CMS Chronic Condition Data Warehouse June 4, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 June 8, 2008 CMS Chronic Condition Data Warehouse.
Advertisements

Bill Stockdale, MBA, Celeste Beck, MPH, Lisa Hulbert, PharmD, Wu Xu, PhD Utah Department of Health Comparison with other methods of analysis: 1) Assessing.
Risk Adjustment Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC Coding)
Opportunities to Leverage HIT for Medicaid Reform in New York Rachel Block, United Hospital Fund C. William Schroth, NYS Department of Health eHealth Initiative.
Overview of NCHS Linked Data and Analytic Considerations Hannah R. Day, PhD 1.
Costs of chronic kidney disease USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report.
The Health Care Industry Part 2 - Medical Insurance Karen F. Nichols, MSA School of Allied Health Professions University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Identification & Distinction of Clinical Trial Participant Charges Bethany Martell Office of Clinical Research Associate Director- Financial Operations.
ACCELERATING CMS OUTCOMES DATA TO NEAR REAL TIME: CHALLENGES & SOLUTIONS Rosemarie Hakim, PhD CMS.
Stages of CKD – KDOQI 2002 Definitions
Selection of Data Sources for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Readmission and Chronic illness that could benefit from end of life discussions.
Surveillance of Heart Diseases and Stroke Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Data: A Researcher’s Perspective Judith H. Lichtman, PhD MPH Associate.
Mercy Care Advantage HMO SNP
1 APCD Analytical Workgroup May 30,
2014 Medicare Advantage Plans  Introduction  Eligibility  Basics of Medicare: 4 Parts: Original Medicare basics (Parts A and B) and limitations Medicare.
Gaps in Supplemental Health Insurance for Disabled Medicare Beneficiaries Jill Klingner MS RN Rural Health Research Center University of Minnesota AcademyHealth.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● January 2012 ● No. 26 Dual Eligibles, Chronic Conditions, and Functional Impairment By Age Group In 2009, 29%
Making Large Data Sets Work for You Advantages and Challenges Lesley H Curtis Soko Setoguchi Bradley G Hammill.
Memorial Hermann Healthcare System Clinical Integration & Disease Management Dan Wolterman April 15, 2010.
The Business Case for Bidirectional Integrated Care: Mental Health and Substance Use Services in Primary Care Settings and Primary Care Services in Specialty.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group June 18, :15 p.m.–4:45.
1 Record Linkage for Epidemiologic Research: Accessing Linked data at the NCHS Research Data Center Christine S. Cox NCHS Data Users Conference July 12,
Improving Care for Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services August 19, 2015.
5 th Annual Lourdes Cardiology Services Symposium: Cardiology for Primary Care.
Health Records in Other Settings Ambulatory CareRehabilitation Long Term CareHome Care Mental Health Hospice.
MARY SOWERS 1 Medicaid Basics: Long Term Services and Supports Center for Medicaid and State Operations Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group.
1 Estimating non-VA Health Care Costs Todd H. Wagner.
July 31, 2009Prepared by the Maine Health Information Center Overview of All Payer Claims Data Suanne Singer, Senior Consultant Maine Health Information.
2004 National Nursing Home Survey Annual AcademyHealth Research Meeting Robin E. Remsburg, APRN, BC Long-term Care Statistics Branch Division of Health.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● October 2011 ● No. 24 Medicare’s Highest Spenders In 2006, Medicare spent almost 90 times more per capita on.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● October 2011 ● No. 20 Seniors with Chronic Conditions and Functional Impairment In 2006, over 26% of seniors.
US Department of Veterans Affairs Hip Fractures in VA/Medicare-Eligible Veterans: Mortality and Costs Elizabeth Bass, PhD, 1 Dustin D. French, PhD, 1 Douglas.
Michigan Department of Community Health Director Olga Dazzo Michigan’s Plan for Integrated Care National Academy for State Health Policy Kansas City, Missouri.
November 18, 2014 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Virtual Research Data Center.
Medicare Home Health and The Role of Physicians Jennifer L. Wolff, Ann Meadow, Carlos O. Weiss, Cynthia M. Boyd, Bruce Leff June 2008.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● February 2013 ● No. 38 Medicare Spending for Beneficiaries with Severe Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder.
Age & Disabilities Odyssey Conference Tuesday, June 21, 2011.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Examining Long-Term Care Episodes and Care History for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Elderly Individuals with.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group March 28, :00.
1 NCHS Record Linkage Activities Kimberly A. Lochner Christine S. Cox NCHS Data Users Conference July 11, 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.
Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) Presentation to the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting San Diego, California Dave Baugh, CMS/ORDI June 8, 2004.
Avalere Health LLC | The intersection of business strategy and public policy Formulary Design: Balancing Cost and Access November 1, 2005 Presented By:
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● October 2011 ● No. 21 Dual Eligibles, Chronic Conditions, and Functional Impairment In 2006, 37% of seniors.
Bundled Payments: Why and Why Not?. 2  Why bundled payments?  What are current Medicare Payments?  What costing systems need to be developed?  What.
Virginia Department of Corrections Medicaid Offender Inpatient Hospital Program Myra Smith, DOC Healthcare Reimbursement Specialist October 1, 2015.
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
GERIATRIC EDUCATION SERIES Presented in partnership by Funded in part by a grant from the EJC Foundation.
This report is available at: This slide set contains slides from Long-Term Care Providers and Services.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Discharges to Home Health and Postacute Care Berry JG, Hall M, Dumas H, et al. Pediatric.
An Introduction to CMS data
Using Data to Address the Health of Seniors Helene M. Calvet, MD Deputy Health Officer, Orange County Health Care Agency.
RESEARCH DATA ASSISTANCE CENTER (RESDAC) Barbara Frank, MS, MPH October 17, 2011 CMS SAS Day.
Diabetes Statistics from the CMS Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW) Wendy Funk, M.S. Kennell and Associates.
CMS SAS Users Group Conference Learn more about THE POWER TO KNOW ® October 17, 2011 Medicare Payment Standardization Modeling using SAS Enterprise Miner.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● September 2011 ● No.18 Differences in Service Utilization by Disability and Residence In 2006, seniors with.
Post-Acute Care Healthcare Beyond The Hospital Claire M. Zangerle, RN, MSN, MBA President and Chief Executive Officer.
Medicare Home Health Care in Context : Investigating Individual Characteristics and Trajectories of Care Using CMS's Chronic Care Data Warehouse Jennifer.
Medication Therapy Management (MTM)
DAD Research Analytic Files
The Continuum of Long-Term Care
Update to EPM changes Proposed rule changes announced in August:
Trends in Use of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Among Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Anita C. Mercado, Shawn P. Nishi, Wei Zhang, Yong-Fang.
Steve Adams, MCS, COC, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, PCS, FCS, COA
Volume 1: Chronic Kidney Disease Chapter 5: Acute Kidney Injury
Presented by Joe Nichols MD Principal – Health Data Consulting
HCBS Claims Analysis Chartbook: A Final Report
2018 Annual Data Report Volume 1: Chronic Kidney Disease
Part 1: Data Sources Frank Porell
Presentation transcript:

CMS Chronic Condition Data Warehouse June 4, 2007

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Background Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, Section 723, mandated a plan to “improve the quality of care and reduce the cost of care for chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries” Essential component of plan was to establish a research database that contains fee-for-service Medicare claims data and assessments, linked by beneficiary, across the continuum of care Claims and assessment data linked to Medicare eligibility/enrollment data 1

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Population: Random 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries (e.g., claims-based sampling methodology) Eligible for and enrolled in Medicare on or after January 1, 1999 through the most current period Health Insurance Claim (HIC) number where the eighth and ninth digits are in the set {05, 20, 45, 70, 95} Qualified for 5% sample, therefore, remained part of the ongoing CCW sample (includes ever-qualifying beneficiaries from January 1, 1999 forward, i.e., an enhanced or person-based 5% sample) 2

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Population: Forward 100% Medicare beneficiaries Linked with historical data Random 5% sample flags Current data 3

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Linkage Across the Continuum of Care All CCW data files linked by assignment of a unique, unidentifiable beneficiary link key for ease of analysis across data files (unique link keys replace HIC numbers) Allows for cross-sectional and longitudinal research from 1999 forward Allows linkage across the continuum of care to construct patient-centric views of enrollment and service utilization Link keys encrypted prior to delivery to the researcher, for privacy protection 4

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Chronic Condition Categories Researchers may request data for 21 predefined chronic condition categories, allowing for timely data extraction: Acute Myocardial InfarctionChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Congestive Heart Failure Diabetes Alzheimer's Disease, Related Disorders, or Senile Dementia Alzheimer's Disease onlyGlaucoma Atrial FibrillationHip/Pelvic Fracture Cancer, BreastIschemic Heart Disease Cancer, ColorectalMajor Depression Cancer, ProstateOsteoporosis Cancer, LungRheumatoid Arthritis/Osteoarthritis Cancer, Endometrial Cataract Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack Chronic Kidney Disease 5

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Key Features Patient-centric data files linked by unique beneficiary key, across the continuum of care (deidentified and encrypted prior to delivery to researcher) Readily available chronic condition cohorts, customized cohorts (defined by researcher), and other categorization schemes Beneficiary Summary File Chronic Condition Summary File Easy to use data files designed specifically for researchers (e.g., limited data set, SAS ® input and label statements, frequency output, etc.) Services from 1999 forward Manageable 5% sample; 100% data for larger subsets or samples 6

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse 7

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Web Site – Statistical Summaries Available to general public (pdf format) Produced by IFMC staff Resource for high level, summary statistics by segmentation variables (e.g., predefined CCW chronic conditions, utilization summary information, demographic, and/or enrollment factors) Helpful for finding quick facts Useful with exploring sample size options 8

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Web Site – Statistical Summaries 9

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Statistical Summaries – Beneficiary Demographics 10

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Statistical Summaries – Population Statistics 11

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Statistical Summaries – Assessment data 12

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Data Files Available Upon Request from CMS Enrollment/eligibility data Administrative claims –Fee-for-service institutional claims for inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, hospice, and home health agency settings –Fee-for-service non-institutional claims for physician/supplier and durable medical equipment 13

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Data Files Available Upon Request from CMS (cont.) Assessment data –Minimum Data Set (MDS) - nursing facilities –Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) - home health agencies –Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) –Swing bed data CCW (CMS) Denominator (100% or 5% sample) Beneficiary Summary File Chronic Condition Summary File Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) 14

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Beneficiary Summary File Annual beneficiary summary file containing demographic and enrollment data Includes data for beneficiaries in the requested cohort or other specified population who were: –Ever part of the CCW 5% sample –Documented as being alive for some part of the reference year –Enrolled in Medicare Part A or B at some point during the reference year (may also have been enrolled in managed care) 15

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Chronic Condition Summary File Summary of a beneficiary’s chronic conditions (if any) by year Flag indicator for presence of a CCW condition during that year Includes beneficiaries in requested cohort (or other specified population) 16

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Data Request Options Standard (e.g., based on predefined chronic condition cohort criteria, entire 5% sample for a given year, etc.) Custom (e.g., researcher-defined cohort based on demographic or clinical information such as diagnosis or procedure codes, etc.) Finder file (e.g., based on known beneficiary identifiers, etc.) Introductory pricing for 5% sample 17

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Data Delivery Options Data loaded to USB hard drive or DVD (no tapes!) Flexible for use with different operating systems (e.g., Windows, Linux, etc.) SAS read-in statements 18

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Data Request Process 1.Researcher contacts Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC) and/or IFMC for assistance with data request packet. 2.Researcher submits data request packet to CMS. 3.CMS approves data request, researcher submits payment to CMS, and and CMS forwards approval to IFMC as notification to fulfill request. 4.IFMC processes, encrypts, and delivers data package to researcher. 5.Copy of data package archived. 19

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Considerations when Requesting CCW Data 1.Consider broad criteria for predefined chronic condition cohorts (indicating beneficiary probably has condition of interest); may require narrowing for analyses 2.Determine whether to restrict cohort based on Medicare coverage criteria 3.Decide whether to include a control or comparison group (chronic condition flags can make this simple) 4.Consider claims maturity 20

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse CCW Chronic Condition Flags For each chronic condition, an annual condition flag in the Chronic Condition Summary File includes the following values: 3 = Met full coverage criteria (Part A and B, no HMO) for entire look-back period (varies by condition) and claims diagnosis criteria 2 = Met full coverage criteria (Part A and B, no HMO) for entire look-back period (varies by condition) and did not meet claims diagnosis criteria 1 = Had intermittent coverage (any partial coverage combination of Part A or B, or HMO) for the look-back period and met claims diagnosis criteria 0 = Had intermittent coverage (any partial coverage combination of Part A or B, or HMO) for the look-back period and did not meet claims diagnosis criteria Note: Coverage required only up to month of death. 21

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Defining CCW Cohorts: Use CC Summary File flags Example: Study diabetes health services in 2005 with control group of non-diabetes health services -Cohort of CC diabetes flag = 3 -Control of CC diabetes flag = 2 Use Beneficiary Summary File variables to further define (or supplement) cohorts using additional demographics, partial coverage options, HMO coverage, etc. Note: CCW does not contain managed care claims. 22

1 Twenty-one chronic conditions have been predefined by CMS for timely, efficient extraction of CCW data files. 2 Counts based on beneficiaries who were alive on January 1, 2005 and enrolled in Part A or Part B for at least one month during the reference year. 3 Reference period represents the look-back time period during which a beneficiary qualified for a condition. 23

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse 24 Types of coverage used for these analyses: Full 1YR (no break in coverage) Months PtA + Months PtB – Months HMO = 24 Partial 1YR (minimal break in coverage) Months PtA + Months PtB – Months HMO  22 January PtA & PtB & no HMO in January of reference year July PtA & PtB & no HMO in July of reference year Any At least one month PtA or PtB

Beneficiary Demographics by Type of Coverage in 2005* Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Based on 5% Medicare sample. 25

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse * Based on 5% Medicare sample. ** Any coverage includes beneficiaries who may not have sufficient coverage to meet the chronic condition diagnosis criteria. Number of Beneficiaries with Chronic Condition(s) in 2005* by Type of Coverage 0 200, , , ,000 0 ** Number of Chronic Conditions Number of Beneficiaries Full 1YRPartial 1YRJuly Any 26

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Based on 5% Medicare sample. Number of Beneficiaries with Acute Myocardial Infarction in 2005* by Age and Type of Coverage 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 < > 85 Age (in years) Number of Beneficiaries Full 1YRPartial 1YR July Any 27

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Based on 5% Medicare sample. 28

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Based on 5% Medicare sample. 29

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse CCW Cohort Considerations: Effect of coverage selections varies by: 1.Demographics (e.g., age) 2.Condition 3.Look-back period Equal opportunity for observing diagnosis of interest in control group as in cohort ResDAC/IFMC Review Board can assist with refining selection criteria 30

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Includes total Medicare fee-for-service payments; extrapolated from 5% Medicare sample. 31 Total Medicare Payments ($275 Billion) in 2005 by Claim Type and Number of Chronic Conditions

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Percent of Medicare Payments* for Beneficiaries with Diabetes in 2005 by Claim Type Percent of Claims* for Beneficiaries with Diabetes in 2005 by Claim Type *Includes total Medicare fee-for-service payments/claims for beneficiaries identified as having diabetes; based on 5% Medicare sample. 32

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse *Includes total Medicare fee-for-service payments/claims for beneficiaries identified as having diabetes; based on extrapolation from 5% Medicare sample. 33

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Research Potential Using CCW Data Supports increased need for chronic disease research as aging population increases Allows longitudinal analyses of Medicare utilization, expenditures, quality of care, and health outcomes across continuum of care Provides researchers with low cost, easy-to-use data files Flexible data extract system allows researchers to request only minimum data needed for studies 34

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Potential Enhancements for CCW Part D enrollment and drug event data (pending federal regulation) Enhanced Summary Files: –Beneficiary Summary File –Chronic Condition Summary File –Condition-specific statistics in form of beneficiary- level (deidentified) analytical file –Care setting/timeline summary file SAS code for deriving denominators 35

Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Questions? Visit these web sites for additional information! Research Data Assistance Center Phone: ResDAC or Iowa Foundation for Medical Care Phone: , ext Visit us at AcademyHealth booth #305!