BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.
Advertisements

Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Shimon Sarraf Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington Using NSSE to Answer Assessment Questions Regional User’s Workshop October.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
Partnering for Student Success The Bridge to Clemson University Program Sue Whorton Clemson University National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students.
NSSE at Gallaudet AY Report prepared by OAQ/Retention; JLD/LB/PH; 06/2015.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Presentation Title (Select: View > Master > Slide Master to edit) Department Name (Select: View > Master > Slide Master to edit) Reflecting on Students’
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE YUNIVESITHI YA FREISTATA Tel.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Center for Teaching and Learning
UNIV 103 Assessment results Thinking about the future
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research Tracy Bartholomew, M.A.T., Assessment and Accreditation Coordinator 1

Goals of the Meeting  Share BCSSE Institutional Report  Not a data dump  Engage in dialogue and conversation regarding how this report may impact your work  Ask questions about further research and reports that our department can build to support your efforts 2

How well do you know our students?  What percentage of our students are coming from private, religiously affiliated high schools?  What percentage of our students are coming to us with “0” AP classes 1-2 AP classes  What percentage of our students have taken college or university courses for credit? 3

Background Information on the Sample?  Response rate: 372/410 = 90.7%  Research done during the first week of school  363 are 2013 graduates (98%)  Most of the graduates are from public high school 74%  23% are from private, religiously affiliated school 4

High School Academic Engagement as a Predictor of Future Performance  Q7. During your last year of high school, about how many papers, reports, or other writing tasks of the following length did you complete?  11 pages or more- None18966% 1-2 papers 8329%  Q8. During your last year of high school, about how many hours per week do you spend:  Preparing for class (studying, doing homework, rehearsing, etc.) 1-5 hours per week 15843% 6-10 hours per week 10829% 5

High School Behavior as a Predictor of Future Behavior  Relaxing and socializing (time with friends, video games, TV or videos, keeping up with friends online, etc.) hours per week 7420% hours per week 3810%  Preparing for class hours per week 277% hours per week 123% 6

General Education  Many of our students are not exposed to Performing or visual arts programs (band, chorus, theater, art, etc.) Not at all13637% Very Little 4312% Some 4211% 7

Student Leadership and Development  Percentage not at all involved  Student government (72%)  Publications (student newspaper, yearbook, etc.) (74%)  Academic clubs or honor societies (49%)  Vocational clubs (business, health, technology, etc.) (75%)  Religious youth groups (55%) 8

Student Expectations:  Come to class without reading the assignment (77%) said they will never do that and we believe  Do you expect to graduate from this institution? (85%) said yes  How many of your close friends will attend this college during the coming year? (55%) said none 9

Student Expectations Ranked in Importance: 1Support to help students succeed academically 2Learning support services (tutoring services, writing center, etc.) 3Opportunities to be involved socially 3Opportunities to attend campus activities and events 4Opportunities to interact with students from different backgrounds (social, racial/ethnic, religious) 5Help managing your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 6A challenging academic experience 10

Quantitative Reasoning (HS_QR) Learning Strategies (HS_LS) Collaborative Learning (EXP_CL) Student-Faculty Interaction (EXP_SFI) Interactions with Diverse Others (EXP_IDO) High school engagement with analysis and numerical information Use of effective learning strategies in high school. Expectation to interact and collaborate with peers Expectation to interaction and engage with faculty Expectation to interact with peers different from themselves BCSSE First-Year Indicators

Expected Academic Perseverance (EXP_PER) Expected Academic Difficulty (EXP_DIF) Perceived Academic Preparation (PER_PREP) Importance of Campus Environment (IMP_CAMP) Student certainty that they will persist in the face of academic adversity Expected academic difficulty during the first year of college. Student perception of their academic preparation. Student-rated importance that the institution provides a challenging and supportive environment. BCSSE First-Year Indicators

BCSSE Report Builder  The BCSSE Report Builder is a public interactive tool that instantly generates reports of your choosing. The tool draws from a secure database of responses from the three most recent years of BCSSE, and can be queried using any combination of student and institutional characteristics. Variable options include individual items and scales.  1.Select report variables (choose one): BCSSE scale statistics or Item frequencies  2.Select a column variable (choose one): Carnegie 2010 Basic Classification; enrollment size (total undergraduate enrollment); control (public or private); gender; first- generation; race/ethnicity  3.Customize by institutional characteristics: Carnegie 2010 Basic Classification; region; control  4.Customize by student characteristics: gender; first- generation; high-school grades; race/ethnicity 13

14 Advising Report

Research Questions  What are your questions about the first-year students?  Items available to conduct further analyses:  Summary Tables:

BCSSE 2013-NSSE 2014 Combined Report  BCSSE institutional report is one of two reports. BCSSE was designed as a companion to the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). By participating in NSSE in the spring of 2014, we will also receive a BCSSE NSSE 2014 Combined Report that provides a detailed cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of our first-year students 16

Questions? 17