Overview of Fish Tagging Draft Analysis February 5, 2013 AWG.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 BPA Fish and Wildlife Division Using Pisces Data to Analyze Wildlife Management Costs December 2006 Portland, Oregon.

Advertisements

Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and

Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Analysis of November 2006 Status of the Resource Summary Report Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council September 11, 2007.

Columbia Basin Pit Tag Information System BPA Project Number July

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.

BPA Christina Luzier USFWS

Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.

P4 Tagging Software and MRR Data Model Preview John Tenney, Nicole Tancreto and Craig White Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for.

Genetic Stock Identification/Parental Based Tagging for Pacific Salmon Molecular Genetics Laboratory (MGL) Pacific Biological Station.

Regional Technical Forum Funding Discussion February 14, 2014 RTF PAC Presentation.

PTAGIS Program Review and Roadmap Focused on Portland Team for the 2014 PIT Tag Steering Committee Annual Meeting.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

Wildlife Management Goal: to maintain healthy populations of all species of wildlife.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

CWTs and the Chinook Fishery Regulation Assessment Model (FRAM) Pete McHugh Washington Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 10 May 2012.

EPAC Land Use & Sustainable Development Subcommittee EPAC Update Land Use & Sustainable Development Subcommittee 2005 Initiatives Integrated Pest Management.

History  Need to mark fish to get survival & exploitation rates for Treaty negotiations, to determine differential survival of various release strategies.

Chinook Management Overview Rishi Sharma Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commission University of Washington, Quantitative Ecology & Resource Management.

3. What is the objective of each tagging effort and are the right tags being used, or proposed to be used, to accomplish that objective Primary (P), which.

NRT/RRT Co-Chairs Meeting Columbia Shuttle Incident Overview Debbie Dietrich NRT Chair, National Response Team March 4, 2003.

Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Program for Mark-selective Chinook Salmon Fisheries in Puget Sound, Washington Washington Department of.

By Richard Hinrichsen, Shawn Narum, Matt Campbell, Mike Ackerman, Craig Steele, Maureen Hess, Bill Young, Barbara Shields, Brian Maschhoff Funded by: Bonneville.

Following is a list of locations that project sponsors indicated their data would be published to for the BPA categorical review process.

WRAP/FEJF Inter RPO Report WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (c)

Estimating the Age and Origin of Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam Christian Smith USFWS Abernathy Lab, Longview, WA Jody White Quantitative.

RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.

Presentation to the Fish Tagging Forum of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council March 22, 2012 PIT Tagging and White Sturgeon Assessments.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.. FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP.

Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.

Big Idea Measurement: Some attributes of objects are measurable and can be quantified using unit amounts. Essential Question How does the size of the measuring.

Estimating Fractions.

® Update: Safe Destruction of Mail Sam Pulcrano Vice President, Sustainability MTAC Washington, DC April 30, 2009.

Learning How to Find a Solution Using Trial and Improvement.

FWCO FALL2013/SPRING2014 MMRPM Summary of Effort and Catch River Resources Action Team 2014.

Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Information-Technology RTF Sub-Committee July 2, 2013 Mira Vowles, P.E., CEM Emerging.

1 BPA Fish and Wildlife Division Process Improvement Initiative Overview January 2005.

Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Information-Technology RTF Sub-Committee May 7, 2013 Mira Vowles, P.E., CEM Emerging.

Mark-Recapture Wildlife Techniques. Capturing Pitfall Trap the use of a pit in the ground into which an animal falls and cannot escape. The ecologist's.

Hangman Creek Fisheries Enhancement BPA Project & Hangman Restoration Project: Wildlife BPA Project

MARCH 1, 2011 BUDGET AND FISCAL AFFAIRS (BFA) PROPOSED DRAINAGE CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMATION SYSTEM Item 8 on February 23, 2011 Council Agenda Item 50.

Fisheries Overview1 The Fisheries Technician and Data Acquisition What questions are answered by field work?

Matlab/Octave/FreeMat: Powerful Tools for Engineering Analysis BJ Furman 02DEC2012.

WHAT QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED BY FIELD WORK? Fisheries Overview 1 The Fisheries Technician and Data Acquisition.

Introduction Adventures in Long Range PIT Tag Detection Willamette Basin Research Vince Tranquilli and Mark Wade.

1 BPA Fish and Wildlife Division Wildlife Management Costs: An Analysis Using Pisces Data November 2006 Council Update Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

Bill Jaeger IEAB & Oregon State University March 19, 2013

Why did we say, do we use rounding?

continued on next slide

The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.

February 12 – 19, 2018.

continued on next slide

continued on next slide

סדר דין פלילי – חקיקה ומהות ההליך הפלילי

Discussion Forum for Community assistance

Negatives and Square Roots

Negatives and Square Roots

The Big 6 Research Model Step 3: Location and Access

CATEGORY ONE Enter category name on this slide..

You must show all steps of your working out.

Warm UP February 18 Point M (-2, 3) is the midpoint of AB. Point A is located at (-8, 2). Find the location of Point B. Simplify.

HIPAA and Harassment.

continued on next slide

Trial & Improvement – Worksheet A

continued on next slide

Presentation transcript:

Overview of Fish Tagging Draft Analysis February 5, 2013 AWG

Costs to BPA by tag type

Number of Fish Tagged

Number of fish tagged or marked in 2011, or if available, 2012

Number of fish tagged in 2011, or if available, 2012 (No adipose clipping numbers included in this slide)

The Big 3 Three long lasting tag types produce most of the information currently used to meet the Fish and Wildlife Program management objectives: Coded Wire tags PIT tags Genetic information In some important ways these three tag types can be viewed as in competition to provide information to answer many management questions in the Fish and Wildlife Program.

CWT 29,000,000 PIT 2,857,473 Genetic 21,000,000 CWT $ 7,000,000 PIT $ 24,500,000 Genetic $ 5,600,000 Closer look at the 3 primary tag types tag data from 2011

Closer look at the 3 primary tag types data from 2011

Closer look at the 3 primary tag types Approximate from estimated costs and tagging efforts.

Regardless of Costs: How well do the tags answer Management Questions? That can be better answered after the next Fish Tagging Forum meeting.

Status of Primary Tagging Tools Draft as of February 5, 2013 CWTPITGeneticsOtolith Cost Effectiveness ? Management Goals and Objectives ? Legacy Commitment Future Potential ?