Binary Image Representation of a Ligand Binding Site: Its Application to Efficient Sampling of a Conformational Ensemble Edon Sung1,2, Sangsoo Kim2* and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Theoretical Investigations of Nitric Oxide Channeling in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Truncated Hemoglobin N  Richard Daigle, Julie-Anne Rousseau, Michel.
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
The Mechanism of Na+/K+ Selectivity in Mammalian Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation  Mengdie Xia, Huihui Liu, Yang Li,
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Energetic Pathway Sampling in a Protein Interaction Domain
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Frank Alber, Michael F. Kim, Andrej Sali  Structure 
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Joe G. Greener, Ioannis Filippis, Michael J.E. Sternberg  Structure 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2018)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
2.3 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of human p97 and mechanism of allosteric inhibition by Soojay Banerjee, Alberto Bartesaghi, Alan Merk, Prashant Rao,
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Molecular Similarity Analysis Uncovers Heterogeneous Structure-Activity Relationships and Variable Activity Landscapes  Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath 
Helicase structures: a new twist on DNA unwinding
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
LC8 is structurally variable but conserved in sequence.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Binary Image Representation of a Ligand Binding Site: Its Application to Efficient Sampling of a Conformational Ensemble Edon Sung1,2, Sangsoo Kim2* and Whanchul Shin1* 1Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul , Korea 2Department of Bioinformatics, Soongsil University, Seoul , Korea *Corresponding authors Additional File 1 – Supplementary Figures (10) and Table (1) addresses: ED: SK: WS:

Supplementary Figure 1 – Multiple steps of identifying ligand binding site residues and mapping 3D points. (A) All protein residues that are within 5 Å from the ligand ensemble (yellow) are identified and referred to as the first layer residues (FLRs) (red). These residues are substituted with Ala. (B) POCKET [10] is used to generate 3- dimensional points (blue) that maps this ligand-binding pocket. The points that are away from the binding site residues or ligand ensemble by more than 6 Å are trimmed. (C) The sterically allowed rotamers of FLRs (red) are considered and the 3D points in contact with these atoms are marked (green). (D) The residues within 3 Å from these 3D points are identified as the second layer residues (SLRs).

Supplementary Figure 2 – Split of the MMP-13 pocket into half. The S1 pocket of MMP-13 is known to have a side pocket (S1*) [8], resulting in an extended ligand binding site. We split the ligand binding site into half with an overlap of points filling the s1 pocket. The "proximal" ligand-binding site that limited to the S1' pocket is shown in green (labeled MMP-13D), while the "distal" region that extends to S1'* is shown in red (labeled MMP-13P). The backbone structure (pdb code: 830c) was plotted in a similar orientation as Figure 2 of Engel et. al. [8]. The catalytic zinc (yellow sphere), inhibitors pb5 (magenta), rs1 (green), o33 (yellow) and Leu 218 (red) are highlighted.

Supplementary Figure 3 - Scatterplot matrix of the MDS results along PC1~4 in (A) MMP-1, (B) MMP-13D, and (C) MMP-13P The plots made with GGOBI ( V1~4 represent PC1~4. The diagonal plot is the univariate distribution of the variable, while the off-diagonal plots are pairwise scatterplots.

Supplementary Figure 4 - Eigen values for MDS in (A) MMP-1, (B) MMP-13D, and (C) MMP-13P MDS was done 100 dimensions in MMP-1 and MMP-13D, and 10 dimensions in MMP-13P.

Supplementary Figure 5 - The heat maps depicting binary image representations of the ligand binding pocket shapes for MMP-13D On the left panel, each column represents the conditional bits and each row represents a pocket shape of a given conformer. The bit position is set (red) if the conformer is in contact with the 3D points. The bit positions were clustered using an agglomerative complete linkage method, while the conformers were ordered according to the membership in the accompanying MDS plot. Phe 252 (red), Leu 218 (green) and Lys 249 (blue), the most influential residues in shaping the pockets, are labeled as 252, 218, and 249, respectively, over the bit blocks they are in contact with. For each pocket shape, the number of bits off is counted and plotted in the middle panel. The heat maps depicting shape incompatibility between a conformer and a ligand for MMP-13D. On the right panel, the columns represent the ligands from the known crystal structures, and their incompatibility with each conformer is coded by red (the darker, the more compatible). For example, the clusters 3 and 4 of MMP-13D were compatible with the all six ligands, while the cluster 5 and 6 were wide enough to accommodate any of the four known ligands excluding o33 and rs1.

xuc (pb3) 1xud (pb4) 1xur (pb5) 1ztq (033) 20w9 (sp6) 830c (rs1)

Supplementary Figure 6 - The heat maps depicting binary image representations of the ligand binding pocket shapes for MMP-13P On the left panel, each column represents the conditional bits and each row represents a pocket shape of a given conformer. The bit position is set (red) if the conformer is in contact with the 3D points. The bit positions were clustered using an agglomerative complete linkage method, while the conformers were ordered according to the membership in the accompanying MDS plot. Tyr 244 (green), Ile 243 (blue) and Glu 223(red), the most influential residues in shaping the pockets, are labeled as 244, 243, and 223, respectively, over the bit blocks they are in contact with. For each pocket shape, the number of bits off is counted and plotted in the middle panel. The heat maps depicting shape incompatibility between a conformer and a ligand for MMP-13D. On the right panel, the columns represent the ligands from the known crystal structures, and their incompatibility with each conformer is coded by red (the darker, the more compatible). For MMP-13P, all the known conformers of ligand-bound forms were found in a single cluster 6, while the apo form was distinct, as reported by others.

Supplementary Figure 7 – Pocket shape of the representative conformers of MMP-1. From the MDS plot, 12 distinctive clusters were recognized and the medoid conformer was selected as the representative of each cluster. The cluster numbers are given within parentheses. The binding site points that are free of contacts with the pocket residues are shown in either green (always) or red (conditional). For clusters 1~6, the conditional points were concentrated on the left-hand site of the pocket, while they were localized in the lower middle part. Unlike these unknown clusters, the clusters including 7 and 9 (known) and 8 (unknown) encompassed both regions and consequently displayed the largest volume.

Supplementary Figure 8 - Rotameric status of the key residues in MMP-13D A total of 33,172 pocket shapes were plotted in the MDS plot (PC1~3). Each conformer is colored by the rotameric status of (A) Phe 252, (B) Leu 218, and (C) Lys 249.

Supplementary Figure 9 - The different conformers mapped to known structures in MMP-13D Their pocket shapes were compared visually by depicting the pocket points with coloring scheme as follows: the 223 points always free of contacts were in green, while the 391 conditional points were either in red (free of contacts) or in blue (in contacts). The known structures, 1ztq (cluster 3) and 2ow9 (cluster 6) are shown on the right and left panel, respectively. The notable differences in pocket shape (marked by arrow) are response for differential binding of the ligands.

Supplementary Figure 10 - Rotameric status of the key residues in MMP-13P A total of 143 pocket shapes were plotted in the MDS plot (PC1~3). Each conformer is colored by the rotameric status of (A) Tyr 244 and (B) Glu 223 (C) Ile 243.

Supplementary Table 1- Shape incompatibility between the known ligands and the medoid pocket shapes in (A) MMP-1, (B) MMP-13D, (C) MMP-13P.