Economics of Alfalfa Rotations Ken Barnett UW-Extension January 26, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
These Graphs Represent An Average of Detailed Records of Farms Enrolled in Farm Management Programs located in North Central North Dakota (Region 2) and.
Advertisements

Farmland Values and Leasing Key Questions Chapter 20 §What determines the value of farmland? §What are the advantages and disadvantages of owning vs. leasing?
Farmland Leasing Economics 333. Types of Rental Arrangements Cash Rent Flexible Cash Rent Crop Share 50-50Tenant & Landlord 67-33Tenant & Landlord Custom.
Flex Leases Land Bubble and Profitability Henderson County January 12, 2011 Greg Halich
The Emerging Role of Agriculture in Economic Development
Strawberry Enterprise Budgeting & AGR-Lite Crop Insurance May 25, 2007 Paul D. Mitchell University of Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics.
Silage and Haylage: facing new economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
ND Farm & Ranch Business Management 2009 Region 3 Annual Report Steve Metzger Carrington Research Extension Center and Carrington Public Schools Carrington,
Missouri FBMA 2008 Analysis and Comparisons FBMA Record Summary 161 Farms Submitted Analysis –141 Included in Summary 56 with enterprise analysis.
HOW TO USE ENTERPRISE BUDGETS By Sherrill Nott, Roger Betz, and Gerald Schwab Day 3: 10: :30 a.m.
Missouri FBMA 2007 Analysis and Comparisons FBMA Record Summary 143 Farms Submitted Analysis –122 Included in Summary 53 with enterprise analysis.
2012 Crop Budgets: Corn, Soybeans, Wheat? Alan Miller and Craig Dobbins Purdue University is an Equal Opportunity/Equal Access institution.
Farm Management Chapter 20 Land  Control and Use.
Chapter 10 Enterprise Budgeting
The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service A Decision Tool for Improved Beef Cattle Production, Management and Marketing System Analysis.
WHAT’S PRECISION WORTH?
The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural.
Can You Pay $300/acre Land Rent with $4 Corn? November 18-20, 2013 Greg Halich 311 CE Barnhart Dept. Agricultural Economics.
Purdue University is an equal access/equal opportunity institution Economics of Organic Farming What Do We Know? Corinne Alexander Department of Agricultural.
High-Stakes Workshop December 17, 2010 Doug Marshall Farm Mgt. Instructor Madison Area Technical College.
THE ‘COST IS RIGHT’ BREAK-EVEN ENTERPRISE ANALYISI  Section: Advanced Agribusiness  Unit: Farm Ranch Business Management.
© Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Farm Management Chapter 12 Whole-Farm Planning.
Determining an Equitable Crop Share Lease AgLease101.org a product of the North Central Farm Management Extension Committee.
2013 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Managing in a Turbulent World Income, Financial Outlook, and Adjustments.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
Keith Torgerson, NDSCS. Farms in the Annual Red River Valley Annual Report FINAN, the analysis software, allows us to take a closer look at the farms.
Farm Management 2011 MC Non-Math. 3. A township is six miles square and includes A. 6 sections. B. 36 sections. C. 40 sections. D. 160 sections. E. None.
Farm Management 2011 Non-Math M/C Problems. 22. For an individual under age 50, the maximum allowable IRA contribution and deduction in 2010 was A. $1,000.
Fixed and Flexible Cash Rental Arrangements AgLease101.org a product of the North Central Farm Management Extension Committee.
Economics of Hay Production Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock.
Leasing: an Introduction Gordon Groover, Tom Stanley, Jesse Richardson.
Relative Cost Efficiency of No-Till Farms 2008 Ag Profitability Conference: McPherson Michael Langemeier January 15, 2008.
Economics of Forage Harvest and Storage Systems Forage Harvesters Silos.
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education Keith Torgerson, NDSCS.
Missouri FBMA 2011 Analysis and Comparisons FBMA Record Summary 153 Farms Submitted Analysis –151 Included in Summary 111 with enterprise analysis.
Does Grazing Lower My Cost of Production? Kenny Burdine University of Kentucky.
Understanding Basic Economics Principles Agribusiness Management.
Estimating your Cost of Production for Growing Irrigated Corn Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics UW-Madison and UW-Extension Hancock ARS.
Organic Agriculture …… Comparison to the Conventional Agriculture: Still Viable? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
Budgets: Uses in Farm Management
Economics of Groundwater Use in the Beryl-Enterprise Area.
Continuous Calving: Are Economic Incentives Large Enough to Eliminate the Traditional Practice? by D. Doye and M. Popp INTRODUCTION Why, despite expert.
Chapter 10 Enterprise Budgeting
ND Farm & Ranch Business Management 2010 Region 3 Annual Report Steve Metzger Carrington Research Extension Center and Carrington Public Schools Carrington,
Budgeting Tools Enterprise Budgeting Partial Budgeting
Crop Compare Dwight Aakre, Farm Management Specialist Andy Swenson, Farm & Family Resource Management Specialist.
Whole Farm Planning—Ch.12 Key questions n What are the steps in preparing a whole farm budget? n What is it used for? n How do short-run and long-run budgets.
1 RISING INPUT COSTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CROP ROTATIONS AND CASH RENT LEVELS Gary Schnitkey.
Budget Analysis Ag Management Chapter 4. Planning a Budget GGood planning = Increased Returns TThe job you do when your budget for your farm or ranch.
Alfalfa Best Practices
GRAZING ECONOMICS: YEAH, BUT WILL IT MAKE MONEY? Dr. Curt Lacy Agricultural Economists University of Georgia.
How Will Farmers Respond to High Fuel and Fertilizer Prices? Damona Doye Regents Professor and Extension Economist Oklahoma State University.
Using Production Costs and Breakeven Levels to Determine Income Possibilities by Gary Schnitkey and Dale Lattz.
Missouri FBMA 2009 Analysis and Comparisons FBMA Record Summary 149 Farms Submitted Analysis –134 Included in Summary 71 with enterprise analysis.
Understanding Personal Finances and Goals and Basic Economic Principles.
ECONOMICS OF IMPROVED GRAZING SYSTEMS Dr. Tommie Shepherd, Dr. John McKissick and Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia.
Record Keeping and Cost Classification Parr Rosson Professor and Director Center for North American Studies Texas A&M University.
Economics of Crop Production. The Three Components of Profit Crop Yield Production Cost Selling Price Received.
Managing With Tight Operating Margins Ron Haugen North Dakota State University Extension Service 2016 Extension Risk Management Educational National Conference.
Farmland Purchase Analysis. Resources ISU Ag. Decision Maker; – Farmland Purchase analysis – Farmland values – Costs of production – Price assumptions.
Cost Concepts—Key Questions Chapter 9, pp  How do operating and ownership costs differ?  How are ownership costs calculated?  How do cash and.
Chapter 10: Kay and Edwards
Chapter 12: Kay and Edwards
Farm Business Analysis
Enterprise Budgets Components and Concepts
Crop Enterprise Information
Divide and Conquer Allocations
Integrated Crop-Livestock Production Systems
Record Keeping and Cost Classification
The Emerging Role of Agriculture in Economic Development
Presentation transcript:

Economics of Alfalfa Rotations Ken Barnett UW-Extension January 26, 2005

Alfalfa is a major profit center on most dairy farms. Alfalfa is a major profit center on most dairy farms. Annual yield has the largest impact on its profitability. Annual yield has the largest impact on its profitability.

As the stand ages, the yield declines due to environmental stresses, wheel traffic, and diseases. As the stand ages, the yield declines due to environmental stresses, wheel traffic, and diseases. Alfalfa yield decline with advancing age means that farmers should consider turning over stands faster to stay in a high yield range. Alfalfa yield decline with advancing age means that farmers should consider turning over stands faster to stay in a high yield range.

This presentation will shed some light on the factors that affect the economics of production and the profit from producing corn silage and alfalfa in rotations of various years. This presentation will shed some light on the factors that affect the economics of production and the profit from producing corn silage and alfalfa in rotations of various years. The economic analysis was prepared using the Agriculture Budget Calculation Software (ABCS). The economic analysis was prepared using the Agriculture Budget Calculation Software (ABCS).

This program allows the user to enter the tasks involved in the production along with the inputs required by each task. Example, the corn-planting task requires the inputs of corn seed and starter fertilizer. This program allows the user to enter the tasks involved in the production along with the inputs required by each task. Example, the corn-planting task requires the inputs of corn seed and starter fertilizer.

The ABCS program calculates the costs associated with using tractors and implements. The costs calculated are: energy, labor, repairs, ownership interest cost, and a depreciation charge. The ABCS program calculates the costs associated with using tractors and implements. The costs calculated are: energy, labor, repairs, ownership interest cost, and a depreciation charge.

The economic analysis required the creation of seven enterprise budgets. They were: an alfalfa establishment budget an alfalfa establishment budget an alfalfa hay budget for the first year an alfalfa hay budget for the first year following establishment following establishment an alfalfa hay budget for the second an alfalfa hay budget for the second year following establishment

an alfalfa hay budget for the third year an alfalfa hay budget for the third year following establishment an alfalfa hay budget for the fourth year an alfalfa hay budget for the fourth year following establishment a corn silage budget for the year a corn silage budget for the year following the plowdown of the hay a corn silage budget for the corn after a corn silage budget for the corn after corn year(s) corn year(s)

The ABCS program has a feature that calculates whole farm incomes and costs based on enterprise budgets. The ABCS program has a feature that calculates whole farm incomes and costs based on enterprise budgets. The acreage selected was 210 crop acres, sufficient to support 60 – 75 dairy cows. The acreage selected was 210 crop acres, sufficient to support 60 – 75 dairy cows.

Six rotations (whole farm budgets) were studied within the 210 acre constraint. Six rotations (whole farm budgets) were studied within the 210 acre constraint. The rotation shorthand used the notation of "E" for the alfalfa establishment year, "A" for the alfalfa hay year(s), and "C" for the corn silage year(s). The rotation shorthand used the notation of "E" for the alfalfa establishment year, "A" for the alfalfa hay year(s), and "C" for the corn silage year(s).

The 6 rotations selected were: EAAAACCC (8-year) EAAAACCC (8-year) EAAAACC (7-year) EAAAACC (7-year) EAAACC (6-year) EAAACC (6-year) EAACC (5-year) EAACC (5-year) EAAC (4-year) EAAC (4-year) EAC (3-year) EAC (3-year)

The base prices were -- oatlage - $71.50/ton of dry matter (tdm) oatlage - $71.50/ton of dry matter (tdm) corn silage - $57.60/tdm corn silage - $57.60/tdm hay - $114.94/tdm hay - $114.94/tdm haylage - $114.94/tdm haylage - $114.94/tdm

The base yields were -- establishment crop, 2.0 tdm oatlage establishment crop, 2.0 tdm oatlage and 1.0 tdm haylage hay crop, 4.25 tdm (decreasing 0.5 tdm hay crop, 4.25 tdm (decreasing 0.5 tdm each year as the stand aged) corn crop, 5.0 tdm (10 percent larger in corn crop, 5.0 tdm (10 percent larger in the year following plowdown)

Rotation Gross Income Direct Costs Fixed Costs Total Costs Profit EAAAACCC EAAAACC EAAACC EAACC EAAC EAC Income, Costs, and Profit ($) per Acre for Selected Rotations The 4-year rotation is the most profitable. The 3-year rotation is the least profitable.

The 4-year rotation of EAAC was the most profitable. The 4-year rotation of EAAC was the most profitable. The 3-year rotation of EAC was the least profitable, followed by the 5-year rotation of EAACC and 8-year rotation of EAAAACCC. The 3-year rotation of EAC was the least profitable, followed by the 5-year rotation of EAACC and 8-year rotation of EAAAACCC. The 6-, and 7-year rotations were relatively close, profit wise. The 6-, and 7-year rotations were relatively close, profit wise.

RotationOatlageHay Corn Silage EAAAACCC 50.5 (25.25) (105) (78.25) EAAAACC 60.0 (30) (120) (60) EAAACC 70.0 (35) (105) (70) EAACC 84.0 (42) (84) (84) EAAC (52.5) (105) (52.5) EAC (70) (70) (70) Tons of Dry Mater Production and Acres in each Crop per Year by Selected Rotations From 825 tdm/A for EAAAACC to 903 tdm/A for EAACC produced per year.

Rotation EAAC (the most profitable) Percent Return on Assets by Alternative Methods of Valuing Land and Equipment The equipment complement selected had a new value of $689,234 with $456,458 cost basis value remaining. Equipment Valued at Equipment Valued at Including Land at Fair Market Value Including Land at Cost Basis Value Excluding Land and Land Interest Charge New Price Cost Basis Value

Rotation EAC (the least profitable) Percent Return on Assets by Alternative Methods of Valuing Land and Equipment Equipment Valued at Equipment Valued at Including Land at Fair Market Value Including Land at Cost Basis Value Excluding Land and Land Interest Charge New Price Cost Basis Value

When calculated as relative measure, the return to assets for the most profitable rotation is over 38 percent higher that the return to assets in the least profitable rotation.When calculated as relative measure, the return to assets for the most profitable rotation is over 38 percent higher that the return to assets in the least profitable rotation.

Rotation 5.25 and and and and and 0.5 EAAAACCC EAAAACC EAAACC EAACC EAAC EAC Profit per Acre ($) for Selected Rotations by Selected Starting Hay Yield and Rate of Yield Decline The 4-year rotation is the most profitable. The 3- and 8-year rotations are the least profitable.

Rotation$20$30$40$50$60 EAAAACCC EAAAACC EAAACC EAACC EAAC EAC Profit per Acre for Selected Rotations by Selected Differences Between the Base Corn Silage Price and Changing Hay Prices The 4-year rotation is the most profitable. The 3- and 8-year rotations are the least profitable.

Conclusions and Summary The 4-year rotation (EAAC) was the most profitable at $91.91 per acre using the base values. The 4-year rotation (EAAC) was the most profitable at $91.91 per acre using the base values. The 4-year rotation continued to be the most profitable for all of the changes in the base hay yield and rate of decline in the base hay yield as the stand aged. The 4-year rotation continued to be the most profitable for all of the changes in the base hay yield and rate of decline in the base hay yield as the stand aged.

The 4-year rotation was the most profitable for all of the price differences, between corn silage and hay, considered. The 4-year rotation was the most profitable for all of the price differences, between corn silage and hay, considered. The amount of profit per acre for all rotations increased substantially as the price difference between corn silage and hay increased. The amount of profit per acre for all rotations increased substantially as the price difference between corn silage and hay increased.

Rapid declines in the base hay yields per acre (1.0 tdm) cause the 8-year rotation to be less profitable than the 3-year rotation. Rapid declines in the base hay yields per acre (1.0 tdm) cause the 8-year rotation to be less profitable than the 3-year rotation.