Universiteit Maastricht Studium Generale Lecture Series April/May 2011 Ethical dilemmas in health care dr. Ron Berghmans, dr. Wybo Dondorp, dr. Jenny Slatman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: Planning for the Future You, Your Biomarkers and Your Rights.
Advertisements

Areas of Research Specific issues. Clinical Trials Phase I First use in humans of an experimental drug or treatment In a small group of healthy volunteers.
For consent to be valid: The patient must be competent – Mental capacity is decision-specific – Ability to understand, retain and weigh in the balance.
Family Secrets Problem Based Learning. Family Secrets Part 1: A Family Disease Part 2: The Test Part 3: A Difficult Choice Part 4: Testing for the HD.
Genetics and genomics for healthcare © 2012 NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre Genetic testing: What is.
Supported by grants from: National Human Genome Research Institute (ELSI) HG/AG (The REVEAL Study); National Institute on Aging AG (The MIRAGE.
Anne-Marie O’Leary GPST What ethical issues are there here?
Newborn Screening: Survey of Parents’ Views and Experiences Robert Clark Clinical Ethics and Law Group Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton.
The principles In Medical Ethics Lecturer :Noha Alaggad
ETHICS In Field Of Dental Hygiene BY Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi.
Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics Conference Testing Children for Carrier Detection and Adult-Onset Disorders Lainie Friedman Ross, MD,
Bodily Integrity in Blemished Bodies VIDI project NWO-Humanities Dr. Jenny Slatman Associate professor Department Health, Ethics and Society.
Hereditary Breast & Ovarian Cancer Syndrome HBOC Tammy McKamie RN MSN OCN Cancer Genetics Educator Clinical Oncology Patient Navigator.
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Ethical Issues.
Issues in Genetic Testing: Real versus Not-so-Real Roberta A Pagon, MD Principal Investigator, GeneTests Professor, Pediatrics University of Washington.
Bioethical Challenges for the Rehabilitation Counselor.
Genetics and genomics for healthcare © 2012 NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre Ethical issues in genetics.
Its more exciting than it sounds.  a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct.
Principles of medical ethics Lecture (4) Dr. rawhia Dogham.
Euthanasia. The patient must be an adult (18 or over) resident of the state of Washington The patient must be mentally competent, verified by two physicians.
Human Rights and Patient Care Anahit Harutyunyan Armenia.
Teaching Bioethics for Undergraduates: Is It Necessary? Nahed Moustafa- MD Prof.& Head of Forensic Medicine& Clinical Toxicology Unit, FOM-SCU, Egypt Certified.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Proxy Consent. Civil code of the Philippines Competency of minors  Art. 38. Minority, insanity or imbecility, the state of being a deaf-mute, prodigality.
GENETIC TESTING: WHAT DOES IT REALLY TELL YOU? Lori L. Ballinger, MS, CGC Licensed Genetic Counselor University of New Mexico Cancer Center.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Chapter 13 Carrier Screening. Introduction Carrier screening involves testing of individuals for heterozygosity for genes that would produce significant.
Research with Vulnerable Populations Marisue Cody, PhD, RN IRB Chair Training Washington DC, April 9, 2004.
LAW AND ETHICS FEBRUARY 3, LAW Law is the basic framework of society and is the context for application of ethics.
Adult-Onset Disease The Example of Colon Cancer Summer, 2012.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION BY DR. ANGELA ESOIMEME MBBS, MPH, FWACGP.
Genetic Issues We are at the dawn of a new age in medicine Genetically engineered therapy will personalize medicine Diagnosis will precede disease This.
MEDICAL ETHICS ETHICS PROJECT. MEDICAL ETHICS MEDICAL ETHICS STUDIES PRINCIPLES OF RIGHT AND WRONG FOUR PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS AUTONOMY JUSTICE.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
ETHICS IN FIELD OF DENTAL HYGIENE Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi
Special Consideration in Public Health Practice & Research Delia Wolf, MD, JD, MSCI Associate Dean, Regulatory Affairs and Regulatory Compliance Lecturer,
Module 4: Ethical/Legal Issues in Pediatric Palliative Care End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium Pediatric Palliative Care C C E E N N L L E E C C.
Matsievskaya Larissa Leonardovna Karaganda 2014 Karaganda State Medical University Department foundations of psychology and communicative skills.
SSHRC - ERA - SAGE Workshop Research on the Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Human Genomics: North America Denise Avard PhD Director of Research.
Understanding Genetic Testing
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Family Secrets Problem Based Learning. Family Secrets Part 1: A Family Disease Part 2: The Test Part 3: A Difficult Choice Part 4: Testing for the HD.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Cancer 101: A Cancer Education and Training Program for [Target Population] Date Location Presented by: Presenter 1 Presenter 2.
Talking to Your Family About Your Diagnosis of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Several of my aunts died of breast cancer, so I was very worried.
Lecture 8 Young Adulthood
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Ethics in Clinical Genetics and Genomics Key Knowledge Year 4 Medical Ethics and Law Thread Course, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford.
Introduction to Medical Ethics Ray Noble Centre for Reproductive Ethics and Rights UCL Institute for Women’s Health University College London.
What Percentage of Cancer is Considered to be Hereditary?
Key Knowledge Confidentiality Year 4 Medical Ethics and Law Thread Course The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford.
Medical Ethics  A set of guidelines concerned with questions of right & wrong, of duty & obligation, of moral responsibility.  Ethical dilemma is a.
Principles of medical ethics Lecture (4) Dr. HANA OMER.
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Outputs from the EASAC-FEAM Working Group Martina Cornel VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Next generation genomics: translation into clinically useful applications in health care Prof.dr. Martina Cornel
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 11 Genomics in Public Health.
BIOETHICAL PRINCIPLES Beauchamp and Childress 2001;Gillon 1986
Chapter 4 Ethical Standards. Introduction Limits to what law, regulations, and accrediting standards and requirements can govern In the absence of law,
Week 5: Ethical, Legal & Social Issues in Applied Genomics
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Chapter 5: Genetics and genomics perspectives in nursing
Diagnostic testing is genetic testing to diagnose a childhood condition or conditions that can be treated medically during childhood. An example is retinoblastoma.
Chapter 10Ethical Issues in Health Care
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Health & Medicine Medical Sociology.
Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Health Care
Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Health Care
WHAT ARE THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICAL GENETIC COUNSELLING?
Presentation transcript:

Universiteit Maastricht Studium Generale Lecture Series April/May 2011 Ethical dilemmas in health care dr. Ron Berghmans, dr. Wybo Dondorp, dr. Jenny Slatman, prof.dr. Guido de Wert FHML/Dept. Health, Ethics & Society

Universiteit Maastricht Ethical dilemmas 1.Predictive testing of adults and children (12/4, GdW) 2.Abortion revisited (19/4, WD) 3.Prenatal diagnosis and embryo selection (26/4, GdW) 4.Bodily integrity in reconstruct. medicine ((10/5, JS) 5.Genetic screening and DTC tests (17/5, WD) 6.Euthanasia and assisted suicide (24/5, RB)

Universiteit Maastricht Predictive genetic testing: what are we talking about? Individual testing vs population screening Postnatal vd prenatal testing Minors/children vs adults Presymptomatic vs susceptibility testing

Universiteit Maastricht 2 cases: Huntington disease and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer 1.HD: autosomal dominant, complete penetrance, mostly of midlife-onset, lethal 2. HBOC: autosomal dominant, incomplete penetrance, onset from early adulthood onwards, preventive and therapeutic options

Universiteit Maastricht Presymptomatic testing for HD: yes or no? No: firstly, do no harm Yes: - respect for autonomy - the subjectivity of harm - relevant empirical findings

Universiteit Maastricht Protocol: presymptomatic testing for HD and HBOC 1.Inclusion-/exclusion criteria 2.Preparing for the test 3.Informing about the test results 4.Post-test counseling

Universiteit Maastricht I. Inclusion criteria 1.Voluntariness: implication of respect for autonomy/self-determination 2.Competence: a necessary condition of autonomy 3.Majority?

Universiteit Maastricht Minors: 3 age categories - 12 y: incompetent, parents decide; y: if competent: shared decision making; double consent; > 16 y: competent (in principle): independent decision making authority

Universiteit Maastricht PGT in incompetent children Strong consensus: 1. The best interests of the child are of paramount importance 2. Postponement of testing in order to respect the child’s right not to know 3. The strongest justification: the health interests of the child

Universiteit Maastricht Presymptomatic testing on the request of the parents: the HD case Against testing: - the child’s right not to know - a high risk of serious harm For testing: ‘empiricism’ - no evidence of harms of testing - possible harms of not-testing What do you think – and why?

Universiteit Maastricht Some other cases 1. MEN type 2A 2. HBOC 3. DMD (Duchenne)

Universiteit Maastricht II. Preparation for the test 1. Pretest counseling - aims - necessity - pros and cons of group sessions

Universiteit Maastricht II. Preparation (cont.) 2. Informed consent Information - medical - non-medical Consent: voluntariness

Universiteit Maastricht III. Informing about the test results: what about the relatives? Medical secrecy/the right to confidentiality 3 views: -secrecy is absolute -the patient is the family: relatives ‘own’ the information -keep the secret, except in case of a conflict of duties

Universiteit Maastricht Informing relatives (cont.) Conditions: -various efforts to get consent have failed -the doctor feels he is in a conflict of duties -there is a high risk of serious harm for the relatives (s) -informing the relative(s) will probably prevent serious harm -no more information is provided than is strictly necessary

Universiteit Maastricht Informing relatives: some cases 1.The Huntington case: -pro: reproductive interests -con: -fatal information -empiricial evidence?

Universiteit Maastricht Informing relatives (cont.) 2.The HBOC case -con: ? -pro: ?

Universiteit Maastricht IV. Post-test counseling Points to consider: 1.understanding and integrating the test result 2.choosing between (reproductive and other) options 3.participating in scientific research

Universiteit Maastricht Susceptibility testing Often: low predictive value Implications for ethical evaluation? - low risk of discrimination? - low risk of conflict of interests? - low risk of psychosocial harm?

Universiteit Maastricht Low risk … low benefits? 1. No categoral distinction: - maybe key genes > predictive value - combination tests 2. Benefits? - motivation to healthy lifestyle? - false reassurance: contraproductive consequences?