Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

B/C Ratio Engr. Faisal-ur-Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.
A Primer on Benefit-Cost Analysis Presented to: The Reclaimed Water Technical Committee June 2, 2006 By Bruce Flory, Ph. D. Seattle Public Utilities.
Executive Session Office of Asset Management
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions Presented by: Hank Bonstedt Executive Director Prestressed.
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014.
26-1 C APITAL B UDGETING LONG-RANGE PLANNING CHAPTER 26.
Chapter 4. Economic Factors in Design The basis of design decisions will be economics. Designing a technically safe and sound system will be only part.
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Pat Gardiner Bureau Of Maintenance And Operations 1.
December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.
CHAPTER 4 BOND PRICES, BOND YIELDS, AND INTEREST RATE RISK.
Ministry of Transportation RISK MANAGEMENT FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN AASHTO Sub-Committee Design July 2009 Gary Todd, P. Eng. Manager, Design & Contract Standards.
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
Alternate Bidding in Missouri Transportation Estimators Association Annual Conference November 2-4, 2005 – Daytona Beach, FL Interstate 44 … South-Central.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding Virginia Concrete Conference Richmond, VA March 6, 2014.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
Pavement Preservation and the Role of Bituminous Surface Treatments—A Washington State View Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 20,
 Life cycle costing, LCC, is the process of economic analysis to asses the total cost of ownership of a product, including its cost of installation,
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 9 Corn growing at site of former rainforest.
PRIORITIZATION.
Investment, the Capital Market, and the Wealth of Nations
FDM9 Capital investment appraisal 1 Capital investment appraisal 1.
Basic Tools of Finance Finance is the field that studies how people make decisions regarding the allocation of resources over time and the handling of.
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
Class 4 Benefit Cost Analysis
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Benefit Cost Analysis Nathaniel D. Coley Jr
Benjamin Krom, PE Michigan Department of Transportation.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
4 C H A P T E R Capital Investment Decisions.
Chapter 3 – Opportunity Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting
Using Value for Money Analysis to Evaluate Highway Public-Private Partnership Projects ARTBA P3 Conference Washington, DC, July 15-17, 2015 Patrick DeCorla-Souza,
Engineering Design: Seeking Sustainable Solutions.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
8- 1  2001 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Management Accounting, 3/E, Atkinson, Banker, Kaplan, and Young Capital Budgeting Chapter 8.
Benefit Cost Analysis for WRTM Mike Lawrence Jack Faucett Associates ITS PCB T3 Webinar July 8, 2014.
Long-Term (Capital Investment) Decisions
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Using Private Financing to Maximize Energy and Cost Savings Track 5: Project Financing Session 7: Economics.
Chapter 26 Capital Investment Decisions
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Introduction to Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Agency Energy ManagerLife-Cycle Cost Methodology Mike Mills, CPA, BEP.
Transportation Asset Management Presented by: Eric Gabler Economist, Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
0 CHAPTER 10 Long-Term (Capital Investment) Decisions © 2009 Cengage Learning.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
Investment and portfolio management MGT531. The course is developed to include the following contents:  Key concepts of investment analysis and portfolio.
Introduction To Transportation Economic Analysis Discounting.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
Software Project Management
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
LEARN ABOUT THE PROCESSES OF SAVING AND INVESTING YOUR MONEY AND SOUND FINANCIAL PLANING Savings and Investment Planning.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Mark Xu NRCS 67th Annual SWCS International Conference.
Road Investment Decision Framework
JTRP Road School March 25, 2008 Uncertainty-Based Tradeoff Analysis for Integrated Transportation Investments Integrated Solutions for Transportation:
Project Feasibility Analysis
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding
Presentation transcript:

Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004

Economic Analysis What Is It? Benefits and/or costs of competing investment options are compared in common unit of the dollar Makes non-like performance measures comparable

Why? Performance What? Greatest net benefit When? Optimal timing Where? Best alignment How? Best implementation strategy Economic Analysis Addresses Key Project Questions

Economic Analysis Issues and Concepts Costs and benefits can be valued in dollars Project life cycle is basis for comparison To be compared, dollars in different years must be “discounted” to their present value amounts

Economic Analysis Typical Life Cycle Profile Year Initial Capital Dollars Benefits Costs Cost

Economic Analysis Adjusting for Present Value where PV = present value at time zero (base year) r = discount rate t = time (number of year) A = amount of benefit or cost in year t

What if we want to determine how much a $1,000 benefit in 30 years is worth to us today? $1000 is in “real” dollars (i.e., in dollars with today’s purchasing power) Discount rate is 3% Economic Analysis Example of Discounting

Plug values into discounting formula: Do calculations: Economic Analysis Example (continued)

Economic Analysis Discount Rate Is Important Higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of a future dollar At 3%, $1, years from now is worth only $412 today Worth $231 at 5% and $57 at 10% Discount rate can influence project selection or design

EA Methods Benefit-Cost Analysis Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

EA Methods Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) BCA compares discounted value of project’s benefits to discounted value of its costs The blue and red bars on the life cycle profile BCA is different from financial analysis, which focuses on how to fund a project

EA Methods BCA Formula BCA is done using the basic multi- year discounting formula:

EA Methods Applications of BCA Project-level analysis Selecting ITS or operations technologies Highway program-level analysis Regulatory analysis

EA Methods Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Subset of BCA The “blue bars” on the life cycle profile LCCA reveals lowest life-cycle cost alternative for a project Used only when all design alternatives yield same benefits

EA Methods LCCA Formula LCCA is done using the basic multi-year discounting formula: where “Cost” equals the cost for design alternative in year t

EA Methods Applications of LCCA Evaluation of pavement preservation strategies Project planning and implementation, especially the use and timing of work zones Value Engineering

EA Methods How to Get Best LCCA Results Evaluate all reasonable design alternatives for the project Analyze alternatives over identical analysis periods Evaluate all relevant costs that vary among the alternatives

EA Methods Cost Items Used in LCCA Agency Costs Design and engineering Land acquisition Construction Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Preservation/Routine Maintenance User Costs At Work Zones Delay Crashes Vehicle Operating

EA Methods Valuation of User Time Business travel valued at wage plus benefits Personal travel valued at what travelers are willing to pay to reduce travel time Usually a percentage of wage People do value their time

EA Methods Inclusion of User Costs in EA Some agencies resist valuation of user delay caused by construction However, agencies seeking to reduce work zone impacts without user cost data may overspend or underspend

Linking EA to Other Tools Other tools increase the usefulness of BCA and LCCA Traffic Forecasting Risk Analysis Economic Impact Analysis

Linking EA to Other Tools Traffic Forecasting Queuing models Included in RealCost LCCA Software Traffic simulation models Corsim QuickZone Travel demand models

Linking EA to Other Tools Risk Analysis Uncertainty can be measured and mitigated Sensitivity and probabilistic methods Risk can be mitigated using alternative engineering, contractual methods, etc.

Linking EA to Other Tools Economic Impact Analysis EA focuses on direct benefits and costs of highway projects Time savings, safety, externalities EIA “translates” EA results into indirect economic effects Delays affect business and jobs Not additive to value of direct benefits and costs

LCCA Applied to Work Zones LCCA can be used to compare construction/work zone mitigation strategies FHWA’s RealCost LCCA software can measure agency costs (construction, rehabilitation, maintenance) and user costs over multi-year periods

LCCA Applied To Work Zones Mitigation Strategies There are many ways to mitigate construction impacts TMP and work zone strategies Innovative contracting Design features and materials Does value of mitigation justify costs?

LCCA Applied To Work Zones Comparing Strategies Each construction/WZ strategy involves trade-offs Agency vs. user costs Initial vs. long-term costs LCCA approach permits comparison of cost trade-offs

Application to Work Zones Example Consider Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) vs. Superpave (SP), each with 24 hour vs. nighttime work zones 5 mile, 4 lane road mill & fill 25,000 vehicles Average Daily Traffic, rising to 60,000 ADT in 35 years One lane closed each way

Application to Work Zones Example (Continued) ADT is allocated by RealCost model to peak/off-peak times RealCost model calculates user delay caused by work zones 35 year analysis period 4 percent real discount rate

Application to Work Zones Example (Continued) SMA costs 20 percent more than SP per overlay but lasts longer 20 percent longer between rehabilitations Nighttime work zones increase agency cost by 10 percent

LCCA Applied To Work Zones Example Results

LCCA Applied To Work Zones Example Results (Continued) Least cost option for the agency (SP/24 hours) is highest cost for travelers Using SMA reduces traveler cost due to fewer rehabs Nighttime work zones eliminate most of delay for SP and SMA at little additional cost to the agency

For Further Information Economic Analysis Primer FHWA IF , August 2003 Contents: Economic Fundamentals Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Benefit-Cost Analysis Forecasting Traffic Risk Analysis Economic Impact Analysis

For Further Information Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Materials Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer RealCost Software and workshops – call your Division Office

For Further Information Other Economic Materials FHWA’s Office of Asset Management, Evaluation and Economic Investment Team: asstmgmt/invest.htm