U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessing Watershed Scale Responses to BMP Implementation - Fairfax County, VA - John Jastram Hydrologist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.
Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in Support of Watershed Model Development, Potomac River Basin A Cooperative Project between the U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
MOFEP Annual Meeting 11/30/2004 Evaluating Timber Harvesting Effects on Water Quality in Low-Order Streams in the Missouri Ozarks John Bowders, David Hammer,
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Management Issues in the Lake Michigan Basin  Aquatic invasive species  Nutrient enrichment  Beach Health  Contaminants – in Sediments, Fish and Drinking.
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Water Contamination Detection – Methodology and Empirical Results IPN-ISRAEL WATER WEEK (I 2 W 2 ) Eyal Brill Holon institute of Technology, Faculty of.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
Groundwater Quality Beneath an Area of Urban Residential and Commercial Land Use, Mobile, Alabama Alabama Water Resources Conference September.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
Site Locations Shaded area = Counties that do not drain into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Basin.
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Sediment Yield and Channel Processes. Definitions Suspend Sediment – sediment (orgranic or inorganic) which remains in suspension in water for a considerable.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Automated Continuous Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in the Blackstone River at the Massachusetts-Rhode Island State Line U.S. Geological Survey.
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Regional Integrated Science Projects - Opequon Creek/Shenandoah River Basins Agencies Involved – USGS Water, Geology, GIO/ Geography, and Biology Disciplines,
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Citizen Science at Kahalu‘u Bay These slides were made possible by generous support from the Hawaii State Department of Health, NELHA, The Kohala Center.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Water quality sensors provide insight into the suspended solids dynamics during high flow events in the Lamprey River, NH Nicholas K. Shonka and William.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Proposed National Sediment and Water-Quality Monitoring Program Piloted in the Mississippi River.
Water-Quality Monitoring in an Urban Watershed:
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Hydrogeologic Investigations of the Silver Lake Wetland
West Virginia CBP Non-tidal Network: 2006 Status Update
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessing Watershed Scale Responses to BMP Implementation - Fairfax County, VA - John Jastram Hydrologist USGS Virginia Water Science Center

Topics  Objectives and Introduction  Study Approach  Site Selection and Watershed Characteristics  Instrumentation and Methods  Anticipated Products  Preliminary Data  Additional Related Research

Study Objectives 1. Generate long-term monitoring data to describe:  Current water-quality (sediment and nutrients) and quantity conditions,  Trends in water-quality and quantity,  Nutrient and Sediment Loads and Yields. 2. Evaluate relations between observed conditions/trends and BMP implementation. 3. Transfer the understanding gained to other less- intensively monitored watersheds.

Introduction: The Challenge BMP induced changes are difficult to quantify at the watershed scale:  Environmental factors cause great variability – need to separate signal from noise,  Lag times may be considerable,  Numerous samples at multiple sites over extended periods of time.

 Operate four intensive monitoring stations  5 – 10 years of data collection - Continuous-record stream gage - Continuous water-quality monitor (turbidity, pH, SC, water temp) - Automated stream sampler (storm samples) - Nutrients & Sediment - Scheduled monthly sampling - Nutrients & Sediment - Annual benthic monitoring  Evaluate trends and loads. Approach: Intensive Monitoring

Approach: BMP Evaluation  Assemble BMP implementation dataset for monitored watersheds.  Extent of BMP implementation.  Types of BMPs installed.  Evaluate relations between water-quality conditions/trends and BMP activities.

 Operate 10 trend monitoring stations.  Partial-record stream gage  Scheduled monthly sampling  Nutrients & Sediment  Annual benthic monitoring  Evaluate trends in water-quality and quantity.  Evaluate relations between trend- and intensive monitoring sites. Approach: Knowledge Transfer

Status Intensive Sites  Streamgages & Water-Quality Monitors installed and fully operational  Real-time data on web (  Sampling underway  Surrogate regressions under development Partial Record - Trend Sites  Staff plates and Crest Stage Gages installed  Monthly sampling underway

 Complete data were not available on all potential study basin characteristics, we used what was available.  Phase 1 Watersheds  Applied cluster analysis to classify sites based on watershed characteristics.  Land use and age of development.  Existing water-quality and benthic macro-invertebrate data.  Presence/amount of BMPs currently in watershed.  Percent imperviousness.  All basins < 6 mi 2.  Planned BMP implementation was considered in the final site selection, but not the cluster analysis… Site Selection Approach Avoid selection of sites based on best professional judgment…

Industrial High/Medium Density Urban Low Density Urban Cluster Analysis for Site Selection

Mean IBI Score % Impervious % Med Density Residential Distribution of Basin Characteristics Intensive SitesTrend Sites Sites Considered

Network VA MD WV

Lab Analyses  Suspended Sediment  USGS Sediment Lab – Louisville, KY  Suspended Sediment Concentration (SSC)  Nutrients –  Fairfax County Environmental Services Lab  Nitrogen  Total N  Filtered TN  Particulate TN  Nitrate  Ammonia  Phosphorus  Total P  Filtered TP  Particulate TP  Orthophosphorus

Instrumentation (Gage House) Sutron Accubar Bubbler SystemSutron Accubar Bubbler System Stage measurement systemStage measurement system Sutron 9210 w/ SATLINK2Sutron 9210 w/ SATLINK2 Datalogger/controllerDatalogger/controller Satellite TransmitterSatellite Transmitter ISCO 6712 FRISCO 6712 FR Refrigerated SamplerRefrigerated Sampler 24 bottle configuration24 bottle configuration 2 bottles per sample2 bottles per sample

Instrumentation (In-stream)  YSI 6920 Water- Quality Monitor  6136 Turbidity Sensor  Temperature  Specific Conductance  pH  Bubbler Orifice  Sampler Intake  Staff Plate

Field Methods  Sampling  National Field Manual for the Collection of Water Quality Data (USGS TWRI Book 9)  Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring  Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water- Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting: USGS TWRI 1-D3  Streamgaging  USGS TWRI Book 3

Value of Continuous Water Quality Data Richness of continuous and real-time data allows broad application. Typically, few discrete samples (20 per year) are collected and used to develop water quality interpretations. Detailed understanding of the system is almost never developed if discrete sampling is used. Delay between sample collection and lab analysis may be critical. Time and costs associated with manual sampling are significant. Sampling designs for loading studies conflict with sampling designs for trend analysis. Estimating non-monitored constituents typically involves regressions to discharge. - Use water-quality data to estimate water-quality data!

Surrogate Methods Continuously measure (15 min. interval) parameters related to constituent of interest (Turbidity, SC, etc.) Manually collect discrete samples of constituent to be estimated (sediment, dissolved solids, nutrients, etc.) Develop regression to estimate constituent concentrations/loads during non-sampled periods This approach provides the ability to generate a time- series of constituent concentrations – improving load estimations.

Methods: Surrogate Approaches  Multivariate Regression  Transformed Variables  Logarithmic  Square Root  Best Subsets Regression  Mallows CP, PRESS, Adj. R 2  Partial Residual Plots  Duan Smearing Correction

Discontinuous Nature of Sediment Transport Why not just use streamflow? 300 fnu 450 mg/L 235fnu 350 mg/l 22,000 cfs Flow-based SSC Estimation Turbidity-based SSC Est.

Integrate continuous water-quality monitor with autosampler to optimize sample collection Algorithm for triggering autosampler (storm samples): - Turbidity threshold (50 FNU) - Stage Threshold (site specific) - Stage Rate of Change (0.1 ft in 15 min) - Time threshold (1 sample per 30 min period) Algorithm will be refined as needed to optimize sample collection at each site. Technology: Turbidity Threshold Sampling

Turbidity Threshold Sampling Dead Run 9/27 00:00, 210 9/27 00:30, 220 9/27 01:15, 160 9/27 04:30, 90 9/27 05:00, 570 9/27 05:30, 520 9/27 06:00, 310 9/27 06:30, 250 9/27 07:00, 180 9/27 07:30, 120 9/27 15:30, 62 9/27 16:15, /26 12:009/26 18:00 9/27 0:009/27 6:00 9/27 12:009/27 18:00 9/28 0:009/28 6:00 9/28 12:00 Stage (ft) Turbidity (FNU) Stage Turbidity Sample

Google Map Data Portal (under construction)

Realtime Data

Methods Summary of Measurements

Realtime Data Products  We have realtime water-quality data,  We are generating regressions for sediment and nutrient estimations,  We will be able to generate realtime estimates of constituent concentrations and loads!  Examples from USGS Kansas WSC…

Realtime Estimated Concentrations and Loads

 Monthly Sampling Results  April through September 2008 Ortho P (mg/L) All Sites OrthoP (mg/L) Total N (mg/L) All Sites Total Nitrogen (mg/L) All Sites Nitrate (mg/L) Total P (mg/L) All Sites Total P (mg/L) Preliminary Data Nitrate (mg/L) All Sites Specific Conductance (us/cm) All Sites Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)

Challenges!!!  $$$  Access/Permission  Electricity  Sample collection –500+ per year  Very flashy streams and dynamic channels

Additional Research in Difficult Run - USGS National Research Program Goal:Characterize sediment and nutrient retention functions of floodplains in a developed watershed.  Floodplain sediment deposition and erosion,  Floodplain topographic change,  Floodplain nutrient deposition and processes,  Floodplain and stream sediment geochemistry,  Floodplain and suspended sediment source tracking,  Streambank erosion,  …

In Summary…  Fairfax County and USGS have initiated a long-term study of watershed-scale water- quality responses to BMP implementation.  Multiple technologies are being used to generate dense datasets in 14 watersheds.  Process level research on sediment/nutrient transport has been added in Difficult Run.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey John Jastram Shannon Curtis fairfaxcounty.gov