Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools.
Advertisements

2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8 Dr. Peggy Carr Associate Commissioner.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
WEEK 6: GLOBALIZATION AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER 4 (CHANGE TO MEGAPOLITAN AREAS, READ HANDOUT) WEEK 7: TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
1 Vanessa Westbrook, Division Director Multicultural/ Equity in Science National Science Teachers Association Charles A. Dana Center University of Texas.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
San Marino Unified School District World Class Schools Academic Accountability Measures.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Current Events Vocabulary American Sign Language II.
Apangea Learning State of Idaho Annual Superintendent’s Meeting Rob Austin, Vice President of Sales & Services Glen Zollman, Idaho Account Manager.
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Positive Action Center: An Innovative Approach to Discipline Management.
Peaking phase Falling phase Rising phase Bottoming phase Q U.S. office clock (overall) Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Los Angeles, Miami Dallas, San.
Poverty and HIV Infection: NHBS National* and San Diego Findings Vanessa Miguelino-Keasling, MPH National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
Current Events Vocabulary American Sign Language II.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Warm-up 2.1 Visualizing Distributions: Shape, Center and Spread.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
UMELA Cohort 2 Meeting Dallas, Texas Westin City Center November 3-5, 2009.
Institute for Urban Policy and Research Analysis, Professor Tang November 19, 2013 Ryan Robinson City Demographer Planning & Development Review Department.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
A Collaboration among: Los Angeles USD University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine Preparing for Success.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
NAEP The Nation’s Report Card: The Urban District By: Katie Urbanczyk Chris Vanderhorst Russell Marzullo Jessica Hartle.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.
DPS students post nation-worst science scores among large urban cities BY CHASTITY PRATT DAWSEY 9:46 AM, Feb. 24, 2011 DETROIT FREE PRESS
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 6, 2012.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
The US in 1900 and today Jan 19, Population million Foreign born 7.4% Black 11.5% Hispanic ? Under 1840% Over 654% Married (age 18+)(60%)
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Big Cities Health Inventory Data Platform 2.0
FWISD Student Performance Percentage of students passing state tests
2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts
Percentage of secondary schools that had an asthma action plan on file for all students with known asthma Newark Detroit Chicago Philadelphia San Francisco.
NNIP Data Inventory & SNIP Score Update
The US in 1900 and today Jan 17, 2017.
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
Unit 3 Lesson 5: Regional Cities
Portland Economic Update Assn. of Financial Professionals
Presentation transcript:

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011

2 Collaboration among National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment Governing Board, and Council of the Great City Schools Voluntary participation by selected districts varying in location and demographic makeup Common yardstick to compare district performance Background

3

4 Representative district samples of Public school students at grades 4 and to 2,700 students per grade in each district Performance reported as Average scale scores (0–500 scale) Achievement levels ( Basic, Proficient, and Advanced ) District results compared to public school students in The nation Large cities of 250,000 or more Trend comparisons for 18 districts

5 Urban districts have a wide range of student demographics –Black students –Hispanic students –English language learners –Students from lower-income families

7 How average mathematics scores in the districts compare to large cities in 2011

8 Four districts score higher than in 2009 Nine districts score higher than in 2003 How performance of districts has changed over time

9 Percentages at or above Basic range from 34 to 88 percent # Rounds to zero. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

10 Students moving from below Basic and into higher achievement levels in most districts In comparison to 2003, percentages of students below Basic lower in nine districts at Basic higher in three districts and lower in one district at Proficient higher in eight districts at Advanced higher in eight districts

11 Teacher education and experience vary across districts

12

13 Grade 4 Number Properties and Operations Question More than 70% correct in –Albuquerque, Austin, Charlotte, Dallas, Fresno, Hillsborough County, and Houston Between 60% and 70% correct in –Atlanta, Baltimore City, Los Angeles, Miami-Dade, New York City, Philadelphia, and San Diego Less than 60% correct in –Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, the District of Columbia, Jefferson County, and Milwaukee

14 How average mathematics scores in the districts compare to large cities in

15

16 Six districts score higher than in 2009 Nine districts score higher than in 2003 How performance of districts has changed over time

17 Percentages at or above Basic range from 29 to 74 percent # Rounds to zero. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

18 Coursetaking patterns vary across districts

19

20 Grade 8 Algebra Question 30% or more correct in –Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Fresno, Hillsborough County, Jefferson County, Los Angeles, Miami-Dade, and San Diego 29% or less correct in –Albuquerque, Baltimore City, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, the District of Columbia, Houston, Milwaukee, New York City, and Philadelphia

21

22 How average reading scores in the districts compare to large cities in 2011

23 No districts score higher than in 2009 All six districts score higher than in 2002 How performance of districts has changed over time

24 Percentages at or above Basic range from 31 to 77 percent NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

25

26

27 Integrate and Interpret Question More than 60% of answers rated “Acceptable” in –Austin, Charlotte, Hillsborough County, Jefferson County, New York City, and San Diego 55% to 60% of answers rated “Acceptable” in –Atlanta, Baltimore City, Boston, Chicago, the District of Columbia, Miami-Dade, and Philadelphia Less than 55% of answers rated “Acceptable” in –Albuquerque, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, Fresno, Houston, Los Angeles, and Milwaukee

28 How average reading scores in the districts compare to large cities in 2011

29

30 One district scores higher than in 2009 Three districts score higher than in 2002 How performance of districts has changed over time

31 Percentages at or above Basic range from 43 to 75 percent # Rounds to zero. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

32 Less than one-fifth of students in districts report reading for fun almost every day

33

34

35 Grade 8 Integrate and Interpret Question More than 60% correct in –Austin, Charlotte, Miami-Dade, and New York City Between 50% and 60% correct in –Albuquerque, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Hillsborough County, Houston, Jefferson County, Philadelphia, and San Diego Less than 50% correct in –Baltimore City, Cleveland, Detroit, the District of Columbia, Fresno, Los Angeles, and Milwaukee

36

37 For more information