SMRD 17-18 April 2007 Status of the atmospheric muon studies Piotr Mijakowski OUTLINE: Primary muon spectrum at the sea level Primary muon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
Searching for the footprint of prompt atmospheric neutrino flux and beyond Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan With N. Tung and F.-F. Lee KEKPH.
Detection of atmospheric muon bundles using ALICE detectors A. Fernández Tellez Universidad Autonoma de Puebla for the ALICE Collaboration VIII Simposio.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
GLAST Rate Calculations Toby Burnett 12 Jan Jan 2000T. Burnett GLAST rate calculations2 Components used to measure rates Source model –Geomagnetic.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
GAMOS tutorial X-ray Exercises
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
TAUP Conference, Sendai September The primary spectrum in the transition region between direct and indirect measurements (10 TeV – 10 PeV)
Final results on atmospheric  oscillations with MACRO at Gran Sasso Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Frascati, Gran Sasso, Indiana, L’Aquila, Lecce,
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
1 Cosmic Muon Analysis: Current Status Stuart Mufson, Brian Rebel Argonne March 18, 2005.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Cosmic-ray physics at CERN (LEP and LHC experiments) Arturo Fernández, Mario Rodriguez Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas Benemérita Universidad Autonoma.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Cosmic ray physics in ALICE Katherin Shtejer Díaz For the ALICE Collaboration LatinoAmerican Workshop on High Energy Physics: Particles and Strings, Havana,
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
The Performance of the ALICE experiment for cosmic ray physics B. Alessandro, V. Canoa, A. Fernández, M. Rodríguez, M. Subieta for the ALICE Collaboration.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
NuMI MINOS Seasonal Variations in the MINOS Far Detector Eric W. Grashorn University of Minnesota Thursday, 5 July, 2007.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Can we detect a marble tomb with cosmic muons ? Corinne Goy, Max Chefdeville, Jean Jacquemier, Yannis Karyotakis 21 December 2015.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
Nuance / Neut comparison  Comparisons on a generator and simulation level (all information is read from.root files produced by Geant)  Neut file:
FLUKA Muon Calculations For Electronic Applications
Detection of atmospheric muons using ALICE detectors
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Update on Muon Flux Underground Using Geant4 Simulation
Searches for double partons
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Outline Analysis of some real data taken with the GLAST minitower (cosmic rays only). Offline analysis software used. Full Monte Carlo simulation using.
EEE telescope simulation
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

SMRD April 2007 Status of the atmospheric muon studies Piotr Mijakowski OUTLINE: Primary muon spectrum at the sea level Primary muon spectrum at the sea level Atmospheric muons location Atmospheric muons location Geant4 simulation Geant4 simulation NTUPLES with atmospheric muon data NTUPLES with atmospheric muon data Some results Some results

Motivation GOAL: determine the requirements for cosmic ray trigger GOAL: determine the requirements for cosmic ray trigger SMRD will provide c.r trigger for calibration of inner ND280 detector components SMRD will provide c.r trigger for calibration of inner ND280 detector components No Ecal at the beginning No Ecal at the beginning Calibration data taken between a beam spills Calibration data taken between a beam spills Detector requirements: Detector requirements: not always clear (more communication needed) not always clear (more communication needed) TPC+FGD: various samples – crossing FGD&TPC, crossing cathode; giving the 20cm transverse length TPC+FGD: various samples – crossing FGD&TPC, crossing cathode; giving the 20cm transverse length P0D: horizontal muons, 100k per week per channel P0D: horizontal muons, 100k per week per channel

Primary muon spectrum at the sea level So far used the official K2K data file – Oyama spectrum So far used the official K2K data file – Oyama spectrum cosmic ray muon simulation cosmic ray muon simulation 10k events 10k events structure: event# cos(  ) Momentum structure: event# cos(  ) Momentum

Oyama spectrum Oyama - cos 2.04  world publ. data - cos 2.16  (*) (different geomagnetic locations) Oyama - cos 2.04  world publ. data - cos 2.16  (*) (different geomagnetic locations) Momentum - zoom FIT: - cos(  )>=0.175 by power factor cos(  ) =0.175 by power factor cos(  )<0.175 linear fit (*) zenith cos 2.04 

Oyama spectrum – P and cos  correlation for vertical muons P and cos  uncorrelated for vertical muons P and cos  uncorrelated for large angles: correlation (LE  decay before reaching the surface, HE  decays mainly contribute) for large angles: correlation (LE  decay before reaching the surface, HE  decays mainly contribute)

Simulation of atm. muons underground muons sampled from a square surface and propagated through the rock muons sampled from a square surface and propagated through the rock initial energy, zenith angle - Oyama, azimuthal angle – isotropic initial energy, zenith angle - Oyama, azimuthal angle – isotropic normalization: 70  /(m 2 s) > 1 GeV at surface (PDG) normalization: 70  /(m 2 s) > 1 GeV at surface (PDG) 3 sets of simulations: 3 sets of simulations: 22m x 22m, illumination time = ~36.1 sec. 22m x 22m, illumination time = ~36.1 sec. 200m x 200m, illum. time = ~2.2 sec. 200m x 200m, illum. time = ~2.2 sec. 400m x 400m, illum. time = ~0.27 sec. 400m x 400m, illum. time = ~0.27 sec. suitable only for veritical muon study small statistics so far

Geant4 simulation - geometry Geometry visualization 30cm thick cement floor 2m of air below floor side view top view 1m cement wall d = 17.5m DETECTOR BOX - shifted 1m along z axis from the pit center length (z axis) = m, width (x axis) = 5.63 m, height (y axis)= m x z

Zenith angle cos  of muons entering the detector box cos  of muons entering the detector box entries tot. flux [  /(m 2 s)] 39.8 ± ± ±0.05 mean green – 400m x 400m, 0.27 s red – 200m x 200m, 2.2 s blue – 22m x 22m, 36 s all det. sides top surface entries tot. flux [  /(m 2 s)] 128±4126± ±0.3 mean Vertical flux information!

Energy spectra kinetic energy of muons entering the detector box kinetic energy of muons entering the detector box green – 400m x 400m, 0.27 s red – 200m x 200m, 2.2 s blue – 22m x 22m, 36 s all det. sides top surface entries tot. flux [  /(m 2 s)] 39.8 ± ± ±0.05 mean [GeV] entries tot. flux [  /(m 2 s)] 128±4126± ±0.3 mean [GeV]

walls y coordinate (height) distribution of muons entering the detector box from the sides ( only 2 instrumented sides ) y coordinate (height) distribution of muons entering the detector box from the sides ( only 2 instrumented sides ) green – 400m x 400m, 0.27 s red – 200m x 200m, 2.2 s blue – 22m x 22m, 36 s entries tot. flux [  /(m 2 s)] 17.7± ± ±0.04 mean [m] Horizontal flux information! ONLY 2 sides

NTUPLES files can be downloaded from: - see description of the contents in readme.txt file - you will also find some example macro files to read the ntuples NTUPLE (ROOT format): 1 branch „Event” 1 branch „Event” 11 leaves: 11 leaves: „no_event” (event number) „no_event” (event number) „charge” (values = „+1” for  + or „-1” for  - ) * „charge” (values = „+1” for  + or „-1” for  - ) * „cos_theta” „cos_theta” „E_kin” „E_kin” „x”, „y”, „z” „x”, „y”, „z” „px”, „py”, „pz” „px”, „py”, „pz” „ID” (track ID of muon from G4) „ID” (track ID of muon from G4) ( * ) implemented mu+/mu- ratio from „Precise Measurements of Atmospheric Muon Fluxes with the BESS Spectrometer” – (arXiv:astro-ph/ )arXiv:astro-ph/