Corrosion Testing Acknowledgements to:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kinetic Metallization
Advertisements

Grounding Electrodes.
P LATING OF A EROSPACE M ATERIALS. Reason for use: Good corrosion resistance and preferred in Aerospace over Zinc Finish/Color: Typical colors include.
HCAT Propeller Hub Chrome Plate Replacement Program
H HCAT Propeller Chrome Plate Replacement Program Edward Faillace - Steve Pasakarnis - Aaron Nardi Hamilton Sundstrand- Engineering August 29, 2001.
Issues Related to Qualification of HVOF Coatings on Landing Gear For fatigue and hydrogen embrittlement, the issue is the impact of the coating deposition.
Reactive HVOF Spraying TiN-matrix Composite Coating and its Corrosion and Wear Resistance Properties Jing Ma Hebei University of Science and Technology.
1 HCAT LANDING GEAR JTP FATIGUE PROGRAM P. E. Bretz J. Schell Metcut GEAE December 2000.
Calculating Coating Lifetime Costs
FINAL REVIEW Landing Gear JTP Wear Test Analyses J.D. Schell GE Aircraft Engines HCAT Toronto Meeting Crowne Plaza Hotel August 28-30, 2001.
Chapter 13 - Reconditioning engine blocks
SPACEPORT ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center Analysis of Corrosion Data For WC- 17%Co.
Aerospace Use Of Hexavalent Chromium And Soluble Nickel In Relation To REACh 7th October 2009 From a combined Goodrich and Rolls-Royce review of the implications.
PPAP Requirements Training
Draft JTP for Hydraulic & Pneumatic Actuators National Technical Systems / Elwin Jang / December 2000.
Manufacturing Processes Lab I MET 1321 Stick Welding part 2
Keith Legg Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing HCAT Program Review Cocoa Beach, Fl December 2000.
Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW)
HCAT PROGRESS REPORT FEBRUARY 2002 GOODRICH LANDING GEAR HCAT STATUS CONDUCTING THREE FULL SCALE TESTS: 1. Fatigue of entire MLG - Dash-8 Series
Cost/Benefit Analysis Conducted at Landing Gear Repair Facility Analysis conducted by Concurrent Technologies Corporation using Environmental Cost Accounting.
Atmospheric Corrosion Testing Comparison of Electrodeposited Hard Chrome to HVOF WC/17Co and Tribaloy 400 Three-Year Atmospheric Exposure Exposures Conducted.
Keith Legg Summary of coating integrity and planned testing HCAT Program Review August 2001 Toronto.
DO NOW LESSON # 1)What are the 5/20/2015. Focus Point: What are the Types of Punches? ► Instructional Objectives: ► 1. List the purpose of various punches.
SMAW- Electrodes NCCER Unit 8.
Project Status as of 1 April 2003
NDT of HVOF Coatings John Sauer Sauer Engineering HCAT Toronto September 25 th, 2002.
1 CHROMIUM PLATING REPLACEMENT AT SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT ROBERT GUILLEMETTE JOHN BARTALOTTA MATERIALS AND PROCESSES ENGINEERING APRIL 26, 2001.
POLLUTION PREVENTION SUB-IPT HCAT MEETING April 01 Long Beach, CA HARD CHROME PLATING ALTERNATIVES Mary Gilman Boeing C-17 Pollution Prevention Project.
Hard Chrome Alternatives Team Joint Group on Pollution Prevention Propulsion Environmental Working Group PROGRAM REVIEW MEETING April 2001 Long Beach,
Copyright UCT Defense LLC, 2003 Page 1 UltraCem TM 5 th Generation Nickel Boron To Replace Chromium Plating Presented to HCAT by Chuck McComas April 2003.
Gas Turbine Engine Project Materials Joint Test Protocol Document Principally Prepared By Jerry Schell GE Aircraft Engines Additional Input From GTE OEMs.
Keith Legg Overview of planned additional work HCAT Program Review Long Beach April 2001.
Flexible Manufacturing
Airbus A330, Picture from wikipedia website Aircraft Landing Gear
SPACEPORT ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center SAE Aerospace Materials Specifications lSAE/AMS.
INTER-LAKES BASES PRODUCTS. MODEL B-75 MACHINE BASE B-75 Model with panels and doors.
Jeff Moorman Hydraulic Systems and Flight Control Actuators (301) Navy Rod Seal Testing Project Status as of 1 Sept 2002 Results from Rod Seal.
A Hard Chrome Alternatives for Hydraulic Components Program established to assist Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center Airborne Accessories Directorate Avionics.
Hard Chrome Alternatives Team Joint Group on Pollution Prevention Propulsion Environmental Working Group PROGRAM REVIEW MEETING 1-2 April 2003 San Diego,
SMAW-Beads and Fillet Welds
TESTING STANDARDIZATION Standardization of Testing and Process Evaluation John P. Sauer SAUER ENGINEERING December 13, 2000.
EPA DOE DoD Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Improving Mission Readiness Through Environmental Research SERDP Program 1152 DACA72-00-C-003.
Keith Legg Test Status Overview HCAT Program Review NASA, Florida Dec 13,14, 2000.
SPACEPORT ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center Analysis of Residual Stress and Fracture.
Revised Draft JTP for Hydraulic & Pneumatic Actuators National Technical Systems / Elwin Jang / April, 2001.
ORENDA AEROSPACE CORPORATION PROGRESS REVIEW MEETING THE CANADIAN HARD CHROME ALTERNATIVES TEAM (HCAT) JOINT PROGRAM HVOF PROCESS DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION.
Ogden Air Logistics Center Innovation & Excellence HVOF On-Going engineering Hill AFB –WC-17Co on 300M steel Summary of A-10 bend tests Compressive.
NCCER Unit 11- Welding Level 1
Status of HCAT Integrity/Fatigue Testing John P. Sauer Sauer Engineering February 20th, 2002.
Keith Legg Overview of fatigue/spalling tests HCAT Program Review Long Beach April 2001.
A Hard Chrome Alternatives for Hydraulic Components Program established to assist Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center Airborne Accessories Directorate Avionics.
Hard Chrome Replacement NADEP Jacksonville February, 2002 Michael Linn Materials Engineering.
TRI-SERVICE GREEN GUN BARREL PROGRAM REVIEW MEETING
Keith Legg Outstanding technical issues HCAT Program Review August 2001 Toronto.
ORENDA AEROSPACE CORPORATION PROGRESS REVIEW MEETING THE CANADIAN HARD CHROME ALTERNATIVES TEAM (HCAT) JOINT PROGRAM HVOF PROCESS DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION.
Status of AFRL characterization of Thermal Sprays for Engine Applications April 2, 2003 Robert Ware (937) Air Force Research Laboratory Susan.
Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center Optical Lithography Lecture 13 G.J. Mankey
Keith Legg Clean Dry-Coating Technology for ID Chrome Replacement SERDP Project # 1151 HCAT Program Review Long Beach April 2001.
Gas Turbine Engine Project Materials Joint Test Protocol Document Principally Prepared By Jerry Schell GE Aircraft Engines Additional Input From GTE OEMs.
Sheet Metal: Notes and Descriptions MachinesProceduresTools.
HVOF CONCERNS Ogden Air Logistics Center. HVOF CONCERNS HVOF CONCERNS Hill AFB concerns 0Thick Coatings 0Spalling 0Corrosion 0Spraying Parameters Sensitivity.
Keith Legg Plasma spray ID coatings HCAT Program Review August 2001 Toronto.
…plating By Rocio SANCHEZ. Definition The process used to cover zinc with copper in making coinage involves using direct-current (DC) electricity, which.
SURFACE TREATMENT AN OVERVIEW
PRESENTED BY : AJIT BEHERA National institute of technology, Rourkela.
a PennEngineering® Company
Bearing Capacity of soil (Comparison between Field and Lab Tests)
STEEL PLATES.
Surface Engineering By Israa Faisal University of Al-Qadisiyah
Presentation transcript:

Corrosion Testing Acknowledgements to: Paul Natishan, Rick Foster, CAPT Marty Mahon Center for Corrosion Science & Engineering Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC and Key West, FL

Atmospheric Corrosion Testing Substrate Materials: 4340 steel Substrate Preparation: For EHC, grit blast with 180-220 grit Al2O3 For HVOF, grit blast with 54 grit Al2O3 Coating Deposition: EHC deposited following MIL-STD-1501 WC/17Co deposited using hybrid Diamondjet gun, hydrogen fuel, Diamalloy 2005 powder Tribaloy 400 deposited using Jet Kote II, hydrogen fuel, Stellite T-400 powder Coating thicknesses of 0.004 inches Tested as-deposited (no grinding) Epoxy masking used on non-coated surfaces

HVOF and Hard Chrome Coatings on 4340 Steel Atmospheric Exposure For 3 Years Thickness 0.004”, Coatings Not Ground

Additional Corrosion Testing To address significant discrepancy between previous B117 and atmospheric testing on flat plates, and LG B117 testing on rods, additional B117 corrosion tests were conducted as follows: Substrate Materials: 4340 rods, 1” diameter, 6” long 4340 plates, 3” x 4” x 3/16” 300M rods, 1” diameter, 6” long Coatings: WC/17Co, WC/10Co4Cr, EHC On rods, coatings to be applied on curved surface, terminating 1” from one end and 1/4” from other end (length of coating 4-3/4 inches) On plates, only coat one face 3”-wide dimension coated edge-to-edge, on 4”-wide dimension, coating to terminate 1/2-inch from edge (coated area is 3” x 3”) Deposition parameters to match Landing Gear JTP, plus must follow Boeing Spec. Sheet 160T1000 which requires that HVOF coatings not terminate with a square edge, but shall taper from full to zero thickness over a minimum length of 0.006 inches EHC coatings ground to 16 Ra finish; some HVOF coatings ground to 8 Ra Non-coated areas to be cadmium plated (including chromate conversion coating) with slight overlap of EHC and HVOF coating

Additional Corrosion Testing 4340 rods Coating Thickness Ground Spray Co. # of samples WC/Co 0.003” Y Hitemco 2 WC/Co 0.003” Y Southwest 2 WC/Co 0.003” N H 2 WC/Co 0.003” N S 2 WC/Co 0.010” Y H 2 WC/Co 0.010” Y S 2 WC/CoCr 0.003” Y H 2 WC/CoCr 0.003” Y S 2 WC/CoCr 0.003” N H 2 WC/CoCr 0.003” N S 2 WC/CoCr 0.010” Y H 2 WC/CoCr 0.010” Y S 2 EHC 0.003” Y S 2 EHC 0.010” Y S 2 Total 28 Repeat this exact matrix for the 4340 plates and the 300M rods.

WC/Co coatings (ground) on 300M steel. breached coating August 2000 August 2001 WC/Co coatings (ground) on 300M steel.

WC/Co coatings (ground) on 4340 steel. breached coating August 2000 August 2001 WC/Co coatings (ground) on 4340 steel.

Comparison of hard chrome samples. breached coating August 2000 August 2001 Comparison of hard chrome samples.

WC/Co coatings (3 mil) on 4340 steel. general corrosion breached coating unground ground WC/Co coatings (3 mil) on 4340 steel.

Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 4340 steel. general corrosion WC/Co ground 10 mil EHC ground 10 mil WC/Co-Cr ground 10 mil Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 4340 steel.

Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 300M steel. general corrosion WC/Co ground 10 mil EHC ground 10 mil WC/Co-Cr ground 10 mil Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 300M steel.

WC/Co coatings (3 mil) on 300M steel. general corrosion general corrosion breached coating unground ground WC/Co coatings (3 mil) on 300M steel.

WC/Co coatings on 4340 steel. general corrosion breached coating ground 3 mil ground 10 mil WC/Co coatings on 4340 steel.

WC/Co coatings on 300M steel. general corrosion general corrosion breached coating ground 3 mil ground 10 mil WC/Co coatings on 300M steel.

Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 4340 steel. general corrosion EHC 10 mil WC/Co ground 10 mil Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 4340 steel.

Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 300M steel. general corrosion EHC 10 mil WC/Co ground 10 mil Comparison of HVOF and EHC coatings on 300M steel.

SUMMARY OF CORROSION TESTING 10 mil thick coatings fared better than 3 mil coatings of any composition in protecting the substrate. The company applying the coating does not have a measurable, definitive effect on coating performance (given the small sample set). Salt fog cabinet used at Kennedy Space Center appeared to be slightly more aggressive than one used at Naval Research Laboratory EHC coatings outperform all other coating compositions, regardless of thickness in this year’s B117 test. At 10 mil thickness, the data set infers WC/CoCr coatings show improved performance over WC/Co coatings, though one 10 mil WC/Co-Cr coating was breached.