ALLOGRAFT VALVE SURGERY P.Skillington CANBERRA April 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Off pump CABG has been performed for the first time 40 years ago. Although conventional CABG is considered both safe and effective, the use of CBP.
Advertisements

Underwriting Impact of New Advances in Valvular Heart Disease NEHOUA 2012 Michael Clark, FACC, FLMI, FBIM Chief Medical Director Swiss Re.
METAΛΛΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΘΕΤΙΚΗ ΒΑΛΒΙΔΑ-ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΗ ΝΟΣΟΣ? Γ.ΔΡΟΣΟΣ Καρδιοχειρουργική Κλινική ΓΝΘ Γ. Παπανικολάου, Θεσσαλονίκη.
AVR: Choice of Prosthesis Tirone E. David University of Toronto.
© Continuing Medical Implementation …...bridging the care gap Valvular Heart Disease Aortic Stenosis.
HTK Cardioprotection in Ross Procedure for Native/Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Yoshiya Toyoda, Abul Kashem, Aki Shiose, Kazuhiro Hisamoto, Eros Leotta,
Mitral valve repair Prof Alain Carpentier is considered the modern day father of MV repair. His publication in the 1980’s called the French correction.
Long-Term Outcomes and Modes of Failure of the Ross Operation in Patients with Aortic Insufficiency Joel Price MD, MPH, Laurent De Kerchove MD, David Glineur.
Mahmoud ABU-ABEELEH Associate Professor Department of Surgery Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery School of Medicine University Of Jordan Adult Cardiac.
How to Do A Mitral Valve Repair for Rheumatic Valve Disease
MINIMALLY INVASIVE VALVE SURGERY. HOW FAR WE HAVE COME  THE MORTALITY FOR VALVE REPLACEMENT SURGERY IN 1968 WAS 42%
Are Stented Bioprostheses Appropriate for Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Patients ? Frank A. Pigula MD Senior Associate Cardiac Surgery Children’s Hospital.
Valvular heart disease Mitral Valve Diseases
Valvular Heart Disease. Normal heart valves function to maintain the direction of blood flow through the atria and ventricles to the rest of the body.
Heart Transplantation for Patients with a Fontan Procedure
Aetiology * MVP { Myxomatous mv },commonest in developed world *Damage to the cusps : _RVD _ IE _ Congenital Cleft MV *Damage to chordae : _RVD.
Common Clinical Scenarios *Younger people *Younger people _Functional murmur vs _Functional murmur vs _ MVP vs _ MVP vs _ AS _ AS *Older people _Aortic.
Valvular Heart Disease
RJS Valvular heart disease Richard Schilling St Mary’s Hospital London.
Valvular Heart DISEASE
Mitral Valve Disease Prof JD Marx UFS January 2006.
Impact of Concomitant Tricuspid Annuloplasty on Tricuspid Regurgitation Right Ventricular Function and Pulmonary Artery Hypertension After Degenerative.
Is an Antithrombotic Therapy necessary after Mitral Valve Repair ? Ph Meurin, JY Tabet, MC Iliou, B Pierre, S Corone et A Bendriss, On behalf of the Working.
KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARDIAC SURGERY UNIT Dr. Khalid Al-Ibrahim Dr. Hussein Jabbad Dr. Khalid Medhat Dr. Ragab Shehata.
Cardiac Intervention in the Elderly. Cardiac Interventions Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA)
MITRAL VALVE DISEASES. MITRAL VALVE DISEASES 1. Mitral valve stenosis. 2. Mitral valve regurge. 3. Mitral valve prolapse.
Cardiovascular surgery, Congenital heart disease Dr. Robin Man Karmacharya, Lecturer, Department of Surgery, Dhulikhel Hospital.
Adult Medical-Surgical Nursing
G. Rainey Williams Symposium September 30, 2005 CABG in the Elderly Patient: On or Off pump? A Single Center Experience R. Nathan Grantham, M.D.
Osaka University Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Osaka University Department of Cardiovascular Surgery The efficacy of debranching TEVAR for arch.
Surgical outcome of native valve infective endocarditis in srinagarind hospital
Valve Surgery V.Rohn. Valve Surgery History before the era of ECC 1925 – Suttar – first successful digital commisurolysis of mitral valve 1952 – Hufnagel.
Management of Heart Disease in Pregnancy.  It is estimated that 1% to 3% of women either have cardiac disease entering pregnancy or are diagnosed with.
Clinical Review AbioCor® Implantable Replacement Heart H Julie Swain M.D. Cardiovascular Surgeon Ileana Piña M.D. Heart Failure Cardiologist DRAFT.
Mechanical PVR Pearls & Pitfalls Joseph A. Dearani, MD Division of Cardiovascular Surgery AATS Seattle April 2015.
Adult Cardiac Valve Disease Marvin D. Peyton, M.D. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Aortic Root Dilatation S/P Ross Procedure
Long-term Survival, Valve Durability, and Reoperation for Four Aortic Root + Ascending Procedures Lars G. Svensson, Saila T. Pillai, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran,
Valvular Heart Disease
3/98medslides.com1 Aortic Valve Homografts A Cinical Perspective Michael E. Staab, MD Rick A. Nishimura, MD Joseph A. Dearani, MD Thomas A. Orszulak, MD.
Ross Operation Seoul National University Hospital Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery.
RJS How and why the heart goes wrong. RJS What there is to go wrong.
The Reoperative Aortic Root: Degenerative Failure vs. Infectious Destruction – Outcomes of The “True Redo-Root” Reconstruction Rita K. Milewski, Arminder.
Mahmoud ABU-ABEELEH Associate Professor Department of Surgery Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery School of Medicine University Of Jordan Adult Cardiac.
Pacemaker following adult cardiac surgery DR M HASANZADEH MUMS NOV 2014.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients.
Patient Selection & Risk Stratification Soltani GH, MD.
MitraClip Mitral Valve Repair System Abbott Vascular MitraClip Mitral Valve Repair System Abbott Vascular Alexandra Camesas & Nathan Kukowski Biomaterials.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Causes of Heart Valve Dysfunction Congenital defects (bicuspid aortic valve) Infections (rheumatic fever and bacterial endocarditis Coronary artery disease.
Objective Bleeding events are grave and sometimes life threatening complications after prosthetic valve replacement, especially in hemodialysis patients.
Cardiac Surgery in KAUH Advances & Hopes. Introdoction.
The Place of Closed Mitral Valvotomy Procedure in Facility Deprived Countries in the Modern PTMC/PMBV Era: 20 Years Experience at SMS Hospital, Jaipur,
EXPANDING INDICATIONS OF TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE INTERVENTIONS. JACC CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION. DR.RAJAT GANDHI.
Primary Mitral Regurgitation Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
© free-ppt-templates.com 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of Valvular Heart Disease Guideline of 2014 DR. OMAR SHAHID TR CARDIOLOGY SZH.
Early results of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection Mina Wahba, Said Soliman, Omar Dawoud, Alaaeldin.
Original slides courtesy of Dr. Alex Morss
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Heart - Pathophysiology
Aortic Valve Homografts A Cinical Perspective
Challenges in the Surgical Management of Aortic and Mitral Valve Endocarditis (IE) Oct 2016 Epworth P Skillington,
Is There a Need to Address AF in patients Undergoing Valve Surgery?
Dr M B Connellan Stellenbosch University
Homograft Replacement of the aortic valve:Ten-year results
Mohamed Eid Fawzy, FRCP, FACC, FESC October 6 University Cairo, EGYPT
pregnancy in Heart disease
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Sorin Bicarbon: 17 years of clinical use
Zoll Firm Lecture Series
Presentation transcript:

ALLOGRAFT VALVE SURGERY P.Skillington CANBERRA April 2003

Aortic Valve Replacement Aetiology of Valvular Disease Pathology encountered Operations Available: focus on Allograft Operative Techniques Results

Aortic Valve - Aetiology Congenital: bicuspid, monocuspid age – 0-70 (peak 35-50) Degenerative: tricuspid age - >60 (peak 70-80) Rheumatic: Post rheumatic fever, uncommon in Australia age – all ages

AVR: Choice of Prosthesis Durability of Prosthesis Necessity for Warfarin- temporary or permanent Risk of Thrombo-embolism & Bleeding Re-operation rate & difficulty

Patient Related Factors Haemodynamic Performance: flow dynamics functional state achieved Biocompatibility Effect of various disease states eg: Marfans,other connective tissue diseases Possible future pregnancy Valve noise

AVR : Mechanical vs. Tissue Valve Excellent Durability 95% at 10yrs. 90% at 20yrs Low rate of re-operation. Easy to insert Warfarin, blood tests Thrombo-embolism 1-2%/pt/yr Bleeding risk 2%/pt/yr Non Cardiac Surgery hazardous Do not need warfarin Low risk of thrombo- embolism and bleeding : 0-1% Noiseless Durability variable:ie higher rate of re-operation Insertion may be more difficult Other surgery safe

Tissue Valve Durability Porcine,Pericardial: 40yrs:– 8-10 yrs 70yrs: yrs Aortic Allograft: 20yrs:- 10yrs 40-70yrs:- 15yrs Ross Procedure: On average,will last 40-50yrs (variable) Re-operation rate:- 1%/pt/yr

Stentless Porcine Valve AVR in elderly Better Haemodynamic function Larger orifice area Better resolution of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Aortic Allograft Insertion Human cadaveric Ao. v Cryopreserved AVR Root Replacement vs Subcoronary

Aortic Homograft (Allograft) Durability Better than Xenografts eg 50yr old: expect 15yr lifespan (vs 10 yrs ) Other Advantages Endocarditis with aortic root abcess Warfarin not required Disadvantages Not on shelf Re-operation difficult

M.O’Brien et al “The Homograft Aortic Valve:29 yrs” J. Heart V. Dis 2001;10: ,022 patients mean age 47yrs: Actuarial Survival

O’Brien et al,2001 Aortic Homograft Durability vs Age: Freedom from Re-op

Summary – Allograft AVR Best age range: 30 – 65 yrs Durability in that age range: 15yrs avge Indications: Endocarditis Not suitable for Ross Proc. Results: 78 pts over 12 yrs ( ) Early Mortality: 0 Late re-operation: 3

Ross Procedure Advantages Viable aortic valve Improved Durability cf other tissue valves No Warfarin absence T/E, ARH Disadvantages Longer operation Follow up of pulmonary valve

Ross Procedure Indications Age 20-60yrs, requiring AVR Contra-indications Bicuspid pulmonary valve(echo) Marfans Syndrome Other connective tissue disease R.arthritis/ SLE Active rheumatic heart disease Triple vessel CAD/ Mitral v. dis.

Patient Demographics (Ross P.) Time Frame : October 1992 to February 2003 No. of Patients: Age:Range (Mean 39.3) 2. :GenderM = 122 (70.9%)F = 50 (29.1%) 3. Valve Lesion: Aortic Stenosis: 68 (40%) AS/AR(Mixed): 51 (29%) Aortic Regurg: 53 (31%) 4. Aortic Valve Aetiology: Congenital: 158 (92%) Other:14 (8%) 5. Re-operation:19 (11%)

Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet – May 2002

MORTALITY & MORBIDITY 1. Early Mortality(in hosp. Or within 30 days)1 (0.6%) Myocardial Infarct 2. Early Morbidity - Re-Exploration9 (a) Bleeding7 (4.1%) (b) Graft RCA.1 ( c ) Low C.O. 1 - Retinal Embolus1 - CHB >>> Pacemaker1 - Renal Impairment4 - AMI2 - Inotropes3 - IABP1 - Respiratory Failure (Re-Intubation)1 - Pericardial Effusion1 - Arrhythmia Ventricular2 Atrial (AF) 20 -Sternal Infection 1 N=172

Late Results (n = 172) Late Death (non-cardiac) 2 1.2% Follow up 98.6% complete 735 patient years Thrombo-embolism 1 Cumulative Inc. 0.1% Bleeding(ARH) 0 0.0% Endocarditis 0 0.0% Re-operation 6 0.8% Late AR>mild 0 0.0% * 5yr freedom from re-operation = 96.2%

Ross (inclusion cylinder) Actuarial Survival: 155 patients 5yrs = 98% 7yrs = 95%

(n=155) 5yrs = 99% 7yrs = 99%

Zellner et al “Long term experience With the St.Jude Medical Valve Prosthesis” South Carolina,USA AVR 418 pts, mean age 54.8yrs Re-operation inc. 1.0%/pt/y *10yr survival 58%

Pregnancy after the Ross Procedure Seven women have under gone 11 successful pregnancies No maternal cardiac complications No problems with the passengers Favourable in contrast with mechanical valves

Durability Aortic Valve Prostheses

Pulmonary Regurgitation

AVR - Choice Prosthesis-Effect of Age yrs Ross, Mechanical, Allograft yrs Mechanical, Allograft, Porcine/Pericardial >70 yrs Stentless Porcine,Stented Pericardial, Mechanical

Results Pulmonary Allograft Insertion for Tetralogy, other Congenital Cardiac 45 patients over 12 year period zero mortality, minimal complications Beating heart surgery Do not require warfarin Quality of life very good

Conclusion 300 patients have had cardiac allograft valve replacement: Ross Procedure 177 Aortic Allograft 78 Pulmonary Allograft 45 Safe surgery: one(1) early death Excellent quality of life without anti- coagulants : young people

Standard Post-op Management Early BP(sys, mean) ; filling pressures (R+L) C. Output – depends on temperature Low CO (>37 C) Pericardial Tamponade signs of tamponade : low bp,high cvp,low urine output (usually prior bleeding) Improve CO optimal filling (+ve balance 1-2 l) vasodilators (GTN, prop., nipride) inotropes (milrinone, NOT adr,dop) noradrenaline IABP rate(80-90),rhythm

ANTICOAGULATION AVR mechanical : INR, Time to reach 2.0 pacing wire removal day 3-4 if not required porcine / pericardial : warfarin 6 weeks Ross / Allograft : aspirin 3months MVR mechanical INR 3.0,if chr.AF, clexane after 3-4 days porcine / pericardial Warfarin at least 3 months, often permanent MV Repair Warfarin 3 months

Special Situations Mitral valve surgery /PHT : pul vaso-dil,extub, sw ganz, LA line,b. gases, pht crisis AVR for AS and severe LVH AVR thin walled aorta – sys BP Ross : Sw Ganz removal Patients with poor LV sys function :early IABP TVR : pacing, cvp only for Repl. PVR : Usually no PA catheter

Stentless Tissue Valves Examples include: stentless porcine valve Aortic Allograft (homograft) Ross Proc. (pul.autograft) Features: Better haemodynamic funct. Improved resolution of left ventricular hypertrophy

Haemodynamic Function Ross (pulmonary autograft) 2-4 Stentless Porcine 5 Aortic Allograft 6 Mechanical Stented Porcine/Pericardial Residual aortic valve gradient(mmHg) *gradients at rest

MITRAL VALVE - Aetiology Myxoid Degeneration – 75% Repair Rheumatic – 95% Replacement Ischaemic – 50% Repair, 50% Replace Other – Endocarditis, SLE, Chordal Rupture

Actuarial Survival No.Patients 5 yr. 5 5yr. 97.5% 5yr.Cardiac Related 98.7%

AVR - Mortality Depends on age,cor.dis.,LV function %

Conclusions Early Mortality for AVR very low – all ages Tissue Valves favoured where possible,especially in the elderly,to avoid warfarin related problems & T- embolism If Tissue Valve used, Stentless valve is better haemodynamically In the elderly, patient will usually outlive their valve In younger patients, Ross Proc. is safe, good quality of life, low risk re-operation

ALREADY SHOWN Low Operative Mortality and Morbidity Resolution LVH Normalization LV Size and Function AIMS Late Valve Related Events Aortic Valve Function and Need For Re-Operation

AORTIC VALVE FAILURE A.R. Re-operation Moderate Aortic Regurgitation or Greater Factors Analyzed Age Sex Aortic Valve Lesion : AS/AR/Mixed Aortic Annulus Diameter Aortic Annulus Reduction Method Implantation of Autograft

TORONTO SPV CLINICAL SERIES June 1994 – May Patients Mean Age 75.5 years (61-87) Sex:Male53.3% (48) Female46.7% (42)

Results Stentless Valve Insertion Early Mortality Re-operation Hospital <30 days Total (%/pt/yr) Ross Proc (0.7%) 0.9 TSPV (2.2%) 0 Aortic Allo

Aortic Allograft :- Indications Endocarditis : Lowest risk of recurrent infection Exclusion of abcess cavities Women of child bearing age <60 yrs:-Unsuitable for Ross Procedure 60-70yrs:-Unsuitable for Mechanical device

Cardiac Surgery Modern Surgical specialty 1953: Development of the heart/lung machine (cardiopulmonary bypass) allowed intracardiac procedures to be performed on the empty heart Later improvements (cardioplegia) led to Asystolic arrest– flaccid or still heart 1960: Cardiac Valve Replacement 1968: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery