USDA Planning Meeting December 5, 2005 NAIP 2005 INSPECTION PROCESS Zack Adkins, Joan Biediger, Mary Carlson NAIP Inspection Team USDA-FSA-APFO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMAGE SERVICES WHAT ARE THEY AND HOW DO YOU USE THEM?
Advertisements

Chapter 4 Quality Assurance in Context
NAIP 2010 Presentation Topics Changes for 2010 Partnership Information Delivery Systems Format of Deliverables Reporting Problems/Issues Support Question.
Introduction to GeoProbe
Final Review of the 2004 NAIP Digital Orthoimagery of Texas NAIP DOQ November 10, 2005 Gordon Wells and Linda Prosperie UT Center for Space Research.
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2010 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: Census Evaluation and Post Enumeration Surveys, Bangkok,
NAIP Preview for FSA State Office GIS Specialists February 24, 2010 NAIP 2010.
28-30 April 2014UNECE - Work session on statistical data editing Data editing and scanner data I. Léonard, G. Varlet and P. Sillard Insee.
1 Software Inspections and Walkthroughs Author: A. Frank Ackerman Presented by Cynthia Johnson EEL6883.
NAIP POST-SEASON MEETING December 6, 2005 ACQUISITION TEAM MEMBERS Contractor:# Planes Great Lakes Aerial – OH1 – PA31 Navajo Woolpert – OH2 – Cessna.
Consumer Assistance Complaint Handling Process 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
FS National Aerial Photography 2007 Bill Belton USDA Imagery Planning and Coordination Meeting December 5-7, 2006.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 23 Slide 1 Software testing.
Presenter: Shant Mandossian EFFECTIVE TESTING OF HEALTHCARE SIMULATION SOFTWARE.
An automated image prescreening tool for a printer qualification process by † Du-Yong Ng and ‡ Jan P. Allebach † Lexmark International Inc. ‡ School of.
Verification and Validation Yonsei University 2 nd Semester, 2014 Sanghyun Park.
SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN
USDA Farm Service Agency National Agricultural Imagery Program Presented by Dan Janes, GIS Specialist North Dakota State Office.
Applying the Inspection Process. What Software Artifacts Are Candidates for Inspection? Software Requirements Software Designs Code Test Plans.
Performance Metrics for Weatherization UGI LIURP Evaluation Yvette Belfort Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
Chapter 121 The Examine Process Chapter 12 Achieving Quality Through Continual Improvement Claude W. Burrill / Johannes Ledolter Published by John Wiley.
Software Inspection A basic tool for defect removal A basic tool for defect removal Urgent need for QA and removal can be supported by inspection Urgent.
2005 USDA Imagery Contracts May 4, 2005 NDOP Steering Committee Meeting Asheville, North Carolina W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial.
Building Enterprise GIS at the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection: 2003 Progress Information Technology Office Technical Applications.
Farm Service Agency National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Pecora Conference November 13, 2002 Denver, Colorado Kent Williams, USDA FSA Aerial Photography.
UP206A: Introduction to GIS. » Geocoding is the process of assigning a location, usually in the form of coordinate values (points), to an address by.
National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes USDA Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah December 4-6, 2006 Kent Williams NAIP Program.
Welcome and Introductions Calendar Overview Acquisition Status Final Product Specs Final Ortho Status – with Kucera DAT Process – with IntraSearch Feedback.
FSA State Office NAIP Training Kent Williams Cindy Sessions David Davis Brian Vanderbilt June 15, 2006.
Work on an Incline Lab (name and period).
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California Caching Imagery Using.
Testing Workflow In the Unified Process and Agile/Scrum processes.
National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) National States Geographic Information Council September 15, 2003 Nashville, Tennessee W. Geoffrey Gabbott,
USDA Imagery Planning & Coordination Meeting Contract Administration Items Wednesday, December 12, 2007 Aerial Photography Field Office Salt Lake.
> The Geospatial Experts 2005 NAIP Post Season Meeting Lessons Learned Jaymes Pardue, Senior Account Manager Paul Currie, Project Manager December 06,
Quality Assurance IS 101Y/CMSC 101Y November 12, 2013 Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
11/19/20081 NAIP 2008: Issues and Enhancements Zack Adkins NAIP 2008 Post Mortem November 19, 2008.
USDA – Planning Meeting December 3, 2008 Digital Inspection Process Review Sherry Holyoak Resource Imagery Inspection Section.
How to startpage 1. How to start How to specify the task How to get a good image.
3/26/20081 Geospatial Data and the APFO: Past, Present, and Future Zack Adkins, Cartographer Civil Commercial Imagery Evaluation Workshop March 25-27,
Caching Imagery Using ArcGIS
North West Group.  Team resources:  7 Cessna Conquest’s  9 ADS40-II SH52 sensors  Used 2008 season (Peak):  7 Conquests  7 ADS40’s  EarthData and.
NAIP 2010 Presentation to National States Geographic Information Council Kent Williams USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO )
1 Quality Control for Field Operations. 2 Overview Goal To ensure the quality of survey field work Purpose To detect and deter interviewer errors and.
Open a web browser, and navigate to the web page: 2. Find the “Web Services” drop-down menu, and select: INSIDE ArcGIS.
Software Engineering1  Verification: The software should conform to its specification  Validation: The software should do what the user really requires.
Steven Lie GBS 205 Mark Barton.   The liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any product for damage caused by that project.
Teens Credit- Day 3 Independent Living December 2, /09.
© Michael Crosby and Charles Sacker, 2001 Systematic Software Reviews Software reviews are a “quality improvement process for written material”.
2005 Program Highlights 151,658 quarter quads under contract 151,658 quarter quads under contract 83% acquired within flying season83% acquired within.
FSA Geospatial Support Kevin Clarke USDA-FSA-APFO USDA Planning Meeting Dec 11-13, 2007.
MilestoneDate Compiling Orders for Final ImageryAugust/September 2012 DAT ReviewSeptember/October 2012 Final Imagery in WMSNovember/December 2012 Delivery.
1 Project Quality Management QA and QC Tools & Techniques Lec#10 Ghazala Amin.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
Advances In Software Inspection
NAIP 2011 Presentation for NSGIC NAIP 2011 Presentation for FSA State GIS Specialists August 31, 2010.
GIS: The Systematic Approach to Precise Farm Management Robert Biffle Precision Agriculture April,
Auditing data management system Bruno Deprez Data Audit officer SPC, Oceanic Fisheries Program.
GAME:IT Mario Creating Platform Games Level 4 with GML Game Maker Language (GML) allows users more flexibility in game design. GML is similar to how real.
Data Storage & Editing GEOG370 Instructor: Christine Erlien.
Geocoding Chapter 16 GISV431 &GEN405 Dr W Britz. Georeferencing, Transformations and Geocoding Georeferencing is the aligning of geographic data to a.
Best Practices for Managing Processed Ortho Imagery Cody A. Benkelman.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Amendment Invoice Task Force Progress Report
Software Reviews.
Best Practices for Managing Processed Ortho Imagery
Presentation transcript:

USDA Planning Meeting December 5, 2005 NAIP 2005 INSPECTION PROCESS Zack Adkins, Joan Biediger, Mary Carlson NAIP Inspection Team USDA-FSA-APFO

NAIP 2004 Inspection Background Inspection completed November 2005.Inspection completed November Inspection could not begin until DOQQs were in house.Inspection could not begin until DOQQs were in house. 100% of individual DOQQs inspected.100% of individual DOQQs inspected. Different process and inspection team for 1 meter and 2 meter images.Different process and inspection team for 1 meter and 2 meter images. Contract reconciliation was not able to be completed until months after imagery was in house.Contract reconciliation was not able to be completed until months after imagery was in house.

NAIP 2004 DOQQ Inspection Individual DOQQ quality inspectionIndividual DOQQ quality inspection 15 percent measured for accuracy15 percent measured for accuracy 2 meter resolution 10 points picked for accuracy per DOQQ2 meter resolution 10 points picked for accuracy per DOQQ 1 meter resolution 20 points picked for accuracy per DOQQ1 meter resolution 20 points picked for accuracy per DOQQ Thorough but very time consuming processThorough but very time consuming process

NAIP 2005 Inspection Process Background Inspection can begin when CCM imagery arrives in house.Inspection can begin when CCM imagery arrives in house. Compressed County Mosaic usually arrives before DOQQ tiles.Compressed County Mosaic usually arrives before DOQQ tiles. 1 meter and 2 meter resolution now done by the same inspection team allowing for a more cohesive inspection process.1 meter and 2 meter resolution now done by the same inspection team allowing for a more cohesive inspection process. Reconciliation needs to begin as early in the year as possible so contracts can be closed out.Reconciliation needs to begin as early in the year as possible so contracts can be closed out.

NAIP 2005 Inspection Process Introduction Inspection is performed on both the Compressed County Mosaic and selected DOQQs in a county.Inspection is performed on both the Compressed County Mosaic and selected DOQQs in a county. Inspection is performed using a 3 phase process.Inspection is performed using a 3 phase process. Custom ArcGis tool designed at APFO used for Inspection.Custom ArcGis tool designed at APFO used for Inspection. Data collected is stored in an ORACLE database.Data collected is stored in an ORACLE database.

NAIP 2005 New Inspection Process Inspection begins when CCM is in house and loaded into the systemInspection begins when CCM is in house and loaded into the system Inspection process is faster and can begin soonerInspection process is faster and can begin sooner Larger area (CCM vs. DOQQ) speeds up inspectionLarger area (CCM vs. DOQQ) speeds up inspection Combination CCM and DOQQ inspectionCombination CCM and DOQQ inspection Random DOQQs are inspectedRandom DOQQs are inspected DOQQs with visual anomalies are inspectedDOQQs with visual anomalies are inspected

Phase 1 Inspection CCM quick check.CCM quick check. The purpose of Phase 1 Inspection is to find major errors early in the Inspection process.The purpose of Phase 1 Inspection is to find major errors early in the Inspection process. Defects noted are missing imagery and offsets over 20 meters.Defects noted are missing imagery and offsets over 20 meters. Vendors can be notified early in the process if there are problems that can be corrected.Vendors can be notified early in the process if there are problems that can be corrected.

Phase 2 Inspection Introduction The purpose of Phase 2 Inspection is to thoroughly examine the imagery for quality and horizontal accuracy.The purpose of Phase 2 Inspection is to thoroughly examine the imagery for quality and horizontal accuracy. Phase 2 Inspection involves a quality check and a horizontal accuracy check on the CCM.Phase 2 Inspection involves a quality check and a horizontal accuracy check on the CCM. Phase 2 Inspection is usually done by the same inspector as Phase 1 but can be done by anyone on the Inspection team if the need arises.Phase 2 Inspection is usually done by the same inspector as Phase 1 but can be done by anyone on the Inspection team if the need arises.

Phase 2 Horizontal Accuracy Inspection Horizontal Accuracy is checked on the CCM against an independent source of imagery.Horizontal Accuracy is checked on the CCM against an independent source of imagery. The tolerance for the imagery is 5 meters for 1 meter imagery and 10 meters for 2 meter imagery.The tolerance for the imagery is 5 meters for 1 meter imagery and 10 meters for 2 meter imagery. The number of points picked is determined by the number of tiles which were used to make the CCM.The number of points picked is determined by the number of tiles which were used to make the CCM.

Phase 2 Horizontal Accuracy Inspection (Cont) 10 points are picked for counties less than 100 tiles.10 points are picked for counties less than 100 tiles. 10 percent of the total number of tiles that make up the CCM are picked on counties over 100 tiles.10 percent of the total number of tiles that make up the CCM are picked on counties over 100 tiles. If any point fails the tolerance, the DOQQ where the point was picked is pulled for a horizontal accuracy check at the DOQQ level in Phase 3 inspection.If any point fails the tolerance, the DOQQ where the point was picked is pulled for a horizontal accuracy check at the DOQQ level in Phase 3 inspection.

Phase 2 Quality Inspection All defects collected are associated with both with the CCM and the individual DOQQ.All defects collected are associated with both with the CCM and the individual DOQQ. 1 meter resolution imagery is inspected at a scale of 1: meter resolution imagery is inspected at a scale of 1: meter resolution imagery is inspected at a scale of 1: meter resolution imagery is inspected at a scale of 1:8000.

Phase 2 Quality Inspection (cont) Image defects collected in Phase 2 inspection: OffsetsOffsets Missing ImageryMissing Imagery Scratches/StreaksScratches/Streaks ArtifactsArtifacts SmearingSmearing Foreign ImageryForeign Imagery Specular ReflectanceSpecular Reflectance Clouds and ShadowsClouds and Shadows

Phase 2 Quality Inspection (cont) Anomaly defect codes are used to create a list of DOQQs that need closer inspection because of severe quality issues.Anomaly defect codes are used to create a list of DOQQs that need closer inspection because of severe quality issues. The inspector will look at these DOQQs in Phase 3 Inspection.The inspector will look at these DOQQs in Phase 3 Inspection.

Phase 2 Quality Inspection (cont) Phase 2 anomaly defect codes used: Clouds AnomalyClouds Anomaly Offsets AnomalyOffsets Anomaly Missing Imagery AnomalyMissing Imagery Anomaly Artifacts AnomalyArtifacts Anomaly Smearing AnomalySmearing Anomaly Foreign Imagery AnomalyForeign Imagery Anomaly Specular Reflectance AnomalySpecular Reflectance Anomaly Horizontal Accuracy AnomalyHorizontal Accuracy Anomaly

Phase 3 Inspection Phase 3 Inspection involves looking at the individual DOQQs.Phase 3 Inspection involves looking at the individual DOQQs. A random sample (10% of CCM) of DOQQs are checked along the tile boundaries where problems may be hidden due to overlap when creating the CCM.A random sample (10% of CCM) of DOQQs are checked along the tile boundaries where problems may be hidden due to overlap when creating the CCM. A Visual Anomaly inspection of DOQQs is performed if Anomalies are found in Phase 2 Inspection.A Visual Anomaly inspection of DOQQs is performed if Anomalies are found in Phase 2 Inspection.

Status of current 2005 Inspection

Conclusions New 2005 NAIP Inspection Process will increase productivity.New 2005 NAIP Inspection Process will increase productivity. Inspection results will be more consistent using one inspection team.Inspection results will be more consistent using one inspection team. Vendors can be notified much earlier to address problems with imagery.Vendors can be notified much earlier to address problems with imagery. Reconciliation of contracts should be more manageable.Reconciliation of contracts should be more manageable.

Kansas City 31 Denver 27