What we should have learned from past experience What can we learn from Fukushima about accident management Richard Wilson Department of Physics Harvard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Deniers: Guilty Knowledge of Radiation from Hiroshima to Fukushima Charles Perrow, Emeritus Professor, Yale University Visiting Professor, Stanford.
Advertisements

Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.
Analysis of Radiation Dose Effects and Emergency Response from Nuclear Power Accidents Thursday, May 17th 2012 American Nuclear Society, Northeastern Section.
Nuclear Power Plants Disasters and their possible meltdowns.
Nuclear Power.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Disasters in Energy Production Nuclear and Coal. Major Disasters in Nuclear Energy National Reactor Testing Station- Jan. 3, 1961 Three Mile Island- March.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe a. Explain the major concerns of Europeans regarding.
Nuclear Disaster in Chernobyl, Ukraine CRCT Coach Pages
Japan and Nuclear Energy “Should Japan continue to use nuclear energy, and if so, to what extent, and when?”
Chernobyl disaster April 26, The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear reactor accident in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine, which used.
International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Summary/Conclusions and Recommendations – Day 3 From RERF LSS: Excess relative risk goes down with.
Nuclear Fission & Fusion Nuclear Fusion - Energy released when two light nuclei combine or fuse However, a large amount of energy is required to start.
Population Considerations for the Nuclear Field Danny Smith, PhD, PE COPAFS Quarterly Meeting June 3, 2011.
Headlines Natural disasters & Japan earthquake by Rand Al-Subu Haiti earthquake by Hanin Sawalha Wars by Bisan Abu Salah Gaza war by Marwa isma’el.
J.M. Navarrete, G. Espinosa, J.I. Golzarri, G. Müller, M.A. Zúñiga, M. Camacho NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO ID 38: MARINE SEDIMENTS AS A RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION.
Chernobyl disaster The worst man-made disaster in human history.
Acid Rain in Germany, Air Pollution in UK, & Nuclear Disaster in Chernobyl, Ukraine © 2014 Brain Wrinkles.
Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Technologies - 2 Bill Menke, October 25, 2005.
International Atomic Energy Agency Miranda Melhado and Daniel Schwapp.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
A Tale of Scorched Earth-: Chernobyl
April 26, Where did it take place?? Cherynobyl, Ukraine.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Chernobyl
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history.
Chernobyl Disaster On April 26, 1986 at 1:23 in the morning, reactor number four in the Chernobyl, Ukraine nuclear power plant suffered a melt down which.
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Stochastic Somatic Effects Radiation risk Lecture IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and.
Chernobyl: Nuclear Core Reactor Meltdown. Background of Chernobyl Chernobyl is a city located in Ukraine. (Near the border of Belarus.) Largely abandoned.
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
Ukraine=”borderland” – Location between Russia and Western European powers Ample resources have led to its being under various foreign control: – Russian.
What we should have learned from past experience What can we learn from Fukushima about accident management Richard Wilson Department of Physics Harvard.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
To explain how earthquakes are created To discover their impact and how people responded in Japan How close did we come to nuclear meltdown? Key terms:
Analysis of Radiation Dose Effects and Emergency Response from Nuclear Power Accidents Thursday, May 17th 2012 American Nuclear Society, Northeastern Section.
Nuclear Power Are the benefits worth the risks?. Nuclear Energy: Benefits vs. Risks Is it worth it? Positives NegativesYour Opinions.
Acid Rain Air Pollution Chernobyl.  Sulfur and nitrogen which are found in acid rain eat holes in the surfaces of statues and buildings.
Learning from History – Evacuation Criteria Friday, July 27 th 2012 Kyoto, Japan Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics (Emeritus) Harvard University.
Atom’s Nucleus and Radioactivity 08 October 2015 Background Background Radioactivity and natural background exposure Radioactivity and natural background.
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
 Why have people become increasingly paranoid and scared since the first atomic bomb dropped in 1945.
С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine. С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine.
April 26,  Timeline of the disaster Timeline of the disaster.
By: Jazmine Porter.  Chernobyl is a man made power plant. This power plant was a nuclear disaster.  On April 26,1986, Reactor #4 at the Chernobyl.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine. Meltdown At Chernobyl Video Clip: m?guidAssetId=D B06-462A-889D-
Chapter 32 Section 4. Nixon and the Environment  Silent Spring (1962): Rachel Carson, talks about ill effects of DDT (pesticide)  Environmental Protection.
Wed/Thurs Dec 3-4 Objective: Calculate the radiation exposure of different people. Checkpoint: How much radiation (in mSv) is a cancer risk? How much radiation.
BY ALEX DONAHUE, CAROLINE BARLOW, AND JACQUELYN O’REILLY Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Power Nuclear Physics Definition of isotope –Atomic mass –Atomic number Behaviors of isotopes Half life.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
The accidents at Fukushima Dai-Ichi Summary of Health Discussions
Nuclear Power.
By: Emily McGuire, Daysha McMullen, Ja’Bria Coleman, India Lockhart
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine
What we should have learned from past experience What can we learn from Fukushima about accident management Richard Wilson Department of Physics Harvard.
Triple Disaster! Japan 2011.
Nuclear Radiation Form of energy that comes from nuclear reactors
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
Good Afternoon! #1. Please take out your agenda and write down your homework for tonight. #2. Write down the EQ in your EQ section of your binder. SPONGE:
Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine
Thursday, May 17th 2012 American Nuclear Society, Northeastern Section
Ramifications of nuclear power on society
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Isotopes.
JAPAN Hiroshima Nagasaki
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
Presentation transcript:

What we should have learned from past experience What can we learn from Fukushima about accident management Richard Wilson Department of Physics Harvard University Seminar on Planetary Emergencies Erice, Sicily August 20 th 2011

Medical X rays Hiroshima-Nagasaki Windscale Three Mile Island Chernobyl also Multistage theories of Cancer (Sir Richard Doll)

During Medical advantage of X rays was so great It outweighed disadvantages BUT advantage could be the same but disadvantage (dose) was reduced a factor of 150 International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) and Physicists

Hiroshima-Nagasaki Then: Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) Now: Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) UNSCEAR 100,000 or so papers Most people died of blast 5000 died or will die of excess radiation Prompt radiation What is the effect of lower dose rate? (only real study is that at Techa River)

Acute Radiation Sickness An acute dose from dose within a few days LD50: 250 to 400 Rem (2.5 Sv – 4 Sv) LD50 after blood transfusion: 350 to 600 Rems (3.5 – 6.0 Sv) (Canadian Louis Slotin, May 1946) Evacuate to avoid acute dose Chronic effect If just below acute dose 10% -20% increase of cancer probability (increasing if exposure continues)

Windscale 1957 Well known iodine cycle: Iodine drops on grass  cows eat grass  concentrate in milk  babies drink milk  concentrate in thyroid Graphite reactor caught fire. Iodine released milk impounded for 100 miles downwind no casualties

Studies on Stress are not definitive 5% increase of cancer probability is plausible Human studies: “Handbook of psychophysiology” By John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, Gary G. Berntson. “Health effects of relocation following disaster: a systematic review of the literature” By Lori Uscher-Pine, Disasters, 33(1):1-22 (2009) Animal studies : NTP control groups “Megamouse” study

Three Mile Island Core melted but inside containment Hydrogen explosion inside containment Probably iodine came out in water as HI (no harm) Unauthorized NRC man panicked and called for evacuation Kemeny commission noted stress due to evacuation

Chernobyl Secrecy was involved: those advising not to drink milk were reprimanded Cesium 134 and 137 were and are the main culprits. Integrated dose was mostly after a few days Evacuation from Pripyat after 36 hours. Estimated dose for a Pripyat resident 5 Rems Chistalogovka was 3 days late Less than 1% strontium 90 released little plutonium

Distinction between compulsion and voluntary evacuation not clear. In USSR: “What was not forbidden was compulsory” Just before Chernobyl National Radiological Protection Board (UK) had careful report on criteria for reentry Panic in Europe (Stockholm) set rules for reentry (reindeer meat: British objected: welsh lamb, etc)

Integrate by taking peak and half width Integrated Dose at main gate through March 16 th 2-3 Rems ( Sv) Nowhere near enough for Acute Radiation Sickness TEPCO regained some control Maybe 5 5 Rems in year; less than 1% increase in cancer rate. No need to evacuate

224.9

Highest Integrated Dose about 15 Rems (0.15 Sv) (in open – 4 times less indoors) Increase in cancer probability: 1 to 2 % (more for younger, less for older) Compare to 5% x e^(+/- 1) from stress

Chairman Gregory Jaczko testimony in US Congress March 17 th 2011 Recently, the NRC made a recommendation that: Based on the available information that we have, that for a comparable situation in the United States, we would recommend an evacuation to a much larger radius than has currently been provided in Japan. As a result of this recommendation, the ambassador in Japan has issued a statement to American citizens that we believe it is appropriate to evacuate to a larger distance up to approximately 50 miles.

Should you compulsory evacuate? Should you assist a voluntary evacuation? Should you encourage sensible efforts to keep the dose down? How do you stop irresponsible comments? Gregory Jacsko on March 17 th Physicians for Social (Ir) Resposibility

What other doses are there? Calculate your own. (mine was 2.4 Rem last year - 2 CAT scans) Many actions can give anyone a dose of 1 Rem: A single chest x ray in a major hospital as late as A CAT scan today. 3 months average public dose 1/25 of what a Chernobyl clean up worker got 1/100 of an astronaut's allowed dose. About the dose I got in 1991 from a day at Chernobyl mostly inside the sarcophagus

Earthquake in Haiti 200,000 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan 30,000 Fatal cancers from Chernobyl in next 60 years (calculated ) 4, In Belarus, Russia and Ukraine 20,000 world wide Fatal cancers calculated from Natural Background (including medical) exposures in US 6,000 per year Cancer fatalities from Three Mile Island 0.7 calculated for the Kemeny Commission “0 - 5,000 adverse health effects of evacuation” from Fukushima.