C.Jeynes 1, A.J.Smith 1, N.Peng 1, M.Zier 2, A. Morel 3, Q.Zhao 3, K.Temst 3, W.Vandervorst 3,4, A.Vantomme 3, A.Cassimi 5, I.Monnet 5, E.Balanzat 5, R.Elliman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Advertisements

Small Scale Facilities in EUROPE ( not included in the Large Scale Facilitity Network) Belgium: 1IKS KU Leuven Czech Republic: 2Nucl. Phys. Inst. Acad.
Dosimeters, calibration and uncertainty
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Experimental studies of low energy proton irradiation of thin vacuum deposited Aluminum layers T. Renger, M. Sznajder, U.R.M.E. Geppert Chart.
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Introduction The use of qNMR for purity measurement has been steadily growing in recent years. The assessment of the purity of calibration materials and.
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Study of sputtering on thin films due to ionic implantations F. C. Ceoni, M. A. Rizzutto, M. H. Tabacniks, N. Added, M. A. P. Carmignotto, C.C.P. Nunes,
Setup for large area low-fluence irradiations with quasi-monoenergetic 0.1−5 MeV light ions M. Laitinen 1, T. Sajavaara 1, M. Santala 2 and Harry J. Whitlow.
Ion Beam Centre IBA XIV: Pitfalls II Pitfalls in Depth Profiling II Joint ICTP/IAEA Workshop on Advanced Simulation and Modelling for.
The Calibration Process
7th Sino-Korean Symp June Evolution of Ni-Al interface alloy for Ni deposited on Al surfaces at room temperature R. J. Smith Physics Department,
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Wolfhard Möller | Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research | Wolfhard Möller Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Data processing in the Activation technique experiment. Making stacked or sandwiched in the repeated order of Al-Cu-Mo. Irradiation of the samples Using.
Some fission yields for 235U (n,f), 239Pu (n,f), 238U (n,f) reactions in ΣΣ neutron spectrum Dr. Cristina Garlea National Institute for R&D of Physics.
29 th June–1 st July 2003NewLeif FP6 I3 Joint Research Activity No. 2 Innovative Low Energy Ion Beam Technologies Co-ordinator: R.W. McCullough, Queen’s.
Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia CRP: Development of a Reference Database for Ion Beam Analysis Measurements of differential cross sections for.
Accuracy and Precision
Ion Beam Analysis Dolly Langa Physics Department, University of Pretoria, South Africa Blane Lomberg Physics Department, University of the Western Cape,
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.
Level 2 Unit 6 Application of Manufacturing Techniques in Engineering Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 6 Application of Manufacturing Techniques in Engineering.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Workshop On European Small-Scale Accelerator Facilities Organized at Agios Nicolaos, Crete, Greece, September 7-8, 2007 Scientists from almost all European.
Paul Sellin, Radiation Imaging Group Time-Resolved Ion Beam Induced Charge Imaging at the Surrey Microbeam P.J. Sellin 1, A. Simon 2, A. Lohstroh 1, D.
Good Practice for monitoring plans Viewpoint of a DOE Marco van der Linden, SGS Climate Change Programme
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
In-beam performance of AGATA-DEMONSTRATOR Ideas for the firsts commissioning experiments of the AGATA-DEMONSTRATOR campaign at LNL-Legnaro F. Recchia INFN-LNL.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
Tim Bolton, KSU Run 2B L0/L1 PRR Aug 7, Radiation Testing at KSU for the Run 2B Upgrade  L0/L1/L2 sensors from both HPK and ELMA tested with 7-14.
Neutron inelastic scattering measurements at the GELINA facility of EC-JRC-IRMM A. Negret 1, C. Borcea 1, A. Plompen 2 1 NIPNE-HH, Romania 2 EC-JRC-IRMM,
Systematic Errors Studies in the RHIC/AGS Proton-Carbon CNI Polarimeters Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory The RHIC/AGS Polarimetry Group:
Ion Beam Analysis Today and Tomorrow Ferenc Pászti Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Budapest 20+5 min.
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Nuclear structure and fundamental interactions Solid state physics Material irradiation Micrometeorite research and study Astrophysics Nuclear astrophysics.
Compositional dependence of damage buildup in Ar-ion bombarded AlGaN K. Pągowska 1, R. Ratajczak 1, A. Stonert 1, L. Nowicki 1 and A. Turos 1,2 1 Soltan.
COSIRES 2004 © Matej Mayer Bayesian Reconstruction of Surface Roughness and Depth Profiles M. Mayer 1, R. Fischer 1, S. Lindig 1, U. von Toussaint 1, R.
UL UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA CENTRO DE FÍSICA NUCLEAR People: Senior Researchers (responsible for activity lines): Eduardo Alves (Head of Lab) Adelaide Pedro.
Status Report of the LISOL Laser Ion Source Yu.Kudryavtsev, T.Cocolios, M.Facina, J.Gentens, M.Huyse, O.Ivanov, D.Pauwels, M.Sawicka, P.Van den Bergh,
Basics of Ion Beam Analysis
Search for QFS anomaly in pd - breakup reaction below E p = 19 MeV Shuntaro Kimura, K. Sagara, S. Kuroita, T. Yabe, M. Okamoto, K. Ishibashi, T. Tamura,
1 Cost Room Availability Passive Shielding Detector spheres for accelerators Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
IEA IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT ON NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY OF FUSION REACTORS International Workshop on Subtask Neutronics Report on ENEA activity in 2004 Paola.
Outsourcing Due Diligence Through Robust Accreditation.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Rita Ramos IBA RCM, Nov 2005 MEASUREMENT OF PROTON ELASTIC SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS FOR LIGHT ELEMENTS – VALIDATION OF A “BULK SAMPLE”
Adapting A Clinical Medical Accelerator For Primary Standard Dosimetry
Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,
Potku – A New Analysis Software for Heavy Ion Elastic Recoil Detection Analysis K. Arstila 1, J. Julin 1, M.I. Laitinen 1, J. Aalto 2, T. Konu 2, S. Ka.
0 Ion Beam Facilities at KOMAC Chan Young Lee on behalf of KOMAC Chan Young Lee on behalf of KOMAC ICABU2014, November 12~14,
Multidisciplinary irradiation beam lines The CATANA proton therapy line The “0 degree” line The CATANA proton therapy line The “0 degree” line LNS Users.
Sunil Kumar, Namita yadav, Pragya Bhatt, Raj Singh, B. K. Singh, R
Technical justifications for accreditation
Electron probe microanalysis EPMA
Study on Surface Asperities
at TSL high energy neutron facility
Chapter 6 Calibration and Application Process
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Siara Fabbri University of Manchester
ION BEAM ANALYSIS.
Recent check of calibration across detectors
Presentation transcript:

C.Jeynes 1, A.J.Smith 1, N.Peng 1, M.Zier 2, A. Morel 3, Q.Zhao 3, K.Temst 3, W.Vandervorst 3,4, A.Vantomme 3, A.Cassimi 5, I.Monnet 5, E.Balanzat 5, R.Elliman 6 1 University of Surrey Ion Beam Centre, Guildford, England* 2 Forschungszentrum Dresden, Rossendorf, Saxony, Germany* 3 Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium* 4 IMEC Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, Belgium* 5 Commissariat à L’Energie Atomique, Caen, France* 6Australian National University, Canberra, Australia* SPIRIT partner providing Trans-National Access Fluence Control in several European Ion Implanters Ion Beam Centre Fluence Control Ion Implantation is one of the basic enabling technologies for our huge semiconductor processing industry, because in principle we can “count the ions in”. This project is designed to demonstrate that the SPIRIT partners (and others) can indeed supply their users with a specified implanted fluence. Surrey : 2 implanters, 2 MV, 200 kV (2 beam lines) Rossendorf : 4 implanters, 40 kV, 500 kV, 200 kV, 3 MV Tandem Leuven : 2 implanters, 90 kV, 200 kV Caen : 1 MeV/amu cyclotron ANU : 2 implanters, 150 kV, 1.7 MV Tandem Fluence Control and SPIRIT SPIRIT SPIRIT (“Support of Public and Industrial Research Using Ion Beam Technology”) is supported by the European Community as an Integrating Activity under EC contract SPIRIT integrates 11 leading ion beam facilities from 6 European Member States and 2 Associated States. 7 partners provide Trans- National Access to their facilities, offering highly complementary equipment and areas of specialization to European scientists. Ions are supplied in an energy range from below 10 keV to more than 100 MeV for modification and analysis of solid surfaces, interfaces, thin films, and soft matter. SPIRIT will increase the quality of research by sharing best practice, harmonizing procedures and establishing rigorous quality control measures. Accurate Analysis (Right) Analysis Protocol based on accurate stopping powers We have demonstrated previously that a-Si stopping powers are given correctly by SRIM03 for 1.5 MeV He, by comparison with a CRM (certified reference material). Therefore the a-Si yield determines the charge.solid-angle product for each spectrum at 0.6%, far better than the ~2% common in charge integration equipment. Detector electronic gain is critical to accuracy. It is astonishingly easy to make large errors (much larger than expected) in the determination of this parameter. A double-detector configuration is always used specifically to validate the detector gain calibration. It also is a double check on internal consistency of the measurements, essential for analyses like these. Surrey will carry out the measurements for the whole project using (mostly) a published protocol. High energy implants require protocol variation. C. Jeynes et al, Quality assurance in an implantation laboratory by high accuracy RBS, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 249 (2006) 482–485 (Below) Uncertainty Budget Traceably accurate analysis must be accompanied by a systematic analysis of all the contributions to the uncertainty. In most analyses this is dominated by uncertainty in either collected charge or stopping power. Symbols: data; Lines: fit Samples and Analyses Surrey 100 mm wafers used in systematic QA programme, fluence measurements for each beam line every quarter 100 mm wafers used in systematic QA programme, fluence measurements for each beam line every quarter Faraday cup validation required Faraday cup validation required Measurements of three wafers (one cycle) is completed Measurements of three wafers (one cycle) is completed Analysis of data almost complete Analysis of data almost complete Target is 2% accuracy and 2% uniformity Target is 2% accuracy and 2% uniformity Rossendorf 100 mm wafers used. 100 mm wafers used. Faraday cup validation required for three implanters and current measurement assembly for the 4thFaraday cup validation required for three implanters and current measurement assembly for the 4th Measurements of four wafers is completed Measurements of four wafers is completed Target is 2% accuracy and 2% uniformity for 2 implanters (FCs), 5% & 5% (FC on 3 MV), 10% and 10% on 200 kVTarget is 2% accuracy and 2% uniformity for 2 implanters (FCs), 5% & 5% (FC on 3 MV), 10% and 10% on 200 kV Leuven Machine problems have precluded preparation of test samples so far. Machine problems have precluded preparation of test samples so far. Caen Small targets (10 mm) Al foil samples Small targets (10 mm) Al foil samples Charge collection validation required Charge collection validation required Samples are prepared : 40 MeV Xe/cm 2 Samples are prepared : 40 MeV Xe/cm 2 Analysis of sample is complex : using PIXE calibrated against low energy Xe standard implants by Surrey, validated as standards by RBS under this programme Analysis of sample is complex : using PIXE calibrated against low energy Xe standard implants by Surrey, validated as standards by RBS under this programme Target is 10% accuracy and 5% uniformity Target is 10% accuracy and 5% uniformity ANU Four 20 x 20 mm samples used. Four 20 x 20 mm samples used. Current collection validation required for two implanters at both low and high energies for eachCurrent collection validation required for two implanters at both low and high energies for each Measurement of four samples is completed Measurement of four samples is completed Target is 5% accuracy and 5% uniformityTarget is 5% accuracy and 5% uniformity One Example of Measurements Conclusions 0.980(5) As/cm (5) As/cm 2 No significant uniformity (better than 2%) No significant uniformity (better than 2%) Absolute measurement accuracy of mean value is 0.9% Absolute measurement accuracy of mean value is 0.9% Detectors agree within expected uncertainty Detectors agree within expected uncertainty 2% (1  ) fluence accuracy achieved 2% (1  ) fluence accuracy achieved TFU = “thin film units” = atoms/cm keV As/cm 2 (Surrey) Line 1, DF (Danfysik) 200 kV implanter Line 1, DF (Danfysik) 200 kV implanter Wafer QA59P#25 (measured March 2010) Wafer QA59P#25 (measured March 2010) 13 spots over 100 mm wafer measured at 2% 13 spots over 100 mm wafer measured at 2% 2 detectors (1,5.3) msr, 40 uC per spot 2 detectors (1,5.3) msr, 40 uC per spot Channelled on substrate Channelled on substrate Charge.solid-angle product determined per detector from the a-Si height in the implanted region Charge.solid-angle product determined per detector from the a-Si height in the implanted region Weighted average of detectors used due to poor counting statistics on the small detector A Weighted average of detectors used due to poor counting statistics on the small detector A