherine Digilio Grimes, MS, RDN, LDN, SNS Director, Office of School Nutrition Programs VA Department of Education.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Office of Child Nutrition.
NH Department of Education Division of Program Support Bureau of Nutrition Programs and Services Verification Module for National School Lunch Program.
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). What do you need to know? If you choose to participate in CEP: You are required to STAY on the program for the.
Part 2 Meal Counting and Claiming Provided by the LAUSD Food Services Division
An Overview of Time, Effort, and Resources Needs in the implementation of Public Law The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004.
Household Applications and Verification School Year Revised July 2014.
RECORDKEEPING & MONITORING. Required Daily Records ◦ Daily attendance rosters or sign-in sheets ◦ Number of at-risk afterschool snacks and/or meals prepared.
Board Meeting June 9, What is Community Eligibility Provision? CEP.
Community Eligibility PROVISION (CEP) Child Nutrition Unit AAEA Summer Conference August 5, 2015.
Presented by : Lisa Brown-Taylor, M.S., R.D., Consultant Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Programs August 2011.
Successful Implementation of the Community Eligibility Provision 2014
D.I.S.H. Director Information Share Hub August 2014 Topic: SY Household Applications Katie Embree-Cleveland.
Meal Benefit Eligibility and Verification for Certifying Students’ Eligibility for Meal Benefits Benefit Issuance Verification Verification Reporting.
Community Eligibility Option (CEO) and Title I Update Suzette Cook Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs West Virginia Department of Education.
Community Eligibility Provision Frequently Asked Questions and Answers State Roundtable 2014 Wednesday July 16th SNA Annual National Conference.
Navigating the Verification Process Office for Child Nutrition.
MASBO Institute of School Business Management Student Nutrition A Presentation by Sherri Knutson, Rochester Public Schools Barb Mechura, Hopkins Public.
Timeline to a Successful Implementation of the Community Eligibility Provision.
Community Eligibility Provision
Mike Bishop, School Nutrition Consultant, Office of School Nutrition
Community Eligibility Provision
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
Mike Bishop, School Nutrition Consultant, Office of School Nutrition
2017 Student October At-Risk/Free Lunch Count Office of School Finance Field Analyst Support Team (FAST) September 2017.
Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
Claims Upload and Security
Student Success and Wellness Bureau
Presentation transcript:

Special Assistance Alternatives Provision 1 and Provision 2

There are “PROVISIONS” (alternate eligibility and meal count systems) THAT WILL HELP TO: ●Reduce administrative burden at the local level ●Reduce paperwork ●Reduce stigma attached to free and reduced-price eligible ●Increase participation

All Provisions Require: Nutrition Services Division Approval by Site!

Provision 1 Overview: Schools with at least 80% of children enrolled for free or reduced-price meals may collect and certify eligibility applications for free students for a two year period.

Provision 1 ●At least 80 percent of children enrolled as of March of the previous school year must be eligible for free or reduced- price meals ●Collect and certify eligibility applications for free students for a two year period.

Provision 1 (continued) ●All other households (reduced-price and paid) must be provided a meal application and be allowed to apply for meal benefits each year. ●Meals do not have to be served free to all students. ●Meal counts must be taken and recorded daily by eligibility category.

Provision 1 (continued) ●Edit checks comparing meal counts by category to attendance adjusted eligibles are required both years. ●Verification must be conducted on a sample of all applications (in year 2 - verification will include a sample of new applications only). ●Reimbursable meal pattern requirements remain the same. ●Site monitoring is required each year.

Provisions 2 Overview: ●Serve meals to participating children at no charge. ●Reduce eligibility application burden. ●Simplify meal counting and claiming procedures.

Feasibility – Is Provision 2 a Good Fit? ●Provision 2 can be a great alternative to an entire school district or a single school within a district. ●Factors to consider in the evaluation process:  Current participation  Potential for increased participation  Cost effectiveness of the operation  Percent distribution of free and reduced-price eligible students  Because serve all students non-pricing, quicker lines, no stigma free and reduced-price, philosophy of administration

Feasibility – Is Provision 2 a Good Fit? (continued) Financial Feasibility: ●Since Provision 2 is non-pricing, how much revenue will be gained from increased participation? ●How much revenue will be lost from loss of paid and reduced-price payments? ●What will be the cost if paid or reduced-price participation increases? ●Can labor be decreased or diverted to other duties? Labor will be decreased to process eligibility applications and conduct verification, count meals by eligibility category, collect money for paid and reduced-price meals, etc.,

Feasibility – Is Provision 2 a Good Fit? (continued) See spreadsheets to determine financial feasibility ●Go to search National School Lunch Program click on Downloadable Documents scroll down to Provisions ●Nevada financial worksheet

Feasibility – Is Provision 2 a Good Fit? (continued) Determine in Which Specific Situations Provision 2 Might be Feasible: ●District-wide for breakfast and lunch ●District-wide for breakfast only ●In selected schools for breakfast and lunch ●In selected schools for breakfast only

Provision 2 ●Four year cycle (base year plus three years) ●Most effective with high percentage of free and reduced-price eligible students ●Applications collected and eligibility determinations made (including direct certification) during the “base year” or first year of the 4 year cycle

Provision 2 (continued) ●All meals must be served at no charge for entire 4 year cycle unless “delayed implementation” option chosen.

Provision 2 (continued) Delayed implementation ▪Must be approved by Nutrition Services Division. ▪Schools may charge students eligible for reduced-price and paid meals in the first claiming period of the base year. ▪Meal counts for ten days or less in one month may be combined with the following month for the claim for reimbursement.

Provision 2 (continued) Delayed Implementation ▪Thirty day carryover of eligibility from the prior year may be reduced (i.e. to 10 days) so students will pay for meals sooner and submit eligibility applications. ▪Following years first claiming period, add meal counts for the base year (not including the first claiming period) to create annualized percentage of free, reduced-price, and paid meals

Provision 2 (continued) During the base year: ●Meal counts must be taken and recorded daily by eligibility category to calculate reimbursement claims. ●Edit checks are required - compare attendance adjusted eligibles to daily meal counts by category.

Provision 2 (continued) ●Percentages of free, reduced-price, and paid meals served during the base year are calculated to claim meals in non-base years (may be monthly or annual percentage, may be by site or group).

Provision 2 (continued) In non-base years (2nd through 4th): ●Take total daily point of service meal counts. ●Calculate meals for claiming - multiply total meal count by the free/reduced-price/paid percentages computed during the same month of the base year (or use annual percentages). ●Do not collect eligibility applications for new students.

Sponsor Provision 2 Claim Worksheet-Single Site BASE YEARCURRENT YEAR Mo. Base Year Meals Claimed Actual meal counts claimed by eligibility category Site Claim Percentages Site Total Meal Count Site Meals to Claim by category Nov. Free275Free % Free Reduced50Reduced %13.942Reduced Paid35Paid %9.729Paid Total360Total %100300Total Agency: FGH District Current Month/Year: 11/10 Base Year: Meal: Bkfst[ ] Lunch[X ] Apply base year claim percentages for each site to subsequent years’ total meal counts for corresponding month. If the total percentages of free, reduced-price, and paid meals do not equal 100 percent for Provision 2 schools, the paid category must be adjusted to make 100 percent.

Provision 2 and 3 Calculate percentages to two places beyond decimal, then round to one place beyond decimal.

Guided Practice: Determine Meal Counts for Provision 2

Provision 2 (continued) In non-base years (2nd through 4th): ●Conduct daily meal count edit checks using total enrollment (do not use free, reduced-price and paid eligible) ●Multiply total enrollment times attendance factor (94.4% for ) for attendance adjusted eligible. ●Compare attendance adjusted eligible to total daily meal counts.

PROVISION 2 MEAL COUNT EDIT CHECK Agency:_______Jefferson Elementary School_________________ Current Month/Year _February 2011 Breakfast [ ] Lunch [ X ] Multiply the total enrollment by the current attendance factor to arrive at the attendance adjusted enrollment. Next, compare this to the total number of meals claimed daily. Provide an explanation for each daily meal count that exceeds the attendance-adjusted enrollment. Date Total Enrollment X Attendance Factor = Attendance- Adjusted Enrollment Total Daily Meal Count Explanation/ Comment 2/1/ % /4/ /5/11238Pizza

Guided Practice: Determine Meal Count Edit Check for Provision 2

Provision 2 ELIGIBILITY Worksheet- Single Site ●Meal counts by category cannot exceed the number of free, reduced-price and paid eligible times the number of operating days. ●In non-base years, if there is more than a 5% increase in enrollment from the base year, you should calculate revised number of eligible free, reduced-price and paid students so claims for reimbursement will pass the edit check. ●Changing enrollment by eligibility does not affect meal counts.

PROVISION 2 ELIGIBILITY WORKSHEET SINGLE SITE Agency:Whittle School District Site: Jefferson Current Month/Year: December 2010 Base Month/Year: December 2004 Meal: Breakfast [ ] Lunch [ X ] To calculate the reported eligibility for the Claim for Reimbursement, apply base month/year eligibility percentages to subsequent month/year total enrollment. Total enrollment may be the last operating day of the month or the highest enrollment during the month. BASE YEAR CURRENT YEAR 1. Month 2. Base Year Eligible Actual base year eligibility by category 3. Eligibility Percentages number of base year free, reduced-price, and paid eligible ÷ by total eligible (from column 2) 4. Current Month Enrollment 5. Current Month Eligibility by Category (Column 3% X Column 4) DEC Free 300 Free % Free Reduced 75 Reduced % Reduced Paid 125 Paid % Paid Total 500 Total % Total

Guided Practice: Determine Eligibility for Provision 2

General Information and Requirements

Provision 2 ●Verification ▪Performed during base year ▪Not required during non-base year ●Eligibility applications and direct certification information may not be collected in non-base years or provision status will be lost (unless collecting socioeconomic data for an extension). ●Site monitoring requirements remain in effect to determine correct meal counting.

Provisions 2 ●Can be used for both Breakfast AND Lunch ●Can be used for Breakfast OR Lunch - however: A provision used for one meal only requires that eligibility applications must be collected and meal counts taken by eligibility for the non-Provision meal ●Reimbursable meal requirements remain the same.

Provisions 2 ●May implement District-wide Provision claiming for all schools or for a subgroup of schools within the District ●Total meal counts for all sites ● Develop meal count percentages (Refer to NSD Information Sheet # 17 for further details)

Both Provisions Recordkeeping is extremely important! ●All base year documents should be kept on file with current year documents. ●Eligibility applications should retrievable by site.

Both Provisions Recordkeeping (continued) ●Rosters must be kept by month by site. (Very Important) ●Base year eligibility documents must be retained until a new base year is developed and for a minimum of 3 additional years beyond the provision cycle.

Provisions 2 Recordkeeping (continued) ●Make sure to maintain base year socioeconomic data used to request extensions throughout the Provision cycle(s) (maintain same base year even with multiple extensions).

Provisions 2 Request for free and reduced-price data ● Provide base year eligibility by category or percentages (i.e. for Star Testing, No Child Left Behind, e-rate, Outdoor Education)

Provision 2 Changes in School Population May Require New Base Year ●Adding new school with changing attendance area ●Splitting one school to two schools with boundary changes ●See USDA Provision 2 Guidance Manual Questions and Answers, page 36

EXTENSIONS: When Cycle Ends : OPTIONS - ●Revert back to standard meal claiming ●Apply for an extension ●Apply for a new base year  Regular  Streamlined (New applications required in both cases)

When Cycle Ends: Establishing a new base year ●Cannot carry-over percentages from the base year for the first claiming period (MB ). ●All students are paid until an approved eligibility application on file. ●Submit request for provision approval prior to new base year.

Applying for an Extension Establish that school’s income level, adjusted for inflation, has remained stable, declined, or had negligible improvement ●Negligible improvement – 5% or less ●Use pre-approved site-specific equivalent socioeconomic data from base year and last year of current cycle (see extension request). ●See USDA Provision 2 Guidance for example to calculate percentage change.

Extension (continued) Pre-approved socioeconomic data ●Food Stamp direct certification ●CalWORKs direct certification ●FDPIR ●Unemployment ●City/county zoning or economic planning

Extension (continued) Another Extension Option ●Determine statistically valid sample of student eligibility by site prior to end of school year last provision year in the cycle. Include  Direct certification  Food Stamps/CalWORKs  Migrant, homeless, runaway  Eligibility applications ●Compare percentage of free and reduced-price eligible to same month in base year

Extension (continued) ●Extensions granted for 4-year cycle for Provision 2. ●Continue using base year percentages (Provision 2). ●Definition of base year – last school year for which eligibility determinations were made and meal counts taken by type.

Guided Practice: Determine If School Qualifies for an Extension

Streamlined Base Year ●Must  Complete a minimum of one Provision 2 cycle.  Request and fail to get approval for an extension.  Serve meals non-pricing. ●May use enrollment based or participation based base year.  If participation based, must have system to accurately count total meals by eligibility.

Streamlined Base Year (continued) School determines program eligibility for a statistically valid sample of either: ●All enrolled students with access to the applicable meal program as of October 31 or another date approved by the State (enrollment based) OR ●Enrolled students participating in the applicable meal program (participation based).

Streamlined Base Year (continued) ●Statistically Valid Sample  Pool of students limited to enrolled students with access to meal program.  Students must be randomly selected from the sample frame (large enough to be significantly valid).  Response rate to survey must be at least 80 percent. ●See USDA Provision 2 Guidance Manual for details.

Guided Practice: Enrollment Based Streamlined Base Year -Determine Meal Counts for New Base Year

Resources ●California Dept. of Education Web Site ●USDA Provision 2 Guidance Manual ●California Food Policy Advocates ● search –National School Lunch Program, click on NSLP Downloadable Documents, scroll down to Provision information ●CDE CNIPS web site, downloadable forms