Rhode Island HIT Survey: 2014 Results and Plans for 2015 January 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wyatt Packer HealthInsight Health Information Technology Community Progress.
Advertisements

0 Arizona Rural & Critical Access Hospitals HIT/Quality Workshop December 6, 2013 Connie K. Ihde Regional Extension Center Director ~ Programs Director.
Building the Health Information Technology (HIT) Workforce for Rural Communities Susan H. Fenton, PhD, RHIA, FAHIMA Asst. Professor, School of Biomedical.
Florida’s Health Information Exchange and Electronic Health Record Incentive Program CHIPRA Part C Meeting January 18 and 24, 2012 Carolyn Turner and Pam.
Corporate Marketing August Primary Care Physician Survey.
HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW Amy Cooper, MPHFebruary 28, 2013.
Computerization of the practice Grzegorz Margas, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Family Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College.
David Garr, MD Executive Director South Carolina Area Health Education Consortium Associate Dean for Community Medicine Medical University of South Carolina.
Northeast Kentucky Regional Health Information Organization Kayla D. Rose, M.A., RRT Executive Director  Get Equipped  Get Connected.
2011 Physician Satisfaction Survey Results September 2, 2011.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Use Case 7 IHE Profiles & Actors Care Theme: Leveraging Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Use Case: Optimizing Cancer Care Coordination Leveraging.
Quality Matters: Optimizing Health IT Adoption in Puerto Rico Fadesola Adetosoye, M.S. Project Officer, Regional Extension Center Program Office of the.
Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Electronic Medical Record Use and the Quality of Care in Physician Offices National Conference on Health Statistics August 17, 2010 Chun-Ju (Janey) Hsiao,
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Enabling a Medical Home With a Patient Communication Strategy Jeanette Christopher Northwest Primary Care Group, P.C.
Adoption of Health Information Technology among U.S. Ambulatory and Long-term Care Providers by Esther Hing, M.P.H., and Anita Bercovitz, Ph.D National.
Kevin Larsen MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT Improving Outcomes with HIT ASCO Oct
An Opportunity for Transformation in Puerto Rico Jessica Kahn, MPH Technical Director for Health IT Center for.
Results from the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2012 User Comparative Database 2012 AHRQ Annual Conference September 10, 2012 Theresa.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting June 5, 2013 Jennifer King, ONC Data Analytics Update.
Cardiac Episode with PCP referral to Cardiologist with Remote Monitoring & Follow-up Care Care Theme: Transitions of Care Use Case 9 Interoperability Showcase.
Mel Borkan June 18, 2010 Meaningful Use and Ohio Medicaid.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Electronic Health Records in the Hospital Electronic Health.
Introduction Physical-mental health integration is an evidence-based approach that supports collaboration between physical health and behavioral health.
Note: PCMH = patient-centered medical home; APCP = advanced primary care practice. Source: The Commonwealth Fund/Kaiser Family Foundation 2015 National.
Robert H. Roswell, M.D. Oklahoma Hospital Association September 1, 2009.
Interoperability Showcase In collaboration with IHE Use Case 3 Care Theme: Leveraging National Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Biosurveillance Monitoring.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
Transformation of Health Care Delivery: Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities Barbara Spivak, M.D. Mount Auburn Cambridge Independent Practice Association,
An EHR isn’t Enough: Information Exchange for Meaningful Use June 18, 2010 Tri-State REC Kickoff Michele Fronckiewicz Executive Director Child Health Administrative.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
New York State Department of Health Hospital-Medical Home Demonstration Reflections, Celebrations and Transformations.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Leila Samy, MPH Rural Health IT Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Hometown Health: Health IT and HIPAA Workshop September 26,
Christopher H. Tashjian, MD, FAAFP July 23, 2013, Washington D.C.
- 0 - September 2007 AHRQ Annual Meeting Opportunities and Challenges for Implementing HIT Steven R. Simon, MD, MPH August 2007 Supported by a grant from.
A health department-led initiative to advance and monitor the statewide HIT infrastructure to support public and population health in Minnesota Karen Soderberg.
Project Update for NCHS Health IT Adoption & Use Dashboard from the: Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT U.S. Department of Health and Human.
SOURCE: The Kaiser Family Foundation/Commonwealth Fund 2015 National Survey of Primary Care Providers (conducted January 5 – March 30, 2015) Primary Care.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting April 8, 2014 Data Analytics Update.
Primary Goal: To support case detection and investigation for the reportable infectious diseases (conditions) using electronic information exchanges between.
The State of Florida’s Advances in Supporting the Use of Health IT 2015 HIT Days State Capitol January 26, 2015 Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary.
Physicians and Ambulatory Electronic Health Records: What’s Happening in Massachusetts? Supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
CRISP: A Regional Health Information Exchange Serving Maryland and D.C. March 8th, 2016.
Janet Hurley MD Operational Chief of Primary Care, CHRISTUS® Trinity Mother Frances Health System.
Jennifer King with Vaishali Patel, Matthew Swain, Michael Furukawa Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) Health Information Exchange Capability.
Overview of P4P Initiatives and HIT Incentives Kelly Cronin Senior Advisor to the Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services August 2005.
RIQI SHIFT in Care Project* January 2016
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Electronic Health Record Update
Electronic Health Record Update
Denmark Leads the Way In IT and Patient-Centered Primary Care 2006: An Example of High Performance Highest public satisfaction with health system among.
OCC Fall Users’ Group Meeting MIPS/MU
Presentation transcript:

Rhode Island HIT Survey: 2014 Results and Plans for 2015 January 2015

Survey Objectives 1.To measure presence (structural measures) and use (process measures) of HIT by clinicians caring for Rhode Island patients 2.To capture HIT data for state agencies and other key stakeholders using single instrument (i.e., minimize data collection burden)

Administered to all Licensed Independent Practitioners (LIPs): Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) Physicians Physician Assistants (PAs) Electronic survey instrument sent via: Hard copy mailing (for physicians, with licensure renewal*) If available, notification and up to two reminders Analyses limited to LIPs: Licensed in Rhode Island In active practice Located in Rhode Island or an adjacent state (Connecticut or Massachusetts) *During 2014 survey year. Methods

1.Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Access to “EHR components,” including functions such as visit notes, lab orders, or prescriptions 2.Basic EHR use: Among those with EHRs, functionality/clinical use relating to documentation and results management 3.Advanced EHR use: Among those with EHRs, functionality/clinical use relating to decision support, external communication, order management, and reporting 4.e-Prescribing: Transmitting prescriptions/medication orders electronically to a pharmacy Publicly-Reported Measures, 2014

The HIT Survey has a relatively high response rate for a single-wave mailed survey. It is higher among physicians than APRNs/PAs. Response rate by year

Physician Results Overall Trends

Measure Survey Respondents (N = 2,567) All Physicians (N = 3,761) NScoreN 1. EHRs, n(%)2,5672,236 (87.1%) 3,7612,236 (59.5%) 2. Basic EHR use, mean2, Advanced EHR use, mean2, e-prescribing, n(%)2,349 1,884 (80.2%)3,5431,884 (53.2%) The 2014 results provide a point-estimate of HIT adoption among physicians for the four publicly- reported measures. Use of EHRs and e-prescribing, among respondents and all physicians

Measure Office-Based by Specialty All Office-Based Physicians (N=1,544) PCP (N=698) Non-PCP (N=846) 1. EHRs, n(%)625 (89.5%)642 (75.9%)1,267 (82.1%) 2. Basic EHR use, mean Advanced EHR use, mean e-prescribing, n(%)590 (85.1%)576 (73.0%)1,166 (78.7%) When looking at office-based physicians by specialty, HIT adoption is highest among office- based primary care physicians (PCPs). Respondents’ use of EHRs and e-prescribing, by physician specialty and practice location

Since 2009, physicians’ HIT adoption has increased for all four publicly-reported measures. EHR adoption increased by nearly 30% and e-prescribing by 95%. Survey respondents’ use of EHRs and e-prescribing

Physician Results Impact of EHRs

(N=1,247) (N=954) Compared to hospital-based physicians, office- based physicians more frequently report using their EHR outside of regular work hours. Percentage of physicians who say “yes,” they use their EHR outside of work hours

Despite agreeing that EHRs improve many aspects of care, fewer than half of hospital-and office-based physicians agree that EHRs improve job satisfaction. Percentage of physicians who “agree or strongly agree” that EHRs…

Compared to 2013, physicians’ agreement increased for all statements about how EHRs improve care, except that EHRs improve job satisfaction.

Percentage of all physician respondents who reported an impact of EHRs on take-home workload (N=2,110) About 40% of physicians say that EHRs increased the amount of work they take home.

For office-based PCPs, EHRs have increased take- home workload. Percentage of office-based PCPs who reported an impact of EHRs on take-home workload (N=595)

Physician Results Public Health

Approximately one-quarter of office-based physicians are using their EHR for population health management. Percentage of physicians using their EHR for population health management (N=1,137)

Among office-based physicians not using their EHR for population health management, responses were relatively evenly distributed about “what it would take” to start: cost, staff, or assistance. Percentage of physicians who thought it would take the following for them to use their EHR for population health management… (N=1,022) (Select all that apply.)

(N=1,430) (N=778) % of patients for whom physicians consult the PMP before prescribing Among physicians who prescribe, fewer than half are consulting the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) before prescribing opioids or benzodiazepines.

Physician Results CurrentCare

Percentage of physicians who are familiar with these CurrentCare services… Approximately a quarter of all physician respondents are familiar with various components of the state’s health information exchange, CurrentCare.

Percentage of patients for whom physicians view or receive CurrentCare data (N=2,492) Nearly 75% of physicians are not signed up to view or receive data, highlighting opportunities for engagement. Among those signed up, about half are using it.

Office-based PCPs were more familiar with CurrentCare services than non-PCPs. N=684 N=676 N=670

Physician Results Meaningful Use

Percentage of physicians who have attested to Meaningful Use Two-thirds of office-based physicians report that they have attested to Meaningful Use.

Percentage of physicians who attested to each stage of Meaningful Use in 2014 Medicare Stage 1 is the most common Meaningful Use attestation

Percentage of physicians who plan to attest to Meaningful Use in 2014 The vast majority (nearly 90%) of office-based physicians who haven’t yet attested to Meaningful Use intended to do so in 2014.

Physician Results Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

Percentage of office-based physicians using PQRS in 2014 (N=1,422) About one-third of office-based physicians say they are already using PQRS and plan to continue in 2014.

Percentage of office-based physicians using the following methods to report PQRS (N=577) Approximately one-fourth of office-based physicians planning to use PQRS in 2014 will use their EHR.

Percentage of office-based physicians using the following approaches to report PQRS (N=582) Office-based physicians who know how they plan to report PQRS in 2014 are approximately evenly split between Group Practice and Individual Reporting.

APRN and PA Results Overall Trends

Measure Survey Respondents (N = 662) All APRNs/PAs (N = 1,505) NScoreN 1. EHRs, n(%) (78.9%) 1, (34.7%) 2. Basic EHR use, mean Advanced EHR use, mean e-prescribing, n(%) (70.4%)1, (28.1%) The 2014 results provide a point-estimate of HIT adoption among APRNs and PAs for the four publicly-reported measures. Use of EHRs and e-prescribing, among respondents and all APRNs/PAs

2015 Survey

2015 Survey Process Administered to all Licensed Independent Practitioners (LIPs): Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) Physicians Physician Assistants (PAs) Electronic survey instrument sent via: Hard copy mailing in April of 2015 If available, notification and up to two reminders Analyses limited to LIPs: Licensed in Rhode Island In active practice Located in Rhode Island or an adjacent state (Connecticut or Massachusetts)

2015 Survey Goals of 2015 Survey: Meet the needs of survey stakeholders, including HEALTH, payers, Rhode Island HIE and provider groups Reduce the length of the survey Measure provider participation in value-based payment programs Measure provider use of patient engagement tools Update publicly reported measures to better reflect current HIT use, programs and state/federal requirements

Discussion Topics Updating publicly reported measures o Needs of providers, patients, other stakeholder groups Use of HIT as part of patient engagement efforts and value-based payment programs o Current and future uses of this technology Provider participation in value-based payment programs o Provider knowledge and administrative practices

Rebekah Gardner, MD, FACP Chair, Physician Reporting Workgroup Samara Viner-Brown, MS Chief, Center for Health Data and Analysis