1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Foster Care Redesign: Region 3b
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
1 There’s a Place in My Past where darkness used to live and When Dad came home, I’d run & hide and hoped he wouldn’t hit Another black eye here, a couple.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Child Welfare Workforce Changing Context & Implications Resulting from Privatization & Performance-Based Contracting Karl Ensign, Director Evaluation for.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Donald R. Rainey, Sr., CPPB/VCO Director, Office of General Services Virginia Department of Social Services.
Spotlight on the Federal Health Care Reform Law. 2. The Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 was signed March 30, 2010.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Apirl 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Funds Educable Child.
Innovative funding for infrastructure services: the use of Output Based Aid in the Honduras water sector Cledan Mandri-Perrott Infrastructure, Economics.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Making CWLA Work for You Presentation to CWLA Southern Region and Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Membership October 5, 2006 Atlanta,
Iowa’s Section 2703 Health Home Development October 04, 2011 Presentation to: 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference Show Me…New Directions in State.
Department of Human Services FY 2012 FY 2011 Amended Budget Considerations.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
State of the State - Drivers of Change June 14, 2011 Normer Adams Executive Director Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children In 2009, I.
Mark Washington, DHS Assistant Commissioner “Preparing for Tomorrow Today” Part II April 23, 2010 FY, FT The Transforming of a Culture and the Potential.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
USING PERFORMANCE DATA TO WIN SUPPORT BARBARA EMERSON, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA SEPTEMBER 2004.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Provider Summit: Preparing for Tomorrow Today Promoting shared responsibility through the outcomes-focused purchasing of evidence-based services.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
1 OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL CHILD CARE FY 2010 PERFORMANCE REPORT Submitted by: Keith D. Bostick, L.C.S.W., Director Department of Human Services Board Meeting.
Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.
Retrospective Rating Program Overview Presented by: Ashley Frank and Tim Smolen.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
Overview of Child Welfare Reform in the U.S. Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare 2016 Spring Conference Crystal Collins-Camargo, MSW PhD Kent.
Related to the framework of the State and Federal Accountability Measures Customer Statisfaction with the ACSI.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan. Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Missouri Behavioral Health Independent Practice Association (IPA)
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes
THE TRANFORMING OF A CULTURE Steps to Strengthen the Alliance Between
Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program
Howard G. Baldwin, Jr. Commissioner
Georgia DFCS Performance-Based Contracting
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Where it Belongs There’s a Place in My Past where darkness used to live and When Dad came home, I’d run & hide and hoped he wouldn’t hit Another black.
Keys to Housing Security
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September 25, 2009

2 Presentation Overview  What is performance based contracting?  Measuring for meaning – what do you want to measure and how do you develop performance indicators?  Leveling the playing field for providers – what is risk adjustment?  How do you set performance benchmarks?  Carrots and sticks – what type of fiscal foundation do you need?  System reform – what supports do you need to be successful?

3 What is Performance Based Contracting (PBC)?  Emphasizes results related to output, quality and outcomes rather than how the work is performed  Has clearly defined objectives and timeframes  Uses measurable performance standards and quality assurance plans  Provides performance incentives and penalties and ties payment to outcomes

4 Expectations and Benefits of Performance Based Contracting  Encourages innovation and competition  Results in both lower costs and improved performance  Shifts some risk to contractors so they are responsible for achieving outcomes  Encourages governmental entities and contractors to work together to provide the best services to children and families  Documents results for fiscal accountability

5 Why are Public Child Welfare Agencies Interested in PBC?  Promotes achievement of specific departmental and federal outcomes  Identifies priority areas and invests resources to maximize client outcomes  Sets groundwork to evaluate programs and services  Documents results for fiscal accountability  Transfers risks (or at least shares it) with the contracted Private Provider

6 Why are Private Agencies Interested in PBC?  Increased opportunity for innovation and creativity  Ability to engage in full partnership with government  Reinvestment of savings into improved services for clients  Potential for less frequent, but more meaningful contract monitoring

7 Challenges of PBC  What outcomes are you measuring?  What baseline data are you relying on?  How reliable is the data?  How do you define your outcomes?  Should the public agency “punish” contractors for legitimate effort that falls short of the goals set?  How do you manage other systems impacting your performance?

8 What type of Outcomes are in PBC?  It will be no surprise to learn that most PBC’s have outcomes that are based upon the CFSR Standards.  In addition, PBC usually have outcomes that are based upon the public sector practice model…i.e. : Georgia Family Centered Practice model  Or court ordered settlements…i.e.: Kenny A.

9 What type of Outcomes are in PBC? Examples of outcomes:  Reduce the length of time for children to achieve permanence  Increase the number of children who exit to permanence  Increase the number of children who enter family- based care  Increase the number of children who are placed with kin  Reduce the number of children who enter congregate care  Reduce the number of children in congregate care

10 How do incentives and penalties work in PBC? Some PBC payments are made in the form of a case rate for services. Depending upon the success of the outcomes, the provider can receive additional incentives or payments or not. Example: Iowa Family Safety and Permanency Contracts Performance Incentive Payment: The contractor will be eligible to receive an incentive payment for each child reunified within twelve months [the child’s Trial Home Visit period will be considered as part of this 12 month period] who remains home for at least six months without experiencing reentry into care. If reentry occurs within six [6] months of the reunification date, the contractor is not eligible for this incentive. 

How do incentives and penalties work in PBC? Performance Incentive Payment: The contractor will be eligible to receive an incentive payment for each case they serve that meeting the following condition:  None of the children residing in the case household at any time during the safety service or prior to the end of the department assessment are placed out of the home by order of the court or by voluntary placement agreement. 11

12 How will we get to PBC in Georgia?  Staff in OPUOM (Office of Provider utilization and Outcome Management) will begin editing the current CCI and CPA contract templates to include PBC language and outcomes as well as CFSR language – Completed by 11/30/09  Review and Editing of first draft – Completed by 1/15/10  Two Sub-Groups of the Provider Network will review and give feed back on 2 nd draft of the PBC’s. CPA Sub-Group will review CPA Template Contract and CCI Sub Group will review CCI Template Contract. SG’s will submit comments and recommendations to OPUOM Staff - Completed by 3/1/10  A Provider Summit will be scheduled for Provider CPA’s and CCI’s to review new CPA and CCI Contracts that will be issued for fiscal year 2010 – Completed by 4/15/10  New PBC will be mailed to CCI and CPA Providers – Completed by May 1, 2010  CPA and CCI Providers return signed contracts to DHS by – 6/15/10  Executed Contracts returned to all CPA and CCI Providers who have returned Contracts – Completed by 7/1/10

13 How will outcomes and indicators be developed?  Outcomes and Indicators will be developed based upon CFSR (federal outcomes), Kenny A Decree and Divisional/State Standards

14 What Everyone Wants to Know!???? FACTS……….  During the first year of PBC, there will be no financial penalties assessed to Providers for not meeting Outcome Measure Standards (OMS)  First year data will be very important, because even though there will not be penalties assessed the first year, a baseline of performance will be computed to rank Provider Agencies Performance.  The higher the rank of the agency the faster referrals will be made to them from the county offices  In the second year of PBC agency rankings will be re- determined each quarter: September, December and March

15 What Everyone Wants to Know!???? FACTS……….  Agencies will have opportunities to receive “Incentive Bonus” pay by meeting outcomes related to specific outcome goals and/or populations of kids –to be determined (incentive bonus pay will begin in year one contracts!)  Technical Assistance (TA) to agencies will begin officially in year one. TA can be requested by an agency, suggested to an agency by OPUOM staff or mandated to an agency based upon poor performance outcome indicators. Corrective Action Plans will accompany all mandated TA.

16 Step 5: Connecting Payment to Performance Penalties & Rewards

17 Why Should We Care About Measuring Performance?  What gets measured gets done.  If you don’t measure results, you can’t tell success from failure.  If you can’t see success, you can’t reward it.  If you can’t reward success, you’re probably rewarding failure.  If you can’t see success, you can’t learn from it.  If you can’t recognize failure, you can’t correct it.  If you can demonstrate results, you can win public support. From Reinventing Government