A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Registration Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel vs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Advertisements

Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Treatment Selection and Sequencing in the First Line and Beyond Moderator: Joseph Gligorov, MD, PhD Head, Cancer.
Robertson JFR et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(27):
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Assistant Professor of Medicine Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
New Evidence reports on presentations given at ASCO 2012
AVADO PFS Analysis (ITT Population) All P values vs. placebo Adapted from Miles et al. ASCO 2008, abstract LBA 1011.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
HERA: KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS, RESULTS AND FUTURE PLANS NSABP 17 SEPTEMBER 2005 Brian Leyland-Jones Minda De Gunzberg Professor of Oncology, McGill University,
A randomized three-arm multi-centre comparison of: 1 year Herceptin®1 year Herceptin® 2 years Herceptin®2 years Herceptin® or no Herceptin®or no Herceptin®
A Phase III study (EMBRACE. ) of eribulin mesylate vs
NCCTG N9831 May 2005 Update Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson N, Martino S, Kaufman P, on Behalf of NCCTG, ECOG, SWOG, CALGB.
Bevacizumab: Antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer: where do we stand? Fortunato Ciardiello Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical and.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
RIBBON-1: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of HER2-Negative.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Assistant Professor of Medicine Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
The Use of Trastuzumab in the Elderly in the Adjuvant Setting and After Disease Progression in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Dall.
Abstract Introduction  What is a Herceptin (Trastuzumab) ?  Herceptin (Trastuzumab) is an monoclonal antibody,it is an example of targeted therapy an.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Axel Grothey, MD Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Lapatinib versus Trastuzumab in Combination with Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis of the GEPARQUINTO.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
A Discussion on Biologic Agents in Gastric Cancer Treatment Yoon-Koo Kang, MD Professor of Medicine Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
PHASE II RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE VERSUS TRASTUZUMAB PLUS DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 – POSITIVE.
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer Slideset on: Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland- Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Four-Year Follow-Up of Trastuzumab Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Operable Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: Joint Analysis.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Pertuzumab plus Trastuzumab plus Docetaxel for Metastatic Breast Cancer José Baselga, M.D., Ph.D., Javier Cortés, M.D., Sung-Bae Kim, M.D., Seock-Ah Im,
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 PHEREXA: No PFS Benefit of Adding Pertuzumab to Trastuzumab + Capecitabine.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 KRISTINE: Neoadjuvant T-DM1 + Pertuzumab vs Chemotherapy With Trastuzumab.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
TRAIN-2 (BOOG ): Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ± Anthracyclines With Dual HER2 Blockade in HER2+ EBC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Presentation transcript:

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Registration Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel vs. Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Untreated HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (CLEOPATRA) J Baselga, J Cortés, S-B Kim, S-A Im, R Hegg, Y-H Im, L Roman, J L Pedrini, T Pienkowski, A Knott, E Clark, M C. Benyunes, G Ross, and S M Swain 1. Baselga et al. N Engl J Med 2011

2 HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MBC, metastatic breast cancer 1. Slamon et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 2. Nahta & Esteva Oncogene 2007; 3. Franklin et al. Cancer Cell 2004; 4. Baselga et al. J Clin Oncol 2010; 5. Gianni et al. Cancer Res 2010 Suppl 2; 6. Baselga & Swain Clin Breast Cancer 2010 Introduction and study objective Trastuzumab-based therapy is the current standard of care in HER2-positive MBC 1 –However, progression of breast cancer still occurs in a majority of patients 2 Pertuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody and HER2 dimerization inhibitor that binds HER2 at a different epitope than trastuzumab 3 Phase II trials in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have shown improved activity, and a good safety profile with pertuzumab- trastuzumab-based therapy 4,5 CLEOPATRA assessed efficacy and safety of a pertuzumab- trastuzumab-based regimen in first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive MBC 6

3 Study design MBC, metastatic breast cancer; PD, progressive disease Patients with HER2-positive MBC centrally confirmed (N=808) Placebo + trastuzumab 1:1 Randomization was stratified by geographic region and prior treatment status (neo/adjuvant chemotherapy received or not) Study dosing q3w: - Pertuzumab/Placebo:840 mg loading dose, 420 mg maintenance - Trastuzumab:8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance - Docetaxel:75 mg/m 2, escalating to 100 mg/m 2 if tolerated Docetaxel* ≥6 cycles recommended n=406 n=402 Pertuzumab + trastuzumab Docetaxel* ≥6 cycles recommended * 6 cycles allowed at investigator discretion PD

4 Key patient eligibility criteria Centrally confirmed HER2-positive (IHC 3+ and/or FISH-positive; ratio ≥2.0) locally recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic breast cancer Measurable and/or non-measurable disease LVEF ≥50% at baseline No more than one hormonal regimen for MBC prior to randomization (Neo)adjuvant systemic breast cancer chemotherapy including trastuzumab and/or taxanes allowed if followed by a disease-free interval of ≥12 months No history of CHF or LVEF decline to <50% during or after prior trastuzumab therapy CHF, congestive heart failure; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MBC, metastatic breast cancer

5 Study endpoints Primary endpoint –Independently assessed progression-free survival (PFS) Secondary endpoints –Overall survival –Objective response rate –Safety –PFS by investigator assessment –Duration of response –Evaluation of biomarkers and correlation with clinical outcomes –Time to symptom progression Baselga et al. Clin Breast Cancer 2010.

6 Statistics Progression-free survival –800 patients and ~381 PFS events were required to provide 80% power to detect a 33% improvement in independently assessed PFS (HR = 0.75) at the two-sided significance level of 5% Overall survival –800 patients and 385 OS events were required to provide 80% power to detect a 33% improvement in OS (HR = 0.75) at the two- sided significance level of 5% –The interim OS analysis (estimated at 50% of events for final analysis) was planned at the time of the primary independently assessed PFS analysis OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival

7 Baseline characteristics (I) ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 406) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 402) Median age, years (range) 54.0 (27–89) 54.0 (22–82) Region, n (%) Asia Europe North America South America 128 (31.5) 152 (37.4) 68 (16.7) 58 (14.3) 125 (31.1) 154 (38.3) 67 (16.7) 56 (13.9) ECOG PS, n (%) 0 1 ≥2 248 (61.1) 157 (38.7) 1 (0.2) 274 (68.2) 125 (31.1) 3 (0.7)

8 Baseline characteristics (II) ER, estrogen receptor; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PgR, progesterone receptor Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 406) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 402) HER2 status IHC, n (%) 0 and No data 2 (0.5) 32 (7.9) 371 (91.4) 1 (0.2) 4 (1.0) 47 (11.7) 350 (87.1) 1 (0.2) HER2 status FISH, n (%) Positive Negative No data 383 (94.3) 4 (1.0) 19 (4.7) 384 (95.5) 1 (0.2) 17 (4.2) Hormone receptor status, n (%) ER- and/or PgR-positive ER- and PgR-negative Unknown 199 (49.0) 196 (48.3) 11 (2.7) 189 (47.0) 212 (52.7) 1 (0.2) Disease type at screening, n (%) Non-visceral Visceral 90 (22.2) 316 (77.8) 88 (21.9) 314 (78.1)

9 Prior therapy for breast cancer Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 406) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 402) Prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) Yes No 192 (47.3) 214 (52.7) 184 (45.8) 218 (54.2) Prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy received, n (%) Components of (neo)adjuvant therapy*, n (%) Anthracycline Hormones Taxane Trastuzumab 192 (100) 164 (85.4) 97 (50.5) 94 (49.0) 41 (21.4) 184 (100) 150 (81.5) 106 (57.6) 91 (49.5) 47 (25.5) * Numbers add up to more than 100% because patients could have received more than one therapy

Efficacy results

11 Stratified by prior treatment status and region Primary endpoint: Independently assessed PFS Median follow-up: 19.3 months D, docetaxel; PFS, progression-free survival; Pla, placebo; Ptz, pertuzumab; T, trastuzumab n at risk Ptz + T + D Pla + T + D Time (months) Ptz + T + D: median 18.5 months Pla + T + D: median 12.4 months HR = % CI 0.51 ‒ 0.75 p< ∆ = 6.1 months Progression-free survival (%)

12 Independently assessed PFS in pre-defined subgroups ER, estrogen receptor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PgR, progesterone receptor; PFS, progression-free survival All No Yes Europe North America South America Asia <65 years ≥65 years <75 years ≥75 years White Black Asian Other Visceral disease Non-visceral disease Positive Negative Unknown IHC 3+ FISH-positive Favors placeboFavors pertuzumab ER/PgR status Disease type Race Age group Region Prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy HER2 status Unstratified analyses ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ ‒ 0.78 nHR95% CI

13 Overall survival: Pre-defined interim analysis Median follow-up: 19.3 months, n = 165 OS events D, docetaxel; OS, overall survival; Pla, placebo; Ptz, pertuzumab; T, trastuzumab n at risk Ptz + T + D Pla + T + D Time (months) Ptz + T + D: 69 events Pla + T + D: 96 events HR = 0.64* 95% CI 0.47 ‒ 0.88 p = * * The interim overall survival analysis did not cross the pre-specified O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundary (HR ≤0.603; p≤0.0012) Overall survival (%)

14 Independently reviewed objective response In patients with measurable disease at baseline Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 336) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 343) Objective response rate, n (%) Complete response rate, n (%) Partial response rate, n (%) 233 (69.3) 14 (4.2) 219 (65.2) 275 (80.2) 19 (5.5) 256 (74.6) p = * Stable disease, n (%)70 (20.8)50 (14.6) Progressive disease, n (%)28 (8.3)13 (3.8) Unable to assess or no assessment, n (%)5 (1.5) * The statistical test result is deemed exploratory

Exploratory efficacy results By prior trastuzumab therapy

16 PFS, progression-free survival Independently assessed PFS by prior trastuzumab therapy in patients with (neo)adjuvant therapy Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel Median PFS, months Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel Median PFS, months Hazard ratio (CI) Prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab treatment (n = 88) (0.35 ‒ 1.07) No prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab treatment (n = 288) (0.43 ‒ 0.83)

Safety results

18 Withdrawals from study treatment in the safety population * Protocol violation, failure to return, or other Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Safety reasons, n (%) Adverse event Death 31 (7.8) (7.4) 23 7 Non-safety reasons, n (%) Progressive disease Refused treatment Other* 248 (62.5) (49.9) Total, n (%)279 (70.3)233 (57.2)

19 Exposure to study treatment Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Study treatment Time on any treatment (median), months Docetaxel Dose intensity (median), mg/m 2 /week Number of cycles administered, median (range) (1 ‒ 41) (1 ‒ 35)

20 Cardiac tolerability LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) LVSD (any grade)4.4%8.3% LVSD (grade >3)1.2%2.8% Fall in LVEF to <50% and by ≥10 percentage points from baseline 3.8%6.6%

21 Adverse events (all grades) ≥25% incidence or ≥5% difference between arms Adverse event, n (%) Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Diarrhea184 (46.3)272 (66.8) Alopecia240 (60.5)248 (60.9) Neutropenia197 (49.6)215 (52.8) Nausea165 (41.6)172 (42.3) Fatigue146 (36.8)153 (37.6) Rash96 (24.2)137 (33.7) Decreased appetite105 (26.4)119 (29.2) Mucosal inflammation79 (19.9)113 (27.8) Asthenia120 (30.2)106 (26.0) Peripheral edema119 (30.0)94 (23.1) Constipation99 (24.9)61 (15.0) Febrile neutropenia30 (7.6)56 (13.8) Dry skin17 (4.3)43 (10.6)

22 Grade ≥3 adverse events (incidence ≥5%) Adverse event, n (%) Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Neutropenia182 (45.8)199 (48.9) Febrile neutropenia30 (7.6)56 (13.8) Leukopenia58 (14.6)50 (12.3) Diarrhea20 (5.0)32 (7.9)

23 Conclusions The combination of pertuzumab with trastuzumab plus docetaxel, as compared with placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, significantly prolonged progression-free survival, with no increase in cardiac toxic effects.