Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation 2008. 11 Jiyoung Park

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ONE HUNDRED AND RISING FEASIBILITY STUDY, DESIGN & PLANNING PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COST CONTROL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, AGENCY MARKETING & PR, RESEARCH &
Advertisements

Planning: Processes and Techniques
© Prentice Hall, Chapter 8 Evaluating Investment Projects Shapiro and Balbirer: Modern Corporate Finance: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Value.
ICS 442 Software Project Management
Chapter 3 Program Management and Project Evaluation Professor Hossein Saiedian McGraw-Hill Education ISBN
Chapter 14 Evaluating AIS Investments Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
CHAPTER 8 PLANNING FOR IT SYSTEMS Knowing Where You‘re Going.
Castellanza, 20 th October and 3 rd November, 2010 FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION. Corporate Finance.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2 Cost Benefit Analysis Identify & evaluate all costs & benefits Discount Assess project(s) by calculating Benefit/Cost Ratio (B/C)
Principles of Corporate Finance Session 17 & 18 Unit III: Capital Budgeting And its Practices.
INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING LEARNING OBJECTIVES Identify the basic types and characteristics of investment properties. Forecast annual cash flows, net of.
Evaluating Decision Support Systems Projects. Who Evaluates Technical Managers  Chief Information Officer,  Corporate IT professionals,  Database administrators,
Moving from Analysis to Design
Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT. Traditional Financial Approaches  ROI – Return on Investments Each area is considered an investment center ROI.
Redesigning the Organization with Information System
ISMT221 Information Systems Analysis and Design
Model Building and Simulation Chapter 43 Research Methodologies.
Research Impact Alexandra Byrnes, Research Publication Officer Rio
PROJECT EVALUATION. Introduction Evaluation  comparing a proposed project with alternatives and deciding whether to proceed with it Normally carried.
1 Engineering Economic Decisions Lecture No.1 Professor C. S. Park Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2005.
Economic Evaluation Tools Benefit-Cost Analysis Cost Effectiveness Analysis Financial Analysis/Feasibility Fiscal Impact Analysis Economic Impact Analysis.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
Role and Components of Project Evaluation
KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: THE NEW ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES Two experts group have prepared reports on the future of university/research relations They have proposed.
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 3 COMM02 Project Evaluation Unit 3.
RTI,Chennai Learning Objective Given the concepts of Decision Analysis, Option Pricing and Investment Decisions, the trainee will be able to audit the.
Investment Portfolio Methodologies Pertemuan Matakuliah: A Strategi Investasi IT Tahun: 2009.
Take a look at : Thailand’s position in S&T competitiveness. Praditta Siripan Technical Information Access Center, National Science and Technology Development.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
A Comparison of Approaches to Investment Analysis John Favaro Proc. Fourth International Conference on Software Reuse, 1996, IEEE Computer Press, p
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
Chapter 10 Managing Information Systems and Technology Investments.
Evaluating Investments in Information Technology Shannon Crump December 9, 2002 ISM 6021.
TOWARDS AN APPROACH TO MEASURE AND JUSTIFY INVESTMENTS IN A TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE.
NEW VISION OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY COURSE (VISION) MODULE 3 LECTURE 1-2 Cairo, 13 July 2005.
ASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY 1 How do we handle the economic crisis? European and National Economic Recovery Plans CEBRE,
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Moving from Analysis to Design.
Innovation Division. Innovation Its embedded novelty, providing qualitative increase in the efficiency of processes or products demanded by the market.
What is SBIR?  SBIR is a federal program where small businesses compete for up to $670,000 to research, develop and commercialize a new technology. 
Study Unit 9 Decision Analysis and Risk Management.
Market Failures Multiple market failures at issue “No single instrument is superior along all dimensions relevant to a policy choice.” Typical Market Failures.
Financial Analysis. Module 1 : Solar Technology Basics Module 2: Solar Photo Voltaic Module Technologies Module 3: Designing Solar PV Systems ( Rooftops)
Software Project Management
Prepared by Collaborative Economics. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  San Diego is participating in a new global innovation economy  San Diego’s global reach has.
‘Real Options’ Framework to Assess Public Research Investments Nicholas S. Vonortas Center for International Science and Technology Policy & Department.
© EIPA – Robin Smail / Ex-ante Project Appraisal & project selection 1 Robin Smail Senior Lecturer CoR / DG Regio Open Days 28 September 2004 Steps for.
1 Chapter 1. Engineering Economic Decisions. 2 Engineering Economics: Economic analysis for engineering and management decision making The term engineering.
Copyright ©2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 22-1 Operations Management 10.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Part I Project Initiation.
Factors to consider System component costs Methods
Strategic Information Systems Planning
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Investment Appraisal – Discounted Cash Flow (NPV)
Preliminary Feasibility Study For Government R&D Programs in Korea
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Lecture # 4 Software Development Project Management
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
BC Knowledge Development Fund Investing in B. C
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
CAPITAL BUDGETING.
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Presentation transcript:

Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation Jiyoung Park

2 Contents Feasibility Analysis on R&D Programs Discussions Practices Economic Analysis

Feasibility Analysis on R&D Programs

4 Purpose  Substantiate the feasibility of large-scale public investment R&D programs  Enhance fiscal efficiency and productivity Subjects  Newly proposed programs of budget plans over $50 M  Programs with concrete plans on technology development Feasibility Analysis system has been legislated by the end of Feasibility Analysis on R&D

5 Process DemandGoalsContents Resources Plan Expected Effects Alternatives GeneralCriteria Uncertainties OverallAssessment Success Success Timing Timing Benefits Benefits Do ? Do not ?

6 Components Technical Analysis  Overlapping of existing programs, Research development plan, Potential to technical success, etc. - Systematic model approach  Output analysis (Patent, License, Publication and citation)  Surveys Policy Analysis  Relevance to national strategic plan, National priority, Contingency plans for risks, etc.  National policy and priorities  Relevant issues and alternative plans

7 Economic/Impact Analysis  Economic benefit, Economic spill-over, Social spill-over, Scientific/Technical spill-over, etc.  Input-Output Analysis, Patent Analysis etc.  Cost-Effective Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis  Surveys Overall Assessment based on Technical/Policy/Impact Analysis (Analytical Hierarchy Process)  Determine relevant importance of each criteria  Maintain balance between qualitative & quantitative analysis Components

Economic Analysis

9 Cost & Benefit Analysis Economic metrics for Cost/Benefit  NPV (Net Present Value) = Amount willing to pay now for the future benefit  IRR (Internal Rate of Return) = Rate of return if NPV is zero  C/B Ratio = Ratio of discounted cash flows Types of benefit  Direct/Indirect, Tangible/Intangible, Economic/Non-economic … First step is to be aware of the characteristics of R&D  Very high uncertainty, very high payoffs : internet, Life science, Solar energy …  Seed corn for the future, especially the early stage R&D

10 ProgramsBenefitsExamples Basic Research ․ Scientists training ․ Patents on fundamental technology ․ Prior occupation of high-tech R&D ․ (Economic benefit) Infrastructure building for Academic Research Creative Research Programs R&D for Public Health & Welfare ․ Improvement of quality of life ․ Reduction of social cost ․ Reduction of environmental pollution ․ Energy and resources security ․ (Economic benefit) Alternative energy development Technology development for Public health Industrial Technology Development ․ Improvement of industrial competitiveness ․ Potential to commercialization ․ Potential to job creation ․ Economic benefit Development of component materials Frontier R&D program Types of Benefits

11 Applications to R&D Programs Industrial R&D  Need to prove expected benefit exceeds projected cost  B/C result for major decision criteria R&D for Public Welfare  Combined tangible & intangible benefits  B/C result for provide alternatives Basic Research  Do not need to calculate B/C  Sometimes proves justification of public investment

12 Assessment of Costs R&D activities for providing infrastructure  Research centers, Fabrication facilities, Large R&D facilities such as Accelerators  Cost calculation based on design, construction cost, etc. R&D activities for producing knowledge, intellectual properties  DB for categorized program cost DB  R&D stages, R&D objectives, R&D field, etc.  Provides range of investment Indirect costs are not considered. Sunk costs are not considered.

13 Assessment of Costs

14 Assessment of Benefit Approaches based on market size Projected Market Size Expected Market Share Profits Contribution of R&D Market research Technology forecast Market analysis Patent analysis Value-added rate -Published by Bank of Korea -Published by Bank of Korea R&D Contribution to GDP growth by industry

15 Assessment of Benefit

16 Assessment of Benefit Approaches based on performance data Expected # of Patents Business from the patents Profits Contribution of R&D Performance analysis data of similar programs Follow-up monitoring of similar programs R&D Contribution to GDP growth by industry Value-added rate -Published by Bank of Korea -Published by Bank of Korea

17 Assessment of Benefit Approaches based on synergies among investments Expected increased # of papers Spin-offs by unit input Benefits from R&D Case studies - Integration, new facilities Averaged over 3 years Case studies - multiplier effect

18 Assessment of Benefit Approaches based on cost avoidance Expected # of users Cost avoidance (in use of R&D facility) User data - Current and future demand Traveling cost Time-saving

PracticesPractices

20 Examples – Targeting Economic benefit New drug discovery (target materials) ScenariosB/CNPVIRR(%) Case-A Royalty 5%0.31-2, Royalty 10%0.62-1, Case-B Royalty 5%0.62-1, Royalty 10%   Reduced initial investment was recommended   Increased investment will be considered after 4-year program monitoring

21 Examples – Combined benefits Fusion Research for environment   Rejected for R&D program targeting industrialization   Recommended small investment for early-stage fusion research SDC 4.5%SDC 5.5%SDC 6.5% Category Category Category Category Category Total

22 Examples – Intangible benefits Basic Research for Clean Energy   Never used the numbers for decision making   Provide justification of governmental investment SDC Case1Case2 NPVB/CNPVB/C

DiscussionsDiscussions

24 Discussions Heroic calculation?  Not a real data  Need guidelines of boundaries Need more intense data on program performance Need to know more on the mechanism of success or fail to reduce uncertainty Need guidelines combining B/C result and cost-effectiveness to make decision We still want to apply cost-Benefit analysis on R&D`!