RFQ Integrated Design Would like to have a method of designing RFQ where all steps are integrated: –Engineering design. –EM modelling. –Beam dynamics simulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RFQ development for high power beams
Advertisements

The Front End Test Stand Collaboration ELECTROMAGNETIC DESIGN OF A RFQ FOR THE FRONT END TEST STAND AT RAL A. Kurup, A. Letchford The RAL front end test.
Imperial College 1 Progress at the RAL Front End Test Stand J. Pozimski Talk outline : Overview Ion source development LEBT RFQ Beam Chopper MEBT.
RFQ Matcher. What am I doing this time?! Concerned that modulations and matcher affect field flatness and frequency These are very small features How.
Tuning the Frequency of the RFQ High Energy End. What are the issues? Both input & output ends of RFQ must be independently tuned for 324 MHz Design of.
Effect of RFQ Modulations on Frequency and Field Flatness
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly 7 th March 2013.
Final Design of a CW Radio-Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) for the Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)* Abstract: The Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)
RAL Front End Test Stand Overview, Status and Plans RAL 12 th January 2005 Alan Letchford, ISIS Injector Group.
Status of the RFQ (i.e. the 4-vane cold model) Ajit Kurup UKNF Meeting 3 rd October 2007.
RFQ CAD Model Tolerance Studies Simon Jolly 14 th December 2011.
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
Is an RFQ a good candidate for a next- generation underground accelerator? Underground Accelerator for Nuclear Astrophysics Workshop October 27-28, 2003.
Technology Education  40 Week Course 20 Weeks (6 th Grade) 20 Weeks (7 th Grade)  Single or Double Periods  Similar Experiences in all Classes  Math/Measurement.
Proposal for the continuation of the Front End Test Stand Accelerator peer review panel August 2011 Alan Letchford STFC, Rutherford Appleton Lab. On behalf.
RFQ Thermal Analysis Scott Lawrie. Vacuum Pump Flange Vacuum Flange Coolant Manifold Cooling Pockets Milled Into Vanes Potentially Bolted Together Tuner.
Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Possible Sr. Projects from Michael Scarpulla Neil E. Cotter ECE Department UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
RFQ CAD Model Beam Dynamics Studies Simon Jolly 3 rd August 2011.
F.E.T.S. RFQ Mechanical Design by Peter Savage 7 th January 2010.
Dustin Halko Jose Rosales Jon Joo Malvinder Gill.
Black = Manual (process or data import) Blue = Electronic (process, data import or software) Purple = Design iteration loop Dotted = Partially implemented.
NuFACT06, Irvine 27. August 2006 The Front End Test Stand (FETS) is a collaborative project, between CCLRC (ISIS & ASTeC) and UK universities (Imperial.
Imperial College 1 Plans and Costs Front End Test Stand Aim is to demonstrate a 60 mA, 2 ms, 50 pps chopped beam at 3 MeV RAL/ISIS (ION SOURCE, CHOPPER,
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
FETS Progress UKNF OsC 21 st June 2010 Dan Faircloth Faircloth.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Peter Savage, HEP, Imperial College LondonFETS meeting, 30 June 2005 Stem thermal model RFQ Rod type Stem Rod mount RAL license ALGOR Vane type Designs.
Current Status of Pepperpot Emittance Measurement System Simon Jolly Imperial College FETS Meeting, 22/02/06.
Replies to Spanish RFQ Questions (slides re-used from previous talks)
FETS RFQ Beam Dynamics Simulations for RFQSIM, CST and Comsol Field Maps Simon Jolly 2 nd June 2010.
Christoph Gabor, ASTeC HIPPI—Meeting (WP 5) 26 th – 28 th September 2007 Non—destructive transverse emittance measurement device The Front End Test Stand.
RFQ 3Dtree Space Charge Studies Simon Jolly 6 th June 2012.
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
RFQ – Design, Components and Fabrication 1 We aim to design and manufacture a Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ).
RFQ GPT Input Beam Distributions Simon Jolly 22 nd August 2012.
The RAL Front End Test Stand David Findlay for Alan Letchford Accelerator Division, ISIS Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory HIPPI-05, Cosener’s.
RFQ Exit Bunch Modelling Simon Jolly 25 th July 2012.
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
HEP Christmas Meeting 2014 FFAG Accelerators at Manchester 18 th – 19 th December 2014 Jimmy Garland In collaboration with Rob Appleby, Hywel Owen and.
ESS RFQ B. POTTIN and RFQ team CEA-IRFU. RFQ design Strategy 3 RF codes to validate calculations Consideration of machining and assembly possibilities.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
PXIE RFQ Engineering Design Steve Virostek Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 10, 2012 Project X Collaboration
RFQ CAD Model Tolerance Studies Simon Jolly 2 nd May 2012.
PXIE RFQ Design Overview Derun Li for PXIE RFQ Design Team Center for Beam Physics Accelerator and Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National.
The RAL Front End Test Stand
CLIC Common RF-girder study
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
GPT Simulations of the Ion Source Beam
Time-Reversed Particle Simulations In GPT (or “There And Back Again”)
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Joint Accelerator Research JGU & HZB
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
Physics I Class 20 Electric Potential.
SIGNIFICANT PHYSICS CHANGES
commissioning and measurements
Importing Transmittals Using the Excel Spreadsheet Template
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Revving up Electrohydraulic Power Steering with Virtual Prototyping
WiTricity Leverages Magnetic Resonance for Flexible Wireless Charging
ICAP 2006, Chamonix Mont-Blanc
Simon Jolly UKNFIC Meeting 25th April 2008
Academic Licenses of COMSOL Multiphysics at LiU
Presentation transcript:

RFQ Integrated Design Would like to have a method of designing RFQ where all steps are integrated: –Engineering design. –EM modelling. –Beam dynamics simulations. Integrating design steps allows us to characterise effects of: –Fringe fields and higher order modes. –Limitations of current modelling techniques. –Thermal and mechanical stress limits. –Particular CNC machining techniques and options on beam dynamics. 24/02/11Simon Jolly, Imperial College London 1

RFQ Integrated Design Steps 24/02/11 RFQSIM Inventor (CAD) Comsol GPT Matla b Integrate RFQSIM, Inventor, Comsol, GPT and Matlab Excel Matla b 2Simon Jolly, Imperial College London

CAD & E-field Modelling Electrostatic field mapping in Comsol almost complete: –Semi-automated modelling of individual cells: almost fully automated, just working out the gremlins… –Already produced high resolution field map from CAD model for beam dynamics simulations. –Currently focusing on design of matching-in and -out sections. CAD modelling of vane tip modulations now complete: –Using values in Excel spreadsheet, possible to create arbitrary vane modulation design up to 1,000 cells in less than a minute. –Vane tip modulation model already added to bulk FETS RFQ CAD model: ready for machining. 24/02/11Simon Jolly, Imperial College London 3

Beam Dynamics Simulations 24/02/11Simon Jolly, Imperial College London 4 Energy Spread (60mA) Transmission (60mA) Beam dynamics simulations carried out in GPT using field maps. For nominal 60mA beam, CAD- based field map gives very similar results to coefficient-based field map from RFQSIM (A. Letchford): –>92% transmission of particles above 2.9MeV. –Slight difference in energy spread and transmission: CAD-based map gives better transmission at high currents!