RESULTS Forest Cover – Treed Retention January 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EziLink RESULTS Training Session 1 – Show and Tell For the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.
Advertisements

Forest Practices Code Transition Planning and Silviculture John McClarnon Regeneration Specialist MOF.
RESULTS Training Core Module 4 Obligation Reporting Standards Unit Modifications Overview Sept 2013.
RESULTS Training Core Module 5 Obligation Reporting Standards Unit Modifications-ESF Sept 2013.
RESULTS Spacing Reporting December Background Spacing activity is conducted on young stands soon after free growing on pre-existing silviculture.
1 Wildlife Tree Retention. 2 Wildlife tree retention One of most valuable components of stand-level biodiversity Over 80 species of wildlife are critically.
RESULTS Training Core Module 1 Obligation Reporting Policy and Business Context Sept 2013.
Forest Practices Code Transition Planning Ian Miller Legislation and Policy Forester, MOF.
Guide to Developing FDP Stocking Standards
Lecture 7 Forestry 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lecture 7 Forest Inventories Avery and Burkhart Chapter 9.
Timber Supply Review and Species Management By: Paul Barolet, R.P.F., Stewardship Officer Stewardship Officer.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS ESF Submission March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Small Scale Salvage Program Application Process. Purpose To establish an application and approval process for small scale timber salvage that is efficient,
1 Forest and Range Practices Act: Forest Stewardship Plans.
1 Merritt TSA Type II Silviculture Analysis Merritt, B.C. April 5th, 2007.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Online Data Entry March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Online Data Entry Demo March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Understanding Key Applications 1 Ministry of Forests Understanding Key Applications: An overview of application inter-connections Corporate IT Training.
Survey and Update of Backlog/NSR in the Mackenzie & Dawson Creek TSA’s Anna Monetta, RPF Silviculture Specialist - Omineca Region Ministry of Forests Lands.
RESULTS Training Forest for Tomorrow Jan Learning Objectives Documentation Guidance Opening Codes and Funding source Codes Use of New vs. Existing.
Presented by: Peter McAuliffe, Sr. Forestry Specialist, Regulatory Affairs and Stewardship Branch Lori Miller, GIS Analyst, Regulatory Affairs and Stewardship.
Overview of the importance of info systems Ralph Winter October 8, 2004.
Rehabilitation and Regeneration of Degraded Forest Stands
RESULTS Training Core Module 3 Obligation Reporting Submitting by ESF Sept 2013.
Live Meeting RESULTS - Reports Species Monitoring.
RESULTS Spacing Reporting December Background Spacing activity is conducted on young stands soon after free growing on pre-existing silviculture.
RESULTS FRPA s.108 Application November 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
Timber Supply Review and Species Management By: Paul Barolet, R.P.F., Stewardship Officer Stewardship Officer.
A new Integrated World Linking Results-Based Code, Inventory Updates & Timber Supply Review By the FC Linkages Team October 2, 2002.
1 FSP Tracking System Overview Bill Beard / John Gallimore March 8, 2007 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Bill Beard/John Gallimore on the.
RESULTS Corporate Reporting System March 2012 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS – Fertilization Overview Interior 2012 Fertilization Meeting February 8 th, 2012 Prince George, BC Paul Rehsler, RPF Resource Practices Branch.
Introduction to eziLink Training For the Ministry of Forests and Sustainable Resource Management.
Special Investigation of Compliance with Section 86 of the FPPR Are we getting RESULTS?The devil is in the details.
Welcome to the Manage Inventory lesson for the North Carolina Immunization Branch. Contents: Adding Inventory Modifying Inventory Inventory Reports **
A1 Agenda RESULTS Training RESULTS & Mapview RESULTS & Mapview MOF Information Management Group 2005 Module 8 – RESULTS & Mapview.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
FN Cultural Heritage Resources The WLP must specify a strategy for conserving and protecting “cultural heritage resources” that are the focus of a traditional.
Forest Planning and Practices Regulation Amendments to Protect Secondary Structure Joint Presentation of: Joint Presentation of: Federation of BC WoodlotAssociationsFederation.
Silviculture Reporting Silviculture business under the FRPA Act and revised FPC Ralph Winter Forest Practices Branch Feb 10, 2003.
Ecological rationale for determining buffer width Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) Report.
RESULTS Business & CRS Overview March 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
1 FRPA Quiz Show Harvesting & Roads Module FRPA Training Program February 2004.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Legislative Context and Submission Documentation March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Range Planning 1 & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
A1 Agenda RESULTS Training Planning Planning MOF Information Management Group 2005 Module 7 – RESULTS Generating Reports.
Cruising Manual Highlights Ministry of Forests & Range 2009.
LBI meeting, October 29 th, 2013, Nelson. RESULTS project details  In September 2011, Resource Practices Branch awarded to CTQ.  CTQ identified RESULTS.
Streamlining Project Final Version August 2005 Cutblock Integration Team Proposals Creating a streamlined forest information management model…
What’s New? RESULTS Training RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? MoFR Information Management Group March 2007 Module 12 – RESULTS 3.0 What’s.
RESULTS Training Carbon Offset Reporting to RESULTS Sept 2013.
1 FRPA Quiz Show Silviculture Module FRPA Training Program February 2004.
MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1 MSRM Vegetation Update Resource Information Business Area.
Key BC Silviculture Statistics ä Forest Practices Branch BC Forest Service September 8, 2009.
RESULTS Spatial Views & Business Overview November 2009 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Training Core Module 2 Obligation Reporting Online Entry and Mandatory ESF Conditions Sept 2013.
FRPA Data Management/Reporting System (Data Collection and Reporting) Building Your New System: Business Requirements Suggestions and Questions RSM Pilot.
1 BULKLEY TSA PLANNING AND HOW IT HELPS SILVICULTURE DECISIONS ON THE GROUND Bill Camenzind, R.P.F, Bulkley/Cassiar District Jay Baker, Silvicon Services.
RESULTS: A New Integrated Tool for Forest Stewardship John Gallimore, RPF Information Management Group Ministry of Forests ESF User Meeting December 9th,
Live Meeting RESULTS - Reports Species Monitoring.
FRPA Silvicultural Tests2 2: MOFR, 2006
Tree Harvesting By Mr. Kennedy.
Shelterwood and clearcut
Management Of Dry-belt Douglas-fir
Small Scale Salvage Program
Cruising Manual Update 2017
RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? 1 MoFR Information Management Group March 2007
Guide to Developing FDP Stocking Standards
Presentation transcript:

RESULTS Forest Cover – Treed Retention January 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi

RESULTS – Scope Supplemental to RESULTS Information Submission Specifications: Licensee Submissions document Submitting Forest Cover to RESULTS for Openings with Treed Retention.

RESULTS – Application Obligation to establish a free growing stand: In accordance to FRPA s.29(1), s.29 (2) and submit under Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (FPPR) sections 86, 87, 88; application for relieve under FRPA s.108 and FPPR.96, and declaration sunder FPPR s.97 In accordance to FPCBCA s.69.1 and s.70 and submit under Timber Harvesting and Silviculture Practices Regulation sections 45, 46, 47, 48 Government-funded activities reporting in accordance to RESULTS Information Submission Specifications: Government-Funded Silviculture Activities.

RESULTS FC Submission via ESF Forest Cover submission must be done via ESF which contains both XML (attribute) and GML (spatial) information. Information on what is ESF and how to submit via ESF may be found at:

RESULTS FC Submission - Keys Keys are what allows RESULTS to identify an opening. If forest cover submission is for a new opening, it must be created. If forest cover submission it is for an existing opening, it must be provided.

RESULTS FC Submission – Keys for harvested areas OptionsNew Tenured CutblockExisting Tenure Cutblock ESF Action CodeI “Insert”U “Update” Must use either tenure key for “I” insert. May use any one for “U” update Licence Number Cutting Permit Cutblock Licence Number Cutting Permit Cutblock Timbermark Cutblock Timbermark Cutblock Mapsheet Grid Mapsheet Letter Mapsheet Square Opening Number Opening ID

RESULTS FC Submission – Keys for non-harvested areas OptionsNew OpeningExisting Opening ESF Action CodeI “Insert”U “Update” Must use either opening key for “I” insert. May use any one for “U” update Mapsheet Grid Mapsheet Letter Mapsheet Square Opening Number Mapsheet Grid Mapsheet Letter Mapsheet Square Opening Number Opening ID*Opening ID * Non FT-opening categories may be created via ESF or online to generate Opening ID for submission

RESULTS FC Submission – Components Polygon Component – all polygons Inventory Component (for areas subject to stocking standards, where silviculture and inventory components are identical. Silviculture Component (for areas subject to stocking standards, where silviculture and inventory components are not identical) Inventory Component (for areas not subject to stocking standards; or for areas subject to stocking standards where silviculture and inventory components are not identical)

RESULTS FC Submission – Components ComponentsDetails Polygon (for all polygons) Standard (SU) Id Polygon (Licensee) ID Area Reference Year Re-entry Year (future yr for harvest entry, when Obj = TIM) Stocking Status Stocking Type Reserve Type Reserve Objective Site Index Site Index Source Tree Cover Pattern

Inventory Component (areas subject to stocking standards, where silviculture and inventory components are identical) Silviculture Component (areas subject to stocking standards, where silviculture and inventory components are not identical) Inventory Component (areas not subject to stocking standards, where silviculture and inventory components are not identical) Layer (I-even-aged; 1, 2, 3, 4 – multi-layered) Crown Closure Total Stems Total Well-Spaced Stems* Well Spaced sph* Free Growing sph* Average Basal Area* Species Species, Percent Average Age Average Height Damage Agent Incident Percent Incidence Area Layer (S-even-aged; 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S – multi-layered) Crown Closure Total Well-Spaced Stems Well Spaced sph Free Growing sph Average Basal Area Species Species, Percent Average Age Average Height Damage Agent Incident Percent Incidence Area Layer (I-even-aged; 1, 2, 3, 4 – multi-layered) Crown Closure Total Stems Average Basal Area Species Species, Percent Average Age Average Height Damage Agent Incident Percent Incidence Area RESULTS FC Submission – Components

LayerDescriptionNotes I SEven-aged standPredominant stand dbh or height (depending on stand age) 1 1SMature Layer – uneven-agedUneven-aged stand with trees 12.5 cm dbh – based on commercial trees 2 2SPole Layer – uneven-agedUneven-aged stand with trees >= 12.5 cm dbh – based on commercial trees 3 3SSapling Layer – uneven-agedUneven-aged stand with trees 1.3m in height to 7.49 cm dbh – based on commercial trees 4 4SRegen Layer – uneven-agedUneven-aged stand with trees < 1.3m in height - based on commercial trees RESULTS FC Submission – Components

Reserve CodeDescription G - GroupMappable reserves or short-term retention area 0.25ha or greater* “Group” reserve type classification denotes full retention. Long-term group reserve not associated with Standards Units. Short –term group reserves with timber management objective “TIM” subject to FPPR 16(4) and 44(4) is associated with an SU. D - DispersedAny polygon in a SU within which the denuded and residual treed portion are not individually mapped. Dispersed reserve type classification denotes varying degrees of partial retention, ranging from low (>5m 2 per ha)** to high volume. Boundary of entire polygon is mapped and denuded and residual portions of the polygon are described in inventory and silviculture component multi-layer forest cover fields. For the dispersed residuals, use best available forest cover information for Layer 1 if recent survey is not available, last forest cover map or cruise summary report. RESULTS FC Submission: Reserve Type Code * RESULTS can accommodate mappable units 0.1ha ** Dispersed retention <5m 2 per ha do not need to be reported, but considered to be best management practices if linked to FSP results or strategy or associated with a silvicultural system (eg. seed tree)

Reserve CodeDescription BIOBiodiversity BOTBotanical Forest Products CHRCultural Heritage Resource CWDCoarse Woody Debris FHForest health FUEFuel Management MSMMSMA Treated Area OTHOther RECRecreation RMARiparian Management Area SENSensitive Site TERTerrain Stability TIMTimber management VISVisual WTRWildlife Tree Retention Goals RESULTS FC Submission: Reserve Objective Code

RESULTS FC Submission: Reserve Objective - TIM Reserve Objective – Many codes exist as residual stems serve multiple purposes. “TIM” denotes residuals that are considered short term retention and available for subsequent harvest entry prior to the end of the current rotational planning cycle (whether or not they are actually harvested). When “TIM” is used, a re-entry year is entered as part of polygon component. Any reserve codes other than “TIM” are considered long term retention and not available for subsequent harvest entry until next rotational planning cycle.

RESULTS FC Submission: Reserve Objective - WTR Reserve Objective – Many codes exist as residual stems serve multiple purposes. “WTR” – residuals left for wildlife tree retention as primary objective. WTR goals would be counted towards meeting FPPR s.66 requirements for wildlife tree retention in RESULTS,

RESULTS FC Submission: Average Basal Area Many silvicultural systems have specific target BA/hectare (or as a percentage of pre-harvest BA/hectare) retention level as part of stocking standard In these cases retained BA/hectare is included with inventory and silviculture components of forest cover submissions

RESULTS

RESULTS Business guidance  RESULTS Information Submission Specifications – Licensee Submissions

RESULTS Business guidance  Submitting Forest Cover to RESULTS for Openings with Treed Retention _Submissions.pdf

RESULTS Reserve Example: Short Term Retention – Group with TIM Polygon “B” is Group with TIM within SU 2

RESULTS Reserve Example: Short Term Retention – Dispersed with TIM Polygon “A” is Dispersed with TIM within SU 1 with full label for multi-storey stand

RESULTS Reserve Example: Short Term Retention – Dispersed with TIM Polygon “1” is Dispersed with TIM within SU 1 with full label for multi-storey Note that example shows only Mature Layer, but all layers were provided (Pole, Sapling and Regen)

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Group with WTR Polygon “W” is Group with WTR objective

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Group with BIO Polygon “W” is Group with BIO objective

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Dispersed with OTH Polygon “1A” is Dispersed with OTH within SU 1 with full label

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Dispersed with OTH Polygon “1A” is Dispersed with OTH within SU 1 with full label

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Dispersed with WTR Polygon “A” is Dispersed with WTR objective Within SU1

RESULTS Reserve Example: Long Term Retention – Dispersed WTR Polygon “A” is Dispersed with WTR objective

RESULTS Submission Requirements Full ESF Submission – xml (attribute) & gml (spatial) for forest cover No Online - Forest Cover Edit attribute only No ESF spatial only updates VRIMS does not pick up attribute or spatial only updates!

RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency – Pending work VRIMs – does not reflect 2009 procedural coding changes. VRIMS team is aware and alignment requirements and will schedule accordingly. Corporate Reporting System’s WTR reports does not reflect new procedures and are unreliable for recently reported areas that uses new procedures.* Business Views – Reserve View is based on old reserve type code usage of “W”, “R”,”O”.* * Strategy is being discussed to balance data based on old versus new reporting procedures

RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency – Current Situation - CRS WTR Report WTP & Riparian based on “W” & “R” (now retired) No conversion of old records so WTP for these records – they exist as is. As new FC submission occur, these will eventually be updated to new standards; however, anything already free growing will remain as old codes.

RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency – Interim workaround to CRS WTR Report RDD008-Forest Cover Report (CSV only) Sort perform summary by Reserve Type & Reserve Objectives Sort by MAT NAT as alternative step Use Excel or MSAccess to calculate.

RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency – Current Situation - LRDW RSLT_RESERVE_SVW WHSE_FOREST_VEGETATION_FOREST_COVER_SVW is used by LRDW, ILRR, FTA Pulls from RESULTS where SILV_RESERVE_CODE is “W”, “R”, “O” This is not applicable to records based on new procedures “G”, “D” & usage of SILV_RESERVE_CODE)

RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency Interim Workaround– LRDW RSLT_RESERVE_SVW RESULTS Reserve Reporting Dependency Interim Workaround– LRDW RSLT_RESERVE_SVW Use WHSE_FOREST_VEGETATION_FOREST_COVER_INV_SVW (join/link via OPENING_ID) to (join/link via OPENING_ID) to OPENING_VW (contains disturbance end date) Pull all SILV_RESERVE_CODE in (“W”,”R”,”G”,”D”) and Pull all SILV_OBJECTIVE_CODE (this reflect both old and new procedures) Use WHSE_FOREST_VEGETATION_FOREST_COVER_INV_SVW (join/link via OPENING_ID) to (join/link via OPENING_ID) to OPENING_VW (contains disturbance end date) Pull all records STOCKING_STATUS_CODE = “MAT” & STOCKING_TYPE_CODE = “NAT” Pull SILV_POLYGON_NUMBER – to display – anything that is like “%W%”, “WTR”, “WTP” may be potentially Wildlife Tree Retention (many licensee have been coding in this manner, but not based on any existing standard)

RESULTS – Treed Retention – Questions? Contact information: or Caroline MacLeod: Please complete evaluation form You will require your log on confirmation number: www106.livemeeting.com/lrs/ /Survey.aspx?Preview=1