Reykjavik 22-23 rd of June 2009 - COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Costs and Benefits of control strategies Final consortium meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Montenegro, 8-9 November 2010 – 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum: WBC-INCO.NET project 1 Joint Programming & Foresight: Shaping a Regional Innovation Action.
Advertisements

Brussels on the 4th of December COBECOS 1 Costs and Benefits of Control Strategies Small- scale consortium meeting Brussels 4th of December 2008.
© European Communities, 2007 Search Engines (SE) SE providers posses technologies that allow the understanding of user behaviours Search patterns can reveal.
NTTS 2009 Brussels February 20 1 A Downscaled Population Density Map of the EU from Commune Data and Land Cover Information NOTES.
Brest, 27 – 29 of February COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Policy-Oriented Research Second progress meeting Brest, 27 th.
© European Communities, 2011 The problem National research and innovation agencies aim to stimulate research, industry and the public sector to create.
© European Communities, 2004 Towards a Multi-scale European Soil Information System M. Van Liedekerke, P. Panagos, L. Montanarella (Joint Research Centre)
© European Communities, 2011 Background The European Science Foundation (ESF) was established in 1974 to provide a common platform for its Member Organisations.
Huelva 17 th and 18 th November 2008 – II Workshop on Entrepreneurship Statistics 1 Evidence on the role of Ownership Structure on Firm’s Innovative Performance.
Workshop on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Research and Development Collaborations, November 13, 2009, Leuven, Belgium 1 R&D Collaborations in FP7 –
Barcelona 8 th October 2008 –Symposium on Business Dynamics and Innovation: The role of space 1 Evidence on the role of Ownership Structure on Firm’s Innovative.
Rome, 25 October 2007 – QUOVADIS Consortium Meeting 1 QUOVADIS Validation Exercise From raw materials to ready results An overview on the identification,
© European Communities, 2007 Incentive structures matter in terrorism foresight Many actions are incentive driven activities in a society. The social incentive.
2 nd Steering Committee Meeting October 2008, Athens and Aegina.
© European Communities, 2011 Background The Science and Technology Policy Research and Information Center (STPI) at National Applied Research Laboratories.
Introduction to Foresight for Policy- and Decision-Making Retreat on Technology Foresight for High-level Decision Makers Seville, October 2008 Professor.
San Sebastian 2 – 3 rd of September COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Policy-Oriented Research Mid-term meeting San Sebastian,
© European Communities, 2007 As part of a widely based funding consortium (listed below), Industry Canada conducted a scenario planning process to answer.
© European Communities, 2011 renewable and clean energy supply technologies and a growing demand for the equipment used to convert that energy to useful.
Annual reports Final report Dr. Cecilia Blasetti Elettra - Sincrotrone Trieste v.
© European Communities, 2011 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT WITH THE A DVANCED S USTAINABILITY A NALYSIS (ASA) APPROACH European Union with novel methodological.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
© European Communities, 2011 Questions to be answered: Opportunities and challenges for Web 2.0 on the SMEs Small and medium enterprises (SME) are pressured.
Nairobi 1-2 October Some Approaches to Agricultural Statistics NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set.
JRC-ITU Karlsruhe – November 2009, Nucleonica ITRAC Training Course 1 November 2008 Uranium detected at scrap metal recycling facility, Rotterdam, NL Questions:
FP7-Infra : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1st October 2011 – 31st December 2014 Duration 39 months – Periods : 2 (month.
© European Communities, 2011 Background & Context The National Foresight Programme “Poland 2020” (NPF “Poland 2020”) was realised in the 2007 – 2009 period.
European Forum of Geostatistics Bled October Downscaling population density with CORINE Land Cover Warning: This presentation.
© European Communities, 2007 Group discussion in panels of experts and stakeholders is widely used in foresight both to produce future visions and images,
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
1 Overview of the JRA1 activities at JRC-IRMM F.-J. Hambsch, A. Al-Adili, I. Fabry, A. Plompen, S. Oberstedt, S. Zeynalov IRMM - Institute for Reference.
Mathias DEPRETZ – EuroVO-DCA Project Manager Work Package 1 – Management First Board Meeting – 2&3 october 2006 WP1 Management EuroVO-DCA Project FIRST.
© European Communities, 2007 Agricultural Biotechnology – Science and Society - Public research provided the foundation for the first agricultural biotechnology.
WFD WG E NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide.
INRA Rabat, October 14, Crop area estimates in the EU. The use of area frame surveys and remote sensing NOTES 1.
© European Communities, 2007 The Ultimate Goal: Informed Decision-Making The business of research and development has felt the growing pressure to produce.
© European Communities, 2011 Conceptual approach: FTA as specific mode(s) of governing expectations Expectations as promises, visions, risk concerns motivate,
© European Communities, 2011 Introduction Efficient technology forecasting and focusing on promising research is crucial to knowledge based economy. Because.
Motivation / Objectives This work is part of a research project to obtain a graduate degree in econometrics depth of the University Hassan II Casablanca.
© European Communities, 2011 The roadmaps serve as both a strategy and a communication tool at many levels: Firstly, the roadmaps serve as tools to communicate.
Objectives This work focuses on the analysis of economic impacts of government funded research institute’s(GFRI) short-term R&D for SME. In this work short-
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
© European Communities, 2011 Methodology (Success) scenario building (success scenario induced driver identification) with backcasting elements Delphi.
Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA) Conferences
Envisaging the Future of Learning
INSPIRE Status Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
Results and policy impact/implications
Guidelines and Template for project oral presentation
NOTES 1. Poster Title • Replace the mock-up text of the poster title (”Joint Research Centre”) with the text of your own title. • Keep the original font.
CALCULATION OF GHG EMISSIONS IN THE FUEL CHAIN
INDUSTRY-DRIVEN ROADMAPS 2020:
Foresight for setting priority development directions
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
Environmental Quality Standards (EQS)
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Foresight for Regional Planning and Sustainable Regional Development
WG-E Guidance on Environmental Quality Standards
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Joint JRC / NORMAN Workshop
Water Framework Directive River Basin Specific Pollutants
NOTES 1. Poster Title • Replace the mock-up text of the poster title (”Joint Research Centre”) with the text of your own title. • Keep the original font.
Analytical Methods for the New Candidate Priority Substances
Water Framework Directive River Basin Specific Pollutants
with EUSAAR NA2 Partners
QUOVADIS Validation Exercise From raw materials to ready results
Chemical Monitoring On-site 3
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Presentation transcript:

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Costs and Benefits of control strategies Final consortium meeting Reykjavik, rd of June 2009 NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide Master Do not change the size nor the position of that text box Replace the mock-up texts for the place (“Place”), the date (“dd Month YYYY”) and the event name (“Event Name”) with your own texts Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (white) Keep the original font body size (7 pt) and the text on one single line. 2. SLIDE NUMBER 2.1. The slide number on the banner’s lower right-hand side is automatically generated. 3. SLIDES 3.1. Duplicate the first slide as needed Do not change the size nor the position of the slide’s text box Try not to place more text on each slide than will fit in the given text box Replace the mock-up heading text (“Joint Research Centre (JRC)”) with your own text heading Set it in Eurostile Bold Extended Two or in Helvetica Rounded Bold Condensed, if you own one of these typefaces. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k) Keep the original font body size (28 pt) and the heading on one single line whenever possible. Reduce the font body size if needed Replace the mock-up text (“The European Commission’s Research-Based Policy Support Organisation)”) with your own text Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k). Use black if you need a second colour Keep the original font body size (22 pt) or reduce it if unavoidable Replace the EU-27 map mock-up illustration with your own illustration(s) Try to keep your illustration(s) right- and top- or bottom-aligned with the main text box whenever possible. NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide Master Do not change the size nor the position of that text box Replace the mock-up texts for the place (“Place”), the date (“dd Month YYYY”) and the event name (“Event Name”) with your own texts Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (white) Keep the original font body size (7 pt) and the text on one single line. 2. SLIDE NUMBER 2.1. The slide number on the banner’s lower right-hand side is automatically generated. 3. SLIDES 3.1. Duplicate the first slide as needed Do not change the size nor the position of the slide’s text box Try not to place more text on each slide than will fit in the given text box Replace the mock-up heading text (“Joint Research Centre (JRC)”) with your own text heading Set it in Eurostile Bold Extended Two or in Helvetica Rounded Bold Condensed, if you own one of these typefaces. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k) Keep the original font body size (28 pt) and the heading on one single line whenever possible. Reduce the font body size if needed Replace the mock-up text (“The European Commission’s Research-Based Policy Support Organisation)”) with your own text Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k). Use black if you need a second colour Keep the original font body size (22 pt) or reduce it if unavoidable Replace the EU-27 map mock-up illustration with your own illustration(s) Try to keep your illustration(s) right- and top- or bottom-aligned with the main text box whenever possible.

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 2 Aims and expectations of the final meeting WP 8 finalised (minus one case study) Conclusions and recommendations Start of WP 9 Agreement on lessons learned and recommendations Guidelines for WP-9 and agreements for the outline of the final report

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 3 Progress the last 6 months (as agreed in Brussels)

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 4 COBECOS progress month 29 - overall picture WPWP nameResponsible partner DeliverableDeadline for delivery (excluding 45 days) Month of delivery Status WP 10Project coordinationJRC, IoESWeb-site00 Finalised on time WP 1Literature reviewNHHReport3 3 Finalised on time WP 2Data CollectionCEDEMReport12 Finalised on time WP 10Project coordinationJRC, IoESInterim activity Report12 Finalised on time WP 4Data harmonizationJRCDatabase128 Finalised on time WP 3Theoretical modelingIoESReport188, 9 Finalised on time WP10Project coordinationJRC, IoESPeriodic activity report18 Finalised on time WP10Project coordinationJRC, IoESPeriodic management report 18 Finalised on time WP10Project coordinationJRC, IoESNewsletter18 Finalised on time WP 5Estimation of theoretical estimations AZTIReport:(18)2422 Finalised on time WP 6Software developmentCEFASSoft ware package i) design phase ii)implementation phase iii) maintenance phase i - 6 ii - 24 iii - 30 i)6 - i and ii finalised - User friendly interface available (alpha version) WP 7Calibrating and testingICReport(21) 24Draft final report available excluding NHH WP 8SimulationsIREPAReport 27Draft final report available excluding NHH WP 9ConclusionsJRCFinal activity report Final periodic report Executive summary 30Work in progress

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 5 Various activities Past Publication in Marine policy - Lone and Frank CFCA meeting on the application of COBECOS for CBA of Joint Deployment Plans (JDP’s) – Ragnar and Jenny Future Presentations at EAFE Malta (6-8 July)- Bertrand and Jenny Presentation at CFCA for EC and member states (8-10 July)- Raul Presentation of results to authorities and industry (prel. Sep)– Ragnar and Jenny

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 6 Thank you!

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 7 Final reports ACTIVITY Final activity report Final periodic report A final plan for using and disseminating the knowledge (no input required from partners) FINANCIAL Final management report Final report on the distribution of the Community contribution QUESTIONNAIRES (same as for the mid-term delivery): A final science and society reporting questionnaire A final reporting questionnaire on workforce statistics A final socio economic reporting questionnaire

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 8 Final deliverables – Periodic report Follows the structure of the mid term periodic report Includes all work from month 18 and onwards. Input from the work package leaders from the WP’s active after month 18 (WP 6,7,8 and 9, (1-2 pages): –Work package objectives –Progress towards objectives –Deviation from work programme –List of deliverables –Lists of milestones Main achievements in the period: –Calibration –Simulations Input from the work package leaders of WP 7,8 –Summary of the results (max 4 pages)

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 9 Final reports – Financial (IoES responsible) Final management report Consolidation of all the costs of the contractors. Same format as for the Periodic management report. Final report on the distribution of the Community contribution Within 60 days of the receipt of the final payment by the EC a final report on the distribution of the Communitys contribution reporting on the final cumulative distribution of funds made to each contractor Same format as for the Periodic management report.

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 10 Final deliverables – Publishable final activity report The main report for disseminating the results Extraction from the guidelines (description): –Resembles an expanded version of the Publishable Executive Summary of the mid term Periodic Report –Cumulates and summarises the project activities and results over the full duration –Suitable for direct publication –While not excluding technical language should be broadly comprehensible to a general reader Extraction from the guidelines (content): –Summary description of project objectives –Contractors involved –Work performed and end results –Elaborating on the degree to which the objectives were reached –Brief description of the methodologies and approaches employed and how they relate to the achievements to the state of the art. –Explanation of the impact of the project on the industry or research sector

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 11 Final deliverables – Publishable final activity report Outline in Word

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 12 Focus for the next 3 months Finalisation of WP 7 asap - awaiting contributions from NHH Finalisation of WP 8 asap - awaiting contributions from NHH WP 9 –by case studies contributions Delivery of final activity report (31 st of July + 45 days, 28 th of August) Contribution to the final progress report Verify to Paolo that the conclusions are ok JRC and IC to improve the user friendly interface. Suggestions for improvements. Contact Ragnar for publication in scientific journal/book volume – before August Synthesis paper for EAFE verified by the participants next week.

Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 13