The Sponsored.xxx TLD Promoting Online Responsibility: Policy Development Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ICANNs Contractual Compliance Program David Giza, Senior Director, Contractual Compliance Stacy Burnette, Director, Contractual Compliance ICANN Policy.
Advertisements

Generic Names Supporting Organisation Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council.
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
CHAPTER 4 E-ENVIRONMENT
ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.
Cairo 2 November Agenda  Guidebook overview  Supporting and explanatory materials  Guidebook Module detail  Probable timelines 2.
STLD RFP: Status Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 24, 2003 Stuart Lynn.
Microsoft Passport Waldemar Swiercz.
Introduction to ICANN’s new gTLD program. A practical example: the Dot Deloitte case. Jan Corstens, Partner, Deloitte WIPO Moscow, 9 Dec 2011.
Intellectual Property Development Matchmaking Database (IP-DMD)
Marko Bonac EURid Marko Bonac TERENA GA – Rhodes June
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
Revised Draft Strategic Plan 4 December 2010.
© 2007 GSM Association Notice: TThis document and its contents are confidential to the GSM Association and/or its subsidiaries, who expressly disclaim.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Genesis USG White Paper, June 5, 1998: –“The U.S. Government will seek international support to call.
E-Commerce Directive 2002 Overview. This Map It was derived from Complying with the E-Commerce Regulations 2002 by the DTI.
Document provided by Global Name Registry for informational purposes only. Opening Up the Second Level ICANN Public Forum Montreal, Canada Wednesday 25.
1 Updates to Texas Administrative Code 1TAC 206 Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources February 8, 2012.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
LET’S BE ADULT ABOUT IT An introduction to the progressive new home of adult entertainment online.
ICANN COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLANNING DISCUSSION Brussels, June
Update from ICANN staff on SSR Activities Greg Rattray Tuesday 21 st 2010.
GhNIC.gh ccTLD organization by Eric Akumiah
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
1 ICANN update Save Vocea APSTAR retreat, Taipei, TW 24 February 2008.
CYBERLAW CLASS 14 Regulating Domain Name Disputes – ICANN and the International System Oct. 15, 2002.
New gTLD Basics. 2  Overview about domain names, gTLD timeline and the New gTLD Program  Why is ICANN doing this; potential impact of this initiative.
The Information Challenge Exponential growth of resources New researchers with new needs Multiple communication options New expectations and opportunities.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
Promoting Good Practices in Domain Name Registration Supported by.
Multistakeholder Policy- & Decision-making
GNSO Public Forum Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Lisbon, 29 March 2007.
© Copyright 2003, JPRS 1.JP IDN Implementation June 24, 2003 Hiro Hotta JPRS (Japan Registry Service) 日本レジストリサービス.jp/
ccTLD IDN Report ccTLD Meeting, Montreol June 24, 2003 Young-Eum
IRTP Part D PDP WG Items for Review. Items for Review Policy Development Process WG Charter GNSO WG Guidelines.
The making of.eu. 2.eu time line Regulation on the implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain – 30 April 02 Framework for the implementation of the.eu.
The challenge of services for new registries Giovanni Seppia Cape Town, November 30, 2004.
State of e-Authentication in Higher Education August 20, 2004.
Asia Pacific Regional Council OCLC Record Use Policy Some Recent Developments OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council Meeting National Library of Australia.
DAC 8 Renewal proposal to ICANN October 11, 2005 Geneva.
Update on auDA activities Paul Szyndler Public Affairs Officer APTLD Meeting Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1 March 2010.
Implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain Marko Bonač Arnes.
1 Proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS) Presented by Chuck Gomes VeriSign Global Registry Services (VGRS)
PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE LAICO REGENCY HOTEL Creating Space for Consumer Rights in.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Governmental Advisory Committee Public Safety Working Group 1.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
GNSO Public Council Meeting Wednesday, 17 July 2013.
Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 04 December 2015.
IRTP Part B PDP Final Report Overview. Background Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Straightforward process for registrants to transfer domain names.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
1 Overview of WLS. 2 Proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS) Presented by Chuck Gomes VeriSign Global Registry Services (VGRS) Potential registrants subscribe,
1 The Dot EU TLD - current state and next steps George Papapavlou Head of unit, Internet-related services European Commission Domain Day 2003 Milan 13.
Vice Chair, UK Representative, Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)
Recent Developments at the International Level
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Country and Territory Identifiers in New gTLDs
NCUC Africa Members First Regional Webinar Ines Hfaiedh
In Depth Overview of Sunrise Period | 21 September 2016
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course
IDN Variant TLDs Program Update
Action Request (Advice) Registry
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Presentation transcript:

The Sponsored.xxx TLD Promoting Online Responsibility: Policy Development Process

IFFOR Charter promote the development of responsible business practices and conduct promote free expression globally promote the development of business practices to empower users and parents online protect the privacy and security of consenting adult consumers endeavor to foster communication between the responsible online adult entertainment community and the broader Internet community seek and support informed participation reflecting the diversity of the responsible online adult entertainment community and the broader Internet stakeholders employ an open and transparent policy development process.

Step 1: Global Stakeholder Outreach Online adult-entertainment industry leaders Free speech, privacy and security advocates Child & family safety groups Information technology (IT) experts Public policy leaders

Status March sTLD application submitted June ICANN Board determination that ICM Proposal met the published sTLD criteria May ICANN Board rejected proposed registry agreement January ICANN posted revised, negotiated registry agreement

Definition of Sponsored Community Precisely defined as providers of online adult entertainment who desire to work collectively to develop industry guidelines and best practices and who desire to establish a space on the Internet where those guidelines and best practices can be implemented. ICM documented, and sponsorship evaluation team acknowledged, broad-based support of the Sponsored Community, including adult webmasters based in more than 70 countries around the world. ICM’s Industry Pre-Reservation Service confirms industry support.

Initial Policies Have Been Identified Registrants must agree to adhere to best practices and policies including: Automated processes to help identify child pornography Clear labeling and ICRA tagging of sites registered in.xxx and sites in other TLDs to which xxx pages automatically redirect Compliance with IFFOR developed best practices, including those related to consumer protection, credit card authentication, spam and privacy ICM will acquire/license expanded geographic identifier list and reserve place names on that list. ICM will provide mechanism for governments to identify culturally significant names to be reserved.

Policy Development Partner The Internet Content Rating Association (ICRA) has formally endorsed.xxx ICRA will be relaunched on 13 February as the Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI) FOSI ’ s mission is to be a body “ where technology and policy stakeholders meet in the field of family online safety. ” Founding members include AOL, AT&T, British Telecom, Cisco, CompTIA, the GSM Association, Microsoft, RuleSpace, Solarsoft, Telmex, and Verizon ICM is in negotiations with ICRA/FOSI regarding its provision of labeling and monitoring services, as well as management of the IFFOR policy development process.

Intellectual Property Protections.xxx is a sponsored TLD, with strict eligibility requirements: Registrants (for resolving names) must be members of the online adult community, their representatives (e.g., trade associations, lawyers, etc.) Prior to resolution of site: Registrant eligibility must be verified Accuracy of Registrant contact information must be verified Repeated failure to comply with registry operator policies places all reservations at risk To discourage speculation and incentivize participation, Registration priority for operators of corresponding sites in other TLDs

Free Pre-Reservation Service ICM has also been offering (since May 2006) a free “ Pre-Reservation ” service to IP holders This enables trademark holders to reserve non- resolving strings in advance of the Start-Up Trademark Opposition Program

Start-Up Trademark Opposition Pre-launch assertion of trademark rights and procedures to remove incentives to squat/speculate Trademark holder(s) place “ stop ” on a string Anyone wishing to register that string must: Be a verified member of the community Pay a non-refundable registration fee ICM will notify the trademark holder(s) of the pending registration Domain will not resolve during the pendency of a UDRP proceeding ICM will discuss simplified UDRP with WIPO for this process

Registering Non-Resolving Strings Long term, deeply discounted options for trademark holders wishing to register non- resolving names secured through pre- reservation, STOP, or ordinary registration activities Cost recovery model, with volume discounts ICM will require registrars to participate in this service

Input from Business ICM has solicited input from the business constituencies, and made presentations at constituency meetings ICM will provide additional opportunities for input from all stakeholders during pre-launch phase