Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Advertisements

ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
A Laser Based Alignment System for the CLIC project
Luminosity Stability and Stabilisation Hardware D. Schulte for the CLIC team Special thanks to J. Pfingstner and J. Snuverink 1CLIC-ACE, February 2nd,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
Vibration measurements on the final doublets and the Shintake Monitor Benoît BOLZON7th ATF2 project meeting, 16/12/08.
Status on MONALISA presented by D. Urner 6 th stabilization day 9. June 09.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Optical Anchor / Interferometer Status: June, 2004 Josef Frisch.
IN2P3 Les deux infinis G. Balik, B. Caron, L. Brunetti (LAViSta Team) LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry,
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini DESY Hamburg XFEL beam dynamics meeting, February 25 st 2008.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
Tue 31 Mar :50 (CEST) 13:50 UTC CLIC stabilisation day 5 - LAPP OXFORD MONALISA 1 Options for interferometric monitoring of CLIC test magnet M.
CLIC QD0 Stabilization J. Allibe 1, L. Brunetti 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2,C.Hernandez 2 1 : LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS,
Vibration Measurement on the Shintake Monitor and Final Doublet Takashi Yamanaka (Univ. of Tokyo) Benoît Bolzon (LAPP) ATF2 weekly meeting 26 November,
CLIC MDI stabilization update A.Jeremie G.Balik, B.Bolzon, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise A.Badel, B.Caron, R.Lebreton, J.Lottin Together with colleagues from.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
CLIC MDI Working Group Vibration attenuation via passive pre- isolation of the FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Active Vibration Stabilization for the NLC Final Focus Quads Josef Frisch, Linda Hendrickson, Thomas Himel, Andrei Seryi,
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.
New in-air seismic attenuation system for the next generation gravitational wave detector M.R. Blom, A. Bertolini, E. Hennes, A. Schimmel, H.J. Bulten,
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
1 ATF2 Project Meeting December 2006 Ground Stabilisation with the CERN STACIS 2000 Stable Active Control Isolation System LAViSta Laboratories in.
Main beam Quad Stabilisation: Status of the stabilisation test program at CERN CLIC-stabilization day S. Janssens Contribution to slides by:
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
STABILISATION AND PRECISION POINTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS IN THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER S. Janssens, P. Fernandez Carmona, K. Artoos, C. Collette, M. Guinchard.
Tze-Wei Liu Y-C Hsu & Wang-Yau Cheng
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
ATF2 weekly meeting 4 July 2007 MONALISA: Attachment of Vacuum Vessels for ATF2 David Urner.
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
ATF2: final doublet support Andrea JEREMIE B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With constant interaction with colleagues from KEK, SLAC.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Test plan for CLIC MB linac quad LAPP option A.Jeremie.
QD0 stabilisation in CLIC CDR A.Jeremie with LAViSta team.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
Alignment and stability session
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
Summary FD Support System
Vibration issues at Linear Colliders:
Topics on Vibration Issues
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
IP configuration session
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Presentation transcript:

Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold

Outline Ideal sensor placement The role of optical sensors (interferometers) Sensor resolutions Beam dynamics simulations that include ground motion and sensor resolution for complex sensor setups

Ideal Sensor Placement Objective: observe coldmass motion of QD0 –QD0: Difficult environment because of: high radiation high magnetic field temperature (superconducting QD0) restricted space –limits low frequency reach of inertial sensors –restricts use of multiple large sensors to »hard to observe flex of QD0 –Floor: better (ideal) in all aspects!

a IP Inertial sensors’ position on (or in) ground allows to get low radiation evrionment shield against magnetic fields use temperature stabilization several sensors for different frequency ranges optimal stable platform (mechanically isolated pylon) - should lead to best performance of sensors requires stiff platform Interferometers measure magnet motion wrt pylon small mirror or retro reflector attached to magnet (coldmass) vacuum tubes between pylon and magnet Ø<2cm no electronics or optics in hostile environment can measure magnet deformation using multiple interferometers vertical measurement sufficient -insensitive to 30 μm horizontal motions Pylon decuples from detector and other civilization sources of motion anchored in bedrock QD0 left

IP 30cm SM Slow measurements Interferometers can measure absolute distance –~1μm accuracy –over days or weeks –determine slow motions of magnet with respect to pylon SM (Straightness Monitor) between pylons –measure relative motion of pylons Horizontal measurement –important to control horizontal motion too –use additional interferometer heads on pylon –30 cm shift sufficient to get to 10nm horizontal resolution –same retro reflectors on magnet can be used

IP 30cm Slow measurements Interferometers can measure absolute distance –~1μm accuracy –over days or weeks –determine slow motions of magnet with respect to pylon SM (Straightness Monitor) between pylons –measure relative motion of pylons or use single 9m long pylon –Coherence might be sufficient in low frequency region

Advantage of Slow Monitor Beam Shift FONT will recover lumi Interferometer will allow feedback loop keeping magnet motions small at all times - keep kicker strenght small at all times BPM will spot move and feed info back to BDS slow feed back system QD0 kicker symmetry axis Magnet Drift BPM In principle BPM and kicker can resolve difference between beam shift and magnet drift, but requires complex feedback system

Interferometer Resolution 100 cm long interferometer –in open air –on passive optical table –laser not locked to absorption line (yet) –Compact interferometer launch head –measurement over 1s. –Bandwidth of electronics 0-1MHz –Acquisition rate 2MHz –Offline low pass filter: 1kHz

Interferometer Resolution Amplitude Spectral Density [m/√Hz] rise due to air turbulence 0.2 nm Integrated RMS Variation [m] This interferometer was developed with a target resolution of 1nm in mind for ILC/ATF2. improved resolutions are being developed via –increasing light intensity (decreases white noise level) –embedding in vacuum –locking laser to atomic feature –improved interferometer head designs –heterodyne interferometers

Beam Dynamics Simulations First Baby Steps We received funding for graduate student –Supervision by Armin Reichold –half a year of work on CLIC beam-dynamics with emphasis on stabilisation issues With help of J. Resta-Lopez: –developed first very simple simulation using PLACET starting at end of linac Include ground motion for electron QD0 Include resolution of QD0 sensor calculate beam offset

Beam Dynamics Simulations First Baby Steps Bunch Train number offset [ μ m] Ground motion (20ms) offset after correction sensor resolution 250pm Ground motion (20ms) offset after correction Bunch Train number offset [ μ m] sensor resolution 25pm Future –Need to include many further effects reproduce D. Schulte’s simulation add realistic models for sensor resolution taking into account combination of different sensor types...

End

Interferometer Resolution 0.2nm