Los Angeles County STD Surveillance Data Surveillance, Sources, Methods and Issues Lisa V. Smith, MS, DrPH Director, Epidemiology Unit Los Angeles County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2010
Advertisements

Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A need for new prevention and research strategies National Sexually Transmitted Disease.
Impact of Age and Race on New HIV Infections among Men who have Sex with Men in Los Angeles County Shoshanna Nakelsky, MPH Division of HIV and.
STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.
Syphilis Trends in the United States James D. Heffelfinger, MD, MPH Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, DSTD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.
A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - VII (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Demographic, Mortality & Morbidity Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
STD Services in Detention in Los Angeles County Melina R. Boudov, MA Project Director LA County Infertility Prevention Project
HIV/STD Syndemic An Overview of South Los Angeles
Curable versus incurable STDs. Objectives To describe the natural history and epidemiology of two curable STDs (i.e. syphilis and chlamydia) and two non-
Laboratory Surveillance of Sexually Transmitted Disease LA County Dept. of Health Services Sexually Transmitted Disease Program Laboratory Surveillance.
Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP)
Epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Sexually Transmitted Disease Program Los Angeles County Department of Health Services.
Commercial Sex Venues: A Closer Look At Their Impact on the Syphilis Epidemics Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Los Angeles Getahun Aynalem, MD, MPH,
The Internet: An Emerging Venue for Syphilis Epidemics Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles LAC - DHS Getahun Aynalem, MD, MPH, Kellie Hawkins,
Linking STD and HIV Morbidity and Risk Behaviors in Indiana James D. Beall, MA Sr. Public Health Advisor Indiana State Department of Health.
STD Testing Protocols, STD Testing, and Discussion of Sexual Behaviors in HIV Clinics in Los Angeles County Melanie M. Taylor MD, MPH Los Angeles County.
Reported Cases in 2012 Wisconsin STD (Sexually Transmitted Disease) Surveillance Data 1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Division of Public Health Bureau.
Surveillance to measure impact of ART Theresa Diaz, MD MPH CDC Global AIDS Program.
1 TB/HIV Project in the Philippines Yumiko Yanase.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2000 Division of STD Prevention.
Continuing Education Meeting: Update on Syphilis, Gonorrhea, and Chlamydia Jan-Jun 2002 Liz Lee Senior Epidemiologist Bureau of Epidemiology Houston Department.
Application of an Epi Profile: Gonorrhea in the U.S. Region V Gonorrhea Control Meeting.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2003 Division of STD Prevention.
STD Control Branch Working With HIV Care Providers: The California/San Diego Experience Jessica Frasure-Williams, MPH Syphilis Elimination Coordinator,
Office of HIV, STD, and Hepatitis C Services CDRs (Communicable Disease Reports) How and Why? STATEWIDE STD MEETING September 2, 2009 Arshad Aziz ADHS/STD.
Public Health Surveillance
ADHS AND COUNTY STD CONTROL AND PREVENTION PROCESSES AND ACTIVITIES Kerry Kenney ADHS/STDP STATEWIDE STD MEETING April 25, 2008.
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2009 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1998 Division of STD Prevention.
Using HIV Surveillance to Achieve High Impact Prevention Irene Hall, PhD, FACE AIDS 2012 High-Impact Prevention: Reducing the HIV Epidemic in the United.
eHARS to CAREWare Pilot Project Update and Training
FY 2008 – 2009 AGREEMENT ADDENDA 536 and 541 CHANGES.
Alliance Discussion with Office of AIDS: November HIV/AIDS Surveillance Surveillance overview HIV Incidence Surveillance Second Surveillance Stakeholder.
STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco 2007—2010 STD Prevention and Control Services San Francisco Department of Public Health.
STD Surveillance Network (SSuN) Cycle 2 Objectives Lori Newman & Kristen Mahle SSuN Principal Collaborators Meeting Atlanta, GA December 2, 2008.
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2007 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
Chlamydia Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2003 Division of STD Prevention.
State and Local STD Prevention Programs Prepared by Jim Lee, Senior Public Health Advisor, Texas Department of State Health Services and Melinda Salmon,
SSuN: MSM prevalence monitoring and HIV Testing in STD Clinics Kristen Mahle & Lori Newman SSuN Call #3 Oct 30, 2008.
Wisconsin Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Data
Lower Hudson Valley Perinatal Network Serving Dutchess, Putnam, Rockland & Westchester Counties Presented at the Quarterly Education & Networking Conference.
Introduction to NCHHSTP National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Office of the Director Jonathan Mermin, MD, MPH National.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2002 Division of STD Prevention.
Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1998 Division of STD Prevention.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2001 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2007 Division of STD Prevention.
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2008 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1999 Division of STD Prevention.
STD’s in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2001 Division of STD Prevention.
Increasing Incidence of Gonorrhea in California (the talk formerly known as: “Gonorrhea Drips on in California”) Michael C Samuel 1, Virginia Loo 1, Denise.
Lesson 4Page 1 of 27 Lesson 4 Sources of Routinely Collected Data for Surveillance.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 24 Public Health Surveillance.
STDs in Racial and Ethnic Minorities Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2003 Division of STD Prevention.
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention.
All Slides Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2005 Division of STD Prevention.
Wisconsin STD Control Section Reported Cases in 2014 Wisconsin Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Data 1 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES.
STDs in Women and Infants Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2007 Division of STD Prevention.
STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2004 Division of STD Prevention.
Introduction to NCHS Rob Weinzimer, Special Assistant for Outreach Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
1 Disaster epidemiology Professor Vilius Grabauskas Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania NATO supported advanced research workshop, Kaunas,
Outline of Current Situation Survey on HIV/AIDS (Proposal) Ms. Keiko Dozono Director for AIDS and Emerging Infectious Disease Control Health and Safety.
STI/ STD Don’t Let it Happen to You By: Andrea Abrams Linda Dhennin Reshma Prasad Rachael Walker Sharon Wang.
City of Milwaukee Health Department
HIV Care Continuum in Manhattan
Public Health Surveillance
M Javanbakht, S Guerry, LV Smith, P Kerndt
Presentation transcript:

Los Angeles County STD Surveillance Data Surveillance, Sources, Methods and Issues Lisa V. Smith, MS, DrPH Director, Epidemiology Unit Los Angeles County Sexually Transmitted Disease Program

Overview  What are active and passive surveillance?  Which STDs are reportable?  What is the impact of LA County morbidity on state and national STD surveillance?  How are cases reported to LA County (LAC), State, and CDC?  What are “rates” and how are they used?  What are the limitations and benefits of LAC STD surveillance data?

What is Surveillance? Systematic collection and evaluation of:  Morbidity and mortality data  Special reports of field investigation of epidemics and individual cases  Data on the isolation and identification of infectious agents by public or private laboratories  Information regarding immunity levels in certain populations

What do we do with this information?  Estimate the magnitude of health conditions in at-risk populations  Detect sudden changes in occurrence and distribution  Detect changes in drug resistance  Identify changes in health care practices  Evaluate control strategies  Allocate resources

Data Sources Conditions of particular importance (outbreaks and epidemics)  Active Surveillance Conditions of particular importance (outbreaks and epidemics) Routine notifiable disease surveillance reported case by case  Passive Surveillance Routine notifiable disease surveillance reported case by case

Active Surveillance  Casefinding: –Prevalence Monitoring Sentinel Surveillance: K-11, Juvenile Hall, Family Planning Clinics, Bathhouses, Syphilis Elimination Project (MSM)Sentinel Surveillance: K-11, Juvenile Hall, Family Planning Clinics, Bathhouses, Syphilis Elimination Project (MSM) Mass Screening: Mobile testing, Adult Movie IndustryMass Screening: Mobile testing, Adult Movie Industry –Epidemiologic research: Primary HIV infection

Passive Surveillance  Accounts for most of the reported cases  Relatively simple compared to active surveillance  Limited by variability and incompleteness  May fail to identify outbreaks  Usually augmented by active surveillance

Which STDs are reportable? Health Care Provider  Syphilis*  Gonorrhea**  Chlamydia**  Chancroid**  PID**  NGU** Clinical Laboratory  Syphilis (Treponema pallidum)  Gonorrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae)  Chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Public Health, Section 2500, 1996 *Report by FAX, telephone, or mail w/in one working day of identification *Report by FAX, telephone, or mail w/in seven working days of identification

Reported Sexually Transmitted Diseases United States, 2003 Source: CDC Sexually Transmitted Disease Report, 2001 AIDS 43,158 (3.6%)

Reported Sexually Transmitted Diseases Los Angeles County, 2003 *Provisional data due to reporting delays Source: LAC DHS STD/ACD Programs Provisional Data, 2003

What is the Impact of LAC Morbidity on STD Reporting in CA & US*  36,555 Chlamydia (31% CA; 4% US)  8,008 Gonorrhea (31% CA; 2% US)  442 P&S Syphilis (34% CA; 6% US)  365 Early Latent (54% CA; 4% US)  28 Congenital Syphilis (47% CA; 7% US) *LA, CA, CDC STD Surveillance, 2003 P&S:chancres/lesions (90 days-6 months); EL asymptomatic (w/in 12 months)

How are cases reported to the STD Program?  Health providers use forms to report STD cases to the health department  STDP uses a “dual” reporting system to gather information on STD morbidity –Confidential Morbidity Forms (CMRs) Submitted by health providersSubmitted by health providers –Laboratory Report Forms Submitted by laboratory facilitiesSubmitted by laboratory facilities

Medical Provider’s STD Reporting Form

Example of Laboratory STD Reporting Form for CT/GC

STD Surveillance Process  Case Definition: Differential clinical diagnosis of reportable STDs to distinguish between cases and noncases  Population Definition: Identify area of interest to determine residency and population denominators

LAC STD Program Data Entry/ Field Services Data Cleaning / Transmission ConfidentialMorbidity Reports (CMR) LaboratorySlips California Department Of Health Services STD Control Branch Centers of Control and Prevention (CDC) 1. MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) 2. Requests for Proposals 3. Healthy People STD Surveillance All CA countyreports Public Health Action

85.2 LA (2003) 73.9 CA (2003) US (2003)

Why do we use rates and not absolute numbers?  Total number of reported cases appears to be adequate, but are these numbers comparable?

Absolute Numbers (Males Only) BlackHispanicAsianWhite Reported Chlamydia Cases in ,9652,

STD Rates Number of new events in specific period Number of new events in specific period Average population* during specific period X 10 n Essential for comparing dx in different populations: Pop A: 1,000/10,000 = 100 cases per 1000 population Pop B: 1,000/1,000,000 = 1 case per 1000 population *Assumes average population and “population at risk” are comparable. = multiplier

Population Rates (Males Only) BlackHispanicAsianWhite Reported Chlamydia Cases in ,9652, *Population Estimates 396,6142,297,208593,6331,590,586 Rate per 100,000 Population *2000 Estimates

How are these rates used?

1. Identify overall trends

Chlamydia Rates by Gender 2. Describe disease patterns patterns

3. Describe spatial distributions distributions

4. Target interventions

Additional Resources National Center for Health Statistics  Nation’s principal health statistics agency  Data are used to guide actions and policies, as well as: –Document health status of populations and important subgroups –Identify disparities in health status by race/ethnicity, socio-economic status, region, etc. –Monitor trends in health status and health care delivery –Support biomedical and health research –Evaluate the impact of health care

National Surveillance Reports (  National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) –Contains important information on sexual behaviors  National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) –AIDS Knowledge and Attitudes Supplement  Young Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) ( –Survey monitors sexual behaviors that contribute to unwanted pregnancies and STD/HIV  UCLA ISSR website:

Data Limitations  Incomplete case reporting –Reporting delays –Missing information –Underreporting (asymptomatic cases)  Reporting bias –Stigmatized condition –Public vs. Private

How Can We Improve Data Quality?  Improve data retrieval system –Phone Shop  Increase provider awareness of reporting regulations –In-services –Mass Mailings –In person visits  Implement CDC NEDSS web-based surveillance

What are the Benefits of STD Surveillance?  Though flawed, STD surveillance data provides –the “best estimate” of magnitude of disease in at-risk populations Numbers are the “tip” of the icebergNumbers are the “tip” of the iceberg –the basis for epidemiologic research –a system to monitor compliance with CDC treatment guidelines

Key Points to Ponder  To date, six STDs are reportable in California  Chlamydia is the most frequently reported STD in the United States  Los Angeles accounts for 1 of 3 STD cases in California and 1 of 25 cases in the United States  Most of the STD data come from passive surveillance systems and “dual” reporting  Data limitations include incomplete case reporting and reporting bias STD surveillance data provides the “best estimate” of magnitude of disease in at- risk populations  Nevertheless, STD surveillance data provides the “best estimate” of magnitude of disease in at- risk populations

Resources  Los Angeles County  California 03.pdf  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 