IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse Inverse method for pyrolysable and ablative materials with optimal control formulation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Advertisements

Yi Heng Second Order Differentiation Bommerholz – Summer School 2006.
Zhen Lu CPACT University of Newcastle MDC Technology Reduced Hessian Sequential Quadratic Programming(SQP)
Various Regularization Methods in Computer Vision Min-Gyu Park Computer Vision Lab. School of Information and Communications GIST.
Assimilation Algorithms: Tangent Linear and Adjoint models Yannick Trémolet ECMWF Data Assimilation Training Course March 2006.
Backward modeling of thermal convection: a new numerical approach applied to plume reconstruction Evgeniy Tantserev Collaborators: Marcus Beuchert and.
By Paul Delgado. Motivation Flow-Deformation Equations Discretization Operator Splitting Multiphysics Coupling Fixed State Splitting Other Splitting Conclusions.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Optimization of thermal processes
Engineering Optimization – Concepts and Applications Engineering Optimization Concepts and Applications Fred van Keulen Matthijs Langelaar CLA H21.1
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Function Optimization Newton’s Method. Conjugate Gradients
Motion Analysis (contd.) Slides are from RPI Registration Class.
October, Scripps Institution of Oceanography An Alternative Method to Building Adjoints Julia Levin Rutgers University Andrew Bennett “Inverse Modeling.
Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : the quantization and the particle filtering approaches Afef SELLAMI Chang Young Kim.
Martin Burger Total Variation 1 Cetraro, September 2008 Numerical Schemes Wrap up approximate formulations of subgradient relation.
Dynamic Optimization Dr
CHAPTER 8 APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS THE INTEGRAL METHOD
Applications of Adjoint Methods for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University.
Adaptive Signal Processing
Advanced Image Processing Image Relaxation – Restoration and Feature Extraction 02/02/10.
Fabrice Laturelle, Snecma Moteurs
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
© Fluent Inc. 9/5/2015L1 Fluids Review TRN Solution Methods.
Astrium Suborbital Space Plane project RAeS – AAAF Space Tourism Symposium Toulouse, 12 March 2008 Hugues Laporte-Weywada Senior VP, Deputy Chief Technical.
Introduction to Adaptive Digital Filters Algorithms
A Brief Overview of Methods for Computing Derivatives Wenbin Yu Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
Charles L. Karr Rodney Bowersox Vishnu Singh
Adaptive Critic Design for Aircraft Control Silvia Ferrari Advisor: Prof. Robert F. Stengel Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program on Air.
Application of Differential Applied Optimization Problems.
Using Partitioning in the Numerical Treatment of ODE Systems with Applications to Atmospheric Modelling Zahari Zlatev National Environmental Research Institute.
UMRIDA Kick-Off Meeting Brussels, october Partner 11 : INRIA.
Progress in the implementation of the adjoint of the Ocean model NEMO by using the YAO software M. Berrada, C. Deltel, M. Crépon, F. Badran, S. Thiria.
LTSI (1) Faculty of Mech. & Elec. Engineering, University AL-Baath, Syria Ahmad Karfoul (1), Julie Coloigner (2,3), Laurent Albera (2,3), Pierre Comon.
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Optimization & Constraints Add mention of global techiques Add mention of calculus.
Variational Data Assimilation - Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Yan Ding, Ph.D. National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering The University.
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY INVERSE DESIGN George S. Dulikravich Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Eng. The University of Texas at Arlington
Xianwu Ling Russell Keanini Harish Cherukuri Department of Mechanical Engineering University of North Carolina at Charlotte Presented at the 2003 IPES.
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
Texas A&M University, Department of Aerospace Engineering AN EMBEDDED FUNCTION TOOL FOR MODELING AND SIMULATING ESTIMATION PROBLEMS IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Application of Bezier splines and sensitivity analysis in inverse geometry and boundary problems Iwona NOWAK*, Andrzej J. NOWAK** * Institute of Mathematics,
Quality of model and Error Analysis in Variational Data Assimilation François-Xavier LE DIMET Victor SHUTYAEV Université Joseph Fourier+INRIA Projet IDOPT,
Data Modeling Patrice Koehl Department of Biological Sciences National University of Singapore
1  The Problem: Consider a two class task with ω 1, ω 2   LINEAR CLASSIFIERS.
Variational data assimilation: examination of results obtained by different combinations of numerical algorithms and splitting procedures Zahari Zlatev.
An Introduction to Optimal Estimation Theory Chris O´Dell AT652 Fall 2013.
Chapter 2-OPTIMIZATION G.Anuradha. Contents Derivative-based Optimization –Descent Methods –The Method of Steepest Descent –Classical Newton’s Method.
NASA, JPL,January  CLIME INRIA Paris  Météo France  Institut de Mathématiques, Université de Toulouse  LEGI, Grenoble  MOISE INRIA Grenoble.
Lecture II-3: Interpolation and Variational Methods Lecture Outline: The Interpolation Problem, Estimation Options Regression Methods –Linear –Nonlinear.
Asteroseismology of Sun-like Stars
This document is the property of EADS LAUNCH VEHICLES. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its contents shall.
Using Neumann Series to Solve Inverse Problems in Imaging Christopher Kumar Anand.
Regularized Least-Squares and Convex Optimization.
Bounded Nonlinear Optimization to Fit a Model of Acoustic Foams
PDE Methods for Image Restoration
Deep Feedforward Networks
CHAPTER III LAPLACE TRANSFORM
Adjoint modeling and applications
Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion Calculations
Linearized Block Implicit (LBI) Method applied to Quasi-1D Flow
© Fluent Inc. 1/10/2018L1 Fluids Review TRN Solution Methods.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Peerapol Yuvapoositanon
Instructor :Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti
6th Lecture : Numerical Methods
Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques
The Second Order Adjoint Analysis
Presentation transcript:

IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse Inverse method for pyrolysable and ablative materials with optimal control formulation S.Alestra 1, J.Collinet 2, and F.Dubois 3 2 EADS ASTRIUM ST Les Mureaux, France 1 EADS Innovation Works Toulouse, FRANCE 3 Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers Paris, France

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p2 Atmospheric re-entry missions Reentry Aerothermodynamics Team at EADS ASTRIUM-ST  Multiphysics : aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, plasma  design and sizing of the Thermal Protection System (TPS) of the aerospace vehicles  the identification of heat fluxes is of great industrial interest ARD Industrial problem Huygens probe (on Titan)

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p3 Internal energy balance Pyrolysis: Arrhenius equation Surface energy balance Surface Recession Decomposition and mass balance General equations of direct problem input data: heat fluxoutput data: temperature

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p4  Evaluate the heat fluxes from temperature measurements on thermal protection with ablation and pyrolysis Inverse Heat problem is hard !! : see theory, diffusion aspect,.. « Monopyro » 1D numerical tool, EADS ASTRIUM ST The inverse method  (t), t in [O,T] p(t)=   (t) ? T in [0,T] p(t)=   (t) ?

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p5 Direct Problem vector of temperature T and ablation s, functions of time t and position x. => system of coupled nonlinear time domain evolution differential equations:  The other variables described above are hidden in the formulation of F  System is rewritten in reduced variables s e T1T1 T2T2 T3T3  (t) X (t) p(t)=   (t) Heat Flux

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p6 Direct Discrete scheme  Heat Flux N~=2000  K number of one-dimensional grid points (~100), N number of time (N~=2000) iterations in the numerical scheme  The equation is written at time (n+1) :  Linearization at time n  forward time discrete linearized Euler scheme, with initial condition vanishing: stability

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p7 Cost Function  time domain unknown heat flux convection coefficient  Quadratic error or cost function j(p)  Measured temperature  Computed temperature  To minimize this quantity, by optimization algorithm  we need the derivatives of J(p), with respect to p. The inverse method

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p8 Adjoint System  Adjoint variable : dual multiplyer of  Lagrangian L + calculus of variations  Cancel the variations of  L with respect to   Direct system, forward in time, initial vanishing condition  Cancel the variations of  L with respect to  w  Adjoint system, backward in time, final vanishing condition The inverse method

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p9 Gradient computation  With this particular choice of , the gradient of the cost function is simply obtained by :  Variations  L function of  p  discrete gradients  apply an iterative inverse procedure minimizing J(p) to estimate the unknown parameter optimal function The inverse method

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p10 Gradient computation The inverse method Adjoint State Final Condition Gradients Direct State Initial condition time W = (T,s)  df / dp = complex, non linear df / dW = complex, non linear, tables Measurements

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p11 Optimization The inverse method Direct problem T(p) Optimization p+  p 1) Steepest Descent to explore 2) Quasi Newton to finish convergence (T(p)-  )**2 p0,  P optimal GradientApproximation of Hessian Direct + Adjoint system Can be computed by Automatic Differentiation tool

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p12 Automatic Differentiation TAPENADE, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France The inverse method  Program (Fortran) : sequence of elementary arithmetic operations  Derivatives can be computed automatically  If the code is modified, it is more easy to compute new adjoints and new gradients Input function f cost function J(p) Output functions f’ gradient dJ/dp AD Tool

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p13 Automatic Differentiation The inverse method  Direct problem instruction  Cost Function  Adjoint system instructions : differentiation in reverse mode, with push, pop  Gradient computed by reverse mode time

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p14 Virgin material, low heat flux)  Pseudo measurements very well rebuilt (RMS<1K)  Automatic Differentiation (AD) sucessful Some applications Heat Flux without AD Heat Flux with AD Gradient Quasi Newton Cost Function

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p15 Carbon/Resin with ablation, pyrolysis & pseudo measurements  Results OK with pyrolysis and ablation (without and with AD)  Results OK with 2% noise on pseudo measurement  Tichonov regularization to stabilize the solution Some applications Convection (noise without regularization) Convection (noise with regularization) Cost Function Gradient Quasi Newton

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p16 ARD  1998 on Ariane Flight 503  First use of the inverse method for « in-flight » rebuilding during ARD post-flight analysis (1999)  Last improvements of the method OK Some applications

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p17 Plasma Torch Facility Material to be tested Nozzle Ablation compensation Fluxmeters Measurements: Laser (ablation) Pyrometer (surface temperature) TC1 TC2 TC3 TC4 TC5 TC6 TC7 TC8

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p18 Plasma torch: First results ONLY ONE SENSOR USED Influence of sensor used  Ablation restitution Influence of sensor used  Temperature at thermocouple

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p19 Missing sensors  Temperature at Thermocouple Missing sensors  convection coefficient restitution Influence of sensor used  Heat Flux restitution Influence of sensor used  Temperature at surface ONLY ONE SENSOR USED SEVERAL SENSORS USED AT THE SAME TIME

This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Astrium Space Transportation IFAC Control of Distributed Parameter Systems, July 20-24, 2009, Toulouse 19/12/2006p20 Conclusion & perspectives  Conclusion:  Inverse method sucessfully implemented  First tests of Automatic Differentiation promising  Validation OK for pseudo-measurements (with or without noise)  Good results obtained on hard cases  Perspectives:  Theoretical aspects (observability, identificability) to be analyzed  Improve robustness of the method (initial guess,uncertainties on noise, regularization)  test on industrial re-entry problems  Improve automatic differentiation version for hard cases