Pedagogical templates approach - the base of EPSS design in B- Learn project Lehti Pilt Blended learning workshop in Porto 13rd of November, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee Date submitted to deafed.net – Date submitted to deafed.net – March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 To contact.
Advertisements

Criteria to design and assess ICT-supported Higher Education Teachers Training European Symposium Teacher training and the innovative use of ICT in HE.
Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS an introduction and overview Lisa Corley CETIS Pedagogy.
KRISTINE SOGHIKYAN YEREVAN STATE LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY EPOSTL AS AN ADMINISTRATOR'S GUIDE TO INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE IN UNIVERSITY LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION.
Personalized and adaptive eLearning Applications in LSMs
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. What is an IEP?  An IEP is a documented plan developed for a student with special needs that:  describes.
New Hanover County March 30, All CTE Courses can now be offered as an Honors Course!
Interaction and adaptation in SCORM-based SE course Todorka Glushkova, University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria
TNA – A Bridge between Standardisation and Personalisation? eCASME - A Leonardo da vinci funded project Ireland, Romania, Portugal Sweden, Latvia.
ALFANET September 23th, 2005UNFOLD-PROLEARN workshopValkenburg Authoring a full life cycle model in standards-based adaptive elearning Peter van Rosmalen.
Educational Modelling Language (EML): Adding instructional design to existing learning technology specifications Rob Koper
The Blackboard Project EDIT 652 Fall 2005 Dr. Mike Uttendorfer.
Template.
ALFANET April 29th, 2005ALFANET, IST rd Review Meeting Adaptation in aLFAnet Peter van Rosmalen Open Universiteit Nederland.
Valentin Razmov, Richard Anderson {valentin,
Manchester, 2007 Adaptive learning paths for improving Lifelong Learning experiences Ana Elena Guerrero Roldán, Julià Minguillón Universitat Oberta de.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
Orientation to the Physical Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
INTEL CONFIDENTIAL, FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 Intel Teach Essentials Program Curriculum Roundtable – Oxford – July 2013.
SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.
New trends in Semantic Web Cagliari, December, 2nd, 2004 Using Standards in e-Learning Claude Moulin UMR CNRS 6599 Heudiasyc University of Compiègne (France)
Faculty development at the K.U.Leuven Aims The participants gain insight in Guided Independent Learning (G.I.L.) The participants acquire knowledge and.
ADDIE Instructional Design Model
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.
Learning Unit Documents and Examples. Learning Units - basic building block of a course For iGETT a Learning Unit consists of –Three parts Instructor.
Curriculum development A brief guide to the construction of relevant curricula.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
I Have to Know What??!! Online Teaching Competencies Adapted from “Online Teaching Facilitation Course: Core Competencies:
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education InternationalChapter Writing Reports and Proposals.
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June 2005.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
2007 © Giunti Labs – No reproduction without written permission Visualizing IMS Learning Design for easier editing Marco Luccini, Giunti Labs R&D Project.
The Pedagogical ICT Licence ICT in initial teacher training Professional development of teachers in ICT Denmark.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
CSC350: Learning Management Systems COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (Virtual Campus)
Sharing Design Knowledge through the IMS Learning Design Specification Dawn Howard-Rose Kevin Harrigan David Bean University of Waterloo McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Dimensions and parameters for the evaluation of e-learning Dr. Bernhard Ertl.
Building (Online) Communities of Practice with Chinese Teachers Sherry L. Steeley, Ph.D. March 27, 2010.
Assessment for learning
Learning Management System Training Workshop IIUM, PJ campus 24 – 25 May 2010 Assoc Prof Dr Kamal Basha b. Madarsha, Inst of Education.
To create an Interactive Learning Template To create new learning content for new courses to be hosted on the Virtual Learning Environment (vle) Learning.
Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
An Open Educational Resource for Faculty Development to Develop and Teach Blended and Online Courses cuOpen.
Using Learning Objects in WReSTT 07/13/2013 WISTPC 2013 Peter J. Clarke.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
Using Learning Objects in WReSTT 03/05/2014 WISTPC 2014:2 Peter J. Clarke.
Lesson Plans Objectives
The Review Process: Where Do We Begin? Jennifer L. Bishoff June 7, 2001.
Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School of Engineering,
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
Skills by stealth Introducing academic culture to low level
Ryan McFall, Herb Dershem Dept. of Computer Science Hope College
Group Assignment: Application and Update of existing ECB-Check quality criteria Uranchimeg Tudevdagva, Kerynn Dahl, Angela Falkensteiner and Eleonora Deschamps.
Your Inquiry Project
Blended learning By: Hayati Wasistya Astri Ulvi
Pima Medical Institute Online Education
Structure of learning content for AgriTeach 4.0
LO4 – New This Year and Find Out More
Curriculum Development (and Planning)
Presentation transcript:

Pedagogical templates approach - the base of EPSS design in B- Learn project Lehti Pilt Blended learning workshop in Porto 13rd of November, 2006

Contents Different types of standardisations Central idea of B-Learn project EPSS design Basic scenario of using pedagogical templates Pedagogical templates structure, examples

Introduction First phase: attention to technical standards Current phase: more attention to pedagogical side – learning activities and the design of learning environments

Different types of standardisations Technical standardisation Graphical standardisation Pedagogical standardisation

Technical standardisation Technical standardisation allows exchanging the content: shifting content from one technical system to another Four main aspects: Packaging – IMS packaging Indexing – IEEE LO metadata Structuring - IMS LD, SCORM Content Aggregation Model Tracking – SCORM Run Time environment

Graphical standardisation Graphical templates integrated with systems allow users to create digital content with certain design and change it easily if necessary. Focus is on layout, colours, background imagery, icons and other graphical elements. Examples: PowerPoint templates, LMS design templates etc

Pedagogical standardisation EML (Educational Modelling Language) - contains a content model, indicating how learning objects should be structured. The emphasis is on the content. IMS Learning Design – emphasis on the learning activities and the achievement of learning objectives, and not the content. Learning Design - description of a method enabling learners to attain certain learning objectives by performing certain learning activities in a certain order in the context of a certain learning environment.

The aims of the EPSS to support instructional designers in planning the teaching and learning process of their blended learning courses to provide a good pedagogical background for instructional design to save the time of teachers in designing and producing e-learning content for their courses

Central idea of EPSS design 3 types of pedagogical templates - study guide, roster, and learning activities Requirements for a PT: the provision of structured context for learning design the provision of structured processes for rework and revision use of appropriate didactical explanations, recommendations and concrete examples

Study guide template Course name Course objectives Course annotation Description of learning process Course schedule Description of learning activities Description of study materials Description of modules and/or topics Course requirements Technical requirements and instructions of using LMS Contact information

Roster template The roster is the key document linking the student with schedule, topics, activities and process. It sets out the time line during which the student is expected to master the content topic materials and participate in various forms of activities and assessment. Structural units of roster: Learning period Topic(s) Activities Assignments Notes

Roster example

Learning activities template The aim of the learning activity Introduction to the learning activity The description of the learning activity * description * desired outcomes * instructions for performing the activity * product form and length * submitting information Criteria for assessment Conclusions

Basic scenario of using templates user will be provided with the set of structural units of study guide, roster and learning activities and (s)he has to make the choice which units (s)he would like to use. filling the templates with content - pedagogical recommendations and examples of learning activities several graphical templates saving the documents under user portfolio and possibility to export the content in different formats

Conclusions not strict, but adaptable pedagogical templates each course have unique learning process model well-planned blended learning courses interesting and diversity learning activities good quality support materials for their independent learning

Resources Bachimont, B., Crozat, S., Mallard, R. Managing learning content and digital formats. Chew, L.K. Learning Design Standard and Its Use.