No Child Left Behind State Communication Strategies KSA-Plus Communications July 2002 Prepared with support from a grant from the U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Navarre Primary School Sept. 17, 2013 Sandi Eubanks.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2009 Copyright All rights reserved. The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Research conducted by.
Chapter 11 Graphic Organizer Jonathan Kniss. The 10 th Amendment makes education largely a state function. The Chain of Command: student, teacher, principal,
Keewaydin School Where learning happens every day for everyone.
SCALING UP: Reform Lessons for Urban Comprehensive High Schools Celine Coggins, Ph.D.
Consensus Questions.  The Education Study scope is broad and includes the following areas under the role of the federal government in public education.
 History of Unions and Union Reform. Industrial unionism WHY UNIONS?Agents of Reform for Democratic Values Middle Class Values Poor Working Conditions.
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
PARCC Transition & Implementation Institute September 9, 2011.
Student achievement in the Hazleton Area SD has increased substantially since Celebrate Success! Hazleton Area SD.
Communicating about the P-16 Plan for Improving Student Achievement Indiana Education Roundtable April 20, 2004 Adam Kernan-Schloss.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
1 Connecting Policy, Programs, and Practice in Closing Achievement Gaps Denise Alston, Ph.D. Linda Bacon NEA Human & Civil Rights NCCRESt Conference February.
A New Vision for Summer School Jeff Smink March 15, 2011 Rhode Island Afterschool Plus Alliance.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting [NAME OF SCHOOL] [DATE][Principal]
A New Vision for Summer School Jeff Smink Bridge Conference Seattle, WA October, 2011.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Presentation by Bob Shireman Senior Consultant, Pathways to College Network SHEEO Professional Development Conference Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August.
Technology Leadership
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) Informational Meeting and Public Forum Organized by Advocates for Children’s Education (ACE) February 12, 2003.
Warren Simmons Urban Education Reform Challenges for the 21st Century Louisville Urban League’s 2007 Education Summit “Setting an Agenda for educational.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Early Childhood Trends and Issues Prepared for the April 20, 2013 GAYC Board Meeting.
TITLE ONE PLAN Forts Pond Elementary School A Title One School Title One Plan.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Alpha Charter of Excellence September 22, 2015 Isabel Navas, Principal.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting SOMERSET ACADEMY SILVER PALMS MS.KERRI ANN O’SULLIVAN.
How Do We Make Adolescent Inclusion Work? What are the values, skills, and knowledge necessary for success in inclusive adolescent settings? Peter L. Kozik.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Final Review Day 2: Education in America. Problems with American Education -Currently 68% of students in high school will graduate -Dropping out of high.
What It Takes to Leave No Child Behind: The Role of School Boards in Closing the Achievement Gap Pedro A. Noguera, Ph.D. Stienhardt School of Education.
Creating a High School Diploma That Counts: What Should Higher Education Do? SHEEO Annual Meeting July 21, 2006.
Technology Needs Assessment Presentation for Los Fresnos HS
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
THE CASE FOR THE NATIONAL WRITING PROJECT AN EVALUATOR’S PERSPECTIVE Inverness Research Associates April 2005.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
® [Insert your presentation title here]. ® ASCD: A Worldwide Community of Educators.
PARENTS ARE OUR PARTNERS Jamilah Fraser Chief of Communications The School District of Philadelphia July 2011.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
The School Counseling Program
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting W.H. Rhodes Elementary School School Year.
Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy. “Great to Excellent” Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy “Great to Excellent”
CREATING A WORLD CLASS KINDERGARTEN FINDING EXAMPLES OF EXCELLENCE IN MINNESOTA SCHOOLS.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
ITQ Institute Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics June 5, 2014 Focus 4; Communicating with Constituents; June 2014.
RAND EDUCATION Test-Based Accountability Systems: Asking the Right Questions Laura Hamilton RAND February 1, 2003 Presented at the Annenberg School for.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
No Child Left Behind Title I, Part A Program Parent Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind State Communication Strategies KSA-Plus Communications July 2002 Prepared with support from a grant from the U.S. Department of Education to the State Education Policy Network

Slide #2 Finding Education Is National Priority 1. Jobs and Economy 2. Education 3. Terrorism 4. Healthcare 5. Social Security *Public Education Network/Education Week (April 24, 2002); Hart/Teeter (May 21, 2002)

Slide #3 Finding Growing Support for Change All adults, 2001 Working pretty well Some changes needed, but basically keep as is Major changes needed Complete overhaul needed All adults, % 45% 52% Major changes/overhaul Northeast West Rural areas Cities High school or less College graduates Public school parents Nonparents 48% 58% 43% 58% 47% 55% 39% 53% *Hart-Teeter, 2002

Slide #4 Message Implications Communicate, communicate, communicate: the public is hungry for information about education Use new report cards to discuss successes and challenges Explain changes that are under way or planned Publicize changes that are producing results Discuss the hard work required to meet the new expectations

Slide #5 Finding No Awareness of NCLB Only 12% of general public Only 63% of education policymakers Only 36% of educators are aware of the new law *Hart/Teeter (May 21, 2002)

Slide #6 Message Implications Start at zero; can’t assume knowledge Explain WHY change is needed and what’s possible Make the case in broad terms: – Too many still unprepared for college or work (Public Agenda) – U.S. scores lag behind other nations (TIMSS) – The achievement gap between white and minority students persists (NAEP) Change requires an informed and consenting public

Slide #7 Finding Investment Priority 63% of adults – education is top budget priority 73% of parents – education is top budget priority 53% want to protect education from cuts Investment in teacher quality/conditions is highest priority *Public Education Network/Education Week (April 24, 2002); Hart/Teeter (May 2002)

Slide #8 Message Implications Recognize that reform requires resources Clarify expectations: “Here is what taxpayers/citizens should expect for $” Stress that fiscal conditions require wise spending Show how report cards and accountability in the new law help target wise spending

Slide #9 Finding Support for Accountability People support more accountability, but only if it is part of a broader improvement package. 23% say accountability is best way to improve instruction, 26% say more funding, 50% say both. Accountability information that counts most: – Literacy rates – Teacher quality – Safety – Budgets – Ratings compared to other schools – Less important: test scores and teacher salaries *Hart/Teeter (May 2001); Hart/Teeter (May 2002);

Slide #10 Message Implications Communicate on public’s terms: report cards should go beyond test scores Emphasize role of accountability to provide useful information to: 1) target supports and 2) create incentives for improvement

Slide #11 Finding Qualified Support for Tests 85% parents and 75% teachers say students work harder if graduation tests are in place 78% say tests are a good way to identify needs early 78% say pressure of one test is not fair *Public Agenda Reality Check 2002

Slide #12 Finding Qualified Support for Tests 48% say there is too much emphasis on test scores 37% believe high-stakes tests encourage teaching to test – “[The public is as] suspicious of efforts to ‘dumb down’ the curriculum as they are of politicians who dumb down democracy by talking a good education game but failing to deliver results.” *Public Education Network/Education Week (April 24, 2002); Public Agenda (March 2002)

Slide #13 Message Implications Testing is a valuable diagnostic and improvement tool, not an end in itself The right tests bring focus to teaching important core subjects: reading, writing, math – “If you test a child on basic math and reading skills, and you're teaching to the test, you're teaching math and reading. And that's the whole idea.” — Pres. George W. Bush Discuss benefits for an individual child Provide examples of schools using data to make positive changes

Slide #14 Finding Support for Quality Teaching Raising teacher quality leads priority list (30%); then funding equity (16%); early childhood (15%); smaller class sizes (12%) 30% of Americans are teachers or have close family members who are teachers *Public Education Network/Education Week (April 2002)

Slide #15 Message Implications Explain new information parents will get about teaching quality in their local schools – The new law defines quality and requires a quality teacher in every classroom. Explain what state is doing to improve teaching quality Explain benefits for teaching profession, such as increased regard for teachers

Slide #16 Finding Most credible voices 60% choose teachers as most credible voice on education issues 46% choose parents as most credible 38% choose college admissions officers as most credible 30% choose business leaders as most credible *The Business Roundtable, August 2000

Slide #17 Finding Teachers’ main concerns Teachers support standards and common- sense testing Teachers want more information about test development and application Teachers want more information about how tests can benefit students and educators Teachers are key to forging support for tests *Belden, Russonello, Stewart poll for Education Week (2001)

Slide #18 Message Implications Address teachers’ legitimate concerns about curriculum alignment, classroom resources, targeted training Enlist teachers and principals from successful schools as key communicators Partner and/or coordinate with other third parties

Slide #19 What’s In/What’s Out Commonsense tests to diagnose Quality teaching Using understandable data Parental involvement High-stakes tests to punish Test-prep shortcuts to boost scores More rhetoric Schools as parents

Slide #20 What’s In/What’s Out Schools can do better Expectations Giving every student a better education Teachers as messengers The big picture *Lessons from BRT focus groups, Schools are failing Standardization Expecting all students to meet high standards Business leaders as messengers The sound bite

Slide #21 What’s In/What’s Out Extra support for teachers and extra help for students to ensure they can meet higher standards Testing to identify ways to improve Multiple opportunities to pass Tests, plus other measures of achievement (grades, classroom work) Improving instruction *Lessons from BRT focus groups, Standards, testing and accountability in a vacuum Testing for accountability and high stakes A single opportunity Tests only Teaching to the test

Slide #22 Yes we can Make Good on the Promise 1. Make goals visible and realistic 2. Celebrate successes: “this is doable” 3. Acknowledge that change is difficult, but worth it 4. Communicate, communicate, communicate: you have stakeholders’ attention