West Fork River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings April 21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Middle Ohio North Watershed
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Rockymarsh Run Watershed May 8, 2013 WV DEP.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 12, 2014 Kanawha City Office Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds TMDL Status Update Meeting.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
TMDL Development West Fork River Watershed July 27 th, 2010 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
TMDL Development Tygart Valley River Watershed May 9 th & 10 th 2012 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 3,2010 Kingwood, WV August 4, 2010 Blackwater.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection November 6, 2014 Cabela’s Conference Room Wheeling, WV Upper Ohio North Tributary Watersheds Draft.
Lower Kanawha Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 28, 2011 Winfield High School.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Elk Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 27, 2011 Elkview Middle School.
CT DEP LONG ISLAND SOUND MONITORING PROGRAM. TOTAL NITROGEN LOAD DELIVERED TO LONG ISLAND SOUND (Lbs TN/Day) Total Load from all Sources = 366K Lbs TN/day.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
TMDL Development Monongahela River Watershed June 30th, 2009 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
TMDL Development Upper Guyandotte River Watershed May 4 th & 5 th, 2015.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection October 13 & 14, 2015 Draft TMDLs for Tygart Valley River Watershed.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 31, 2011 Ravenswood High School Middle Ohio South Watershed TMDL Status Update Meeting.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Monongahela River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 20, 2013.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WVDEP TMDL Development Nutrient Management Training December 16, 2009 Dave Montali, WVDEP.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

West Fork River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings April 21, 2014

TMDL/ water quality standards recap Overview of this TMDL effort Explanation/demonstration of electronic documents, spreadsheets, tools Questions and Answers Agenda

What’s a TMDL? “Total Maximum Daily Load” How much pollutant a stream can receive and remain healthy A Pollution Budget – prescribes reduction of pollutants (where needed) that result in the restoration of an impaired stream TMDL development is required by the Clean Water Act for all streams impaired by a pollutant

What’s an Impaired Stream? Stream that doesn’t meet water quality standards WV Water Quality Standards are codified in 47CSR2 ttp://apps.sos.wv.gov/adlaw/csr/ruleview.aspx?document=8208 Standards include “Designated Uses” for WV waters and the criteria to protect those uses Water Quality Criteria can be numeric or narrative

Numeric Criteria of Concern Total Iron Aquatic Life/Public Water Supply Not to exceed 1.5 mg/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period Public Water Supply mg/l Fecal Coliform Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply Shall not exceed 200 counts/100ml as a monthly geometric mean (5 samples/month) Nor to exceed 400 counts/100 ml in more than 10% of samples in a month

Additional Criteria of Concern Dissolved Aluminum Aquatic Life Not to exceed 750 ug/l as a 1 hour average concentration more than once in a three year period Not to exceed 750 ug/l (warmwater) as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period pH Aquatic Life/Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply No values below 6.0 nor above 9.0.

Additional criteria of concern (Bingamon Run & tribs) Chloride Aquatic Life/Water Contact Recreation/Public Water Supply Not to exceed 230 mg/l as a 4 day average concentration more than once in a three year period

Narrative Criteria Previous 47 CSR i Assessment Based on Benthic Macroinvertebrates West Virginia Stream Condition Index (WVSCI) Standardized method for assessing benthic macroinvertebrates (aquatic bugs) WVSCI stream scores normalized to range Streams scoring less than the 60.6 threshold value labeled as “impaired” and placed on the 303(d) list Streams listed as impaired slated for TMDLs “Biologically Impaired” streams evaluated for source/s of impairment during the TMDL development process (Stressor Identification Process)

Narrative Criteria 2012 Legislative Changes Senate Bill 562 passed by the 2012 West Virginia Legislature amended the WV Water Pollution Control Act Requires “evaluation of the holistic health of the aquatic ecosystem” Requires DEP to develop and secure legislative approval of new rules to interpret 47 CSR i Section b : ntire.cfm?chap=22&art=11 ntire.cfm?chap=22&art=11 No biological TMDLs are part of this effort

Stressor Identification Process Method to evaluate stressor/s of biologically impacted streams Process used to evaluate if numeric TMDLs (iron, fecal) will address biological stressors Information will be retained and may be used to delist streams in the future (see Table 4.1)

TMDL =  WLA +  LA + MOS  = “sum of” WLA = “wasteload allocations” LA = “load allocations” MOS = “margin of safety” WLAs - pollutant loads for “point sources” Discharge from point Need NPDES permit LAs - pollutant loads for “nonpoint sources” and background Precipitation and runoff No permit required

TMDL Development History Project Timeline: Proposed streams advertised for public comment April 2010 Initial Public Meetings (TMDL Intro) July 2010 Watershed Monitoring and Source Tracking July June 2011 Draft TMDL Public Meeting Today

Impaired Waters 305 named streams – See Table 3-3 beginning on page 11 of Draft Report for a complete list of streams and impairments

Modeling

MDAS (Mining Data Analysis System) Fecal Coliform, iron, chlorides, Al and pH Can handle point and nonpoint sources (representation and allocation) Recognizes exposure duration and exceedence frequency components of criteria

Modeling 52 TMDL watersheds 700 subwatersheds West Fork mainstem is included

Baseline Condition Design precipitation period Hourly precipitation data for a six-year period Design period includes wet and dry years Applied to present day land uses Permitted discharges equal to permit limits

TMDL Condition Existing pollutant sources reduced such that TMDL endpoints are achieved in each modeled subwatershed recognizing Criteria value, duration and exceedence frequency Margin of safety

Required component of TMDLs Explicit 5% used in most TMDLs TMDL endpoints for numeric criteria are 95% of criterion value (ex mg/l for 1.5 mg/l criterion) Margin of Safety

Baseline/TMDL Example

Pollutant Sources (Iron) Streambank erosion Abandoned Mine Lands Upland Sediment Sources Harvested Forest Oil and Gas Agriculture Urban Residential Stormwater Roads Active Mining Construction Stormwater General Permits

Iron Reduction Strategy Streambank Erosion reduced to reference stream loadings Sediment sources, including AML, set to iron loadings equivalent to 100 mg/l TSS AML seeps set to WQ at end of pipe Mining point sources set to WQ at end of pipe where needed for modeled attainment

Iron Reduction Strategy continued Future growth for Construction Stormwater throughout the impaired watershed drainage was initially allocated at 2.5% of subwatershed area If further reductions needed then based on sensitivity analysis: CSGP areas were reduced incrementally from 2.5 to 0.5 % and/or Dominant land sources were reduced incrementally below 100 TSS threshold until endpoint is met or 70 mg/l TSS If further reductions needed at subwatershed pour points then CSGP areas were reduced to 0% Nonpoint source reductions did not result in LA lower than background concentrations Point Source reductions did not result in WLA more stringent than water quality standards end of pipe

Modeled Aluminum Sources Significant Dissolved Aluminum/pH sources: Abandoned Mine Land seeps Atmospheric Acid Deposition Active mining sources and sediment associated aluminum sources were also represented in the model but no reduction was required

Dissolved Aluminum/pH Reduction Strategy All pH/Dissolved Aluminum impaired streams are also impaired for iron First step is reduction of total iron sources (e.g. seeps) to meet iron TMDL endpoints since instream dissolved iron concentrations can reduce pH levels and affect instream dissolved aluminum levels Alkalinity was added to achieve target pH of approximately 6.5 at all subwatershed pourpoints. If further reductions were needed, total aluminum reductions and/or further alkalinity additions were made until Al(d) and pH TMDL endpoints were met

Fecal Pollutant Sources & Strategy Fecal Coliform STP effluents represented at existing limits (200/400) Failing/nonexistent on-site sewage systems – 100% reduction Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) - reduced to water quality criteria (200/400 cts) Sensitivity Analysis based reductions Urban runoff Agriculture

Source allocations developed for all subwatersheds contributing to chloride impaired streams Individual WLAs were developed for all high volume, pumped discharge, mining outlets (discharges dominated stream flow) Individual WLA based on chronic aquatic life protection criterion (230 mg/l) Non appreciable chloride contributions from all other sources are contained in aggregated loads for Background & other Nonpoint sources

Future Growth Highlights New facility anywhere in watershed if meeting water quality criteria end of pipe Subwatershed-specific future growth allowances have been provided, where possible, for site registrations under the Construction Stormwater General Permit Full details on Future Growth can be found beginning on page 86 of the Draft report

Public Comment Public Comment period ends May6, 2014 Documents may be reviewed/downloaded from DEP webpage CD available upon request – CD includes GIS Shapefiles and Technical Report Comments should be submitted to Steve Young at Questions - contact Dave Montali, Jim Laine (304) (Ext 1063, 1061,)

TMDL Products Main Report – Overall description of the TMDL development process for the West Fork River watershed Technical Report with detailed appendices

TMDL Products Allocation spreadsheets: Fecal Coliform, Iron, Dis. Al, pH, Chlorides TMDL for each stream, WLAs and LAs by SWS Filterable GIS shapefiles, along with Technical Report and Appendices, available on CD

CD /Spreadsheets/ GIS Demo