Calculating Measures of Comorbidity Using Administrative Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Adjustment Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC Coding)
Advertisements

Why it is important and how it affects you as a physician. Jeni Smith, CPC.
Kids’ Inpatient Database: Empowering Scientific Discovery Jay G. Berry MD MPH Complex Care Service, Cerebral Palsy Program, Program for Patient Safety.
ICD-10 Getting There….. Radiology. What Physicians Need To Know Claims for ambulatory and physician services provided on or after 10/1/2015 must use ICD-10-CM.
Centre Cérébrovasculaire PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE ASTRAL SCORE, THE CHARLSON AND THE ELIXHAUSER COMORBIDITY INDEXES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE Kakaletsis.
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN PRESCRIPTION DRUG UTILIZATION AN ANALYSIS OF BETA-BLOCKER AND STATIN USE FOLLOWING HOSPITALIZATION FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.
Chapter 2: Identification and Care of Patients With CKD 2014 ANNUAL DATA REPORT VOLUME 1: CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE.
STROKE Dr Ubaid N P Community Medicine Pariyaram Medical College.
Stages of CKD – KDOQI 2002 Definitions
1 25th ECCMID , Munich, Germany Magnitude of bacteremia predicts one-year mortality Kim O. Gradel 1, Henrik C. Schønheyder 1,2, Mette Søgaard 1,
Hospitalizations for Severe Sepsis Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries William Buczko, Ph.D. Research Analyst Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Surveillance of Heart Diseases and Stroke Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Data: A Researcher’s Perspective Judith H. Lichtman, PhD MPH Associate.
Estimating Readmission Rates using Incomplete Data: Implications for Two Methods of Hospital Profiling William J. O’Brien, Qi Chen, Hillary J. Mull, Ann.
Comorbidity in SLE Compared with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Non-inflammatory Disorders Frederick Wolfe 1, Kaleb Michaud 1,2, Tracy Li 3, Robert S. Katz 4.
1 Population Health Model (POHEM) AMI Acknowledgements: CCORT for collaboration and funding.
1 Leveraging the Culture of Performance Excellence in Ontario’s Health System HSPRN is an inter-organization Network funded by the Ontario Ministry of.
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on Prognosis The Clinical Question Will the prognosis of patients with gout be affected by the administration allupurinol?
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on Prognosis. The Clinical Question What is the risk of mortality among patients with hyperuricemia who received allupurinol?
Modeling Risk Adjusted Capitation Rates in Regione Umbria Elaine Yuen, PhD; Daniel Z. Louis, MS; Paolo DiLoreto; Joseph S. Gonnella, MD American Public.
County of San Diego Division of Emergency Medical Services EMS 1 Mental Health Disorders and Substance Use and Abuse in the Emergency Department County.
South Service Planning Area (SPA 6) and King-Drew Medical Center Health Needs Planning Data 2004 Compiled by LAC DHS Office of Planning, 2004.
Ryan Kelly Dr. Nicolas Shammas Christine Beuthin Jackie Carlson Marti Cox Kathy Lenaghan Dr. Ram Niwas Dr. Jon Lemke 06/18/15 ASSESSMENT OF TIME TO HOSPITAL.
Measuring trauma outcomes & processes of trauma care The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Influence of Comorbid Depression and Antidepressant Treatment on Mortality for Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by SSDI-eligibility.
US Department of Veterans Affairs Hip Fractures in VA/Medicare-Eligible Veterans: Mortality and Costs Elizabeth Bass, PhD, 1 Dustin D. French, PhD, 1 Douglas.
Bariatric Surgery: Outcomes and Safety MISS 2010 Bruce M. Wolfe, MD Professor of Surgery Oregon Health & Science University.
Association between Systolic Blood Pressure and Congestive Heart Failure Complication among Hypertensive and Diabetic Hypertensive Patients Mrs. Sutheera.
Studying Health Care: Some ICD-10 Tools Hude Quan, Nicole Fehr, Leslie Roos University of Calgary and Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.
Ryan Mutter, Ph.D. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD Michael Rosko, Ph.D. School of Business Administration Widener University Chester,
Hypertension Family Medicine Specialist CME October 15-17, 2012 Pakse.
UKRR – HES linkage James Fotheringham Sheffield Kidney Institute.
Chapter 8: Transition of Care in Chronic Kidney Disease 2015 A NNUAL D ATA R EPORT V OLUME 1: C HRONIC K IDNEY D ISEASE.
Do veterans with spinal cord injury and diabetes have greater risk of macrovascular complications? Ranjana Banerjea, PhD 1, Usha Sambamoorthi, PhD 1,2,3,
A Claims Database Approach to Evaluating Cardiovascular Safety of ADHD Medications A. J. Allen, M.D., Ph.D. Child Psychiatrist, Pharmacologist Global Medical.
“SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS & CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE OUTCOMES AMONG VETERANS” by Jim Banta UCLA Committee members: Alexander Young, Gerald Kominksi, William.
Probability of Survival (Ps) & Hospital Survival Rate (Ws) The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
EPI 5344: Survival Analysis in Epidemiology Week 6 Dr. N. Birkett, School of Epidemiology, Public Health & Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa 03/2016.
Identifying Patients at High Risk for Hospitalization Brooke Salzman, Rachel Knuth, Elizabeth Gardner, Marianna La Noue, Amy Cunningham Department of Family.
Enhancing Incidence Data with Passive End-Results Jill MacKinnon, Sarah Manson, and Mayra Alvarez Florida Cancer Data System.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Long-term Prognosis of Acute Kidney Injury After.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Has Public Reporting of Hospital Readmission Rates.
Malnutrition is common in US hospitalized patients In 2010, approximately 1.2 million hospitalized patients over the age of 18 had.
Acute Renal Failure in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Nationwide Analysis of Hospitalizations in the United States Kavelin Rumalla 1, Adithi Y. Reddy.
3 rd Annual Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists Conference.
1 Predicting Dementia From Vascular Conditions Among Tennessee Medicare Elderly Baqar A. Husaini, PhD Professor & Director, Center for Health Research.
R. Papani, A. G. Duarte, Y-L. Lin, G. Sharma
Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) Product Review
Probability of Survival (Ps) & Hospital Survival Rate (Ws) The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Probability of Survival (Ps) & Hospital Survival Rate (Ws) The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Behavioral health effects inpatient costs and utilization of diabetes related lower extremity complications Zachary Gustin and Jonathan Labovitz,
Trans-apical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with History of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database.
WHO Collaborating Centre in Calgary, Canada
Fig. 1. Age-dependent distribution of AKI risk factors
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on Prognosis
Menachem M Meller,MD, PhD
IBH, Cost (Risk Adjusted)
CAREGIVER BURDEN AMONG CAREGIVERS OF PERSONS WITH DEMENTIA AND LATE ONSET DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH PERCEIVED ELDER ABUSE Presenter:
Presented by Joe Nichols MD Principal – Health Data Consulting
Cohort study of preoperative blood pressure and risk of 30-day mortality after elective non-cardiac surgery  S. Venkatesan, P.R. Myles, H.J. Manning,
Calculating Measures of Comorbidity Using Administrative Data
Volume 2: End-Stage Renal Disease Chapter 4: Hospitalization
Chapter 2: Pharmacological cholesterol-lowering treatment in adults
Trends in Stroke Rates, Risk, and Outcomes in the United States, 1988 to 2008  Margaret C. Fang, MD, MPH, Marcelo Coca Perraillon, MA, Kaushik Ghosh, PhD,
Calculating Measures of Comorbidity Using Administrative Data
Presenter: Wen-Ching Lan Date: 2018/10/17
Multi-Morbidity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Across Three Geographic Regions of a Large Integrated Healthcare Organization Richard A Mularski,
Characteristics of 21,484 Patients With MI Who Survived for >30 Days After Discharge, by Calendar Year - Part I Soko Setoguchi, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.
Volume 80, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Cancer is not a risk factor for bullous pemphigoid
Figure 2. Associations of comorbidities with PD in elderly participants in the multivariate regression analysis. The multivariate Cox proportional-hazards.
Presentation transcript:

Calculating Measures of Comorbidity Using Administrative Data Vicki Stagg Statistical Programmer Department of Community Health Sciences Dr. Robert Hilsden Associate Professor Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences Dr. Hude Quan Centre for Health and Policy Studies (CHAPS) University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Background Medical Administrative Data Comorbidity Comorbidity Index Inpatient hospital visit information Comorbidity Pre-existing diagnosis / additional complication of admitted patient Comorbidity Index For measurement of burden of disease and case-mix adjustment Allows for stratification or adjustment by severity of illness Two common tools – Charlson and Elixhauser Clinical Conditions International Classification of Disease 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM codes) 10th Revision (ICD-10 codes) (International statistical classification of disease and related health problems, 1992) Medical administrative data contain anonymized records of inpatient hospital visit information for use by provincial health care departments A comorbidity is a pre-existing diagnosis of an admitted patient, which could potentially negatively effect the hospital outcome Burden of disease – impact of illnesses on society; can be measured in years of life lost due to the disease Case-mix adjustment – process of adjusting for the severity of disease Stratification Two common tools – different classes/ categories of comorbidites and definitions Clinical conditions are summarised in the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification which contains the ICD-9-CM codes; the 10th Revision give the ICD-10 codes Various comorbidity coding algorithms have been developed to effectively define and summarize comorbidities. These are based on the different disease codes. The Enhanced ICD-9-CM was developed to resolve discrepancies between coding algorithms for some condittions, by redefining those comorbidities. SAS to Stata

Algorithms included in ado programs Charlson (17 comorbidity definitions) Presence/absence, weighted sum (Charlson index) Charlson index developed to predict risk of one-year mortality from comorbid illness (J Chron Dis, 1987;40(5):373-383) Deyo modification for ICD-9-CM (J Clin Epi, 1992;45(6):613-619) Quan’s Enhanced ICD-9-CM Quan’s ICD-10 (Medical Care, 2005;43(11):1130-1139) Elixhauser (30 comorbidity definitions) Presence/absence, sum (Medical Care, 1998:36(1):8-27)

Algorithms – development of ICD-10 & enhanced ICD-9-CM ICD-10 comorbidity coding algorithm Based on Charlson index Swiss, Australian, Canadian collaborative groups ICD-10 Canadian version (ICD-10-CA) Enhanced ICD-9-CM coding algorithm Back-translated from new ICD-10 coding algorithm To improve original Deyo (Charlson) and Elixhauser comorbidity classifications 3 international research groups

Charlson Comorbidities with Corresponding ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Codes (Medical Care. 2005;43:1130-1139)

Example coding algorithm Comorbidity Deyo Enhanced ICD-10 Myocardial infarction 410.x, 412.x I21.x, I22.x, I25.2 Congestive heart failure 428.x 398.91, 402.01, 402.11, 402.91, 404.01, 404.03, 404.11, 404.13, 404.91, 404.93, 425.4-425.9, 428.x I09.9, I11.0, I13.0, I13.2, I12.5, I42.0, I42.5-I42.9, I43.x, I40.x, P29.0 (Medical Care, 2005;43(11):1130-1139)

Charlson Comorbidities & Weights CHARLSON COMORBIDITY ASSIGNED WEIGHTS 1. Myocardial infarction 1 2. Congestive heart failure 3. Peripheral vascular disease 4. Cerebrovascular disease 5. Dementia 6. Chronic pulmonary disease 7. Rheumatic disease 8. Peptic ulcer disease 9. Mild liver disease 10. Diabetes without chronic complication 11. Diabetes with end organ damage 2 12. Hemiplegia / paraplegia 13. Renal disease 14. Any malignancy/lymphoma/leukemia 15. Moderate or severe liver disease 3 16. Metastatic solid tumor 6 17. AIDS/HIV Weighted scores are related to relative risks determined for each illness (<1/2 were deleted) and reflect the seriousness of the disease

Input data Patient demographic data ID variable (string) required if multiple visits Comorbidity diagnoses codes (strings) Charlson ICD-9-CM / ICD-10 Elixhauser Additional medical information For subsequent modeling, if desired Input database can contain patient demographic data as well as the comorbidity codes or simply the codes for each patient. If some patients have multiple records, a patient ID variable is required. Additional

Syntax Charlson Elixhauser charlson varlist [if exp] [in range], index(string) [idvar(varname) diagprfx(string) assign0 wtchrl cmorb noshow] by may be used with charlson Elixhauser elixhauser varlist [if exp] [in range], index(string) [idvar(varname) diagprfx(string) smelix cmorb noshow] by may be used with elixhauser

Input options index (string) idvar(varname) diagprfx(string) assign0 ICD-9-CM (charlson) c Enhanced ICD-9-CM (charlson/elixhauser) e ICD-10 (charlson/elixhauser) 10 idvar(varname) Required when multiple records per patient diagprfx(string) Gives common root of the comorbidity variables Necessary only when varlist not used assign0 Only applicable to charlson Flag to apply hierarchical method Index identifies algorithm to be used. Hierarchical method is applied when it is desired to exclude from the calculations a mild comorbidity when a patient also exhibits a more severe form of the diagnosis.

Output options wtchrl (charlson command) wtelix (elixhauser command) Presents summary of Charlson Index (frequencies of weighted sums) wtelix (elixhauser command) Displays frequencies of sum of elixhauser comorbidities cmorb Displays frequencies of individual comorbidities noshow Controls display of chosen options

Sample program #1 – charlson (Enhanced ICD-9-CM Algorithm) Input data (ICD-9-CM codes) - Small Sample Data patientid diag1 diag2 diag3 id1 39891 5834 342 id2 0930 id3 2500 2507 id4 3441 id5 id6 5722 id7 196 id8 042 id9 V427 4561 id10 176 197

Sample program #1 – charlson Command – . charlson, index(e) diagprfx(diag) wtchrl cmorb

Sample program #1 – charlson – Output (part 1) (Option noshow omitted) (0 observations deleted) COMORBIDITY INDEX MACRO Providing COMORBIDITY INDEX Summary OPTIONS SELECTED: INPUT DATA: Enhanced ICD-9 OBSERVATIONAL UNIT: Visits ID VARIABLE NAME (Given only if Unit is Patients): PREFIX of COMORBIDITY VARIABLES: diag HIERARCHY METHOD APPLIED: NO SUMMARIZE CHARLSON INDEX and WEIGHTS: YES SUMMARIZE INDIVIDUAL COMORBIDITIES: YES Please wait. Thank you! Program takes a few minutes - there are up to 3 ICD codes per subject. Iteration 1 of 3 - Program is running - Please wait Iteration 2 of 3 - Program is running - Please wait Iteration 3 of 3 - Program is running - Please wait Total Number of Observational Units (Visits OR Patients): 10

Sample program #1 – charlson – Output (part 2) INDEX | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 10.00 10.00 2 | 1 10.00 20.00 3 | 2 20.00 40.00 4 | 2 20.00 60.00 5 | 1 10.00 70.00 6 | 1 10.00 80.00 9 | 2 20.00 100.00 Total | 10 100.00 GROUPED | 2 | 9 90.00 100.00 Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- charlindex | 10 4.6 2.716207 1 9 (option wtchrl)

Sample program #1 – charlson – Output (part 3) (option cmorb) selected comorbidities displayed Diabetes | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- Absent | 7 70.00 70.00 Present | 3 30.00 100.00 Total | 10 100.00 Diabetes + | Complicatio | ns | Freq. Percent Cum. Absent | 9 90.00 90.00 Present | 1 10.00 100.00

Output dataset – describe obs: 10 vars: 41 17 Oct 2007 10:08 size: 1,880 (99.9% of memory free) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- storage display value variable name type format label variable label id str23 %23s diag1 str5 %9s diag2 str4 %9s diag3 str4 %9s ynch1 float %9.0g ynlab AMI (Acute Myocardial) ynch2 float %9.0g ynlab CHF (Congestive Heart) ynch3 float %9.0g ynlab PVD (Peripheral Vascular) ynch4 float %9.0g ynlab CEVD (Cerebrovascular ynch5 float %9.0g ynlab Dementia ynch6 float %9.0g ynlab COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary) ynch7 float %9.0g ynlab Rheumatoid Disease ynch8 float %9.0g ynlab PUD (Peptic Ulcer) ynch9 float %9.0g ynlab Mild LD (Liver) ynch10 float %9.0g ynlab Diabetes ynch11 float %9.0g ynlab Diabetes + Complications ynch12 float %9.0g ynlab HP/PAPL (Hemiplegia or Paraplegia) When patient is the observational unit – only last visit data retained (warning – sort by visit before running program)

Output dataset – describe continued ynch13 float %9.0g ynlab RD (Renal) ynch14 float %9.0g ynlab Cancer ynch15 float %9.0g ynlab Moderate/Severe LD (Liver) ynch16 float %9.0g ynlab Metastic Cancer ynch17 float %9.0g ynlab AIDS weightch1 float %9.0g weightch2 float %9.0g weightch3 float %9.0g weightch4 float %9.0g weightch5 float %9.0g weightch6 float %9.0g weightch7 float %9.0g weightch8 float %9.0g weightch9 float %9.0g weightch10 float %9.0g weightch11 float %9.0g weightch12 float %9.0g weightch13 float %9.0g weightch14 float %9.0g weightch15 float %9.0g weightch16 float %9.0g weightch17 float %9.0g charlindex float %9.0g CHARLSON INDEX grpci float %9.0g GROUPED CHARLSON INDEX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorted by: Note: dataset has changed since last saved

Output dataset – selected variables . list id ynch10 ynch11 ynch15 +------------------------------------+ | id ynch10 ynch11 ynch15 | |------------------------------------| 1. | id1 Absent Absent Absent | 2. | id2 Absent Absent Absent | 3. | id3 Present Present Absent | 4. | id4 Present Absent Absent | 5. | id5 Absent Absent Absent | 6. | id6 Present Absent Present | 7. | id7 Absent Absent Present | 8. | id8 Absent Absent Absent | 9. | id9 Absent Absent Present | 10. | id10 Absent Absent Absent | . list id weightch10 weightch11 weightch15, c +------------------------------+ | id we~10 we~11 we~15 | |------------------------------| 1. | id1 0 0 0 | 2. | id2 0 0 0 | 3. | id3 1 2 0 | 4. | id4 1 0 0 | 5. | id5 0 0 0 | 6. | id6 1 0 3 | 7. | id7 0 0 3 | 8. | id8 0 0 0 | 9. | id9 0 0 3 | 10. | id10 0 0 0 |

Output dataset – Charlson index & grouped Charlson index . list id charlindex grpci +-------------------------+ | id charli~x grpci | |-------------------------| 1. | id1 5 2 | 2. | id2 1 1 | 3. | id3 3 2 | 4. | id4 3 2 | 5. | id5 2 2 | 6. | id6 4 2 | 7. | id7 9 2 | 8. | id8 6 2 | 9. | id9 4 2 | 10. | id10 9 2 |

Program rerun with assign0 option – (changes frequencies) . comorbid, index(e) diagprfx(diag) wtchrl cmorb assign0 CHARLSON | INDEX | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 10.00 10.00 2 | 2 20.00 30.00 3 | 2 20.00 50.00 4 | 1 10.00 60.00 5 | 1 10.00 70.00 6 | 1 10.00 80.00 7 | 1 10.00 90.00 9 | 1 10.00 100.00 Total | 10 100.00 GROUPED | 2 | 9 90.00 100.00 +-------------------------+ | id charli~x grpci | |-------------------------| 1. | id1 5 2 | 2. | id2 1 1 | 3. | id3 2 2 | 4. | id4 3 2 | 5. | id5 2 2 | 6. | id6 4 2 | 7. | id7 9 2 | 8. | id8 6 2 | 9. | id9 3 2 | 10. | id10 7 2 |

Selected comorbidities revisited- Diabetes | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- Absent | 8 80.00 80.00 Present | 2 20.00 100.00 Total | 10 100.00 Diabetes + | Complicatio | ns | Freq. Percent Cum. Absent | 9 90.00 90.00 Present | 1 10.00 100.00

Sample program #2 – elixhauser (ICD-10 Algorithm) Input - real inpatient data - obs: 2,987 vars: 43 18 Oct 2007 10:18 size: 1,000,645 (90.5% of memory free) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- storage display value variable name type format label variable label dx1 str6 %9s DIAG1 dx2 str6 %9s DIAG2 . . . dx24 str6 %9s DIAG24 dx25 str6 %9s DIAG25 cdr_keyforqsh~e long %12.0g CDR_KEY (for QSHI use) admitdate str20 %20s Admit Date dischargedate str20 %20s Discharge Date acutelosdays int %8.0g ACUTE LOS (days) birthdate str11 %11s Birth Date age int %8.0g AGE pc str6 %9s PC residence str7 %9s RESIDENCE entrycodetoho~l str61 %61s ENTRY CODE to hospital strokediagtyp~a str25 %25s Stroke Diag Type when Stroke not the Main Diag gender long %8.0g gender gender site long %8.0g site site stroketype long %13.0g stroke Stroke type disposition long %60.0g disp discharge disposition cohort float %9.0g cohort cohort

Sample program #2 – elixhauser Command – . elixhauser dx1-dx25, index(10) smelix cmorb

Sample program #2 – elixhauser Output COMORBIDITY | SUM | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- 0 | 402 13.46 13.46 1 | 715 23.94 37.40 2 | 751 25.14 62.54 3 | 529 17.71 80.25 4 | 303 10.14 90.39 5 | 174 5.83 96.22 6 | 71 2.38 98.59 7 | 30 1.00 99.60 8 | 10 0.33 99.93 9 | 1 0.03 99.97 10 | 1 0.03 100.00 Total | 2,987 100.00 Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- elixsum | 2987 2.216605 1.621281 0 10

ELIXHAUSER COMORBIDITY PERCENT Congestive Heart Failure 8.20 Cardiac Arrhythmias 22.23 Valvular Disease 4.49 Pulmonary Circulation Disorders 1.77 Peripheral Vascular Disorders 5.49 Hypertension, Uncomplicated 58.49 Paralysis 25.68 Other Neurological Disorders 23.84 Chronic Pulmonary Disease 7.20 Diabetes, Uncomplicated 15.80 Diabetes, Complicated 4.08 Hypothyroidism 3.85 Renal Failure 4.69 Liver Disease 0.77 Peptic Ulcer Disease Excluding Bleeding 0.40 AIDS/HIV 0.13

ELIXHAUSER COMORBIDITY …continued ELIXHAUSER COMORBIDITY PERCENT Lymphoma 0.57 Metastatic Cancer 1.61 Solid Tumor Without Metastasis 2.98 Rheumatoid Arthritis/Collagen Vascular 1.47 Coagulopathy 2.68 Obesity 3.31 Weight Loss 0.67 Fluid and Electrolyte Disorders 6.46 Blood Loss Anemia 0.50 Deficiency Anemia 1.31 Alcohol Abuse 3.35 Drug Abuse 0.74 Psychoses Depression 4.59 Hypertension, Complicated 3.82

Acknowledgements Dr. Robert Hilsden Dr. Hude Quan I would like to express sincere gratitude to: Dr. Robert Hilsden Depts. of Medicine/ Community Health Sciences, U of Calgary For supervising this work and for all his advice and support. Dr. Hude Quan Centre for Health and Policy Studies Dept. of Community Health Sciences, U of Calgary For providing the SAS code and databases and for his support. Haifeng Zhu MSc Graduate Student Dept. of Community Health Sciences For her assistance with converting the Elixhauser algorithms to Stata. Malcolm Stagg Student, Vista Virtual School, Calgary AB My son, for his help with preparing this PowerPoint presentation and all his encouragement. Andrew Stagg Intern, Google Inc., Mountain View CA My son, for his encouragement.

SUGGESTIONS / COMMENTS WELCOME vlstagg@ucalgary.ca Thank you!