The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inspiraling Compact Objects: Detection Expectations
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
The Strongly Relativistic Double Pulsar and LISA Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Oct 2006 g.modestino1 Experimental results correlating GW detector data and Gamma Ray Bursts Giuseppina Modestino LNF ROG Collaboration INFN – LN Frascati,
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
Search for gravitational-wave bursts associated with gamma-ray bursts using the LIGO detectors Soumya D. Mohanty On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Double NS: Detection Rate and Stochastic Background Tania Regimbau VIRGO/NICE.
Le Fond Gravitationnel Stochastique Tania Regimbau ARTEMIS - OCA.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
01/02/2009Moriond th Rencontres de Moriond Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe Why the Swift GRB redshift distribution is changing in time.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
Astrophysical Sources of Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background Tania Regimbau CNRS/ARTEMIS GWDAW 12, Boston, Dec LIGO-G
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
Improving the sensitivity of searches for an association between Gamma Ray Bursts and Gravitational Waves Soumya D. Mohanty The University of Texas at.
M. Principe, GWDAW-10, 16th December 2005, Brownsville, Texas Modeling the Performance of Networks of Gravitational-Wave Detectors in Bursts Search Maria.
Binary Pulsar Coalescence Rates and Detection Rates for Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunglee Kim, Vassiliki Kalogera (Northwestern U.), and Duncan R.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
The inclusion of sub-dominant modes in the signal brings additional modulation in the strain. This effect is visible on the time-frequency profile as measured.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
LIGO- G Z Analyzing Event Data Lee Samuel Finn Penn State University Reference: T030017, T
Gamma ray burst triggered searches in the S2, S3, S4 runs of LIGO Soumya D. Mohanty On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
S.Klimenko, August 2003, Hannover LIGO-G Z How optimal are wavelet TF methods? S.Klimenko l Introduction l Time-Frequency analysis l Comparison.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
Search for Short-Duration GW Bursts Coincident with S2/S3/S4 Gamma-Ray Bursts S5 GRB-GWB Search: First Results Isabel Leonor (for External Triggers group)
Science with DECIGO Naoki Seto (Kyoto U) The 1st International LISA-DECIGO.
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
Binary Compact Object Inspiral: Rate Expectations Vicky Kalogera with Chunglee Kim Richard O’Shaughnessy Tassos Fragkos Physics & Astronomy Dept.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, December'03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA Dept. of Physics.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Craig Robinson On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
Maria Principe University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
The Method of Comparing BNS Merger Rate Estimated from Radio Afterglows from Short Gamma Ray Bursts and by Gravitational Waves my new research plan Minori.
Presentation transcript:

The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the Australian Research Council grant DP and D. M. Coward is supported by an Australian Post Doctoral Fellowship. This research is part of the Australian Consortium for Interferometric Gravitational Astronomy Dr David M. Coward Research Fellow Eric Howell Marc Lilley Dr Ron Burman Prof. David Blair 2005

We demonstrate how the signal from an astrophysical GW background evolves with observation time. There may be a regime where the signature of an astrophysical population can be identified before a single local event occurs above the noise threshold. Outline We outline a model that describes the relationship between an observer-detector and transient astrophysical events occurring throughout the Universe

Assumptions Transient “events” are defined as cataclysmic astrophysical phenomena where the peak emission duration is much less than the observation time. Supernovae (GWs and EM) GWs - milliseconds GRBs (gamma rays) (seconds-minutes) Double NS mergers (GWs) seconds ?

Events in a Euclidean Universe The events are independent of each other, so their distribution is a Poisson process in time: the probability for at least one event to occur in this volume during observation time T at a mean rate R(r) at constant probability is given by an exponential distribution: Cumulative event rate =

Probability with a speed? The corresponding radial distance, a decreasing function of observation time, defines the PEH:

PEH velocity for supernova for 3 cosmological models

“The min z ( T obs ) for at least 1 event to occur at a 95 % confidence level” ( see D.M.Coward & R.R.Burman, accepted MNRAS, astro-ph ) Using Poisson statistics and knowledge of the event rate we can define a PEH :

PEH and GRBs The probability “tail” of the GRB redshift distribution – physically it represents the local rate density of events (presently not well known). The PEH algorithm is very “sensitive” to the tail of the distribution because it includes the temporal evolution of the low probability events. By fitting a PEH model with the local rate density modeled as a free parameter, the method can be used to estimate the local rate density.

First application of the PEH concept to GRB redshift data

 Running minima of z (T obs ) define a horizon approaching the detector  The horizon’s initial approach is rapid for around the first 100 events  The horizon slows down as a function of T obs Low probability tail

Poisson process - probability distribution of the number of occurrences of an an event that happens rarely but has many opportunities to happen p ( r ) = M r e -M r!, where M = R ( z ) T M = mean number of events R(z) = rate of events throughout the Universe T = observation time P( at least 1 event ) = 1 – e -M If we set a 95% confidence level 0.95 = 1 – e –R(z)T -R(z)T = ln(0.05) R(z)T = 3 additionally P( 0 ) = e –M

Simulating the PEH

The “probability event horizon” for DNS mergers DNS mergers are key targets for LIGO and Advanced LIGO The horizon represents the radial boundary for at least one DNS merger to occur with 95% confidence. Upper and lower uncertainties in the local DNS rate densities respectively are taken from (Kalogera et al. 2004).

Arnaud at al. PRD , Arnaud at al. PRD Suboptimal filtering methods in time domain a) Norm Filter b) Mean Filter Determines signal energy in a moving Window of size N Determines mean of data in a moving window of size N ROBUST – similar efficiencies for different signals – e.g. Gaussian pulses, DFM ● Important as waveforms not known accurately ● Only a priori knowledge – short durations the order of ms ASSUMPTION – data is whitened by some suitable filter

Monte-carlo generation of signals in Gaussian Noise Down sample data to 1024 Hz Pass filter across window – if SNR above pre-defined threshold – Event Trigger Estimate time of arrival of candidate – systematic errors Apply initial thresholding to data windows of size 2048 Determine position of candidate in time-series Find amplitude of candidate Data Mining - apply PEH in search for Astrophysical populations f s ~ Hz Gaussian Pulse ~ ms

Non-Gaussian noise model – Mixture Gaussian and distributions Weighting factor: Allen at al. PRD , Finn S. PRD are Gaussian and

PEH for the signal-noise-ratio for LIGO This analysis shows that the detectability of a GW stochastic background and individual DNS mergers are inexorably linked to the observer and to the sensitivity of the detector

Inject simulated signals in real data to test filter performance. We plan to test the PEH concept by developing a PEH filter and applying it to simulated data Utilize the PEH filter in the frequency domain. Future Work THE END