Wazz up with Education : Looking at Challenges, Contexts, and Complexities Elizabeth B. Kozleski Arizona State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Carnegie Schools for a New Society: Reflections on a National, Districtwide High School Reform Initiative ROCHELLE NICHOLS-SOLOMON & MICHELLE FEIST Academy.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
1 Cultural Competencies, Part IV: Race & Ethnicity Maggie Rivas April 11, 2007.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
June 2014 “College and Career Readiness” for Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities 1.
News You Can Use: Family Engagement and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Melody Musgrove, Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
History–Social Science: Unit 2, Key Topic 4http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
March Creating and Sustaining Culturally Responsive Educational Systems High Achievement for All Students, Closing Gaps and Eliminating Disproportionality.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Donald Kauchak and Paul Eggen
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
In what ways do you contribute to students’ learning in mathematics? What do you think is the role of the district in improving math achievement?
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
+ Welcome! Agenda: 5:00-5:30 Influences discussion 5:30-6:30 Review of last week’s discussion NBPTS standards 6:30-6:45 Break 6:45-7:00 NAEA Standards.
Molly Fisher Dara Ludens Sharon Packard. How Many Gen. Ed. Teachers feel prepared to work with students of Sp. Needs?  According to a study, “From Ryan.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Special Education Teacher Effectiveness: Policy Context Past and Present Margaret J. McLaughlin University of Maryland.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A quick look at the mission statements of a variety of schools and districts will reveal at least an awareness and belief that all students deserve equality.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Strategies for Achieving Broad-based Diversity ADD Perspectives Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Curriculum Analysis and Development Project Holly Cronin.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
CHAPTER 6: WORKING WITH FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILIES
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
NJCU College of Education
English Learner Parent Academy
Presentation transcript:

Wazz up with Education : Looking at Challenges, Contexts, and Complexities Elizabeth B. Kozleski Arizona State University

Of Every 100 White Kindergartners 88 Graduate from High School 58 Complete some College 26 Obtain at least a Bachelor’s degree (24 Year Olds) Source: US Bureau of Census, Current Population Reports, Educational Attainment in the United States; March 1998 (p ) Detailed Tables No. 2

Of Every 100 African American Kindergartners (24 Year Olds) Source: US Bureau of Census, Current Population Reports, Educational Attainment in the United States; March 1998 (p ) Detailed Tables No Graduate from High School 45 Complete some College 11 Obtain at least a Bachelor’s degree

Of Every 100 Latino Kindergartners (24 Year Olds) Source: US Bureau of Census, Current Population Reports, Educational Attainment in the United States; March 1998 (p ) Detailed Tables No Graduate from High School 35 Complete some College 8 Obtain at least a Bachelor’s degree

Of Every 100 Native American Kindergartners (24 Year Olds) 58 Graduate from High School 7 Obtain at least a Bachelor’s degree Source: US Bureau of Census, Current Population Reports, Educational Attainment in the United States; March 1998 (p ) Detailed Tables No. 2

Of Every 100 Students in Special Education (24 Year Olds) 50 Graduate from High School 7 Obtain at least a Bachelor’s degree About 6 million students in the US on IEPs (out of 55 million) 3 million graduate from high school 420,000 receive a BA

Challenges Lack of Confidence –Schools –Teacher Education Lack of Agreement in the Field –What should teachers know and be able to do –How should teachers be prepared Education for some but not all

Contexts NCLB IDEA ’04 NCATE INTASC CEC TASH OSEP

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings (1) Disability is a natural part of the human experience and in no way diminishes the right of individuals to participate in or contribute to society.

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings Improving educational results for children with disabilities is an essential element of our national policy of ensuring equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for individuals with disabilities.

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings However, the implementation of this title has been impeded by low expectations, and an insufficient focus on applying replicable research on proven methods of teaching and learning for children with disabilities.

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings Almost 30 years of research and experience has demonstrated that the education of children with disabilities can be made more effective by…

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings (A) having high expectations for such children and ensuring their access to the general education curriculum in the regular classroom, to the maximum extent possible, in order to

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings (i) meet developmental goals and, to the maximum extent possible, the challenging expectations that have been established for all children; and

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings (ii) be prepared to lead productive and independent adult lives, to the maximum extent possible;

IDEA ’04: Congressional Findings The opportunity for full participation by minority individuals, minority organizations, and Historically Black Colleges and Universities in awards for grants and contracts, boards of organizations receiving assistance under this title, peer review panels, and training of professionals in the area of special education is essential to obtain greater success in the education of minority children with disabilities.

Features Changes in Compliance and Monitoring Focus on Response to Intervention General Education Teachers and Principals

4 Pillars of Public Policy

Complexities Assumptions about knowledge generation, diffusion, adoption Interaction between general and special education Special education as a vehicle of exclusion and segregation vs. special education as a vehicle for support Intersection of race, SES, and disability Funding Cultural Reproduction

INTASC Standards Model Standards for Licensing General and Special Education Teachers of Students with Disabilities: A Resource for State Dialogue dStds.pdf

(1) Content – Both general and special education teachers have command of the subject matter that they teach such as math, English language arts, science, social studies, and the arts. Special educators also have knowledge of communicative, social and emotional development, communication skills and oral language development, social/behavior skills, motor skills, functional and independent living skills, employment-related skills, self- advocacy skills, orientation and mobility skills, and travel instruction.

(2) Pedagogy Both general and special educators understand how, and can effectively teach, content to students with disabilities. This means teachers have a repertoire of instructional strategies, assessment techniques, and accommodations they can employ to meet each student’s needs. They create a positive learning environment that motivates students, and are able to communicate with students, plan instruction, self reflect, and collaborate with families and other professionals to further student learning. In addition, special education teachers know how to design and implement specialized accommodations, to access resources and assistive technologies to support student learning, and to provide transition support.

(3) Students with Disabilities – Both general and special education teachers know their students, including specific information about each student’s abilities and disability(ies), learning strengths and needs, prior experiences, and cultural and linguistic backgrounds. In addition, special education teachers have specialized knowledge of specific disabilities and their implications for teaching and learning in order to address the unique needs of individual students with disabilities.

(4) Contexts – Both general and special education teachers have knowledge of the special education policies, procedures and legal requirements that provide the framework within which teaching of students with disabilities occurs. In addition, special education teachers have a greater understanding of the larger contexts within which the teaching of students with disabilities occurs (family, classroom, school, community, district)….

Inside the Academy Reinventing ourselves –Boundaries –Expertise –Knowledge Production –Practice Communities

Perspectives Activity Theory Intersection between P-12 and Teacher Education Research & Development Practice Communities Networking & Diffusion Continuous Improvement

Research & Development Action Research Professional Development Schools Evidence Based Practice The Connecticut Case Studies School Improvement Sustainability

Continuous Improvement Performance Based Assessment linked to P-12 student performance

Networking and Diffusion Every School Every Teacher Every Family

Practice Communities What Works Why How

Special Education Educating Teachers

Research & Development Practice Communities Networking & Diffusion Continuous Improvement

IHE Leadership: the 4 Cs Curriculum Context Complexity –Identity –Technical –Conditional –Critical Commitment –to partnership

Join the TA & D Network

References Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. A. (2006). A conversation of many voices: Critiques and visions of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, Commins, N. L. & Miramontes, O. (2006). Addressing linguistic diversity from the outset. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, Hargreaves, A. (2001). Beyond anxiety and nostalgia: Building a social movement for educational change. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (2001, May). Model Standards for Licensing General and Special Education Teachers of Students with Disabilities: A Resource for State Dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Kozleski, E. B., Pugach, M., Bellamy, G. T. & Yinger, B. (2002). Preparing teachers to work with students with disabilities: Challenges and possibilities for special and general education teacher preparation. Washington, D. C.: The American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.